DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 19

Every Entrepreneur Must First Become a Pricing Engineer

0

One of the most influential courses I took as an engineering student at the Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO) was Engineering Management. It was not just another technical course; it became a bridge between engineering and business, between designing products and creating value. The course was taught by three lecturers, each contributing a unique perspective that has stayed with me throughout my career.

Engr. Dr. Onwuka, now Professor Onwuka, handled a significant portion of the course. Fresh from earning his MBA, he brought a refreshing business perspective into an engineering classroom. He introduced us to Managerial Accounting, teaching us that engineering decisions cannot be separated from financial realities. It was a lesson that challenged many of us to see beyond calculations and technical specifications.

Another remarkable contributor was the celebrated Professor P.B.U. Achi of Mechanical Engineering. While teaching Automation and Robotics, he consistently emphasized the economics behind automation. Technology, he argued, should never be evaluated solely by its sophistication but also by its ability to reduce cost and improve productivity. Towards the end of the course, together with Dr. “Ichie”/Remy Uche, the lecturers delivered a unifying theme they called “Engineer Turns Manager.” Their message was unmistakable: the best engineers eventually learn to think like business leaders.

Looking back, that course fundamentally reshaped my understanding of innovation. It taught us that great engineering is incomplete unless it is commercially viable. Every design has a cost implication. Every invention must ultimately find a market. Every technical breakthrough must justify itself economically.

Years later, when I joined the banking industry, I reconnected with many of those lessons. Costing, especially marginal cost, became central to understanding how businesses create sustainable value. I realized that while engineers often focus on building products, successful businesses focus on improving unit economics as they deliver value by fixing market frictions. The difference between a promising startup and a profitable company is frequently the ability to continually reduce marginal cost while maintaining or increasing customer value.

This realization has deeply influenced how I teach entrepreneurship today in Tekedia Mini-MBA. I tell founders that if they do not understand pricing, they should postpone starting a business until they do. Pricing is not merely attaching a number to a product; it is one of the most important strategic decisions a company makes. In markets like Nigeria, where purchasing power is constantly under pressure and competition is relentless, pricing often determines whether a business survives or disappears.

Many entrepreneurs devote enormous effort to product development while treating pricing as an afterthought. That is a costly mistake. A brilliant product with the wrong pricing model can fail just as easily as an average product with poor execution. Sustainable businesses are built not only on innovation but also on pricing architectures that reflect customer behavior, market realities, and long-term economics.

History repeatedly illustrates this point. Elon Musk’s achievement at Tesla was not limited to building exceptional electric vehicles. He also reinvented how automobiles could be sold, financed, updated, and monetized over their lifecycle. Bill Gates ignored the prevailing assumption that software should simply accompany hardware. Instead, Microsoft established software as a product with independent economic value through licensing and contractual pricing.

Likewise, Nigeria’s new-generation banks transformed banking by making relationships agnostic of where accounts were opened but they also engineered revenue models, including the once-prominent Commission on Turnover (COT), that generated the financial resources needed to expand aggressively before incumbents responded.

These examples demonstrate an enduring principle: innovation is incomplete without a viable commercial model. Products may attract attention, but pricing determines sustainability.

That lesson from Engineering Management at FUTO continues to resonate with me decades later. The course was never really about accounting or management in isolation. It was about teaching engineers to understand markets, economics, and customers. It was about recognizing that invention creates possibility, but pricing creates business.

For every entrepreneur, therefore, the question is not simply, “Have I built a great product?” The more important question is, “Have I engineered a pricing strategy that customers will embrace and that will allow my business to thrive?” Understanding pricing is understanding business itself.

Synthesia Expands Beyond AI Video Generation With Interactive Training Platform To Measure Employee Performance

0

British artificial intelligence startup Synthesia is expanding beyond AI-generated corporate videos with the launch of an interactive training platform designed to help enterprises measure whether employees actually improve their skills, marking a shift toward performance management.

The company on Wednesday unveiled Roleplay Sessions, an AI-powered training product that allows employees to simulate real-world workplace conversations with AI avatars that can respond dynamically, challenge users, and assess their performance against predefined evaluation criteria.

