DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 24

Michael Saylor’s New Secret Sauce isn’t just MSTR Common Stock Anymore — it’s STRC

0

STRC; ticker for Strategy’s “Stretch” perpetual preferred stock is designed as a high-yield, low-volatility income product — often described by the company as a “short-duration high-yield credit” or Bitcoin-backed “money market equivalent.”

Its yield mechanics revolve around a variable dividend rate that’s adjusted monthly to target price stability near $100 par value. STRC has no maturity date; it’s perpetual preferred stock. Strategy isn’t obligated to redeem or buy it back at any fixed time.

Currently set at 11.50%, based on the $100 stated amount. This rate applies to the par value, not the trading price. Dividends are paid monthly in cash for March 2026, the monthly payout is roughly $0.9583 per share, or 11.50% / 12. The next payout is scheduled for March 31, 2026.

Strategy’s board sets the rate each month “in its sole and absolute discretion,” with the explicit goal of encouraging trading around $100 and minimizing price volatility.If STRC trades significantly below $100 due to market pressure or reduced demand, the company typically increases the rate to make it more attractive ? boosting demand ? pulling the price back toward par.

On March 1, 2026, Strategy hiked it by 25 basis points from 11.25% to 11.50% — the seventh increase since launch in July 2025 — amid MSTR/common stock weakness and BTC drawdowns. Downward adjustments are possible but restricted; can’t drop more than ~25 bps + SOFR changes from the prior period, can’t go below one-month SOFR, and only if prior dividends are fully paid.

The stated annualized rate is 11.50% at par. If trading slightly away from $100 current price ~$99.83, the effective yield becomes ~11.52% higher if below par, lower if above. This is what income-focused investors actually earn. Strategy uses proceeds from selling STRC shares via ATM programs or direct issuances to buy more Bitcoin. The growing BTC treasury indirectly “backs” the dividends though not a hard collateral like a stablecoin.

Higher BTC value ? stronger balance sheet ? more confidence in paying/sustaining high yields ? more STRC demand ? more capital to buy BTC. It’s a self-reinforcing loop, turning traditional yield-seeking capital into relentless BTC accumulation.

Dividends are not guaranteed — declared by the board out of legally available funds. If missed, they accumulate cumulatively with compounding and must be paid before common dividends. Unlike stablecoins, there’s no redemption mechanism or FDIC insurance. Price can deviate; dipped to ~$97 in late 2025, though adjustments aim to pull it back.

Seniority — Preferred over common stock (MSTR) for dividends/liquidation, but junior to debt. Tax note — Some dividends have been treated as non-taxable return of capital for certain U.S. holders depends on your situation; check with a tax advisor. 30-day historical volatility is low ~2.3–2.4%, far below MSTR’s wild swings.

In short: STRC’s yield isn’t fixed like traditional preferreds — it’s a dynamic tool Strategy tunes monthly to keep the price anchored at ~$100 while delivering juicy ~11.5% payouts. This appeals to yield-hungry investors who want BTC exposure without direct crypto ownership or MSTR’s equity rollercoaster.

The recent hikes show it’s responsive to market conditions to maintain that stability. Saylor’s new secret sauce isn’t just MSTR common stock anymore — it’s STRC, a high-yield preferred equity product nicknamed “Stretch.” It trades on Nasdaq, pays a variable monthly dividend currently ~11.5% yield, and is designed to stay pinned near its $100 par value.

Think of it as a Bitcoin-backed “money market equivalent” for fixed-income investors who want juicy yields without touching actual crypto or stablecoins. Roughly $1.1 billion of last week’s purchase came from STRC sales, with the rest from MSTR stock.

This isn’t a one-off — STRC has been exploding in volume, with analysts estimating it alone funded thousands of BTC in single-day bursts recently. Saylor’s essentially built a flywheel: sell STRC to yield-hungry institutions ? buy more BTC ? back the yield with the growing treasury.

Boris Johnson Describes Bitcoin as a Ponzi Scheme 

1

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson recently described Bitcoin as a “giant Ponzi scheme” in a March 2026 opinion column published in the Daily Mail.

