Statistically speaking, men are known to commit more crimes than women. The annual crime rate for men including arrests, convictions, violent crimes and homicide stands between (80-90)% annually [Source: Wikipedia]. With this, one can easily conclude that men are the sole and only functional source of a dysfunctional society; Wait until you hear the root source.

The world has been carved to think in one direction due to underground forces promoting self-sustaining agenda against men. Of course, this is an entire industry of its own which those who promote these agenda make a fortune from.

Paternity fraud has become a common type of fraud in our society. For those who still wonder what paternity fraud is, Wikipedia describes it as

Paternity fraud (also called misattributed paternity or paternal discrepancy) is the intentional deception in which a woman identifies a man as the biological father of her child, knowing or strongly suspecting he is not. It is primarily done to secure financial support (e.g., child support)

For a moment I wondered why we have a known type of fraud attributed to gender, but there’s only mention of the crime committed by just one gender (whereas we have two distinct genders).

Maternity fraud is a known type of fraud which people do not talk about. If women can falsefully attribute the biological parenthood of a child to a man, then it shouldn’t be strange if men can also indulge in this act.

By now you must be wondering how men could deceive a woman to instigate motherhood of a child to her. Turns out you might be right, but not correct. The process of childbirth does not pose any ambiguity to determine who the mother of a child is, the child emanates from inside the mother, so the father might has in fact nothing to say to convince anyone who the mother of the child is. But there’s a catch; women are often made to act as the mother of a child after childbirth. So how does this constitute or relate to fraud?

Women often argue of consent whenever anything to do with gender is brought on the table. They argue even in marriage where a man is legally married to a woman, he needs to seek for consent before they engage in reproductive activities; [I wouldn’t want to go into this argument for now so lets just stick to our discussion]

Paternity fraud has become a thing because is it a global industry which supports the deprivation of men’s rights to uplift women who would have rather perished or languished in their degenerative state until they descend into oblivion. This industry has a strong sibling which often thrive alongside it called feminism [another topic which I wouldn’t want to touch now]

Paternity fraud wouldn’t have been a thing of discussion but has become a subject matter because several economies support it; this is one of the few cases of frauds in which laws are bent to justify it.

We have heard several cases of paternity fraud which women claim without remorse not to have told the man the children are not his, even when they were married. In fact, bearing children for another man while still married is and should be a crime, but no law on earth incriminates that.

Take for instance France. In France, it has been made a crime to prove paternity fraud without seeking the consent of the offender. If you don’t understand what this means, it means, you have to seek for the permission of a criminal in order to prove or prosecute them in the law court. This is sinister and a gross neglect of male rights regarding their personal lifestyle, wellbeing, finances and all that has to do with them and parenting.

Several laws have given legal protection to women who engage in paternity fraud even when proven. I earlier said paternity fraud is an industry of its own, now let’s talk about this industry.

Women have been emboldened to perpetrate in this fraud because the law gives them the morale standings, benefits and compensations, even when proven guilty. Take for instance these legal cases

1. The Houston Case of Ronald Carson (Texas)

A woman in Texas wrote the name of a man on the birth certificate of her child without informing the man. He had never met this child in his life until investigations began. The state began taking child support from this man, without his knowledge to support a woman he never birthed a child with and a child he never knew. Despite DNA results proving 0.00% probability he was the father, the courts refused to wipe away the accumulated debts (meaning he is owing money to the woman for the years he didn’t have enough money to pay up to their lifestyle and must give her money for falsifying his name on a document).

2. The Case of Parker v. Parker (Iowa, 2008)

The case of Parker is quite trivia that should result to maximum punishment under every logical circumstance, but was not. A married man, Joe Parker raised a daughter with his wife. Years later, he discovered through DNA test that the child was not his but was actually fathered by the lover of his wife.

The judge ruled that, even though paternity fraud had occurred, preserving the established father-child relationship and ensuring financial security for the child took priority over biological truth. His request to vacate his child support obligations was denied

3. The Shelby County Court Cases (Tennessee)
4. Uzoamaka Ohiri v. Chinedu Emmanuel (popularly known as Nedu of Wazobia FM)

I could go on and on to list these cases of fraud where the courts impoverished the pockets of fraud victims to enrich the pockets of offenders. This is a felony and a way of emboldening criminals with known records.

In each of these cases, one thing is common. Offender gets to walk away with benefits, compensations, lumps of cash, no remorse and a backing from the government. One thing you must have noticed from these cases; there’s no penalty to paternity fraud.

When the law does not penalize know criminal offences, it is invertedly promoting such crime with benefits to it, and the people in power are actually benefiting from it.

Paternity fraud itself is a crime just as rape. But in both cases of crimes, if the inverse is discovered, there’s no penalty to the alternating party; in case of paternity fraud, the perpetrator of the fraud, in case of false rape, the false accuser. Rather, the courts sets them free, and in most times, no reparations are made to the victims (The Houston Case of Ronald Carson – Texas) etc.

Several powerful figures have been made, and benefited from this fraudulent scheme. One instance is the state in most cases. Because under the law, the state would be required to take financial responsibility of the child in question if the forced father is set free, this in turn puts more pressure on the purse of the state, they rather choose to force a man to pay financial support to a child who has legally been proven not to be his and hence owe no financial or social obligations to, than set him free.

In several of these cases, the courts usually present one bizarre argument: “Best Interests Over Biology”. I do not know since when emotional factors has become a contending ground over proven logical facts on ground. Most of the times these officials compromise due to their personal reasons, experience and background. This should not be the case. The laws have been manipulated to such manner that, even if a man discovers a child is not his, he cannot legally stop an obligation which he is by law not supposed to partake in. They go ahead to give timelines in which if not reported, would render your discovery void. If this is the case, all crimes should also have timelines if not acted upon, no longer become a crime.

Women often have a strong feminine argument they like to present when it comes to gender related activities, they call it ‘consent’. If the law itself holds men accountability to gender or sexual related participation without consent then, it should therefore also be a crime to give a man a child which is not his, and falsely take financial gains from such under pretense.

By now you should be wondering so what is maternity fraud? The short answer is, it doesn’t exist. The case of child association to a woman which should have been termed fraud is that which a man bears a child from another woman and compels their wife to take ownership and responsibility for the upbringing of that child (which itself is not deceit or attribution under false pretense). Typically in this case, the woman takes consent to acting as a foster mother to the child while being married to the father, in this similar sense, the man, not the woman, takes full responsibility of providing all that is required in the upbringing of the child. If this wasn’t the case, the outcry from the feminist community would have made the earth an uninhabitable place for aliens.

This is typically one of the cases in which women have been handed over the justice baton to prove the existence of gender inequality and bias in our society, but instead chose to take full advantage of it because determining the father of a child solely lies in the authority of the woman bearing the child.

In our next story, we will cover Russia’s black widows and other laws which have been bent to finance lavish lifestyles for women without accountability and responsibility to their actions.