The launch represents Synthesia’s first product under a broader Sessions platform that the company plans to expand into additional enterprise applications, including job interviews and candidate screening, according to TechCrunch.

The move follows a broader shift in the enterprise AI market, where customers are now demanding measurable returns on their AI investments rather than simply adopting generative AI tools for productivity gains.

Synthesia built its business by enabling companies to produce training videos using AI-generated avatars, dramatically reducing the cost and time required to create corporate learning materials.

However, Chief Executive and co-founder Victor Riparbelli said the company believes that generating training content alone is insufficient if businesses cannot determine whether employees have actually learned new skills.

“Video performs way better than text or sending out a document,” Riparbelli told TechCrunch. “But for most things, we learn the best by actually practicing something rather than just reading it.”

The company cited research suggesting that while instructional videos improve knowledge transfer, behavioral change is more effectively achieved through repeated practice combined with immediate feedback.

Roleplay Sessions is designed around that principle by allowing employees to engage in simulated conversations covering scenarios such as sales presentations, customer complaints, performance reviews, and difficult workplace discussions. Rather than simply watching instructional content, users receive real-time responses from AI avatars before being evaluated against company-defined rubrics.

The new offering also represents a repositioning for Synthesia as generative AI technologies become increasingly commoditized. While the company continues to rely on its proprietary avatar and voice-generation technologies, the reasoning capabilities underpinning the conversations are powered by OpenAI’s large language models.

By layering enterprise-specific assessment tools, analytics, and performance scoring on top of foundation models, Synthesia is attempting to differentiate itself from companies offering generic AI assistants.

“From a managerial executive layer, we’re seeing huge interest in mapping out the talent in their company in a way that’s been really difficult to do before,” Riparbelli said.

“If you have your entire sales team practice with an AI role player, you can get very granular data on how your sales force is doing overall.”

Vendors in enterprise software are increasingly seeking to build proprietary workflows and datasets around third-party AI models instead of competing solely on model capabilities.

Synthesia said several large organizations have already begun deploying the platform commercially. According to the company, early customers include one of Europe’s three largest publicly listed companies by market capitalization, one of the five largest Fortune 100 companies and one of the world’s largest recruitment firms.

The most common applications involve sales enablement and leadership development, where employees can repeatedly practice customer interactions, negotiations and management conversations before engaging with clients or colleagues. Organizations can either build their own roleplay scenarios using existing company documentation and training materials or work with Synthesia’s consulting team to develop customized training programs tailored to their business needs.

The launch comes as businesses increasingly scrutinize enterprise AI spending following an initial wave of enthusiasm surrounding generative AI. After two years of rapid experimentation with AI assistants and content-generation tools, many corporate technology leaders are shifting their attention toward measurable business outcomes, productivity gains and workforce performance.

This evolution is reshaping enterprise AI priorities. Rather than evaluating AI based on its ability to generate text, images or videos, organizations are now seeking platforms that can demonstrate improvements in employee productivity, sales effectiveness and operational performance.

For AI vendors, this creates an opportunity to move beyond offering standalone generative AI features and instead become integrated into broader enterprise workflows.

Although Roleplay Sessions is initially targeted at large enterprise customers, Synthesia plans to expand the platform to smaller businesses, individual professionals and educational institutions over the coming months as AI inference costs continue to decline. The company expects the broader Sessions platform to evolve beyond employee training into areas such as recruitment, candidate assessment and other interactive business workflows that combine conversational AI with structured performance evaluation.

Oil tops $94 as Red Sea tensions lift energy stocks while investors brace for Big Tech earnings

0

Global stocks edged higher on Wednesday as surging oil prices boosted energy shares, although U.S. equity futures retreated ahead of closely watched earnings from Alphabet and Tesla that could test investor confidence in the artificial intelligence-driven market rally.

Crude prices climbed to six-week highs after renewed security concerns in the Red Sea disrupted shipping, while investors also monitored developments in Japan after reports suggested the Bank of Japan was becoming more concerned about persistent inflation pressures.

The combination of higher energy prices, geopolitical risks and a busy earnings calendar left markets cautious despite gains across European equities.

The MSCI All-World Index rose 0.1%, while Europe’s STOXX 600 advanced 0.6%, led by oil and gas companies that benefited from the jump in crude prices.

U.S. futures, however, pointed to a weaker open, with Nasdaq futures falling 0.6% and S&P 500 futures slipping 0.2%, reflecting investor caution ahead of earnings from two of the market’s most influential technology companies.

Brent crude climbed 3.5% to $94.22 per barrel, its highest level since early June, after two oil tankers carrying Saudi crude to Asia reversed course in the Red Sea following renewed threats from Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi militants.

The development renewed concerns about potential disruptions to one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes, tempering hopes that geopolitical tensions in the Middle East were beginning to ease.

Higher oil prices have become a growing concern for investors because they threaten to reignite inflation at a time when major central banks are attempting to balance slowing economic growth with still-elevated price pressures. The rally in crude also lifted European energy stocks, making the sector one of the strongest performers in regional markets.

Big Tech Earnings Face Heightened Scrutiny

Attention is now shifting to quarterly earnings from Alphabet and Tesla, which are expected after the U.S. market closes. The results are being closely watched because they could provide fresh insight into whether the massive wave of AI-related capital expenditure is translating into sustainable earnings growth.

Alphabet is under pressure following delays to one of its flagship AI model releases, raising questions about its competitive position against rivals including OpenAI, Anthropic and rapidly advancing Chinese AI developers.

Tesla, meanwhile, is widely expected to report its first quarterly cash burn in more than two years, highlighting investor concerns over slowing electric vehicle demand, heavy spending on artificial intelligence and autonomous driving technologies, and the company’s expanding robotics ambitions.

“Even the slightest doubt about the monetization of artificial intelligence or the return on infrastructure spending could call into question the main driver of the market rally over the past nearly two years,” said John Plassard, head of investment strategy at Cité Gestion.

His comments amplify growing investor concerns that after driving equity markets to record highs, AI-related valuations now require stronger earnings growth to justify continued optimism.

Markets also digested a new trade policy announcement from U.S. President Donald Trump. The president said generic drugs imported into the United States will face no tariffs for two years beginning August 1, after which duties will rise to 100% for one year before increasing further to 200%.

The phased approach appears designed to give pharmaceutical companies time to shift manufacturing capacity while encouraging domestic production.

Earlier this week, Trump also imposed a 50% tariff on selected Canadian goods, adding another layer of uncertainty to the global trade environment.

Yen Steadies As BOJ Inflation Concerns Grow

Currency markets focused on Japan after Reuters reported that Bank of Japan officials are increasingly alert to upside inflation risks that could require interest rate increases sooner than financial markets currently expect.

The yen strengthened modestly to 162.98 per dollar after falling to its weakest level in roughly four decades on Tuesday.

Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama reiterated that authorities remain prepared to take “decisive action” in foreign exchange markets if necessary, although she declined to comment on specific exchange rate levels.

The weak yen, combined with rising energy prices, pushed Japan’s imports to a record high in June. At the same time, exports exceeded expectations, supported by robust overseas demand for AI-related infrastructure and data-center equipment, alongside improved competitiveness from the depreciated currency.

However, the resurgence in oil prices is adding another challenge for policymakers preparing for upcoming monetary policy meetings. The European Central Bank is scheduled to announce its latest policy decision on Thursday, while the U.S. Federal Reserve meets next week.

Both central banks are widely expected to leave interest rates unchanged this month, but derivatives markets continue to price in at least one additional 25-basis-point rate increase in both the United States and the euro zone before year-end, according to LSEG data.

The prospect of higher borrowing costs has kept bond markets relatively stable. The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note held at 4.63%, near a two-month high reached in the previous session.

Meanwhile, investors also sought traditional safe-haven assets. Gold rose 1.1% to a two-week high of about $4,120 per ounce, benefiting from heightened geopolitical uncertainty and expectations that inflationary pressures could remain elevated if energy prices continue to climb.

The coming days are likely to be pivotal for global markets, with investors weighing corporate earnings, central bank signals and geopolitical developments to assess whether the AI-driven equity rally can withstand a more challenging macroeconomic backdrop.

The Imaginary Customer Problem in African Startups

0

Somewhere in Lagos, a founder is adjusting pricing for a customer who exists only in their imagination. This customer earns in dollars, spends without hesitation, values convenience above cost, and sees another subscription charge as a minor inconvenience.

They look suspiciously like the founder’s university friends, X circle, or former colleagues abroad. Entire business models are built around this person. When growth stalls, the explanation comes quickly: the market is not ready.

But the market is rarely the problem. The customer simply does not exist in the numbers the founder imagined.

This is one of the quiet tragedies of entrepreneurship across Africa. Founders often make enormous decisions based on intuition, proximity, and aspiration rather than observation.

They know ten people who would gladly pay for a premium financial product, an AI productivity tool, or a sophisticated software service. From those ten people, they infer millions. The issue is that the people founders know are frequently statistical outliers.

They are among the most educated, digitally connected, globally exposed, and highest-earning individuals in their societies. Their lifestyles are not representative of the broader market.

Yet because they dominate online conversations and professional networks, they begin to feel like the average customer. They are not. The average consumer in Lagos, Nairobi, Accra, or Kampala is making purchasing decisions under entirely different constraints.

Income volatility, inflation, unreliable infrastructure, and competing family obligations shape how money is spent.

Price sensitivity is not irrational caution; it is economic reality. The willingness to experiment with new products is often lower because every purchasing decision carries greater consequence. This is where investors frequently possess an advantage over founders.

Investors have seen dozens of similar businesses. They have watched products fail because pricing was too aggressive, because customer acquisition costs exceeded lifetime value, or because founders misjudged how much consumers could actually pay.

While founders are often operating from conviction and anecdotal evidence, investors are operating from patterns. The founder feels opportunity. The investor measures it.

The gap between feeling and measurement is where many promising African startups quietly disappear.

There is also a more subtle tension: the diaspora effect. Many African founders have studied or worked abroad.

They return with valuable experience, global networks, and higher ambitions. Yet they also return carrying assumptions shaped by New York, London, Toronto, or San Francisco. The customer they remember becomes the customer they build for.

Sometimes they are designing products for the country they wish existed rather than the one standing before them. They expect seamless digital payments, high subscription tolerance, and purchasing behaviour similar to developed markets. But aspirations do not automatically create demand.

A society cannot be priced according to its dreams alone. This does not mean founders should abandon ambition or avoid building sophisticated products. Some of Africa’s most successful companies emerged precisely because they anticipated future behaviour rather than merely reacting to present conditions.

The challenge is balance. Vision without data becomes fantasy. Data without vision becomes incrementalism. Great founders understand both. They dream several years ahead while maintaining an honest understanding of today’s customer.

They know who can pay now, who might pay later, and what conditions need to change before mass adoption becomes possible. They do not confuse X users with the entire market or diaspora experiences with universal reality.

Entrepreneurship is an exercise in seeing clearly. Markets do not fail because customers are unambitious. Businesses fail because founders sometimes mistake familiarity for evidence and aspiration for demand. The market is often ready. It is simply waiting for someone willing to look at it as it truly is.

Kalshi Launches Midterms Hub To Track Election Forecasts As Prediction Market Activity Accelerates

0

Prediction market platform Kalshi has unveiled a new election intelligence platform that combines real-time market forecasts, polling, campaign finance data, and political news, as it deepens its push into U.S. politics ahead of the 2026 midterm elections and seeks to establish prediction markets as a mainstream source of election analysis.

The new Midterms Hub is designed to provide a comprehensive snapshot of how traders believe the battle for control of Congress will unfold, allowing users to monitor every competitive House and Senate race through continuously updated market odds rather than relying solely on traditional opinion polls.