In the piece (titled along the lines of expressing his long-held suspicion and reinforced by recent “tales of woe”), Johnson argued that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin rely primarily on a continuous influx of new, optimistic investors to sustain their value, lacking intrinsic backing comparable to assets like gold or even collectibles such as Pokémon cards.

He shared an anecdote about a friend or acquaintance in his village who reportedly lost around £20,000 after falling for a scam involving repeated “fees” tied to a supposed Bitcoin investment, which he used to illustrate broader risks and his view that the system resembles a classic confidence-based scheme.

Michael Saylor countered that Bitcoin fundamentally differs from a Ponzi scheme, as it has no central issuer, no promoter promising returns, and no mechanism paying early participants with later investors’ funds — instead, it’s a decentralized network driven by open-source code, market demand, and voluntary participation.

Other figures like Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, Blockstream’s Adam Back, and various Bitcoiners echoed similar points, emphasizing Bitcoin’s fixed supply (21 million cap), transparency via blockchain, and lack of centralized control. Some responses turned ironic or critical toward Johnson himself.

Noting his time in office involved economic turbulence; the 2022 mini-budget crisis that spiked UK borrowing costs and weakened the pound or accusing fiat and debt-based systems including the UK’s of resembling Ponzi dynamics more closely.

The statement sparked widespread discussion online, with many in the Bitcoin space treating it as classic “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, doubt) — and some even joking it’s a contrarian buy signal, especially as Bitcoin prices hovered in the low-to-mid $70,000s around that time without collapsing.

Johnson’s view isn’t new in political or traditional finance circles — similar criticisms date back years from figures like Jamie Dimon or central bankers — but coming from a high-profile ex-leader in 2026 highlights ongoing tensions between legacy institutions and decentralized assets.

Bitcoin, of course, has weathered such claims repeatedly while growing in adoption and market cap. Bitcoin is not a ponzi scheme, even though critics like Boris Johnson have labeled it one. The comparison often arises from Bitcoin’s price appreciation driven by growing adoption and the fact that early holders benefit disproportionately when new buyers enter.

However, this surface-level similarity breaks down when examining the actual definition and mechanics of a Ponzi scheme versus Bitcoin’s structure. According to standard definitions from the U.S. SEC and Investopedia, a Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud with these core characteristics: A central operator or promoter who controls the operation.

Promised and guaranteed high returns with little or no risk. Returns to earlier investors are paid directly using money from newer investors, rather than from legitimate profits or underlying economic activity. The scheme is inherently unsustainable and collapses when recruitment of new participants slows or stops, as there is no real value generation.

It relies on deception and secrecy about how “profits” are generated. Classic examples include Charles Ponzi’s 1920s stamp scheme or Bernie Madoff’s fraud. Bitcoin fails to meet any of these defining traits :No central operator or promoter. Bitcoin has no CEO, company, or single controlling entity promising anything.

It is an open-source, decentralized protocol running on thousands of independent nodes worldwide. No one “runs” Bitcoin or collects fees to pay others. As Michael Saylor responded directly to Johnson’s claim: “A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones. Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand.”

No promised or guaranteed returns. Bitcoin never promises profits, yields, or interest. Its price is determined purely by supply and demand in a global, transparent market. Buyers know upfront that the value can go to zero. There are no “investment contracts” or promotional claims of fixed returns.

No redistribution of new money to pay old investors. In a Ponzi, new inflows are funneled to pay out earlier participants; creating the illusion of profit. Bitcoin has no such mechanism—there is no central pool paying anyone. When you buy Bitcoin, you purchase it directly from a seller on an exchange or peer-to-peer.

The seller gets your fiat; you get the Bitcoin. Price rises occur because more people want to hold it (demand increases) relative to its fixed supply, not because new money is secretly rerouted to old holders. Every Bitcoin transaction is recorded on a public blockchain, verifiable by anyone.

The code is open-source and has been scrutinized for 17 years. There is no hidden “backend” promising fake profits. It can function without constant new inflows. While adoption helps drive value through network effects, Bitcoin does not collapse if new buyers slow down. It has survived multiple multi-year bear markets where inflows dropped dramatically, yet the network continued operating securely.

