12
06
2025

CATEGORIES

PAGES

12
06
2025

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2

Ripple (XRP) Price Prediction: Which One Will Reach $10 First? XRP, SUI, Toncoin, or Rexas Finance (RXS)?

By
TI Partners
-
0

As crypto markets regain momentum, a new question dominates investor chatter: which sub-$10 token is realistically capable of crossing that psychological threshold first? With XRP, SUI, Toncoin, and the fast-rising newcomer Rexas Finance (RXS) all trading well below $10, speculation is heating up. Here’s a deep dive analysis of each project’s current standing, growth potential, and whether a $10 price tag is within reach.

XRP: Resistance Builds, Momentum Weakens

Ripple (XRP) has long been a heavyweight in the altcoin space, but its current technical setup reflects more frustration than opportunity. XRP has been stuck under key resistance zones between $2.30 and $2.60, and it continues to trade beneath its 50-, 100-, and 200-period EMAs — a clear bearish signal for short-term traders. Adding to the unease, the RSI is below 50, indicating a lack of bullish strength, and derivatives data show a drop in open interest to $4.7 billion as volume spikes — a telltale sign of long liquidation pressure. Unless XRP can break and sustain a move above $2.30–$2.40, analysts warn that a drop back toward $2.20 or lower is likely. With a $10 target requiring over four times the upside from its previous cycle high (~$2.70), Ripple would need a significant catalyst, such as a favorable SEC ruling or major institutional adoption, to shift this narrative. Until then, XRP’s trajectory appears more like a consolidation than a moonshot.

SUI: Rising Adoption, Real Fundamentals

SUI has emerged as one of the more impressive performers in 2025, recently climbing from $2 to the $3.20 range. Behind this rise is a wave of user and ecosystem growth: SUI is adding over 1 million new wallets per day, with roughly 80% of them being new participants. Daily DEX volume has remained consistently above $400 million, and the stablecoin market cap on SUI has surged to nearly $900 million. Institutional moves also support SUI’s growth story, most notably the launch of a dedicated SUI product by 21Shares. These fundamentals give SUI real credibility as a Layer 1 contender. However, while the growth is strong, a jump from $3.20 to $10 is still over a 3× move. Most price forecasts only target around $5 for 2025, meaning $10 could remain out of reach, unless a full-blown alt season occurs.

Toncoin (TON): News-Driven Spikes, Volatile Path

Toncoin, trading around $3.12, benefits from a strong association with Telegram and intermittent bursts of hype. In late May, speculation of a collaboration between Telegram and Elon Musk’s AI product caused a temporary rally to $3.68. A subsequent announcement of a $300 million integration with Grok sparked another 12% surge. Despite this, Toncoin struggles with consistency. It needs to hold $2.95 to maintain a bullish bias, while resistance around $3.30–$3.50 continues to cap any upside. While Toncoin’s MACD recently triggered a bullish golden cross, analysts stress the need for more sustained ecosystem traction beyond speculative headlines. To realistically reach $10, TON would need a persistent growth narrative, stronger tokenomics, and broader momentum in the crypto market.

Rexas Finance (RXS): Microcap Wild Card with Massive Upside

Rexas Finance (RXS) is currently the dark horse in this race, and also the most explosive. It just wrapped up a heavily subscribed presale, selling over 465 million tokens and preparing for its initial listing at $0.25. That alone sets it apart: even a jump to $10 from $0.25 is just a 40x increase. However, from its current presale base of $0.06, that would be over 150x. The project aims to bring real-world asset tokenization to DeFi, which is competing with giants like Ondo and Mantra. It’s a bold vision, but still in its infancy. RXS’s path to $10 isn’t about slow adoption; it’s about viral momentum, investor speculation, and timing. With no historical trading data and pending exchange listings, the token is essentially a high-risk lottery ticket. Still, the ultra-low market cap and rising hype give RXS what others don’t: mathematical leverage. Even small inflows could move the price dramatically. The risk is high, but so is the upside.

Conclusion

SUI stands on solid fundamental ground among the contenders but will likely stall around $5–$6. XRP faces strong resistance and will require significant catalysts to break out of its current range. Toncoin has branding and news momentum but lacks consistency. Rexas Finance, though unproven, offers the most direct path to $10 thanks to its low base and explosive upside potential. If there’s one token with the raw leverage to surprise everyone in 2025, it’s RXS.

For more information about Rexas Finance (RXS) visit the links below:

Website: https://rexas.com

Win $1 Million Giveaway: https://bit.ly/Rexas1M

Whitepaper: https://rexas.com/rexas-whitepaper.pdf

Twitter/X: https://x.com/rexasfinance

Telegram: https://t.me/rexasfinance

A Foray Into The Potential $1.5 Billion IPO of Uphold

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Uphold, a New York-based digital asset trading platform, is exploring a U.S. initial public offering (IPO) targeting a valuation above $1.5 billion, as reported by various sources in June 2025. CEO Simon McLoughlin revealed that the company’s board has engaged investment bank FT Partners to evaluate strategic options, including a potential Nasdaq listing or a sale to a financial or payments firm. This move follows significant revenue growth, with Uphold projecting $300 million in 2025, a 275% increase from $80 million in 2022, driven by retail expansion and enterprise partnerships, such as with IG Group and a German bank.

The platform’s focus on XRP, including a U.S. debit card with XRP rewards and yield farming via Flare Network, aligns with its strategy to capitalize on the loyal XRP community. The recent success of Circle’s IPO, with shares surging over 300%, has fueled enthusiasm for crypto fintech IPOs, positioning Uphold to potentially ride this wave. However, McLoughlin emphasized that any decision would require careful analysis, and discussions with banks, brokers, and payment firms are ongoing.

A successful IPO could signal further integration of crypto platforms into traditional financial markets, following the likes of Coinbase and Circle. This legitimizes digital assets, attracting institutional investors and retail users wary of unregulated markets. Uphold’s focus on XRP and innovative offerings like yield farming and crypto-linked debit cards could set a precedent for other platforms to bridge crypto and fiat services.

With Circle’s IPO surging over 300%, Uphold’s $1.5 billion valuation target reflects bullish sentiment in the crypto fintech sector. A strong debut could drive valuations higher across the industry, encouraging other crypto firms to pursue public listings. However, an overheated market risks volatility if investor expectations outpace fundamentals.

Listing on Nasdaq would subject Uphold to stringent U.S. regulatory oversight, particularly from the SEC. This could set a benchmark for compliance in the crypto space, especially for platforms handling assets like XRP, which has faced legal battles over its security status. A successful IPO might pressure regulators to clarify crypto rules, benefiting the broader market.

Uphold’s partnerships, such as with IG Group and a German bank, and its XRP-centric products position it as a hybrid fintech-crypto player. A public listing or sale could accelerate its growth, enabling acquisitions or expansion into new markets, particularly in regions with high crypto adoption. Uphold’s emphasis on XRP and its rewards programs taps into the loyal XRP community, potentially boosting user engagement. A high-profile IPO could drive retail interest in crypto trading, especially if marketed as a success story for XRP holders.

Uphold, like Coinbase, operates as a centralized entity, offering user-friendly interfaces and fiat integration but relying on traditional financial infrastructure. An IPO reinforces this model, aligning with Wall Street and regulatory frameworks. DeFi protocols and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap prioritize user sovereignty and anonymity, rejecting centralized control. These platforms are unlikely to pursue IPOs, as their ethos clashes with traditional finance.

Centralized platforms like Uphold must navigate complex regulations, which can limit innovation but provide stability and trust for mainstream users. An IPO would deepen Uphold’s regulatory commitments. DeFi projects often operate in gray areas, resisting oversight to preserve decentralization, which appeals to crypto purists but risks regulatory crackdowns.

Uphold’s IPO could attract traditional investors and retail users seeking regulated, familiar platforms, widening the gap with DeFi’s tech-savvy, crypto-native audience. DeFi’s permissionless nature caters to users in underbanked regions or those avoiding KYC requirements, a segment Uphold’s model may not fully serve. Centralized platforms prioritize scalability and user experience, as seen in Uphold’s XRP debit card and yield farming.

However, they may lag in adopting cutting-edge DeFi innovations like automated market makers or governance tokens. DeFi’s rapid experimentation drives innovation but often lacks the stability and customer support of centralized platforms, creating a trade-off. A successful IPO could tilt market favor toward centralized crypto firms, potentially diverting capital from DeFi projects. Conversely, a failed IPO or regulatory hurdle might bolster the narrative that decentralized systems are more resilient.

Uphold’s IPO could bridge the gap by bringing crypto to traditional markets, but it also risks widening the ideological divide. Centralized platforms may dominate in regulated markets, while DeFi thrives in decentralized ecosystems, creating parallel financial systems. The outcome of Uphold’s IPO—whether it fuels mainstream adoption or highlights regulatory tensions—will shape how this divide evolves.

The Scar On My Foot – The Meat Seller and His Boy

By
David Gani
-
0

As I made my way home through the alley of the bustling Egbeda market, traders called out to passersby as others haggle. Okada riders honk indiscriminately jostling for passengers. In this potpourri of confused sounds I noticed a mild drama that brought back memories of a childhood experience I had. A meat seller had his son on his laps screaming, with his left hand he held the lads hands and, with his right hand, he sharpens his knife. And when our eyes met he said laughing, “Don’t beg me o! I am going to cut off his hands.” I laughed too.

How I Got the Scar

I was six years old when my Dad threatened to cut off my leg if I do not stretch it for treatment. And in my innocence I believed he would as he kept the machete beside my leg. The thought of a greater pain of having my leg chopped off made me surrender it. The incident that led to that event happened a day before. There was a burning bush a block away. Someone had set fire to dried stalks of corn on his farm and this, as expected, attracted all the children around, including me. I found a comfortable place to sit in the middle of the road and watched how other children went in and beat the fire with sticks that had nylon tied at the tips.

It was fun watching how excited fire flakes jumped into the sky with exploding sounds. And as I watched in awe I saw how a burning nylon went beyond the radius and descended, not knowing that it would land on my left foot. I cannot remember the pain but I cannot forget how I cried as I was carried home. The scar, still obvious on my foot is a daily reminder of the inherent dangers of being a spectator on life’s stage. How come the children that played in the fire never got burnt?

A sitting duck is an easy target.

Life Rewards the Bold

It is more risky for an airplane to remain on the ground than being in the sky.

I was told by my Mom that when I was a kid I rarely played with other children. I always sat a distance and watched them play. It was this behavior, though not bad in itself, that gave me a permanent scar. I am really glad this happened to teach me a valuable lesson that life rewards only those who go out and make things happen and not to those who wait.

He that observeth the wind shall not sow; and he that regardeth the clouds shall not reap. – Ecclesiastes 11:4

Take that Risk!

Why are we sitting here until we die? -2Kings 7:3-20

The Biblical event of the four leprous men sums up my reason for writing. They were ostracized from society to be onlookers but that day they decided to become actors, they did not only save their lives but those of countless others in the city. Today I no longer sit and watch. I have gone beyond throwing my hat in the ring to building it because I have experienced the consequences of being an onlooker and also, I have tasted the rewards of putting my best foot forward.

I will end this piece with the story of the crow and the rabbit. A crow was sitting on a tree doing nothing all day. A small rabbit saw the crow, and asked him, ‘Can I also sit like you and do nothing all day?’ The crow answered: ‘Sure, why not.’ So, the rabbit sat on the ground below the crow, and rested. All of a sudden, a fox appeared, he jumped on the rabbit and ate it. The moral of this story is, to be sitting and doing nothing, you must be sitting very, very high up.

The ball is in your court. Do with it as you please.

The 16-Day Ethereum ETF Inflows Streak Reflects Robust Institutional Confidence

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Spot Ethereum ETFs in the US have indeed extended their inflow streak to 16 days, with a reported $52 million in daily net inflows, contributing to a total of $890.5 million over this period. This marks the longest inflow streak for Ethereum ETFs in 2025, reflecting growing institutional confidence in Ethereum. BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) has been a major driver, consistently leading inflows, with $576 million over the past two weeks alone. The streak, which began on May 16, 2025, accounts for roughly 25% of the $3.32 billion in total net inflows since the ETFs launched in July 2024.

This surge aligns with Ethereum’s price recovery and network upgrades like Pectra, which reduced transaction costs significantly. However, Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust (ETHE) has seen outflows, offsetting some gains. If the trend continues, analysts predict Ethereum ETFs could hit $1 billion in cumulative inflows soon. The 16-day inflow streak for spot Ethereum ETFs, with $52 million in daily net inflows, carries significant implications for the crypto market, Ethereum’s ecosystem, and investor sentiment. The consistent inflows, totaling $890.5 million over 16 days, signal strong institutional interest in Ethereum as a long-term investment.

BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) leading with $576 million in inflows underscores the involvement of major players, which could legitimize Ethereum further in traditional finance. This institutional backing may stabilize Ethereum’s price volatility and attract more conservative investors, as ETFs provide a regulated, accessible way to gain exposure without directly holding crypto. The inflow streak aligns with Ethereum’s price recovery, with ETH trading around $3,400-$3,600 recently (based on general market trends). The sustained demand from ETFs could push prices higher, especially if inflows surpass $1 billion soon, as analysts predict.

Positive ETF performance may also boost sentiment for other cryptocurrencies, reinforcing the narrative of crypto as a maturing asset class. Ethereum’s recent Pectra upgrade, which reduced transaction costs by up to 50% and improved scalability, likely contributes to investor optimism. Lower costs enhance Ethereum’s appeal for decentralized applications (dApps) and DeFi, supporting long-term ETF demand. The inflows reflect confidence in Ethereum’s role as a backbone for Web3, despite competition from chains like Solana.
The success of Ethereum ETFs, following Bitcoin ETFs, strengthens the case for further crypto ETF approvals (e.g., Solana or XRP ETFs). This could pressure regulators to clarify crypto classifications, especially as Ethereum’s commodity status remains debated.
Increased ETF adoption may also drive liquidity in Ethereum markets, improving price discovery and reducing spreads. BlackRock’s ETHA and other ETFs like Fidelity’s FETH have seen consistent inflows, reflecting strong investor preference for low-fee, well-managed funds. BlackRock’s dominance highlights its brand power and distribution network.
Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust (ETHE) has faced persistent outflows, losing $2.4 billion since July 2024. ETHE’s higher fees (2.5% vs. 0.25% for ETHA) and its conversion from a trust to an ETF have driven investors to cheaper alternatives. The divide underscores a competitive ETF market where fee structures and brand reputation dictate flows. Grayscale may need to lower fees or innovate to regain market share. The inflows are largely driven by institutional investors, such as hedge funds and asset managers, who use ETFs for diversified exposure. BlackRock’s involvement suggests sophisticated players are betting on Ethereum’s long-term growth.
Retail investors, while participating, are less dominant in ETF flows due to limited capital and preference for direct crypto purchases on exchanges like Coinbase. Retail sentiment on platforms like X remains mixed, with some praising ETF accessibility and others criticizing fees. The institutional tilt could widen the gap between professional and retail investors, with institutions benefiting from early positioning. However, retail adoption may grow as ETFs become more familiar.
Ethereum ETFs’ success contrasts with the slower progress of other crypto ETFs. Bitcoin ETFs have seen stronger inflows ($20 billion+ since launch), while Solana or XRP ETFs remain speculative. Ethereum’s ETF success reinforces its position as the second-largest crypto by market cap, but it may divert capital from smaller altcoins, concentrating investment in top-tier assets.  Bulls on X and analyst reports highlight Ethereum’s scalability improvements and ETF-driven demand as catalysts for a potential $5,000 ETH price by 2026.
Critics argue that ETF inflows are modest compared to Bitcoin’s and that Grayscale’s outflows signal waning interest in older fund structures. Some also question Ethereum’s ability to compete with faster chains like Solana. The divide in sentiment could lead to short-term volatility, but sustained inflows may tilt the narrative toward optimism.
The 16-day Ethereum ETF inflow streak reflects robust institutional confidence, bolstered by Ethereum’s technical upgrades and growing mainstream acceptance. However, the divide between high-performing ETFs (e.g., BlackRock) and laggards (e.g., Grayscale), as well as between institutional and retail investors, highlights a competitive and uneven market. The inflows strengthen Ethereum’s position but may widen gaps with other cryptos and investor types. 

NASDAQ Files For Rule Change With SEC To Expand Nasdaq Crypto Index

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

NASDAQ filed a proposed rule change with the SEC on June 2, 2025, to expand its Nasdaq Crypto Index (NCI) by adding Solana (SOL), Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA), and Stellar Lumens (XLM) alongside the existing Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Chainlink (LINK), Litecoin (LTC), and Uniswap (UNI). This aims to make the index, which serves as the benchmark for the Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ), more reflective of the broader crypto market.

Currently, the ETF is restricted to holding only BTC and ETH due to SEC regulations, using a sampling strategy to approximate the index’s performance, which introduces tracking error risks. The SEC’s decision is expected by November 2, 2025. If approved, the ETF could invest in all nine assets, enhancing diversification and potentially boosting institutional interest in these altcoins. @MerlijnTrader on June 7, 2025, claim the SEC has already approved the updated Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price Index (NCIUS) including these altcoins, citing strong liquidity and reliable pricing.

However, this claim conflicts with multiple sources indicating the SEC’s decision is still pending until November 2, 2025. Given the inconsistency, the approval status remains inconclusive without official SEC confirmation. The inclusion of Solana (SOL), Ripple (XRP), Cardano (ADA), and Stellar Lumens (XLM) in the Nasdaq Crypto Index (NCI) has significant implications for the crypto market, institutional investment, and regulatory landscape. Adding SOL, XRP, ADA, and XLM to the NCI signals growing acceptance of altcoins beyond Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) in mainstream finance.

This could attract institutional investors seeking diversified exposure to digital assets, as the NCI now covers ~78% of the crypto market cap, up from 64%. Inclusion in a Nasdaq index enhances visibility and trading liquidity for these altcoins, potentially reducing volatility and fostering price stability, as seen with BTC and ETH after ETF approvals. If the SEC approves Nasdaq’s proposal by November 2, 2025, the Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) could hold all nine assets in the NCI, reducing tracking errors and aligning the ETF more closely with the broader crypto market.

This could set a precedent for multi-asset crypto ETFs in the U.S., reports suggest immediate market reactions, with SOL, ADA, XLM, and XRP seeing price surges (e.g., SOL +8.2% to $166, XRP +7.1% to $2.30) after the June 2025 filing announcement, driven by expectations of institutional inflows. The proposal fuels speculation about an “altcoin season,” where these assets could outperform BTC and ETH, as hinted by BlackRock’s recent shift from BTC to ETH holdings.

Nasdaq’s involvement may strengthen ties between crypto and tech-heavy stock indices, increasing correlations and potentially amplifying market movements. The filing tests the SEC’s willingness to embrace altcoins, especially after its cautious approach to non-BTC/ETH assets. Approval could signal a shift toward broader crypto acceptance, particularly post-Ripple’s 2023 legal victory and a pro-crypto regulatory environment under new U.S. leadership.

Approval may align U.S. crypto ETFs with more crypto-friendly jurisdictions, encouraging global adoption of multi-asset ETFs and boosting on-chain activities like staking and DeFi. XRP for cross-border payments, SOL for scalable smart contracts, ADA for research-driven blockchain, and XLM for low-cost global transactions. Their inclusion validates these use cases, potentially driving adoption in their respective niches.

Large players like BlackRock and Fidelity may favor the diversification, as it reduces risk and aligns with growing demand for altcoin exposure. Approval could trigger similar filings from major asset managers, as noted by Bloomberg’s James Seyffart. Some retail investors, particularly BTC and ETH “maxis,” express concern that altcoin inclusion dilutes the dominance of these primary assets. X posts highlight fears that BTC and ETH may lose their “unfair advantage” as altcoins gain legitimacy.

Industry analysts and X users believe the SEC’s potential approval, especially under a pro-crypto administration, could pave the way for more ETF approvals (e.g., for AVAX, DOGE, or TRUMP).  Others caution that the SEC’s historical caution, as noted by Chair Gary Gensler, may delay or limit approval, especially given unresolved issues like XRP’s securities status. Conflicting X posts (e.g.,  @MerlijnTrader claiming approval vs. reports stating a pending decision) reflect uncertainty.

Limited to BTC and ETH ETFs, U.S. investors may benefit from diversified exposure if approved, but face delays due to SEC scrutiny. Jurisdictions like Brazil, where Hashdex already launched an XRP ETF, are ahead in offering altcoin products, creating a divide in access to diversified crypto investments. The Nasdaq’s proposal to include SOL, XRP, ADA, and XLM in the NCI is a pivotal step toward mainstreaming altcoins, promising increased institutional adoption, liquidity, and market stability.

However, it creates a divide between institutional and retail investors, BTC/ETH maxis and altcoin advocates, regulatory optimists and skeptics, and U.S. versus global markets. The SEC’s decision by November 2, 2025, will be critical in determining whether this move bridges or widens these gaps. Stakeholders should monitor price movements, public comments, and regulatory updates to navigate emerging opportunities.

123...6,961Page 2 of 6,961

© 2024 Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© 2024 Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy