DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 21

South Korea Launches Probe after Authorities Lose over 340 BTC

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

In January 2026, the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office launched an internal investigation and audit after discovering that 320 BTC valued at around $28-29 million USD at the time, or about 40-41 billion KRW had been lost/stolen from custody.

This occurred during an internal handover process in August 2025, with indications it may have involved a phishing attack or other compromise while managing seized criminal assets. Prosecutors stated they would pursue recovery and potential criminal liability if wrongdoing is found.

More recently, Seoul’s Gangnam Police Station confirmed the loss of 22 BTC worth approximately 2.1 billion KRW or ~$1.6 million USD from evidence storage. These coins were voluntarily submitted in a 2021 investigation later suspended, and the disappearance was uncovered during a nationwide audit and inspection of seized virtual asset handling procedures triggered by the earlier Gwangju case.

An internal probe is underway to determine how the unauthorized transfer occurred, including possible insider involvement. The physical cold wallet remains in possession, but the BTC was transferred out. Adding these up (320 BTC + 22 BTC = 342 BTC), this closely matches the “over 340 BTC” figure across multiple cases/institutions (prosecutors and police).

These incidents have prompted broader scrutiny of how South Korean authorities secure and manage confiscated cryptocurrencies from criminal investigations, amid concerns over storage practices, phishing risks, and potential internal lapses.

Note that this is separate from the high-profile February 2026 Bithumb exchange incident, where a staff error caused ~620,000 BTC worth ~$40-44 billion to be accidentally credited to users in a promotion gone wrong (a “fat-finger” input of BTC instead of KRW).

That led to its own regulatory probe by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), on-site inspections, and industry-wide reviews—but it involved an exchange, not government authorities losing seized assets. These government-related losses highlight ongoing challenges in handling digital assets as evidence in South Korea, even as the country advances crypto regulations and legalization efforts.

Authorities have emphasized thorough investigations and recovery attempts in statements. The combined value at the time of discovery was roughly $30-48 million USD depending on exact BTC price fluctuations around January-February 2026, with BTC hovering near $66,000-$70,000.

These were seized criminal assets intended for potential forfeiture to the national treasury or victim restitution after convictions. Their loss represents a direct hit to public funds and investigative outcomes. Recovery efforts are ongoing, but success is uncertain due to the nature of transfers post-phishing or unauthorized access.

In one instance, funds were traced but remained unmoved in a wallet, complicating legal claims. The Gwangju case (320 BTC) stemmed from a phishing attack during an internal handover or routine inspection in mid-2025, where staff likely accessed a fake site, leaking credentials or private keys from a hardware wallet/USB storage.

The Gangnam Police case (22 BTC) involved unauthorized transfers from a cold wallet (physical device intact but compromised digitally), uncovered only during a nationwide audit triggered by the prior incident. The 2021 case had been suspended, delaying detection.

These highlight systemic issues: reliance on basic hardware storage without advanced multi-signature, institutional-grade security, air-gapped procedures, or automated monitoring. Even state agencies fall to common threats like social engineering and credential compromise.

Incidents undermine confidence in law enforcement and prosecutors’ ability to securely manage seized digital assets, especially as crypto seizures increase following Supreme Court rulings. If authorities can’t safeguard confiscated crypto, questions arise about protecting citizens’ assets in regulated environments or during enforcement actions.

Broader scrutiny of evidence handling could complicate future criminal cases involving crypto, potentially affecting convictions or asset forfeiture. These events have prompted nationwide audits of seized virtual asset procedures by police and prosecutors, likely leading to mandated upgrades; better training, multi-factor protocols, third-party custody solutions, or institutional wallets.

They coincide with South Korea’s push toward fuller crypto legalization and integration, lifting bans on public company crypto investments, recognizing blockchain securities, and advancing spot ETFs/stablecoins. Ironically, while exchanges face probes; government mishandling adds pressure for uniform standards across public and private sectors.

Potential acceleration of the Digital Asset Basic Act or related laws, emphasizing IT security for state-held crypto, AML compliance, and institutional custody best practices. Reinforces the mantra “Not your keys, not your coins” — even for governments. Centralized custody introduces single points of failure.