Miners are rewarded through new issuance (halving every ~4 years) and transaction fees, but this is algorithmic and capped—not dependent on recruiting people. Fixed, predictable supply creates scarcity unlike infinite fiat printing or Ponzi promises. Bitcoin has a hard cap of 21 million coins, enforced by code.

This scarcity is a core property that drives demand as a potential store of value—similar to gold or rare art—rather than relying on endless recruitment. Early buyers of Amazon stock or gold in the 2000s benefited hugely from later demand. It’s not fraud; it’s market dynamics.

“It’s a greater fool trade” ? Possibly in speculative short-term trading, but Bitcoin’s long-term thesis is monetary utility (sound money, censorship resistance, portable value), not endless recruitment. Scams exist in crypto ? Many fraudulent projects, rug pulls, and centralized schemes are Ponzi-like, but Bitcoin itself is distinct—the base-layer protocol is not one of them.

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital asset with voluntary participation, transparent rules, and no fraudulent promises or central redistribution. Calling it a Ponzi ignores these structural differences and applies the term too loosely. Whether one believes in its long-term value is a separate debate—but structurally, it is not a Ponzi scheme.

Paolo Ardoino Teases Major Development Highlighting Expansion of Tether’s Broader Strategy 

0

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino recently teased a major development, stating that the company’s AI team will release a “true breakthrough” this coming week.

This announcement has generated significant buzz in the crypto and tech communities, as Tether—primarily known as the issuer of the dominant stablecoin USDT (with a market cap around $145 billion)—continues expanding aggressively into areas beyond stablecoins, using profits from its core business to fund these ventures.

The tease is closely tied to QVAC; QuantumVerse Automatic Computer, Tether’s decentralized AI platform under its Tether Data division. QVAC focuses on: Fully local, on-device AI that runs without reliance on centralized cloud services (no Big Tech dependency).

Privacy-preserving models trained on massive synthetic datasets, recent expansions to 148 billion tokens. Peer-to-peer networks for inference and agent operations. Tools like QVAC Workbench recently updated to version 0.4.1 with UI overhauls, better mobile support, and features for local experimentation.

Recent updates include open-source frameworks for fine-tuning large language models on consumer hardware; even smartphones or modest laptops, and demonstrations of fully local AI assistants handling complex tasks. Speculation around the “true breakthrough” includes possibilities like: A major upgrade or full release of the QVAC assistant/agent framework.

Advanced on-device models or edge-optimized inference. Deeper integration of AI agents with USDT payments for autonomous, decentralized transactions. This fits Tether’s broader strategy to challenge centralized AI providers and build uncensorable, open-source intelligence infrastructure.

The company has reported over $10 billion in profits largely from U.S. Treasury holdings to fuel investments in AI, health tech, brain-computer interfaces, and more. No official details or confirmation of the exact release have dropped yet so it’s still in the teaser phase—classic crypto hype style.

The community is watching closely, with many viewing it as a step toward making USDT the go-to currency for AI-driven economies or agents. QVAC Workbench is Tether’s free, cross-platform consumer app designed as your entry point to fully local, privacy-first AI experimentation and usage.

It lets you run powerful open-source AI models directly on your device; phone, laptop, or desktop without any cloud dependency, data sharing, or external APIs—everything stays encrypted and owned by you. The app is available on Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it one of the most accessible tools for on-device AI.

It’s still labeled as alpha/early-stage but it already packs practical features that set it apart from many local AI setups. Run AI models natively on your hardware for complete offline capability and maximum privacy—no data ever leaves your device.

Comes pre-configured with popular open-source models, including: Llama series. Upload or point to your local documents; PDFs, text files, expanded format support in recent updates, and query them privately. The AI processes and retrieves from your files without sending anything externally.

A standout feature: your mobile app can offload heavy computation to a more powerful desktop and laptop instance of Workbench over a local P2P connection. All data remains private and never hits the internet. Recent updates improved status indicators and model selection for this.

Instances on different devices can communicate and sync conversations and settings peer-to-peer, so your chats and projects aren’t siloed. Built-in speech features leveraging models like Whisper for hands-free interaction.