The launch represents another step in Kalshi’s transformation from a prediction market operator into a broader political information platform, targeting not only traders but also journalists, policymakers, campaign strategists, investors, and politically engaged citizens looking for real-time insights into electoral dynamics.

At the heart of the hub is an interactive national map displaying market-implied probabilities for individual congressional races. The platform aggregates contracts across every competitive Senate and House contest, giving users an evolving picture of which party is expected to control each chamber after November’s elections.

Unlike conventional election forecasting models that are updated periodically, prediction markets respond almost instantly to new information. Market prices fluctuate as traders react to campaign developments, fundraising disclosures, candidate debates, economic data, endorsements, legal rulings and geopolitical events, producing a continuously evolving assessment of electoral probabilities.

To help users evaluate those forecasts, Kalshi has integrated polling averages directly into the platform, allowing visitors to compare survey-based projections with market expectations. The side-by-side presentation highlights where prediction markets and opinion polls align and where they diverge, offering a fuller picture of electoral sentiment.

The hub also incorporates the latest Federal Election Commission campaign finance filings, enabling users to track fundraising performance for individual candidates alongside market odds. Because campaign fundraising is widely viewed as an important indicator of organizational strength and advertising capacity, the additional data provides context for shifts in market sentiment.

Curated political reporting and analysis from multiple news organizations further rounds out the platform, allowing users to connect changing market probabilities with the events driving those movements.

Kalshi said the platform is designed as much for observers as for traders.

According to the company, roughly 75% of visitors to its platform do not actively trade contracts but instead use Kalshi to monitor probabilities surrounding elections, economic releases, monetary policy decisions and other major events.

Chief Executive Officer Tarek Mansour said prediction markets offer an increasingly valuable alternative to traditional political analysis because participants have financial incentives to make accurate forecasts rather than simply express political preferences.

“Our prediction markets cut through polarization and show you what the wisdom of the crowds actually believes, backed by real money, not rhetoric,” Mansour said in a statement.

“That kind of clarity is rare right now and that’s what people are getting with the Midterms Hub.”

Mansour, an MIT graduate who previously worked as a trader at Citadel and an analyst at Goldman Sachs, has argued that financial incentives encourage participants to incorporate diverse sources of information into market prices, making prediction markets a useful complement to polling rather than a replacement for it.

The launch builds on Kalshi’s expanding political product lineup. Earlier this year, the company introduced the American Power Index, which it describes as an “S&P 500 for politics.” The index tracks the relative political strength of Democrats and Republicans by aggregating prices across numerous political event contracts, providing a market-based gauge of shifts in political momentum.

The move follows the upcoming battle for congressional control, which is expected to dominate U.S. politics over the coming months, with both parties competing aggressively for House and Senate majorities that will shape President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda during the second half of his term.

Political analysts expect campaign spending to reach record levels as competitive races intensify across multiple battleground states. That environment is likely to drive substantially higher trading activity on election-related contracts as investors, political professionals and retail participants seek to price rapidly changing developments.

The platform is already seeing strong engagement. Kalshi said more than $30 million has been traded on contracts forecasting which party will control the House of Representatives and the Senate following the 2026 elections, months before voters head to the polls.

The growing interest reflects a broader shift in how election forecasting is consumed. While polling remains a cornerstone of political analysis, prediction markets have gained prominence in recent election cycles because they continuously synthesize new information into market prices instead of providing periodic snapshots of voter preferences.

Supporters believe the markets often capture factors that polls may not fully reflect, including candidate quality, fundraising strength, turnout expectations, demographic shifts, macroeconomic conditions and the probability of late-breaking political events. Critics, however, warn that prediction markets can be influenced by liquidity constraints, trader concentration and changing market sentiment, meaning they should be viewed as one forecasting tool among many rather than a definitive predictor of election outcomes.

Kalshi’s latest expansion also underscores the rapidly growing commercial opportunity surrounding event-based prediction markets. Beyond politics, the company offers contracts tied to inflation, Federal Reserve decisions, economic indicators, weather events, sports and other real-world outcomes, positioning itself at the intersection of finance, data analytics and information markets.