Highlights phishing as a persistent threat, even against sophisticated entities, underscoring needs for education, hardware isolation, and behavioral safeguards. In a country with high crypto adoption, these lapses could fuel calls for self-custody advocacy or offshore shifts if domestic handling appears unreliable.

While not catastrophic in scale compared to private sector incidents, these cases serve as a wake-up call for institutional crypto management in South Korea. They expose gaps at a pivotal time when the nation is formalizing digital asset rules, likely driving reforms to prevent recurrence and restore credibility. Authorities have emphasized thorough probes, recovery attempts, and accountability.

U.S and Taiwan Have Finalized and Signed the Reciprocal Trade Agreement 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The United States and Taiwan finalized and signed the U.S.-Taiwan Agreement on Reciprocal Trade often referred to as a reciprocal trade agreement.

This deal, negotiated under President Donald Trump administration, reduces U.S. tariffs on most Taiwanese imports including key exports like semiconductors to a maximum of 15%. This is down from higher rates initially imposed or proposed such as 20% in some earlier frameworks or up to 32% in discussions, and it aligns Taiwan’s tariff treatment with that of other key U.S. partners in the region like Japan and South Korea.

U.S. side: Applies a 15% cap; combining most-favored-nation rates plus any reciprocal adjustments on originating Taiwanese goods. It also provides preferential treatment for Taiwanese semiconductors and related products under Section 232 investigations (national security tariffs on chips and equipment), with exemptions or lower rates tied to investments in U.S. production.

Taiwan side: Commits to eliminating or reducing 99% of its tariff barriers on U.S. goods, granting preferential market access for American exports including automobiles, auto parts, beef, pork, dairy, wheat, pharmaceuticals, machinery, chemicals, and agricultural products. Some specific tariffs on certain pork products drop but may not go to zero immediately.

Taiwan plans to purchase significantly more U.S. goods from 2025–2029, including around $44.4 billion in liquefied natural gas and crude oil, $15.2 billion in civil aircraft and engines, and $25.2 billion in power equipment, generators, marine equipment, and related items; totaling roughly $85 billion in some reports.

Taiwanese companies led by firms like TSMC pledge major investments in U.S. high-tech sectors (semiconductors, AI, energy), with figures cited around $250 billion in direct investment plus government credit guarantees for additional amounts. This supports U.S. “reshoring” of chip manufacturing and supply chain resilience.

The agreement builds on a January 2026 framework/MOU and aims to address the large U.S. trade deficit with Taiwan (driven heavily by chips), deepen high-tech cooperation, and strengthen economic ties amid geopolitical dynamics with China. The deal was signed under the auspices of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO), as the U.S. does not have formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

It requires approval by Taiwan’s legislature where opposition holds a majority, and some pushback has been noted. U.S. officials, including Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, highlighted it as advancing “America First” trade while boosting mutual prosperity and national security.

This is viewed as a win for Taiwan’s export competitiveness and U.S. efforts to secure supply chains and increase exports to Asia. Markets and analysts have noted it as part of broader Trump-era reciprocal trade deals.

Taiwan’s commitments open its market to U.S. autos, pharmaceuticals, beef, pork, dairy, wheat, chemicals, machinery, and more, while removing non-tariff barriers. The $85 billion procurement pledge including $44.4 billion in LNG/crude oil, $15.2 billion in aircraft/engines, and $25.2 billion in power/marine equipment directly supports American farmers, energy producers, manufacturers, and high-tech sectors.

This helps address the ~$127 billion U.S. trade deficit with Taiwan (driven by chips). Massive Taiwanese investments accelerate “massive reshoring” of chip production, creating high-paying U.S. jobs and “world-class” industrial parks.

This reduces reliance on overseas supply chains, enhances domestic AI/energy/tech capacity, and mitigates risks from disruptions. The 15% cap aligns Taiwan with partners like Japan/South Korea, providing predictability for U.S. importers while advancing “America First” reciprocal trade.

The tariff reduction to 15%; non-stacking with most-favored-nation rates levels the playing field against competitors, shielding key exports especially semiconductors from higher duties or Section 232 national security tariffs. Exemptions/preferential treatment for chips reward U.S. investments.

While opening to U.S. goods increases competition domestically, it fosters two-way investment and strengthens high-tech ties. Heavy U.S. investment commitments could shift production abroad, raising concerns about “hollowing out” Taiwan’s semiconductor edge. The deal requires legislative approval in Taiwan, where opposition may push back.

