DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 197

93.35% of Nigeria’s Currency Stays Outside Banks in Nov as Tax Fears Deepen

0

Nigeria’s cash-based economy tightened its grip in 2025, with new Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) data showing that the overwhelming majority of physical currency continued to circulate outside the formal banking system.

Beyond structural informality and lingering trust issues, the trend is increasingly being linked to anxiety around the country’s controversial new tax law and its enforcement provisions, which many Nigerians see as punitive.

CBN money and credit statistics for November 2025 show that currency outside banks stood at N4.91 trillion, out of a total N5.26 trillion in circulation. That means roughly 93.35% of all physical cash in the country was held outside the banking sector, leaving barely 6.65% within banks. This marks one of the highest ratios recorded in the year and reinforces a pattern that has now persisted for almost two years.

The scale of the imbalance is striking. In October 2025, N4.65 trillion out of N5.06 trillion in circulation sat outside banks, equivalent to 91.87%. The further rise in November points to an accelerating preference for cash holdings as the year drew to a close, rather than a seasonal blip.

Across the full year, the data paints a consistent picture. January 2025 opened with N4.74 trillion outside banks out of N5.24 trillion in circulation, or about 90.49%. February dipped slightly to 89.62%, before March jumped to 91.91%. April and May remained above 91%, with May reaching 92.39%. Although June and July eased marginally to just under 90%, the ratio climbed again from August through November, staying above 92% for much of that period.

In simple terms, Nigeria has spent most of 2025 with more than nine out of every ten naira notes circulating entirely outside the formal banking ecosystem.

Total currency in circulation also rose steadily. At N5.26 trillion in November, it reached its highest level of the year, up from N5.01 trillion in May and N5.23 trillion in January. On a year-on-year basis, currency in circulation expanded from N4.88 trillion in November 2024, meaning roughly N383.7 billion in additional cash was injected into the economy over twelve months.

Yet this increase did not translate into stronger bank deposits. The share of currency retained within banks stayed trapped in a narrow 6–10% range throughout the year. In effect, newly issued cash largely flowed straight into the informal economy, bypassing deposit mobilization.

The reserve data adds another layer to the story. Bank reserves stood at N30.94 trillion in November 2025, slightly lower than October’s N31.58 trillion but well above the N27.43 trillion recorded in January. Reserves peaked at N34.67 trillion in September before easing back. Year-on-year, reserves jumped from N25.99 trillion in November 2024 to nearly N31 trillion a year later, an increase of almost N5 trillion.

This divergence is telling. While currency in circulation grew by less than N400 billion year-on-year, bank reserves rose by about N5 trillion. The implication is that liquidity tightening measures mopped up bank funds aggressively, pushing financial institutions to lock more money with the CBN rather than deploy it as credit. This environment raises funding costs and intensifies credit pricing pressures, even as businesses already struggle with high borrowing rates.

At the same time, the informal economy absorbed most new cash issuance. Physical naira continued to circulate through retail trade, transport, household consumption, and small-scale enterprises, with little recycling back into the banking system.

What makes the 2025 trend more politically and socially sensitive is the growing belief that recent tax policy changes are accelerating the shift away from banks. The new tax law, which came into force amid strong public debate, expanded enforcement powers for revenue authorities. Among its most controversial elements is the alleged authority of the Nigerian Revenue Service (NRS) to place liens on, or directly debit, bank accounts suspected of tax non-compliance.

While officials have sought to reassure the public that safeguards exist, the perception on the street has been harder to manage. For many small business owners, traders, and self-employed Nigerians, bank accounts are now seen not only as financial tools but also as potential exposure points to aggressive tax enforcement. In response, cash holding has become a form of self-protection.

This fear-driven behavior appears to be compounding long-standing mistrust rooted in past policy shocks, including sudden regulatory changes and enforcement actions. Instead of deepening financial inclusion, the tax law has coincided with a period in which people are actively distancing themselves from banks, preferring to transact and store value in cash.

The macroeconomic consequences are significant. When such a large share of money circulates outside banks, the effectiveness of monetary policy weakens. Interest rate adjustments, liquidity controls, and other tools largely operate through the banking system. Cash-dominant actors in the informal economy remain largely untouched by these signals, even as formal-sector borrowers face tighter conditions.

There are fiscal implications as well. A system where most transactions never touch bank accounts complicates tax administration and widens information gaps. Ironically, fears of enforcement may be driving behavior that makes revenue collection harder, not easier.

As 2026 begins, the message from the data is that Nigeria’s economy is still running heavily on cash, and policy actions meant to strengthen control and compliance may be reinforcing that reality. Until trust in institutions improves and enforcement is seen as predictable rather than punitive, physical cash is likely to remain the safest option for millions of Nigerians, far removed from the balance sheets where monetary policy is meant to bite.

Big Four Giant PwC Expands Cryptocurrency Services Amid Regulatory Shift

0

As global regulators move from outright caution to clearer frameworks for digital assets, traditional financial institutions are stepping decisively into the crypto space.

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), one of the Big Four accounting giants, is expanding its cryptocurrency and digital asset services, signaling growing institutional confidence in the sector.

The move reflects a broader shift in regulatory attitudes toward crypto, as firms seek to help clients navigate compliance, risk management, and innovation in an increasingly structured digital-asset ecosystem.

PwC’s U.S. Senior Partner and CEO, Paul Griggs, stated in a recent interview with the Financial Times that the accounting firm is significantly expanding its cryptocurrency-related services after years of caution. He attributed this shift to improved U.S. regulatory clarity, particularly the passage of the GENIUS Act (a stablecoin framework signed in 2025) and a broader pro-crypto regulatory environment.

He said,

“The GENIUS Act and the regulatory rulemaking around stablecoin I expect will create more conviction around leaning into that product and that asset class. The tokenization of things will certainly continue to evolve. PwC has to be in that ecosystem.”

“PwC feels a responsibility to be hyper-engaged in both auditing and consulting for crypto clients, as we see more and more opportunities coming our way. We are never going to lean into a business that we haven’t equipped ourselves to deliver, noting that over the past 10-12 months, PwC has bolstered its resources (including rehiring digital asset specialist Cheryl Lesnik) to handle increased demand”, Griggs added.

PwC is now actively advising clients on using stablecoins for efficient payments, expanding into tokenization of real-world assets, and providing full services in audit, tax, and advisory for crypto entities. The firm already audits clients like Bitcoin miner MARA Holdings.

The accounting firm plans to grow its crypto audit, compliance, and advisory offerings for exchanges, stablecoin issuers, blockchain startups, and tokenization platforms.

This move aligns with similar expansions by other Big Four firms (KPMG, Deloitte, and Ernst & Young) amid growing institutional interest in digital assets.

KPMG has developed a comprehensive suite of digital?asset and blockchain capabilities that span audit, tax, risk, and advisory services. Its offerings help clients navigate regulatory compliance, risk assessment, controls, cybersecurity, and blockchain strategy across the full crypto lifecycle.

Deloitte has long been active in the blockchain space and offers blockchain strategy, implementation, and consulting services to clients. This includes helping organizations define blockchain goals, build prototypes, and integrate distributed ledger technology into business processes.

Ernst & Young (EY) has been particularly proactive in developing crypto and blockchain software tools for auditing and compliance. Notably, platforms like EY Blockchain Analyzer aggregate transaction data across ledgers to support audits, tax reporting, and transaction monitoring — helping clients meet regulatory and reporting requirements in the digital?asset space.

Before the GENIUS Act, stablecoins and many crypto products existed in regulatory gray areas that made institutions wary of legal risk. By establishing a clear, federal framework for payment stablecoins — including licensing, reserve requirements, and compliance standards — the Act eliminated a major barrier to institutional participation.

With clearer rules, firms can confidently offer stablecoin issuance support, compliance consulting, reserve auditing, treasury strategy, and risk advisory services. Accounting and consulting firms — including the Big Four — are now able to package crypto practices into mainstream service lines without fear of legal backlash or uncertain enforcement.

While the GENIUS Act is a U.S. statute, its emergence has coincided with other regulatory efforts globally (like the EU’s MiCA framework). This convergence toward structured, rules-based crypto regulation gives multinational corporations and service firms a consistent basis to develop cross-border crypto offerings, bolstering confidence to invest in digital-asset teams, products, and partnerships.

In summary, the GENIUS Act’s passage, combined with a broader pro-crypto shift in regulatory environments, has reduced legal ambiguity, aligned digital assets with traditional financial norms, unlocked new product and service opportunities — and ultimately empowered companies to seriously explore and scale crypto-related offerings rather than treat them as speculative side projects.

Uber, Lucid, and Nuro Unveil Production-Intent Robotaxi at CES, Fueling Escalation in Premium Autonomous Ride-Hailing Race

0

Uber, Lucid Motors, and autonomous driving startup Nuro have lifted the curtain on the production-intent version of their long-anticipated robotaxi, offering the clearest signal yet that Uber plans to play a central role in the next phase of commercial autonomous ride-hailing.

Revealed at the 2026 Consumer Electronics Show, the vehicle is the most tangible outcome so far of a partnership announced more than six months ago, when Uber committed $300 million to Lucid and agreed to purchase 20,000 of the automaker’s electric vehicles. The companies said the robotaxi is already undergoing testing on public roads, ahead of a planned commercial rollout in the San Francisco Bay Area later this year.

The robotaxi is built on Lucid’s Gravity SUV platform and is positioned as a premium autonomous vehicle, a deliberate contrast to the more utilitarian designs that have dominated early driverless deployments. Integrated into the body and a roof-mounted “halo” are high-resolution cameras, solid-state lidar sensors, and radar systems, all powered by Nvidia’s Drive AGX Thor computing platform.

That halo also features LED lighting designed to help riders identify their vehicle, echoing a now-familiar approach used by competitors such as Waymo. Unlike Waymo, however, the Uber-Lucid-Nuro vehicle is being assembled with its autonomous hardware already integrated at Lucid’s Casa Grande, Arizona, factory. This removes the need for costly post-production retrofitting, a step that Waymo currently undertakes by dismantling and reassembling Jaguar I-Pace SUVs.

Industry analysts see this as a meaningful operational advantage. Embedding autonomy hardware during manufacturing can shorten deployment timelines, reduce labor costs, and improve long-term scalability — all issues that have weighed heavily on the economics of robotaxi services.

Visually, the CES version is a more refined iteration of the test vehicles that have appeared in press images over the past seven months. The most notable additions relate to the rider experience, an area where Uber is seeking to leverage its consumer-facing strengths.

The robotaxi features an exterior screen on the halo that greets riders on arrival, as well as multiple interior displays designed to guide passengers through the trip. The rear passenger screen shows an isometric map of the vehicle navigating city streets, complete with visual representations of nearby cars and pedestrians — a design that will feel familiar to anyone who has ridden in a Waymo vehicle.

While the software was not yet interactive at the CES preview, Uber said the interface is being built to display estimated arrival times, remaining journey duration, climate and music controls, and access to rider support. A dedicated control allows passengers to request a pull-over, an increasingly standard feature aimed at improving trust and comfort in autonomous vehicles.

The front passenger screen mirrors much of this information on a larger central touchscreen, with elements also extending to Lucid Gravity’s sweeping 34-inch curved OLED display behind the steering wheel. The emphasis on screens and visual feedback reflects a broader industry consensus that transparency — showing passengers what the vehicle “sees” and “thinks” — is critical to user acceptance of driverless rides.

Uber’s decision to anchor this service around the Gravity underscores its intent to differentiate on comfort and perceived quality. The SUV’s spacious interior, particularly in the two-row configuration showcased at CES, positions the service closer to a premium ride-hailing tier rather than a low-cost mass transit substitute. Uber said a three-row version will also be offered, potentially broadening appeal to families and group travelers.

Still, the choice is not without risk. Lucid’s first full year of Gravity production was marked by software challenges as the company ramped up manufacturing. Those issues became significant enough that interim CEO Marc Winterhoff sent an apology email to customers in December, acknowledging the “frustrations” they faced.

Lucid has since said it has stabilized production and software performance, announcing on Monday that it doubled 2024 production and achieved record sales. Whether the robotaxi variant avoids similar software growing pains remains an open question, particularly given the added complexity of autonomous systems layered on top of vehicle controls.

From a strategic standpoint, the partnership highlights Uber’s evolving approach to autonomy. After exiting its own self-driving unit in 2020, Uber has repositioned itself as a platform partner, investing selectively while leaving vehicle engineering and autonomy stacks to specialists. Nuro, which provides the autonomous driving technology, brings experience from both delivery robots and passenger vehicle autonomy, while Lucid supplies a high-end EV platform that aligns with Uber’s premium ambitions.

Once final validation is complete later this year, the companies said true production versions of the robotaxi will begin rolling off Lucid’s Arizona assembly lines. No firm production or deployment timeline was disclosed, underscoring the cautious tone that continues to surround commercial autonomy even as public testing expands.

However, the CES reveal marks a notable escalation in the autonomous ride-hailing race. While Waymo remains the clear leader in deployed robotaxi miles, Uber’s re-entry through partnerships — and its bet on a premium, factory-integrated vehicle — signals a more assertive attempt to shape how autonomous rides are delivered, branded, and monetized in the years ahead.

Nigeria’s Next Vital Journey: From Money to Capital

1

Nigeria is operating far below its productive potential. If the country were anywhere near optimal efficiency, its GDP should be closer to $3 trillion, not the roughly $400 billion we see today. That gap tells a simple story: Nigeria requires at least a 7× economic expansion to approach equilibrium.

Yet, nearly 90% of existing companies are structurally incapable of delivering that kind of scalable growth even. Yes, even with effort and goodwill, many are anchored to outdated assumptions, weak foundations, and legacy business models that cannot be redesigned for exponential leverage.

Only new species of companies, built on fresh business models, enabled by smarter policies, and energized by modern technology, can unlock that growth. That reality explains why insurance penetration remains below 2%, why electricity companies deliver more darkness than light, why access to clean potable water is still elusive, and why we deploy nearly 65% of our workforce yet still struggle with hunger and low productivity. You can add many more items to that list.

It is tempting to blame customers, but history teaches us otherwise. Recall the 1990s, when new-generation banks emerged and convinced Nigerians, many for the first time, that banking services could be trusted and valuable. That same level of redesign is now required in insurance, power, water, education, healthcare, and beyond. The companies capable of driving those transformations are still too few.

I noted recently that South Africa runs a national budget about $100 billion larger than Nigeria’s, despite having less than 30% of Nigeria’s population. That is not magic; it is the outcome of productivity, structure, and effective enterprises. Their stock market is worth at least $1 trillion more than Nigeria’s. That is not luck; it is a translation of an economy from money to capital. Nigeria needs that to happen; move from money and capitalize the economy!

Get it: Money is a subset of capital, and nations which allow money to dominate their thinking inevitably underperform. In Nigeria, we are excessively focused on money. But until Nigerian policymakers reorient our priorities toward capital formation and evolution, our economic struggles will persist, because without capital, money only scales poverty!

MiniMax IPO Caps Breakout Moment for China’s AI Sector as Investor Frenzy Sweeps Hong Kong Market

0

MiniMax Group’s plan to price its Hong Kong initial public offering at the top end of its marketing range is fast becoming a defining moment for China’s artificial intelligence sector. It is believed to pinpoint how aggressively investors are chasing exposure to domestic AI champions as geopolitical tensions reshape global technology markets.

The Beijing-based startup is expected to raise about $538 million by pricing shares at up to HK$165 apiece, valuing the company at roughly $6.5 billion, according to people familiar with the deal quoted by Reuters. Bookbuilding, which began on December 31, has attracted demand multiple times the shares on offer, the sources said, pointing to a strong institutional appetite despite lingering concerns over global market volatility and China’s slowing economy.

If completed as planned, MiniMax’s listing will be one of the largest AI-focused IPOs in Hong Kong in recent months and part of a tightly packed calendar that will see at least six Chinese companies debut in the city this week alone. Trading in MiniMax shares is scheduled to begin on January 9, following pricing on January 6, with one source saying the institutional tranche could close as early as Monday afternoon.

Founded in early 2022 by Yan Junjie, a former senior executive at SenseTime, MiniMax has positioned itself as a developer of so-called multimodal AI models, capable of processing and generating content across text, images, audio, video, and music. Its products, including MiniMax M1, Hailuo-02, Speech-02, and Music-01, place it in direct competition with a growing cohort of Chinese startups racing to build broad-based AI systems that can be deployed across consumer apps, enterprise services, and creative industries.

The enthusiasm around the deal reflects more than just confidence in MiniMax’s technology. It also highlights how capital markets are responding to Beijing’s push to accelerate domestic innovation in response to U.S. restrictions on advanced chip exports and other sensitive technologies. For many investors, Chinese AI firms are increasingly viewed not just as growth stories, but as strategic assets likely to receive long-term policy support.

Recent listings have reinforced that view. AI chip designer Shanghai Biren Technology surged 76% on its Hong Kong debut earlier this month and remains more than 70% above its IPO price. Similar gains have been recorded by other technology names, helping to revive sentiment in a market that struggled for much of the past two years with weak deal flow and cautious investors.

MiniMax’s closest rival, Zhipu AI, which is also listing in Hong Kong this week, fixed its offer price at HK$116.20 per share to raise HK$4.3 billion, according to its prospectus. The clustering of AI listings has created a rare moment of momentum for the exchange, with bankers and advisers betting that strong aftermarket performance could encourage more Chinese technology firms to follow.

Professional services firms share that optimism. PwC Hong Kong Capital Markets Leader Eddie Wong said the city’s IPO market is expected to remain vibrant, with funds raised potentially reaching HK$350 billion in 2026. He noted that listings of high-end manufacturing and technology companies are likely to drive that growth, as Chinese firms continue to seek offshore capital and global visibility.

Exchange filings point to a steady pipeline. Seventeen companies have already submitted listing applications this year, while Chinese internet giant Baidu confirmed that its AI chip unit Kunlunxin has filed for a Hong Kong IPO, adding to expectations that semiconductors and AI will dominate the market narrative.

However, public-market scrutiny is expected to bring new pressures to MiniMax alongside fresh capital. As competition intensifies among China’s AI developers, investors are expected to focus closely on how quickly the company can turn advanced models into sustainable revenue, manage computing costs, and differentiate itself in a crowded field that includes well-funded rivals and tech giants.

Still, the willingness of investors to back MiniMax at a premium valuation suggests that, for now, confidence in China’s AI trajectory outweighs those concerns. The IPO is shaping up as both a test of market depth and a signal that Hong Kong is regaining its role as the preferred listing venue for Chinese technology firms navigating an increasingly fragmented global tech landscape.