Group conversations into projects, manage threaded chats, and organize experiments cleanly. Adjust inference parameters, prompt engineering, model configurations, and delete individual models to manage storage. Recent versions added a redesigned, simpler UI focused on ease-of-use, plus mobile performance fixes.

Support for vision models; doubled performance in late 2025 updates, enabling image understanding and processing locally. Connect to local tools and third-party apps like Asana demos shown by Paolo Ardoino for agent-like workflows—all running locally. QVAC Workbench serves as the user-facing showcase for Tether’s broader QVAC vision.

A decentralized, P2P-native AI framework that runs on consumer hardware, avoids Big Tech clouds, and aims for uncensorable, self-sovereign intelligence. It’s powered by massive synthetic datasets like Genesis I/II (up to 148B tokens, STEM-focused) and ties into future SDKs for building custom local AI apps.

It’s evolving rapidly—v0.4.1 brought UI overhauls, better RAG, and delegated inference polish—with Paolo Ardoino teasing even bigger “true breakthrough” updates this week.

Wall Street Journal Highlights How Traders are Using Hyperliquid to Trade Oil Futures

0

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently published an article highlighting how traders are using the decentralized crypto exchange Hyperliquid to trade oil futures specifically perpetual contracts tracking West Texas Intermediate crude on a 24/7 basis.

The piece, titled “The Hottest New Crypto Trade Is 24/7 Oil Futures,” discusses this amid escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East including U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran, which caused traditional futures markets like the CME to close over weekends while volatility surged. Key points from the WSJ coverage include: Hyperliquid’s oil perpetual futures allow continuous trading without expiration or downtime, enabling price discovery even when conventional markets are offline.

For example, on a Saturday evening about 20 hours before mainstream markets reopened, WTI perpetuals on Hyperliquid jumped to around $96 per barrel, compared to the prior Friday close of $90.90 on regular futures.

Cumulative trading volume for these oil contracts exploded from $339 million on February 28, 2026, to $7.3 billion by March 12 or 13, 2026 depending on exact tracking. This reflects a broader trend where crypto platforms are becoming venues for macro asset speculation, especially during off-hours or crises, with high leverage amplifying both gains and risks.

The article frames Hyperliquid’s oil perps as a glimpse into a future where traditional and digital finance converge, allowing any asset to trade anytime. This story gained traction in crypto communities, with X users noting Hyperliquid’s mainstream media mentions as a sign of growing legitimacy for on-chain derivatives trading.

Hyperliquid has positioned itself as a “house of all finance” through features like its HIP-3 permissionless markets, which have seen oil become one of the top-traded assets sometimes surpassing Ether in volume during peaks. Note that U.S. residents currently cannot access Hyperliquid directly, per the reporting.

Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 markets refer to permissionless perpetual futures markets enabled by Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3 (HIP-3), also known as “Builder-Deployed Perpetuals.” This upgrade, activated on mainnet in October 2025, marks a major step toward decentralizing market listings on Hyperliquid.

Traditionally, adding new perpetual futures contracts on centralized or semi-centralized exchanges requires approval from the platform team. HIP-3 changes this by making the process fully permissionless on Hyperliquid’s core infrastructure (HyperCore), which handles high-performance on-chain order books, margining, liquidations, funding rates, and settlement.

Builders (deployers) can now launch their own perpetual markets — or even dedicated “perp DEXs” — without centralized gatekeeping. This allows trading of virtually any asset class as perpetual futures, including exotic or niche ones that centralized venues might not support quickly (or at all).

To deploy, a builder must stake a significant amount of HYPE tokens; Hyperliquid’s native token as collateral and bond. This acts as a spam deterrent and security mechanism with potential slashing for bad behavior. The exact threshold has been reported as 500,000 HYPE in most sources roughly $15–25M+ depending on HYPE price at deployment time.

Qualified deployers can launch markets directly on HyperCore. Early adopters often get a limited number of free markets, after which additional slots may involve a Dutch auction process bidding in HYPE every ~31 hours to secure them. The builder defines key parameters like oracle sources for price feeds, leverage limits, contract specs, and potentially custom fees.

They earn a share of trading fees often ~50% split with the protocol in many cases, aligning incentives to promote healthy, liquid markets. For users, HIP-3 markets trade seamlessly via Hyperliquid’s unified API and interface — same order books, margin system, discounts, and 24/7 availability as native markets.

However, they carry a disclaimer: independent deployment means potentially higher risks like lower liquidity, volatility, or incomplete oracle setups. Later enhancements like “HIP-3 Growth Mode” allow deployers to slash taker fees dramatically e.g., 90%+ reductions to as low as ~0.0015–0.009% on new markets to bootstrap liquidity.

HIP-3 has driven explosive growth in non-crypto asset trading on Hyperliquid. It enables markets for: Commodities. Traditional finance assets. Bonds, pre-IPOs, or even novelty items. Open interest in HIP-3 markets has hit records; $1.2B+ reported in early 2026, with volumes sometimes rivaling or exceeding native crypto perps during hype cycles.

It positions Hyperliquid as a “house of all finance” — infrastructure where anyone can permissionlessly create and monetize derivatives markets. HIP-3 turns Hyperliquid from a single DEX into modular, community-driven derivatives infrastructure — democratizing access to perpetuals for any asset imaginable, while leveraging the chain’s speed and on-chain transparency.

Africa’s Startup Ecosystem Settles Into a Steady Funding Growth Phase

0

After years of dramatic highs and sharp pullbacks, Africa’s startup ecosystem is entering a more measured and stable phase of growth. Funding levels, once fueled by global liquidity and rapid investor expansion, have now found a steadier rhythm, signaling a shift from hyper-growth to sustainability.

A recent report by Africa: The Big Deal, stated that startup funding across Africa has settled into a new phase of stability following years of volatility, signaling a maturing ecosystem after the dramatic highs and lows of the past half-decade.

After the funding level accelerated rapidly from mid-2021 and peaked at approximately $6.3 billion between July 2021 and June 2022, it declined sharply through 2023. This period marked a peak in investor enthusiasm, driven by a combination of global liquidity, growing interest in African tech innovations, and a wave of high-profile startup successes across fintech, e-commerce, and healthtech sectors.

However, the exuberance of this period proved difficult to sustain. Throughout 2023, the ecosystem experienced a sharp correction, with funding activity steadily declining as investors became more cautious amid economic uncertainties, global market volatility, and rising interest rates. By the period of July 2023 to June 2024, total startup funding had fallen to around $2 billion, representing a significant reduction from the previous peak.

Notably, since mid-2025, the market has found a steady rhythm. From August 2025 onward, 12-month rolling funding has hovered consistently around $3.1 billion, fluctuating within a narrow band of roughly $90 million. This level of stability is rare in the post-2020 period, with only a brief plateau in late 2022 offering a similar pattern before funding resumed its decline.

Importantly, this stability extends beyond total funding volumes. The number of startups raising significant rounds has also remained consistent. Ventures securing $1 million or more have stabilized at around 211 deals, while those raising $10 million or more stand at approximately 65 deals. These figures have remained largely unchanged since mid-2024, indicating a balanced and predictable investment environment.

A key structural shift underpinning this new equilibrium is the growing role of debt financing. Prior to the funding boom, Africa’s startup ecosystem was heavily equity-driven. Today, debt accounts for roughly 39% of total funding.

Since August 2025, equity funding has averaged about $1.8 billion, while debt financing contributes around $1.2 billion. This diversification reflects increasing sophistication in capital structures and a broader range of financing options available to founders.

At the early stage, however, there are signs of tightening. The volume of deals in the $100,000 to $1 million range has declined compared to peak years. Yet this contraction is not isolated to smaller deals alone.

The reduction in early-stage activity mirrors a proportional decline in larger funding rounds, suggesting a systemic slowdown rather than a collapse at the base of the ecosystem.

Outlook

If this current stable phase of growth represents Africa’s new trajectory, the ecosystem faces a critical test. Sustained growth will depend on its ability to continuously fund and nurture early-stage startups, ensuring a steady pipeline of ventures that can scale into larger deals over time.

Without another surge akin to the 2021–2022 heatwave, the focus will shift toward efficiency, capital discipline, and long-term value creation. The increasing role of debt and the consistency in deal activity suggest a more resilient and mature market.