Sales of Heavy Truck Particularly Class 8 Decline Significantly 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Heavy truck sales particularly Class 8, which includes the largest commercial trucks have been declining significantly, and this metric has historically served as a leading indicator for economic slowdowns or recessions.

However, as of February 2026, the signal is mixed—while sales remain weak overall, recent order data shows some signs of stabilization or modest recovery, and the broader economy hasn’t yet tipped into recession based on available indicators.

Heavy truck sales often measured as retail sales of heavy-weight trucks are considered a forward-looking gauge because businesses invest in new trucks when they expect strong freight demand, manufacturing activity, and economic expansion. Declines often precede recessions as companies cut back on capital spending amid weakening demand.Since the late 1970s, sharp drops in heavy truck sales have coincided with most U.S. recessions.

There have been a few false positives—episodes of declining sales that didn’t lead to recession—but a sustained collapse is generally viewed as a concern. Recent analyses from 2025 into early 2026 have highlighted this, with some sources noting drops of 20-30%+ year-over-year in 2025 as a potential warning sign.

Commercial truck sales including heavy-duty/Class 8 fell sharply. Total commercial truck sales dropped about 13.6% year-over-year, with heavy-duty down ~13.3% and medium-duty ~13.9%. Some reports cited steeper declines in certain quarters; 20-30% for heavy trucks from major manufacturers, or even 30%+ in specific periods.

This contributed to recession fears, especially as sales hit multi-year lows. Forecasts for Class 8 sales in 2026 point to further weakness; one outlook estimates ~171,000 units, an 18% drop from 2025 levels. However, early 2026 data shows nuance: January 2026 Class 8 net orders rose ~20-27% year-over-year to around 30,800-32,500 units, marking consecutive months of y/y gains—the first such streak in a while.

This is tempered: Orders fell sequentially from December 2025 highs, and cumulative orders for the early 2026 season remain down ~13% y/y. Analysts attribute recent upticks more to deferred replacement demand, tariff clarity, and some economic momentum rather than a full cyclical rebound.

Heavy truck sales (SAAR) were around 0.459 million units in January 2026 (seasonally adjusted), with some monthly figures showing fluctuations but overall softness compared to prior peaks. Freight market conditions remain challenged, but some optimism exists for gradual improvement in 2026 due to factors like AI-driven growth or potential policy shifts.

It’s a valid concern but not definitive yet. The prolonged decline through 2025 aligns with historical patterns that have preceded downturns, and sources continue to flag it as a red flag amid other signals. However: The economy showed resilience in late 2025 (strong GDP growth in some quarters).

Recent order rebounds suggest fleets may be responding to stabilization rather than anticipating collapse. Not all past truck sales drops led to recession—context like overcapacity cycles in trucking or post-pandemic distortions matter.

Declining heavy truck sales remain a noteworthy warning sign that bears watching closely, especially if weakness persists through 2026. But early 2026 indicators hint at possible bottoming or cautious optimism rather than an imminent recession trigger. Broader data will be key to confirm any downturn.

The heavy truck weakness no longer screams “imminent recession” as definitively as in late 2025, given order stabilization and resilient GDP/consumer data. However, downside risks persist—tariffs raising costs, geopolitical uncertainty, fragile freight recovery, and macro headwinds could prolong softness or tip into broader slowdown if demand doesn’t firm.

Most outlooks lean toward sluggish growth rather than outright recession in the near term, but the sector remains a key watchpoint. In essence, the implications have shifted from a strong recession foreshadowing to a prolonged industry drag with tentative green shoots.

If orders sustain y/y gains and freight rates/pricing improve meaningfully through spring 2026, it could support a “soft landing” scenario; persistent weakness would heighten recession concerns.

Bitcoin Could Crash to $50,000 – Standard Chartered Issues Warning

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Major investment bank Standard Chartered has delivered one of the more sobering near-term outlooks for the cryptocurrency market in recent months.

In a recent commentary shared by reporter Bloomberg, Geoff Kendrick, the bank’s Head of Digital Assets Research, now anticipates Bitcoin sliding to around $50,000 and Ethereum (ETH) dropping toward $1,400 in the coming months

This prediction represents roughly 26% further downside for BTC and 29% for ETH from mid-February 2026 levels where BTC hovered near $67,000 and ETH near $1,950–$2,000.

