DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2071

Tesla’s Stock Crash Deepens as Musk’s Controversial Politics Collide with Market Fears

0

Tesla’s stock plummeted 15% on Monday, marking its worst single-day decline since September 2020, as a combination of political controversy surrounding CEO Elon Musk, a deteriorating brand image, and broader market fears continued to weigh on investor sentiment.

The electric vehicle giant has now suffered through seven consecutive weeks of losses, its longest losing streak since going public on the Nasdaq in 2010.

Since peaking at $479.86 on December 17, 2024, Tesla shares have lost more than 50% of their value, wiping out over $800 billion in market capitalization. Monday’s dramatic selloff represented the seventh worst trading day in Tesla’s history.

The stock’s collapse mirrored a broader downturn in tech-heavy equities, with the Nasdaq Composite tumbling nearly 4%, its sharpest single-day decline since 2022. But Tesla’s decline stood out, as investors increasingly viewed the company’s problems as self-inflicted, largely stemming from Musk’s erratic political entanglements and shifting brand perception.

Trade War Concerns and Trump’s Tariff Plans Send Ripples Through Tesla

Tesla’s sharp decline came amid heightened concerns over President Donald Trump’s proposed tariff increases on Canada and Mexico, two of the most important markets for automotive suppliers. Investors are growing uneasy about the potential for a full-fledged trade war, which could significantly disrupt Tesla’s supply chain and force the company to raise prices.

As an automaker that depends on battery components from China, Tesla is also vulnerable to any escalation in U.S.-China trade tensions, especially given Trump’s history of imposing steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Higher import duties could not only increase Tesla’s production costs but also make its vehicles less competitive in global markets, further dampening demand.

Tesla’s stock, which has long been propped up by investors’ faith in Musk’s vision, now faces a more skeptical Wall Street. As analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities noted in a report, investors are beginning to question whether Musk’s political distractions have left Tesla without a clear strategic direction.

“A pivotal moment for Musk and Tesla.. autonomous, FSD, new cheaper EV models all coming on the horizon to drive demand…but this Musk/DOGE political firestorm needs to be contained for the Tesla brand. Investors need to see Musk lead Tesla at this key moment…the time has come,” he said.

Musk’s Political Rhetoric Pushes Tesla Toward a Branding Crisis

Beyond trade policy concerns, Tesla is grappling with an identity crisis, as Musk’s controversial political persona increasingly alienates traditional buyers. Since taking a leading role in the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, Musk has repeatedly used his platform to attack judges, amplify far-right conspiracy theories, and promote Kremlin-aligned narratives about Ukraine, drawing widespread condemnation.

Many former Tesla supporters, particularly those who embraced the brand for its climate-friendly innovation, are now distancing themselves due to Musk’s alignment with Trump, whose administration has rolled back environmental regulations and dismissed the urgency of climate change.

Musk’s increasingly combative stance on social media platform X has only worsened matters. His public clashes with critics, journalists, and even his own investors have further alienated key demographics, leading to a noticeable drop in consumer sentiment toward Tesla.

In a research note, Bank of America analysts highlighted that Tesla’s new vehicle sales in Europe plunged by 50% in January compared to the previous year, even as global electric vehicle sales grew by 21%. The sharp decline was attributed to a growing distaste for Musk’s politics, in addition to potential customers delaying purchases while awaiting the next-generation Model Y.

Despite Tesla’s struggles, the Model Y remained the best-selling battery electric vehicle globally in January, followed closely by China’s Geely Geome, which overtook the Model 3 sedan in sales. However, the trend suggests that competitors are steadily eating into Tesla’s market share as once-loyal customers explore alternatives.

Vandalism and Protests Target Tesla Facilities

As Musk leans further into politics, the backlash against Tesla is becoming more tangible. Across the United States and Europe, Tesla facilities have been targeted by protests, vandalism, and even arson attempts, underscoring the deepening divide between Musk and sections of the public.

In Loveland, Colorado, a Tesla service center has been attacked multiple times, with the latest incident occurring on March 7. Authorities have yet to identify the perpetrators, but the pattern of incidents suggests growing hostility toward the brand.

Speaking to CNBC, Ben Kallo, an analyst at Baird, warned that the rise in vandalism incidents could hurt Tesla’s bottom line, as customers may think twice about purchasing a vehicle that could be targeted in politically charged attacks.

“When people are worried that their Tesla might get vandalized or set on fire, even those who were previously indifferent to Musk’s politics might hesitate before buying one,” Kallo explained.

Musk’s Insouciance Isn’t Fading as Investors Prepare to Step In

For months, Musk has brushed off criticism, seemingly unfazed by Tesla’s stock decline and growing brand troubles. His nonchalant attitude has frustrated investors, many of whom have urged him to refocus on Tesla’s core business rather than engaging in politically charged battles.

However, as Tesla’s market cap continues to shrink, the pressure is building for investors to step in and demand changes. Institutional shareholders, including large investment funds and pension funds, have started raising concerns about Musk’s leadership and the direction of the company.

In a sign of growing tensions, Tesla board members have reportedly been in discussions about whether Musk should scale back his involvement in political affairs and devote more attention to stabilizing Tesla’s plummeting stock price. However, Musk has so far given no indication that he plans to change course.

Trump’s Public Show of Support for Tesla

Against the backdrop of Tesla’s stock freefall, President Trump sought to show solidarity with Musk on Tuesday, publicly stating that he planned to purchase a Tesla vehicle to demonstrate his support for the company.

While Trump’s backing could shore up support among conservative consumers, it may further alienate progressive and environmentally conscious buyers, deepening Tesla’s branding crisis. Political polarization has rarely benefited consumer brands, and analysts warn that Musk’s refusal to distance himself from Trump’s administration could ultimately cost Tesla more than it gains.

African Startups Secure $119M in February 2025, Bringing Year-to-Date Funding to $408M

0

According to a report by Africa: The Big Deal, in February 2025, African startups collectively raised $119 million in disclosed funding, reflecting a decline compared to previous years.

The number of $100k+ deals announced (38), was lower than the average of the past 12 months and previous February’s since 2021. Similarly, the total amount raised in February fell below the average of the last year and previous February’s since 2019.

However, a broader perspective highlights a more positive trend. Year-to-date funding in 2025 has reached $408 million, surpassing the $302 million recorded during the same period in 2024 and slightly exceeding the $400 million raised in 2021.

While the total number of $100k+ deals announced this year lags behind previous years, the number of $1M+ deals, 42 in total, aligns closely with 2023 (42) and 2024 (43) and remains significantly higher than the pre-heatwave levels recorded between 2019 and 2021 (20-31 deals).

The fintech and logistics sectors dominated February’s funding landscape, accounting for the seven largest deals, which collectively represented 80% of the total amount raised. This trend is consistent with 2024 funding patterns. The majority of these major deals took place in Africa’s “Big Four” markets which include Nigeria, Egypt, South Africa, and Kenya.

The largest funding round in February came from Gozem, a Togo-based ride-hailing startup, which secured $30 million through a combination of $15 million in equity and $15 million in debt financing. The company disclosed plans to use the funds to bolster its vehicle financing service and foray into new markets.

Other notable transactions included Egypt’s fintech startup Khazna raising $16 million. The company announced that the investment will support its expansion plans as it prepares to apply for a digital banking license in Egypt and expand into Saudi Arabia.

Also, Hakki Africa, a mobility fintech providing microfinance solutions for taxi drivers in Kenya, secured approximately $13 million in a fintech-mobility deal. The investment follows a Series B funding round in 2023, during which Hakki secured 1.58 billion yen (approximately $10.6 million). The company’s financing model seeks to address a longstanding challenge faced by taxi drivers in Africa?, which is access to affordable vehicle ownership.

Nigeria’s Raenest closed $11 Million Series A Funding Round Led by QED Investors. The funding round aims to expand Raenest’s operations in both local and international markets.

Additionally, Nigerian fintech firm Tether raised $3 million in a seed round alongside $7 million in debt financing, while Ghana’s Affinity secured $8 million. Egypt’s Taager, operating in logistics and transport, raised approximately $7 million in a pre-Series B round.

Recall that African startups raised $289M in January 2025 across 40 deals, reflecting a strong start to the year with a 240% increase over January 2024’s $85M. The $119M funds raised in February could suggest a dip from January but still a solid performance, consistent with growing investor confidence in African tech ecosystems.

Despite some declines in specific funding metrics, the broader outlook for African startup funding in 2025 remains strong, with continued investments in the fintech and logistics sector.

Looking Ahead

At $408M through two months, 2025 could hit $2.4B to $3B annually if the pace holds, surpassing 2024 but not 2022’s peak. The strong start contrasts with 2024’s cautious environment, where global venture capital tightened due to high interest rates and economic uncertainty.

Investors appear to be regaining confidence in African startups, possibly buoyed by proven resilience (e.g., $1 billion+ raised in 2024’s first seven months despite headwinds) and standout exits or unicorn births like Moniepoint and Tyme Group in 2024.

The Presidential Buy and Scoring an Own Goal for Tesla

0

First, I only buy stocks in the US during recessions and I know the sector I focus on. That sector is the first to be “bailed out” as the government relaxes all known rules to make the industry profitable, so that other sectors will come along. You can never go wrong, as for more than 50 years, all US governments have used one tool to fight recession, and that sector has always benefitted.

In Dec 2024, I sold all my positions after Trump returned. I am a Democrat and always think Reublications will find ways to crash the economy with a recession, natural luck, big tax cuts and the typical. So, as I write, I have zero US stocks. I hope we do not have a recession, but if it does happen, I will be greedy to bounce.

But as everything happens in this young Trump 2.0 Presidency, one person I do not understand anymore is Elon Musk. He sells a product named Tesla which mainly the liberals in America and Europe buy. But he goes after them daily. Does he think anyone in Alabama, West Virginia, etc cares to drive a Tesla? Without CA, MA, NY, MD, etc there may not be Tesla today. How? Those states offer generous tax rebates for EV cars and they fueled Tesla ascension as the only major EV producer in the US. California offered EV tax credits before the US government. In other words, CA gave Tesla “free” cash as it shaped buying decisions.

But Musk seems to always fight with these customers and their leaders. Get me right: when I see an own-goal, I know one even before the referee calls.  You see, what does this village boy know when billionaires are playing their games? You are correct: I do not understand how a man who owns Tesla will always fight with blue states. Sure, Trump wants to buy a new Tesla as the company’s valuation takes a heat: “President Donald Trump has pledged to buy a new Tesla vehicle to show his support for Elon Musk, as the electric carmaker struggles with a stock market crash, declining sales, and intensifying protests.”. A presidential buy could do the magic. Good luck, Elon.

After soaring for years, Tesla’s stock has tumbled over 50% from its recent highs, breaking away from the so-called “Musk trade” that’s lifted the billionaire’s other companies. While investors appear to be buying Elon Musk’s vision of robotaxis and artificial intelligence, analysts say Tesla shareholders are concerned about Musk “being spread too thin,” given his focus on cutting government spending, along with growing stigma around the brand. Tesla’s profits have plunged in several countries amid increased competition, particularly in China.

Trump Backs Musk, Promises to Buy Tesla Amid Stock Slump and Protests, But Critics Say The President’s Policies Hurt EVs

0

President Donald Trump has pledged to buy a new Tesla vehicle to show his support for Elon Musk, as the electric carmaker struggles with a stock market crash, declining sales, and intensifying protests.

“To Republicans, Conservatives, and all great Americans, Elon Musk is “putting it on the line” in order to help our Nation, and he is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! But the Radical Left Lunatics, as they often do, are trying to illegally and collusively boycott Tesla, one of the World’s great automakers, and Elon’s “baby,” in order to attack and do harm to Elon, and everything he stands for,” Trump said.

He added that “they tried to do it to me at the 2024 Presidential Ballot Box.”

“In any event, I’m going to buy a brand new Tesla tomorrow morning as a show of confidence and support for Elon Musk, a truly great American. Why should he be punished for putting his tremendous skills to work in order to help MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN???”

The announcement, made on Trump’s Truth Social platform on Tuesday, came amid what his allies have termed the “Tesla Takedown”, a reference to the growing demonstrations against Musk’s role in implementing massive cuts to the federal workforce under the Trump administration.

Trump’s endorsement of Tesla appeared to provide a temporary lift to the company’s stock, which rebounded 5% in premarket trading after suffering its worst single-day decline in over four years on Monday.

However, industry experts argue that while Trump’s symbolic gesture may help bolster Musk’s public image among conservative supporters, it does little to address the real challenges Tesla is facing. Many have pointed out that if Trump truly wanted to help Tesla and the broader electric vehicle (EV) industry, he would need to reverse his administration’s aggressive rollback of pro-green energy policies, which had been boosting EV sales under the previous administration.

Tesla, once a dominant force in the EV market, is experiencing an unprecedented period of turmoil, with its stock price, sales, and brand reputation all taking major hits. Musk’s increasingly controversial political activity, particularly his leadership of the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has alienated large portions of Tesla’s customer base and sparked a wave of anti-Tesla protests across the U.S.

Last week, 350 demonstrators gathered outside a Tesla showroom in Portland, Oregon, condemning Musk’s role in eliminating thousands of government jobs. Earlier this month, a Tesla dealership in New York City was the site of another demonstration, where nine people were arrested after tensions escalated. Protesters argue that Musk’s deep involvement in Trump’s efforts to dismantle federal agencies and reduce public sector employment is a direct betrayal of Tesla’s original image as a forward-thinking, progressive company.

The backlash has translated into declining consumer interest in Tesla, particularly in states and countries that have traditionally favored green energy policies. According to a report from Bank of America, Tesla’s vehicle sales in Europe plunged by 50% in January compared to the previous year. The report attributed the drop in part to growing unease over Musk’s politics, as well as delays in the release of a redesigned Model Y.

Trump defended Musk, saying the billionaire was “putting it on the line” to help the country and was doing a “fantastic” job. Musk responded on his own platform, X, thanking Trump for his endorsement.

Trump’s EV Policies Contradict His Support for Tesla

While Trump’s public embrace of Tesla and Musk has been celebrated by many of his supporters, it is believed that his administration’s aggressive rollback of pro-EV policies is actively harming the industry, including Tesla itself.

Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has dismantled nearly all of the Biden-era policies that were fueling EV adoption in the U.S.

Among the most damaging reversals are:

  • Eliminating federal EV tax credits: Under Biden, consumers could receive up to $7,500 in tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle. These incentives helped drive demand for Tesla and other EV brands. Trump’s decision to terminate these credits has made EVs less affordable, discouraging buyers.
  • Defunding EV charging infrastructure: The Biden administration had earmarked billions of dollars to expand the national EV charging network, making it easier for Americans to transition from gas-powered cars. Trump slashed this funding, significantly stunting infrastructure growth.
  • Rolling back emissions standards: Biden had imposed strict emission reduction targets that pushed automakers to prioritize EV production. Trump has reversed these regulations, allowing companies to slow down EV development and extend the lifespan of gasoline-powered vehicles.
  • Removing federal fleet EV mandates: The previous administration had committed to converting the entire federal vehicle fleet to electric cars, a move that would have resulted in major contracts for Tesla and other EV makers. Trump scrapped the plan, eliminating what could have been a lucrative revenue stream for the industry.

Industry analysts argue that while Trump’s symbolic support for Tesla may boost Musk’s morale, it cannot compensate for the material damage his policies are causing to the electric vehicle market.

Tesla’s stock has suffered a dramatic collapse since reaching its all-time high of $1.5 trillion in market capitalization on December 17, 2024. The company has now lost more than 50% of its value, erasing most of the gains it made following Musk-backed Trump’s electoral victory in November.

The decline has been fueled by a combination of falling sales, growing brand toxicity, and investor concerns that Musk’s political distractions are preventing him from properly managing Tesla.

On Monday, Tesla shares experienced their biggest single-day drop since September 2020, dragging the Nasdaq down nearly 4%, its worst decline in years. Analysts warn that unless Tesla can stabilize its business and repair its reputation, the company’s downward spiral may continue.

Nigerian Govt., NNPCL Dismiss Reports of Terminating Naira-Based Crude Supply Agreement with Dangote Refinery

0

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) has moved to dispel widespread speculation regarding the alleged termination of its naira-for-crude agreement with the Dangote Refinery and other local refineries.

The state-run oil company clarified that the deal was originally structured as a six-month agreement, subject to renewal and availability, and is set to expire at the end of March 2025.

The controversy arose following reports suggesting that NNPCL had abruptly ended the naira-based crude supply arrangement, effectively forcing Dangote Refinery and other local refiners to purchase crude in US dollars. The reports triggered concern among industry stakeholders and the public, given the potential impact on fuel prices and the already struggling naira.

In a statement issued on Monday, NNPCL’s Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Olufemi Soneye, addressed the matter, stating that discussions are ongoing to finalize a new supply agreement after the current one lapses. He reiterated that NNPCL remains committed to supporting domestic refining operations and that there has been no policy shift terminating local crude supply in naira.

“NNPCL has made over 48 million barrels of crude oil available to Dangote Refinery since October 2024 under this arrangement. In total, over 84 million barrels of crude oil have been supplied since the refinery commenced operations in 2023,” Soneye said.

He reaffirmed that NNPCL is fully committed to ensuring the supply of crude oil for local refining, based on mutually agreed terms and conditions, dismissing reports of a sudden disruption.

Federal Government Backs Naira-Based Crude Supply Policy

Amid the concerns raised by reports of the deal’s alleged termination, the Federal Government also reaffirmed its commitment to the naira-for-crude policy, clarifying that it has not been scrapped or reviewed for discontinuation.

In a separate statement on Monday, Zacch Adedeji, Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and head of the Technical Sub-Committee on Domestic Crude Supply addressed the controversy, stating that the policy remains intact.

According to Adedeji: “The policy framework enabling the sale of crude oil in naira for domestic refining remains in force. There has been no decision at the policy level to discontinue this approach, nor is it being considered. After implementing the policy for some months, evidence abounds that it is the right way to go, and it will continue to help the economy.”

He also emphasized that local refineries have not been excluded from the domestic crude supply, adding that the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) is ensuring full compliance with the Domestic Crude Oil Obligations (DCO) provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA).

Adedeji explained that the engagement process for crude allocation to local refineries remains in place and is governed by structured agreements that take into account factors such as availability, demand, and market conditions.

“There is no exclusion of local refineries from access to domestic crude. The Federal Government remains committed to ensuring the efficient execution of this initiative in line with its core objectives—enhancing local refining, reducing foreign exchange exposure, and stabilizing the domestic fuel supply,” he said.

Background of the Naira-for-Crude Policy

The naira-for-crude initiative was introduced in July 2024, when the Federal Executive Council (FEC) directed NNPCL to sell crude oil to Dangote Refinery and other local refiners in naira instead of US dollars.

This policy was introduced as part of broader efforts to:

  • Reduce Nigeria’s reliance on foreign exchange for crude purchases, thereby easing pressure on the country’s foreign reserves.
  • Stabilize domestic fuel prices, as the pricing of crude in naira would help shield Nigeria from the volatility of the international oil market.
  • Promote domestic refining capacity, ensuring that local refineries have priority access to crude without the constraints of forex shortages.

The initiative was seen as a bold move to strengthen Nigeria’s refining sector, particularly at a time when import dependence and foreign exchange scarcity were putting immense strain on the economy. The expectation was that by removing the need for local refiners to source dollars, the government could ease pressure on the naira while ensuring that refined petroleum products remain affordable for Nigerians.

The speculation that the policy had been scrapped sparked widespread alarm because of the potential economic fallout. If NNPCL were to suddenly halt crude sales to local refineries in naira, it would mean that refineries like Dangote would have to buy all crude on the international market in dollars. This would have severe consequences for fuel pricing and the already fragile naira exchange rate.

Removing the naira-based crude arrangement would increase pressure on Nigeria’s forex reserves, as refineries would require billions of dollars to purchase crude, further weakening the naira against the US dollar.

Analysts warn that if local refineries were forced to buy crude in dollars, they would have to pass the cost onto consumers, potentially leading to a sharp increase in the prices of petrol, diesel, and other refined products. Given the current economic challenges, such an outcome could further worsen inflation and worsen the cost-of-living crisis in Nigeria.