DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2

German Exports Showed Positive Turn in Late 2025, as German-Swiss Consortium Wins Contract for Danish Driverless Railway

0

German exports showed a positive turn in late 2025, with a surprising surge at the end of the year helping the country achieve overall annual growth after two years of declines.

According to data released by Germany’s Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) exports in December 2025 rose by 4.0% month-on-month compared to November, reaching €133.3 billion. This significantly exceeded expectations of a 1% increase and marked a rebound from a 2.5% drop the prior month.

The boost came from stronger shipments to both EU and non-EU countries, including notable gains to the US (+8.9% from November) and China (+10.7%).For the full year of 2025, total exports reached approximately €1.57 trillion around $1.84 trillion, up 1.0% from 2024 on a seasonally adjusted basis.

This ended a streak of contractions and came as a surprise given ongoing challenges. European demand played a major role in supporting the annual growth, with exports to other EU countries rising around 4%. US trade faced headwinds from tariffs including a 15% baseline levy on many EU goods, leading to a 9.3% drop in exports to the US for the full year, shrinking the bilateral trade surplus to a four-year low of about €52.2 billion.

China overtook the US as Germany’s top trading partner in 2025, with overall trade volume growing about 2.7% year-on-year. Imports in December rose more modestly +1.4% month-on-month, widening the monthly trade surplus to €17.1 billion.

However, the picture was mixed: Industrial production fell more than expected in December down 1.9% month-on-month, particularly in autos and machinery, highlighting that the export rebound doesn’t fully signal a broad industrial recovery amid global uncertainties like tariffs and economic pressures.

This data reflects resilience in German trade despite external headwinds, with intra-European strength and a late-year push providing the key lift. US tariffs, primarily imposed under President Donald Trump’s second term starting in 2025, have had a significant negative impact on German exports, particularly to the United States, though the broader German economy has shown some resilience through diversification.

The key development was a July 2025 trade deal between the EU and the US that set a baseline tariff of 15% on most EU exports to the US (higher than pre-Trump levels, with even steeper rates on specific sectors like steel, aluminum, and autos in some cases).

This followed earlier announcements of tariffs on global imports, including targeted measures on automobiles and parts. In 2025, German exports to the US fell by 9.3% year-on-year, according to Germany’s Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) data released in early February 2026.

This reduced the bilateral trade surplus to a four-year low of about €52.2 billion from nearly €70 billion the prior year. Total German goods exports to the US amounted to roughly €147 billion ($173 billion) for the year. Sector-specific hits were severe: Automobiles and parts dropped sharply around 17.5% from January-November 2025 data, with some reports citing nearly 19% declines in motor vehicles/parts over parts of the year.

Machinery fell by about 9-9.5%. Chemicals and other products also saw notable declines. These reductions stemmed directly from the tariffs making German goods less competitive in the US market, with some front-loading of exports early in 2025 before full effects kicked in.

Despite the US hit, overall German exports rose by about 1.0% in 2025, ending two years of contraction. Stronger demand from other EU countries up around 4% largely offset losses to the US and a slight dip to China. China overtook the US as Germany’s top trading partner in 2025, with overall trade volume growing modestly.

The tariffs contributed to ongoing challenges in Germany’s export-oriented industries, exacerbating weak industrial production like a 1.9% monthly drop in December 2025 and contributing to subdued GDP growth of just 0.2% in 2025. Uncertainty from tariffs and threats of escalation weighed on investment and business sentiment, though some surveys showed economic confidence rebounding to multi-year highs by early 2026 despite ongoing risks.

Broader forecasts from Oxford Economics and others suggest that escalated tariffs, a hypothetical 25-30% blanket on Europe with retaliation could shave around 1% off eurozone GDP at peak, with prolonged effects on export-heavy Germany. Tensions flared in January 2026 with threats of additional 10-25% tariffs on Germany and other European nations tied to unrelated geopolitical issues, but these were later withdrawn or de-escalated.

German officials and industry groups via warnings from Chancellor Merz have criticized the measures as damaging, while noting that the US market remains important despite the hit. Some analyses indicate that US consumers and importers bear most of the tariff costs around 96% in one German study, rather than fully shifting the burden abroad.

While the tariffs delivered a clear blow to Germany’s US trade—particularly autos and machinery—they did not derail a modest export recovery, thanks to intra-European strength. However, persistent trade policy uncertainty continues to pose risks for 2026 and beyond, especially if further escalations occur.

German-Swiss Consortium Wins Contract for Danish Driverless Railway

A German-Swiss consortium consisting of Siemens Mobility (Germany) and Stadler Rail (Switzerland) has won a major contract from Danish State Railways (DSB) to supply and maintain a new fleet of fully automated, driverless trains for Copenhagen’s S-Bane (suburban rail network, also known as S-tog).

The framework agreement, announced in early 2026 with some reports referencing the award around January 2026 and formal signing/press releases on February 6, 2026, is valued at approximately €3 billion (around DKK 23 billion). It includes: Delivery of at least 226 four-car electric multiple units (EMUs), designed for fully driverless operation at Grade of Automation 4 (GoA4) — the highest level, meaning unattended train operation with no onboard driver.

An option for up to 100 additional trains. A 30-year maintenance agreement with options for extensions, including digital services via Siemens’ Railigent X platform. The trains will feature an iconic design, low-floor access for accessibility, modern passenger information systems, and a maximum speed of 120 km/h.

This contract is described as the world’s largest for driverless trains in an open (non-metro) railway system. It builds on earlier work: Siemens was awarded contracts worth about €270 million in 2024 to upgrade the network’s signaling and onboard systems for GoA4 automation.

Testing of the first driverless trains is expected to begin around 2028. Initial passenger service with the new trains starts in 2032. Full network automation across the 170 km S-Bane system is targeted by around 2040, enabling more frequent services potentially up to 35% increase, higher capacity, improved reliability, and closer headways.

The project is part of DSB’s “Future S-train” program to modernize the nearly 90-year-old Copenhagen suburban network, shifting from semi-automated (GoA2 with drivers) to fully unattended operations for better efficiency and passenger experience.

This deal highlights growing adoption of driverless technology in European commuter rail, with Siemens leading on electrical/digital systems (propulsion, braking, control, etc.) and Stadler handling carbodies, interiors, and assembly.

GoA4 (Grade of Automation 4) represents the highest level of automation in railway and urban guided transit systems, as defined by international standards like IEC 62290-1 from the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and aligned with definitions from the International Association of Public Transport (UITP).

The Grades of Automation (GoA) classify how much responsibility for train operation is handled automatically versus by humans. These levels apply primarily to urban rail systems (metros, subways, commuter trains) but are increasingly relevant to mainline and suburban networks like Copenhagen’s S-Bane.

Here are the standard five Grades of Automation (GoA0 to GoA4): GoA0 — Line-of-sight / manual operations with no automatic protection. The driver controls everything manually without automatic safeguards (rare in modern systems).

GoA1 — Non-automated train operation. The train is driven manually by a driver in the cab, but protected by automatic train protection (ATP) systems that prevent collisions, overspeed, etc. (common in traditional signaling).

GoA2 — Semi-automated train operation (STO — Semi-automatic Train Operation): The train automatically handles starting, acceleration, cruising, braking, and stopping. A driver remains in the cab to start the train (if required), operate doors (or supervise them), monitor the platform/track, handle emergencies, and intervene if needed. This is one of the most common levels today in many metro and commuter systems.

GoA3 — Driverless train operation (DTO — Driverless Train Operation). No driver is needed in the cab for normal operation — the system fully automates driving, starting, stopping, and often platform monitoring. However, onboard staff is present to open/close doors, assist passengers, handle customer service, and manage emergencies or degraded situations. The train can operate without a qualified driver, but humans are still onboard for safety and service roles.

GoA4 — Unattended train operation (UTO — Unattended Train Operation) or fully driverless/manless. This is the highest level: the train is fully automated and unattended, with no onboard staff required for safe operation. All core functions are handled automatically, including:Setting the train in motion

Onboard staff may optionally be present for non-safety roles like customer service, ticket checks, or cleaning, but they are not required for the train to operate safely. Manual fallback controls may exist for exceptional failures, but normal operation relies entirely on the automation system.

Key Advantages of GoA4

Enables very short headways; trains every 90–120 seconds for higher capacity. Reduces operational costs (no driver salaries, more efficient staffing). Improves reliability, energy efficiency, and punctuality through consistent automation. Supports 24/7 or high-frequency service.

Many modern driverless metro lines operate at GoA4, such as parts of the Singapore MRT, Vancouver SkyTrain, Delhi Metro (certain lines), Paris Métro Lines 1 and 14, and Sydney Metro. In the context of the Copenhagen S-Bane project, achieving GoA4 on an existing suburban rail network (not a closed metro) is ambitious and groundbreaking, as it extends full unattended automation to an open, mixed-traffic-style system.

GoA4 means complete transfer of operational responsibility to the system — no human is needed onboard to drive or ensure safety, marking true “driverless” or “unattended” rail operation.

Amazon’s $200 Billion AI Bet Triggers Stock Rout as Investors Question Timing of Returns

0

Amazon shares sank 11% in extended trading on Thursday after the company laid out plans to spend as much as $200 billion on capital expenditures, a figure that has sharpened Wall Street’s unease about how far, and how fast, Big Tech is willing to go in the race to dominate artificial intelligence infrastructure.

The scale of the forecast left investors stunned. Amazon spent about $131 billion on property and equipment in 2025, already a steep increase from roughly $83 billion the year before. The new outlook implies another dramatic step up, placing Amazon well ahead of its megacap peers and more than $50 billion above what analysts had penciled in. In a market increasingly sensitive to cash flow discipline, the reaction was swift.

The selloff comes at a moment when the AI narrative is shifting. Since OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT in late 2022, technology companies have justified rising spending by pointing to explosive demand for compute. Entering 2026, that logic is facing tougher scrutiny as commitments grow larger and timelines for returns remain uncertain.

Alphabet said this week it could spend up to $185 billion next year, while Meta has guided for capital expenditures of as much as $135 billion. Rather than peaking, the AI investment cycle appears to be accelerating.

On Amazon’s earnings call, analysts pressed management to explain when shareholders might begin to see tangible payback. CEO Andy Jassy said he was “confident” that the investments would deliver strong returns on invested capital, particularly through Amazon Web Services, but he declined to offer specific milestones.

That lack of precision was central to investor concerns. Evercore ISI analyst Mark Mahaney urged Jassy to bridge the gap between conviction and visibility, asking how the company gets from today’s spending surge to sustained long-term returns. Jassy responded by framing the investment as demand-driven rather than speculative.

“This isn’t some sort of quixotic, top-line grab,” he said, arguing that Amazon is responding to concrete customer needs. According to Jassy, demand for AI compute on AWS is so strong that growth is being constrained by capacity rather than interest.

The numbers from AWS lend some support to that claim. The cloud unit reported revenue growth of 24% to $35.6 billion in the most recent quarter, beating expectations and marking its fastest pace of expansion in 13 quarters. Jassy said AWS could have grown faster if it had more infrastructure in place, a point he used to justify the aggressive buildout.

To close that gap, Amazon added nearly 4 gigawatts of computing capacity in 2025 and expects to double its available power by the end of 2027. That expansion requires massive upfront investment in data centers, networking equipment, and custom chips, locking Amazon into a capital-heavy path that investors worry could weigh on margins if demand cools or pricing weakens.

Beyond near-term financials, analysts are also questioning how the structure of the AI market will evolve. Barclays analyst Ross Sandler asked whether spending remains concentrated among a handful of AI-native labs or whether enterprise adoption is broad enough to support sustained returns on infrastructure.

Jassy described the market as increasingly polarized. On one side are large AI labs consuming enormous amounts of compute. On the other hand, enterprises are adopting AI as a tool for productivity gains and cost control. Between them is a broad middle of companies experimenting, piloting, and gradually scaling applications.

“That middle part of the barbell very well may end up being the largest and most durable,” Jassy said, suggesting that enterprise demand, rather than hype around foundation models, will underpin long-term growth.

Still, the market reaction suggests investors are no longer willing to take that outcome on faith. Amazon’s stock drop underscores a broader shift in sentiment: enthusiasm for AI remains, but tolerance for open-ended spending is narrowing. With interest rates still elevated and competition intensifying across cloud and AI services, investors are increasingly focused on execution, efficiency, and timing.

The challenge for Amazon now is to convince the market that its AI ambitions will follow the same arc as AWS did in its early years, when heavy investment eventually produced one of the most profitable businesses in tech.

CME Group Eyeing a Coin and Could be more than Stablecoins 

0

Wall Street is eyeing a CME Coin, and it could matter more than Stablecoins. This stems from comments made by CME Chairman and CEO Terry Duffy during the company’s Q4 2025 earnings call.

CME Group is actively exploring the launch of its own proprietary digital token, often referred to in coverage as a “CME Coin.” This would be a blockchain-based asset potentially operating on a decentralized (public) network, setting it apart from many institutional tokens that run on private or permissioned systems like JPMorgan’s JPM Coin on closed networks.

It’s tied to CME’s broader push into tokenized collateral and tokenized assets for margin, settlement, and risk management in derivatives markets. This is distinct from a separate but related project: CME is collaborating with Google Cloud on a “tokenized cash” solution, expected to roll out later in 2026.

That product would enable tokenized deposits or cash equivalents likely backed by a depository bank for use as collateral in trading, including crypto derivatives. The “CME Coin” concept appears aimed at broader industry use—allowing other participants to leverage it for margin posting, settlement, or related functions in regulated markets.

CME has not confirmed specifics like whether it would be a stablecoin, a settlement token, or another format. No launch timeline, technical details, or regulatory filings have been announced yet—it’s still in the exploratory phase.

This aligns with CME’s aggressive expansion in crypto: Record volumes in 2025 averaging billions daily in crypto derivatives, plans for 24/7 trading of crypto futures/options in early 2026 pending approval, and upcoming launches like futures on Cardano (ADA), Chainlink (LINK), and Stellar (XLM) starting February 9, 2026.

Stablecoins primarily facilitate retail/crypto-native payments, trading, and DeFi by providing dollar-like stability on public blockchains. A CME-issued coin, however, would target institutional and regulated environments: CME clears trillions in derivatives exposure across interest rates, equities, commodities, FX, and now crypto.

If a CME Coin became eligible as margin/collateral, it could embed itself at the core of global risk management and price discovery. It might “move risk” more than money—enhancing efficiency in post-trade processes, reducing counterparty risk, and potentially sidelining less-regulated stablecoins in institutional settings by raising the bar for collateral “pedigree.”

This reflects TradFi deepening its integration with blockchain, potentially challenging or complementing crypto-native infrastructure while reinforcing CME’s dominance in market infrastructure. In short, while still speculative and early-stage, this signals Wall Street’s accelerating embrace of tokenization—not just for payments, but for controlling core financial plumbing.

If realized, it could reshape how institutional risk flows in a tokenized world. Tokenized collateral refers to the process of representing traditional financial assets such as cash, U.S. Treasuries, money market fund shares, or other high-quality liquid assets as digital tokens on a blockchain or distributed ledger technology (DLT).

These tokens serve as collateral — primarily for posting margin in derivatives markets, repo transactions, securities lending, or other secured obligations. In traditional finance, collateral management involves slow, siloed processes: assets are held in separate custody accounts, transfers require intermediaries like correspondent banks or tri-party agents, settlements often take T+1 or T+2 days or longer across borders/time zones, and reconciliation between parties is manual and error-prone.

This leads to inefficiencies, excess collateral buffers, and challenges for 24/7 operations. Tokenization addresses these by moving collateral onto programmable, shared ledgers, enabling near-instant, transparent, and automated movements.

A qualified issuer creates a digital token that represents ownership or a claim on an underlying real-world asset (RWA). Tokenized cash/deposits — A 1:1 claim on USD held at an insured depository institution potentially FDIC-insured.

Digital representation of U.S. government securities. Tokenized money market funds — Shares in government or prime funds tokenized for on-chain use. The token embeds key details: asset type, issuer, identifiers, rights, redemption rules, and compliance logic.

Tokens are held in wallets controlled by qualified custodians, clearing members, or the clearinghouse (DCO) itself. Segregation ensures client assets remain separate from the issuer’s or intermediary’s proprietary funds critical for bankruptcy remoteness and regulatory compliance.

Multi-signature controls, hardware security modules, and proof-of-reserves attestations provide transparency and security. Collateral moves via on-chain transactions, often on permissioned networks or potentially public/decentralized ones. Transfers can occur in seconds/minutes, 24/7, using mechanisms like: Delivery versus payment (DvP) — Collateral and payment/obligation settle simultaneously.

Clearinghouses apply haircuts (discounts for risk) — potentially with slight premiums for tokenization mechanics/operational risks.
Holders can redeem tokens back to the underlying asset via the issuer or custodian, often with same-day or next-day liquidity for eligible assets.

CME Group is actively advancing this through: A partnership with Google Cloud on tokenized cash expected rollout in 2026 for margin/settlement in derivatives. Exploration of a proprietary “CME Coin” or similar token potentially on a decentralized network, aimed at broader industry use for collateral.

This targets institutional-grade plumbing: enabling faster, more reliable margin flows in CME’s massive derivatives ecosystem; trillions cleared daily. Regulators are aligning frameworks — e.g., allowing tokenized assets/stablecoins as eligible collateral under strict rules on reserves, attestations, redemption, and custody — to support this without compromising stability.

Tokenized collateral upgrades the “plumbing” of risk management from slow, fragmented legacy systems to fast, shared, blockchain-based rails — potentially freeing up hundreds of billions in trapped liquidity while enabling continuous, efficient markets.

ZKP Crypto’s $100M Infrastrucure Backing Goes Viral in February While Mutuum & Bitcoin Hyper Fall Behind

0

The February 2026 presale market is increasingly shaped by proven progress rather than future promises. Market participants now focus on real delivery instead of vision alone when deciding the best crypto to buy now. Several ongoing presales highlight how the development stage impacts risk and confidence. Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) enters with infrastructure already running, Mutuum Finance (MUTM) operates with a live testnet, and Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER) continues raising capital to build its core systems.

All three projects show measurable movement. Each has drawn strong interest and funding. Yet their current development positions carry very different risk levels, which must be carefully weighed when selecting the best crypto to buy now.

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)

Within discussions around the best crypto to buy now, ZKP stands out due to its completed build phase before public access. Unlike many presales that collect funds first and build later, ZKP finalized its core systems prior to opening its presale auction, reducing uncertainty tied to execution.

Before launching the presale auction, the project committed more than $100 million of self-funded capital. These funds were used to construct the full network rather than plan future work. Spending was clearly allocated: $20 million toward blockchain core systems, $17 million for Proof Pod hardware production and global delivery channels, and $5 million for securing key digital domains.

The network structure consists of four active layers covering consensus, execution, proof creation, and storage. This setup is already running and does not rely on future deployment. Proof Pods are physical devices already manufactured and prepared for shipment, with delivery expected within five days of purchase. The testnet launches alongside the presale auction only to confirm performance, not to build unfinished features.

ZKP focuses on private computation for AI workloads through zero-knowledge methods. Demand for privacy-focused computation exists beyond short-term market cycles. Financial firms require protected data processing whether markets rise or fall, supporting long-term relevance.

Distribution is handled through a 450-day presale auction spread across 17 stages. Stage 2 is live now, offering 190 million coins per day. Each window applies the same pricing method for all participants. A streak system adds a 5 to 10 percent ZKP bonus for continued participation. Any unsold supply is permanently removed.

What strengthens ZKP as the best crypto to buy now is its completion. The infrastructure is live, the network is active, and Proof Pods are shipping. Functionality does not depend on future development, allowing participants to assess finished work rather than expectations.

Mutuum Finance (MUTM)

Mutuum Finance has surpassed $20.2 million raised and reached an important milestone with the release of its V1 protocol on the Sepolia testnet as of February 1, 2026. This confirms movement beyond early design into usable testing.

Participants can now interact directly with the platform. The testnet enables minting of test assets such as test-USDT and test-ETH for use in Peer-to-Contract lending pools. This confirms the working state of mtTokens, which are designed for yield efficiency, along with Automated Liquidator Bots meant to manage risk during market stress.

Still, a testnet remains a controlled environment. Conditions during testing do not always match real-world use. Bugs identified must be resolved before broader release. The timeline for mainnet availability remains unclear, and some platforms stay in testing phases for extended periods.

Mutuum also depends on stablecoin systems. External decisions by stablecoin issuers can impact access and liquidity regardless of test results. This dependency remains a factor when evaluating the best crypto to buy now.

Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER)

Bitcoin Hyper has gathered an estimated $30 million while focusing on expanding its staking-based ecosystem. A large portion of presale supply is already locked through staking at roughly 40 percent APY, reducing the immediate supply at launch.

This staking approach reflects progress in economic design rather than network completion. Encouraging long-term locking shapes supply behavior once trading begins. High staking levels can reduce early selling pressure, influencing early market movement.

The concept combines fast execution with Bitcoin-linked settlement. Speed is supported by the Solana Virtual Machine, while Bitcoin settlement adds trust appeal. Strong community engagement further supports launch visibility.

However, evaluating the best crypto to buy now requires reviewing technical readiness. Bitcoin Hyper continues raising funds to complete its main systems. The zero-knowledge bridge linking SVM activity to Bitcoin remains the core dependency. If the bridge underperforms, the system faces serious operational risk.

Final Say

Each project reflects a different level of readiness:

ZKP reflects completed development, with network, infrastructure, and hardware already active. Technical delivery is complete, removing build-stage uncertainty.

Mutuum represents mid-stage progress, with a functioning testnet and active testing, but unresolved timing and external system reliance.

Bitcoin Hyper reflects funded development, where economic systems advance while core technical components are still being finalized.

Choosing the best crypto to buy now depends on comfort with these stages. Some may prefer active testing environments, others may accept infrastructure build risk, while those prioritizing proven delivery may find ZKP offers the clearest case among the best crypto to buy now.

Website: https://zkp.com/

Buy: http://buy.zkp.com/

X: https://x.com/ZKPofficial

Telegram: https://t.me/ZKPofficial

 

AI Takes Center Stage at Super Bowl 2026: Record $8M Ad Slots Filled by Tech Giants

0

Super Bowl LX, set for February 8, at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California, is poised to become the biggest showcase yet for artificial intelligence companies, with major players and emerging startups spending record sums—averaging $8 million per 30-second spot, with some reaching $10 million—to reach an expected audience of up to 130 million viewers.

The surge in AI-focused advertising reflects the technology’s rapid mainstreaming, as companies vie to demonstrate practical applications for both consumers and businesses in one of the year’s most-watched television events. Production costs for Super Bowl commercials typically start at $1 million and often climb far higher, with celebrity appearances alone commanding millions.

This year’s lineup features deep-pocketed tech giants alongside smaller AI firms, filling slots vacated in part by traditional advertisers like automakers, many of which have pulled back amid economic pressures and shifting marketing priorities.

Anthropic Kicks Off the AI Ad War

The battle began days before kickoff when Anthropic released a spot for its Claude chatbot that directly mocked OpenAI’s decision to introduce ads into ChatGPT. The ad highlighted Claude’s ad-free experience, prompting a swift response from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman that amplified attention on both campaigns. OpenAI is returning to the Super Bowl after its 60-second debut spot last year, continuing its push to showcase ChatGPT’s capabilities to a massive audience.

Google Doubles Down on Gemini

Alphabet’s Google is running ads for the second consecutive year promoting Gemini AI, following previous campaigns highlighting Pixel features like Guided Frame and Magic Eraser. This year’s spots emphasize Gemini’s role in enhancing everyday tasks, reinforcing Google’s position as a consumer-facing AI leader.

Amazon Plays on AI Home Concerns

Amazon is leaning into humorous skepticism about AI in the home with a spot for Alexa+, featuring actor Chris Hemsworth expressing comedic concerns about the risks of advanced AI assistants. The ad aims to position Alexa+ as a safe, helpful companion in an era of growing AI integration into daily life.

Meta Focuses on Hardware

Rather than promoting its chatbot, Meta is returning with advertisements for its Oakley Meta AI glasses, which provide access to its AI tools through wearable technology. The campaign highlights practical, hands-free AI use cases, differentiating Meta’s approach from pure software-focused rivals.

Smaller AI Players Seize the Spotlight

A wave of startups is using the Super Bowl platform to introduce products to a broad audience. Genspark is marketing its AI productivity platform with an ad featuring actor Matthew Broderick. Base44 showcases its AI-powered app development tool, claiming anyone can create custom apps. Wix, known for website creation tools, will promote its new Harmony platform, which leverages AI to simplify web design.

Artlist.io stands out with an entirely AI-generated 30-second spot, created in five days for just a few thousand dollars, and purchased a week before the game. The ad positions Artlist’s AI tools as accessible and powerful for consumers, demonstrating the technology’s speed and affordability.

Non-tech brands are also embracing AI. Svedka Vodka returns to Super Bowl advertising after decades, reviving its early-2000s Fembot character with AI trained on TikTok dances. Absolut is also running a spot. Xfinity used AI to digitally de-age the Jurassic Park cast for a nostalgic commercial.

The heavy AI presence points to a strategic pivot: tech companies are capitalizing on the Super Bowl’s massive reach to demonstrate real-world value amid growing consumer and enterprise adoption. The high cost—up to $10 million per spot plus production expenses—raises the stakes, with success measured not just in brand recall but in driving downloads, subscriptions, and enterprise inquiries.

The response to these campaigns could reshape advertising norms. If AI-generated or AI-promoted ads prove effective and cost-efficient, they may accelerate the adoption of generative tools in commercial production.

Conversely, any backlash over authenticity or quality could temper enthusiasm. For now, the Super Bowl serves as a high-visibility battleground where AI companies are betting big to capture attention in a pivotal year for the technology’s mainstream integration.