The global thought leader on digital assets attributed the potential downturn to a softening U.S. economy, declining holdings in digital asset ETFs, and delayed expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts until at least June, all of which continue to weigh on crypto markets.

The bearish short-term call comes amid persistent ETF outflows (nearing $8 billion in cumulative redemptions in some reports), softening U.S. economic signals, and the continued delay of meaningful Federal Reserve rate cuts (now not expected until potentially June or later).

After a brief period of optimism that saw Bitcoin price stabilize trading above $72,000, after falling as low as $59,847 earlier this month, the world’s largest cryptocurrency has resumed its downward trajectory, reflecting a sharp shift in investor sentiment.

Bitcoin is down 23% year-to-date and approximately 40% off its late-2025 peak. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has fallen into single digits (Extreme Fear territory). Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF flows remain net negative in recent weeks, with daily outflows occasionally exceeding $400 million.

With Bitcoin consolidating between the $66,000 and $67,000 zone, several analysts note that Bitcoin’s recent price structure reflects a market still dominated by distribution pressure rather than sustained demand recovery.

Standard Chartered has now revised its end-of-2026 price targets downward for the second time since late 2025. The bank has reduced it Bitcoin price projection ti $100,000 (previously $150,000; originally $300,000 in earlier 2025 forecasts. Also, its price for Ethereum was reduced to $4,000, previously $7,500.

Similar cuts were applied to several altcoins:

– Solana (SOL) ? $135 (from $250)

– BNB ? $1,050 (from $1,755)

– Avalanche (AVAX) ? $18 (from $100)

– XRP ? $2.80 (from $8.00 in some prior views)

Despite the cuts, the bank insists its long-term constructive view remains intact. It continues to project Bitcoin reaching $500,000, Ethereum $40,000, and Solana $2,000 by the end of 2030.

Kendrick highlighted several reinforcing factors for near-term weakness:

1. ETF investor behavior — Many recent buyers are sitting on unrealized losses and appear more inclined to reduce exposure than to “buy the dip.”

2. Macro headwinds — U.S. economic softening and delayed monetary easing remove a key tailwind that crypto had enjoyed in previous cycles.

3. Deleveraging underway — Open interest has declined, and the current correction — while painful — is described as more “orderly” than the chaotic crashes of 2018 or 2022.

Once a bottom is established around the projected levels, Kendrick expects a recovery phase through the second half of 2026, eventually carrying major assets toward the revised year-end targets.

While some traders view the $50,000 region as strong historical support (previous cycle highs and institutional cost-basis zones), others warn that capitulation selling could briefly overshoot if ETF redemptions accelerate or if broader equity markets weaken further.

Outlook

Standard Chartered’s latest note is a clear reminder that  even in a maturing asset class crypto remains highly sensitive to macro liquidity conditions and institutional flows. Whether Bitcoin holds above $50,000 or tests lower will likely depend on the pace of ETF selling and any surprise shifts in Fed rhetoric over the next 1–3 months.

The bank’s outlook comes at a time when Bitcoin has been navigating heightened volatility, with investors weighing institutional inflows against tightening financial conditions and global economic uncertainty.

Russia Considering a Return to Using USD for International Settlements 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Russia is considering a return to using the US dollar in international settlements as part of a proposed wide-ranging economic partnership with the United States under President Donald Trump’s administration.

This stems from an internal Kremlin memo reviewed and reported by Bloomberg. The document outlines several areas of potential US-Russia economic alignment, potentially tied to a broader deal that could include ending or resolving aspects of the Ukraine conflict.

Russia’s proposed return to the dollar settlement system, which could extend to energy transactions; a major reversal of Moscow’s multi-year push toward de-dollarization and alternatives like the ruble, yuan, or BRICS mechanisms.

Joint ventures in oil, LNG, and offshore/hard-to-recover reserves, allowing US firms to recover prior losses. Cooperation on critical raw materials like lithium, copper, nickel, platinum. Long-term aviation contracts and potential US involvement in Russian manufacturing.

Preferential access for US companies to the Russian consumer market. Collaboration on nuclear energy including AI-related ventures. Joint promotion of fossil fuels over low-emission policies seen as favoring China and Europe.

The memo argues that re-embracing the dollar would help Russia expand its foreign exchange market, reduce balance-of-payments volatility, and stabilize its economy—benefits that would require lifting Western sanctions and restoring access to dollar-based systems like SWIFT.

This represents a dramatic policy shift for Russia, which has aggressively pursued de-dollarization since 2022 sanctions like shifting trade with China and others to national currencies, building BRICS alternatives. A pivot back could slow global de-dollarization momentum, reinforce the dollar’s dominance, and impact markets; recent reports noted sharp drops in gold and silver prices on the news, as it undercuts narratives around dollar alternatives and inflation hedges.

However, this is still at the proposal stage—an internal pitch, not a finalized agreement. It would depend on major concessions (sanctions relief, Ukraine-related deals), and reactions vary: Some view it as tactical leverage or bargaining in US-Russia talks.

Others note Russia’s deepening ties with China make a full pivot unlikely without significant incentives. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has commented that the dollar remains attractive if not “weaponized,” but Russia hasn’t formally abandoned alternatives.

BRICS de-dollarization efforts remain a key ongoing initiative among the bloc’s members (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, plus expanded partners like Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia), aimed at reducing reliance on the US dollar in international trade, reserves, and payments.

This is driven by concerns over US sanctions, dollar “weaponization,” geopolitical tensions, and the desire for greater financial sovereignty in a multipolar world. De-dollarization has made tangible but gradual progress, particularly in intra-BRICS trade: Local currency settlements now account for 60-67% of BRICS trade overall, with even higher figures in specific bilateral pairs.

BRICS nations are actively reducing dollar reserves down from ~58.2% in 2024 to ~56.92% in early 2026 across the group.
Central banks especially in BRICS+ have accelerated gold purchases, breaching the 5,000-tonne milestone in annual global buying in recent years, with gold increasingly viewed as a neutral reserve asset to hedge against dollar exposure.

Russia, China, and India conduct much of their energy and commodity trade without dollars, and similar patterns exist with Brazil and others. However, progress is uneven and faces challenges: No unified BRICS currency exists yet (a common one remains a “distant dream” per analysts).

Efforts focus on practical alternatives like linking national central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) — e.g., India’s digital rupee, China’s digital yuan, Russia’s digital ruble — for interoperable cross-border payments. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed formally linking BRICS CBDCs to simplify trade and tourism, potentially on the agenda for the 2026 BRICS Summit (hosted by India).

Projects like BRICS Bridge (a blockchain-based payment system), mBridge (for CBDC settlements), and experimental “BRICS Unit” (a settlement unit backed ~40% by gold and 60% by member currencies) are in pilot or early stages. The New Development Bank (NDB) has ramped up loans in local currencies.

Impact of Recent Russia-US Developments

The February 2026 Bloomberg-reported Kremlin memo proposing Russia’s return to dollar settlements including for energy in a potential Trump-era deal has sparked debate. This could include sanctions relief, SWIFT access, and US involvement in Russian energy/minerals.

It represents a potential tactical shift for Russia to diversify away from over-reliance on China/yuan and stabilize its economy.
Analysts note it would slow de-dollarization momentum but not end it — China, India, and others continue pushing alternatives independently. Over 60% of BRICS trade is already in local currencies; a Russian pivot might stall broader bloc unity but wouldn’t reverse existing bilateral non-dollar flows.

Market reactions reflect short-term narrative shifts, but structural trends like gold hoarding and CBDC links persist. Some view Russia’s proposal as leverage in US talks possibly tied to Ukraine resolution rather than a full abandonment of BRICS.

The dollar remains dominant globally still ~58-60% of reserves, per various metrics, bolstered by network effects, deep markets, and lack of viable full alternatives. De-dollarization is more about diversification and risk reduction than outright replacement — a gradual “multipolar” shift rather than collapse.

Challenges include coordination hurdles, convertible currency limits, political risks and internal BRICS differences. 2026 could be pivotal with India’s BRICS presidency and summit focusing on payment interoperability, but experts see no imminent “BRICS currency shock.”

BRICS efforts are accelerating in targeted areas (local currencies, gold, digital systems) but remain incremental and resilient to setbacks like potential Russian realignment. The process is chipping away at dollar hegemony without fully dismantling it yet.

1...202122...8,219Page 21 of 8,219

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy