DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 27

Bitcoin ETFs Break 4 Days Streak with $117M Net Inflows, as Bitcoin Keeps Exhibiting Two-Phase Reaction on Global Escalations

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Bitcoin ETFs break 4 day outflow streak with $117M of net inflows” refers to recent data from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs.

The funds recorded approximately $116.67 million to $117 million in net inflows sources vary slightly on the exact figure, often rounded to $117M, snapping a four-day streak of outflows that totaled over $1.3 billion in withdrawals from January 6–9.

This marked a return to positive territory after challenging sessions, with outflows peaking at around $486 million on January 7. Fidelity’s FBTC was a major driver of the inflows on January 12, contributing significantly around $111–126 million in some breakdowns.

Other funds like BlackRock’s IBIT showed mixed but overall supportive activity in the rebound. This shift signaled renewed institutional interest amid Bitcoin’s price volatility early in 2026, following heavier redemptions likely tied to year-end adjustments and market consolidation.

Note that flows have been highly volatile since the start of the year: Strong inflows kicked off January e.g., $471M on Jan 2, $697M on Jan 5. Then a pullback with the mentioned outflow streak. More recently as of mid-January 2026, flows turned strongly positive again in subsequent days, with much larger inflows reported e.g., hundreds of millions to over $800M on some dates, pushing Bitcoin toward highs near $97K+ and cumulative ETF inflows climbing further.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs continue to serve as a key barometer for institutional sentiment, with cumulative net inflows since launch now well over $58 billion and total assets under management exceeding $120–128 billion depending on the latest snapshots.

This rebound highlights the resilient demand for Bitcoin exposure through regulated vehicles despite short-term swings.

Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) played a pivotal role in snapping the recent 4-day outflow streak for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, recording the largest single-day inflow on January 12, 2026.

According to data from trackers like SoSoValue widely cited in reports, FBTC saw approximately $111.75 million in net inflows on that date. This accounted for the vast majority of the total ~$116.67 million net inflows across all spot Bitcoin ETFs, effectively driving the rebound after cumulative outflows exceeded $1.3 billion from January 6–9 with FBTC itself contributing heavily to those redemptions earlier in the week.

Key breakdown for FBTC on January 12, 2026: Daily net inflow: ~$111.75 million equivalent to roughly 1,220 BTC added, based on prevailing prices around that time. This represented a strong reversal for the fund, which had faced significant pressure in the prior sessions, outflows in the hundreds of millions during the streak, including notable redemptions on January 7–8.

Cumulative net inflows since launch: Approximately $11.83 billion at that point. Net assets under management (AUM): Around $18.19 billion post-inflow. Trading volume for FBTC that day: ~$316 million, with the ETF’s share price gaining about 1.40%.

FBTC’s inflow dominated the session, while other major funds showed mixed results, BlackRock’s IBIT experienced outflows of ~$70 million or so in some reports, offsetting part of the total positive figure. This highlighted Fidelity’s strong appeal among investors seeking Bitcoin exposure, often attributed to its low 0.25% fee, robust platform integration, and retail/institutional accessibility.

The rebound aligned with Bitcoin’s price stabilization and recovery momentum early in 2026, following year-end adjustments and consolidation. For more granular historical daily flows on FBTC including the full January 2026 volatility, reliable sources include: Farside Investors— Provides real-time daily tables in USD millions.

Flows remain highly dynamic—e.g., subsequent days in mid-January showed continued positive momentum in some sessions—but FBTC’s January 12 performance was the standout contributor to ending that specific outflow streak.

Bitcoin Typically Exhibits a Two-phase Reaction on Global Escalations

If fears of World War 3 or major global escalation spike, Bitcoin tends to exhibit a two-phase reaction based on historical patterns from geopolitical crises like Russia-Ukraine invasion in 2022, Israel-Hamas/Israel-Iran tensions in 2023–2025, and recent US-Iran escalations in early 2026.

Bitcoin typically behaves like a high-beta risk asset during the initial shock and liquidity crunch: Markets sell off uncertainty first ? risk assets (stocks, crypto) get hit hard as investors seek immediate cash or traditional safe havens.

In past episodes, Bitcoin has dropped significantly in the early days/hours e.g., 8–16% dips during specific escalations in 2024–2025, or broader volatility tied to macro fallout like rate hikes after the 2022 Ukraine invasion, which contributed to a ~65% crash over months.

As of early 2026 show Bitcoin dipping during peak tension but often rebounding quickly when macro conditions stabilize e.g., surging above $95,000 amid US-Iran fears combined with easing inflation.

In a true WW3-scale event (direct major-power conflict), the initial phase would likely see even steeper declines due to global deleveraging, internet and power disruptions in affected regions, or flight to ultra-safe assets like physical gold and cash.

Academic studies and analyses reinforce this: cryptocurrencies show higher volatility and weaker hedging properties against geopolitical risk compared to gold, USD, or oil in extreme conditions.

Potential Rise as “Digital Gold”

If the conflict drags on, Bitcoin can shift toward its portable, censorship-resistant narrative and act more like a hedge: Capital controls, sanctions, currency devaluation, or fragmented finance increase demand for borderless, non-seizable assets.

In regions with hyperinflation fears, banking restrictions, or evasion needs e.g., parts of the world during Ukraine sanctions, Bitcoin sees usage spikes. Historical data shows Bitcoin often posting positive average returns ~31% in 50 days post-major geopolitical events since 2010, per some analyses.

In prolonged scenarios with easier money (central bank stimulus to counter recession/war costs) or fragmented global rails, Bitcoin rebounds strongly and can outperform as a “non-sovereign store of value.” Recent 2025–2026 patterns, Bitcoin rallies during Middle East escalations suggest growing acceptance as a geopolitical hedge, especially with institutional adoption like ETFs, and corporate treasuries.

Gold typically outperforms in pure fear phases —more stable safe haven, while Bitcoin acts as a complement rather than direct substitute — it can decouple and rally later if policy supports risk assets.

Bitcoin likely crashes first but has a credible shot at becoming “digital gold” in the aftermath — especially if the scenario involves prolonged uncertainty, monetary debasement to fund war, sanctions, or capital flight rather than total infrastructure collapse e.g., nuclear doomsday, where most assets including Bitcoin become irrelevant.

Ethereum likely crashes or drops sharply first in a geopolitics spike— risk-off liquidity hit, often amplified vs. Bitcoin, but has solid potential to recover and perform as a “digital utility/hedge” in the medium term — particularly if the scenario involves sanctions, capital controls, inflation, or decentralized demand rather than total collapse. It’s more volatile and ecosystem-dependent than Bitcoin, so resilience depends on broader crypto adoption trends.

In extreme WW3 scenarios, portfolio survival trumps speculation — but history shows crypto (including ETH) often rebounds when fragmentation favors non-sovereign assets.

This isn’t guaranteed — Bitcoin remains more volatile than traditional havens — but evidence from real crises shows resilience and eventual upside in fragmented, inflationary environments. In a full-scale WW3 nightmare, survival trumps portfolio performance anyway.

Silver Price at $90 Shows its Edge as a Safe Haven Asset

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Silver’s been on an absolute tear lately. As of today the spot price is hovering around $90–$91 per ounce, with recent quotes from major sources like Kitco ($90.65–$90.90 bid/ask), APMEX ($91.47), JM Bullion ~$91.54, and others in that ballpark.

It’s pulled back a bit today, down roughly 2–3% in early trading, but that’s after smashing through fresh all-time highs earlier this week. It did surge over $88 and even hit above $92 at peaks in the last few days—marking new record territory beyond the old 1980 inflation-unadjusted highs and the more recent 2011 peak.

The run has been explosive: silver’s up massively year-over-year around 190–195% in many trackers, driven by a combo of factors like: Strong industrial demand (solar, EVs, AI/electronics, clean energy tech). Persistent supply constraints and multi-year market deficits.

Safe-haven buying amid geopolitical tensions, fiscal concerns, and macro uncertainty. Broader precious metals momentum (gold’s also near records, but silver’s often more volatile/amplified). It’s been quite the rally since breaking out in late 2025.

The dip today might tie into profit-taking, some tariff-related news easing like Trump holding off on certain critical mineral moves, or general volatility—but the underlying drivers still look supportive for many analysts.

Silver’s industrial demand has become the dominant force in its market—typically accounting for 50-60% of total annual consumption around 59% in recent data from 2025. Unlike gold, which is mostly investment-driven, silver’s price and availability are increasingly tied to real-world manufacturing and tech applications, where its unmatched electrical and thermal conductivity— the highest of any metal makes it hard to replace.

This demand has hit record highs in recent years, with industrial fabrication reaching about 680.5 million ounces in 2024, a new all-time high, up 4% year-over-year and projections for continued strength into 2025-2026, even with some short-term fluctuations from high prices prompting “thrifting” reducing silver per unit.

The key drivers fueling this growth are tied to the global energy transition, electrification, and digital/tech expansion. Silver paste is used in conductive layers on solar cells for efficient electricity collection—each panel typically requires 15-25 grams of silver.

This sector has exploded: PV silver demand rose from ~11% of industrial use in 2014 to 29% in 2024, with installations growing massively especially in China, Europe, and the US. Global solar capacity has surged over 10x in the last decade, and forecasts show solar becoming the top renewable source by 2030 (IEA projects strong CAGR in new capacity).

Despite “thrifting” (tech advances cutting silver per panel, e.g., in some 2025 forecasts leading to flat or slightly lower demand temporarily), overall volume keeps rising due to sheer scale—some estimates see PV consuming 10,000–14,000 tonnes ~320-450 million ounces annually by 2030.

It’s largely price-inelastic: governments and companies push renewables hard, even at higher silver costs. EVs use significantly more silver than traditional internal combustion engine vehicles—often 67-79% more up to ~1-2 ounces per car in wiring, sensors, power modules, batteries, and electronics.

Demand grows from vehicle production + charging infrastructure, stations need high-conductivity components. Global automotive silver demand is forecast to rise at a 3.4% CAGR through 2031, with EVs overtaking ICE vehicles as the main source by 2027 projected to account for ~59% of auto silver use by then.

Broader vehicle tech like sensors, autonomous features, infotainment adds more. Silver’s conductivity shines in high-performance electronics: switches, contacts, conductors in phones, tablets, wearables, 5G networks, and power management.

AI/data centers are a rising factor—massive power needs require efficient electrical components and thermal management; global IT power capacity has grown ~53x since 2000. Grid upgrades for renewables (transmission lines, smart grids) boost demand.

Electrical and electronics overall has grown ~51% since 2016, often the largest sub-sector. Ethylene oxide (EO) catalysts for chemicals though slower growth recently. Brazing alloys, medical devices, and more minor applications.

High silver prices like the current run over $88/oz can slow some growth via thrifting/substitution or economic caution, but structural trends in clean energy and tech make demand resilient and growing long-term. Analysts from the Silver Institute and others see industrial use expanding through 2030, contributing to persistent market deficits demand outpacing supply for years.

This “non-negotiable” industrial floor—less cyclical than investment demand—helps explain silver’s explosive run. If you’re watching the metal, these drivers are why many see sustained upside despite volatility.

Polygon Acquisition of Coinme and Sequence Builds on its Stablecoin Rail

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Polygon Labs has acquired Coinme and Sequence in a major deal announced on January 13, 2026. The transactions, valued at more than $250 million combined, position Polygon to become a regulated U.S. payments platform focused on stablecoin-based transactions and global money movement.

Key Details of the Acquisition

Coinme, a crypto payments firm known for its bitcoin ATMs via partnerships like Coinstar and fiat-to-crypto on/off-ramps. It holds money transmitter licenses in 48 U.S. states, serves over 1 million users, and operates in more than 50,000 retail locations. Coinme will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Polygon Labs after regulatory approvals, with the deal expected to close in Q2 2026.

Sequence, a wallet infrastructure and developer tools provider offering enterprise smart wallets, cross-chain orchestration via its Trails platform for 1-click transfers, and intents-based routing. It supports networks like Polygon, Arbitrum, Immutable, and others, with backers including Coinbase, Polychain, and Ubisoft. This deal is expected to close in January 2026 potentially already or imminently.

These acquisitions form core components of Polygon’s Open Money Stack launched and announced around early 2026, an integrated, open platform combining. Regulated fiat on/off-ramps from Coinme Wallet infrastructure and cross-chain payment flows from Sequence. Polygon’s high-throughput blockchain rails for settlement.

The goal is seamless, compliant bridging between traditional finance and on-chain systems, enabling instant global payments, lower fees, and programmable money use cases for banks, fintechs, remittances, merchants.

Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron described payments as the “killer use case” and the aim to become a regulated U.S. payments player. Co-founder Sandeep Nailwal called it a “reverse Stripe” strategy—building on existing blockchain infrastructure while adding regulated fiat access to compete with traditional fintech giants like Stripe which has made its own crypto acquisitions.

Combined, the entities have processed over $1 billion in off-chain sales and $2 trillion in on-chain value transfers. Polygon reported ~$3.3 billion in on-chain stablecoin supply at the end of 2025 (a 3-year high), and the moves target unlocking >$100 million in annual revenue from fees and scaled adoption.

This marks Polygon’s shift from primarily a low-cost Ethereum scaling solution to a vertically integrated, revenue-focused payments company emphasizing real-world utility amid growing stablecoin demand boosted by U.S. regulatory progress like the 2025 GENIUS Act.

The announcement aligns closely with your statement—Polygon is leveraging these buys to establish itself as a regulated U.S. payments platform via stablecoins and compliant infrastructure.

The Open Money Stack is Polygon’s ambitious vision and integrated infrastructure platform, designed to make money movement instant, reliable, global, borderless, and programmable—essentially turning stablecoins and on-chain assets into seamless, everyday money.

At its core, it’s an open, modular, vertically integrated stack of services and technologies that bridges traditional finance (TradFi) with blockchain rails.

The goal is to move “all money onchain,” where funds flow like information on the internet: fast (seconds instead of days), cheap (fractions of traditional fees), always available (24/7, no banking hours), and productive (idle funds can earn yield automatically via on-chain opportunities like staking or lending).

Why Polygon is Building This

Traditional global payments suffer from high costs, delays e.g., wire transfers take days with correspondent banking, intermediaries, and friction. Stablecoins solve much of this on-chain, but the ecosystem has been fragmented: poor fiat access, complex wallets, cross-chain hassles, and compliance gaps.

Polygon aims to fix that by providing a single, developer-friendly integration point for banks, fintechs, remittance providers, merchants, enterprises, and payout platforms. It’s positioned as a “reverse Stripe” strategy—starting from blockchain infrastructure and adding regulated fiat layers, rather than the other way around.

The stack combines several layers for end-to-end money movement: Blockchain Rails ? Polygon’s high-throughput chain (fast settlement, low fees, ~$3.3B+ stablecoin supply as of late 2025, >$2T in historical on-chain value transferred). Fiat On/Off-Ramps ? Licensed access to convert cash/fiat to/from stablecoins (physical cash via retail networks and digital fiat).

Wallet Infrastructure ? Enterprise-grade smart wallets for seamless, secure management, embedded wallets, recovery options, one-tap sending. Tools for 1-click transfers across networks (hides bridging, swaps, gas fees; uses intents-based routing so money reaches its destination automatically).

Money transmitter licenses and frameworks for regulated operations especially in the U.S.. Programmable features like on-chain identity for KYC/compliance and automatic yield on holdings so money “works” instead of sitting idle. Interoperability ? Powered by tech like AggLayer, making chains feel unified/invisible to users.

These components abstract complexity—users don’t need to understand chains, bridges, or wallets; it just works like modern fintech apps.

The January 2026 acquisitions of Coinme for regulated U.S. fiat on/off-ramps in 48 states, physical cash-to-crypto via 50,000+ locations like Coinstar kiosks, serving 1M+ users and Sequence for smart wallet infrastructure and cross-chain orchestration via Trails for 1-click intents-based transfers are foundational.

They deliver three core pillars: fiat ramps, wallets, and orchestration. Combined deals >$250M; they enable compliant, real-world bridging to on-chain settlement. Together with Polygon, these entities have handled >$1B off-chain sales and >$2T on-chain transfers.

Instant global payments/remittances, lower fees, funds earn yield by default, seamless UX (one-tap, recoverable wallets). For Businesses and institutions ? Real-time settlements, reduced correspondent banking risks, predictable costs, easy integration for payments/lending/remittances.

Unlocks programmable money e.g., automated payouts, tokenized assets, supports stablecoin adoption as real settlement layers. The stack is rolling out in phases, early access for design partners via Polygon’s site. It’s a shift for Polygon from pure scaling solution to a revenue-focused, regulated payments player amid growing stablecoin momentum.

In short, Open Money Stack aims to make on-chain money as easy and ubiquitous as the internet made information—borderless, instant, and always productive. If you’re building in payments, fintech, or stablecoins, it’s worth watching closely.

CZ Binance Joins Genius Terminal as a Strategic Advisor

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder of Binance, has joined Genius Trading also known as Genius Terminal as an advisor following a significant investment from YZi Labs, his family office along with co-founder Yi He, spun out from Binance Labs.

YZi Labs made a “multi-8-figure” investment well above $10 million, described in some reports as tens of millions in Genius Trading, a privacy-focused, self-custodial on-chain trading terminal.

The platform aggregates spot trading, perpetual contracts, and copy trading across multiple blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and others, aiming to provide CEX-like speed and privacy while remaining fully decentralized and non-custodial.

It positions itself as an “on-chain alternative to Binance,” addressing issues like information leakage for large traders through features like “Ghost Orders” splitting trades across wallets for reduced traceability and cross-chain execution without bridging.

Genius previously raised about $7 million including a $6 million seed in 2024 led by CMCC Global, with investors like Balaji Srinivasan and Anthony Scaramucci. The new funding and CZ’s involvement are accelerating development, with a public beta for its privacy layer planned for Q2 2026 and a full public launch later in the year.

Early users can earn “GP” points through trading volume, swaps, referrals, and daily activities potentially for a future airdrop, and there are competitions with cash prizes. CZ has clarified that Genius is a trading terminal connecting to perp DEXs not a direct competitor to projects like Aster.

Separately, CoinGecko, the popular independent crypto market data platform, is reportedly exploring a potential sale. It has engaged investment bank Moelis to advise on the process, which began late last year. Sources indicate a target valuation of around $500 million, though it’s early stages and no final figure is set—CoinGecko hasn’t publicly confirmed.

This comes amid booming crypto M&A disclosed deals hit ~$8.6 billion across 133 transactions in 2025 and challenges for data platforms, including declining web traffic as users shift to AI tools for info— CoinGecko’s monthly visits dropped sharply from 2024 levels.

It draws comparisons to Binance’s ~$400 million acquisition of rival CoinMarketCap in 2020. These developments highlight ongoing consolidation and investment in crypto infrastructure—privacy-focused DeFi tools on one side, and valuable data assets on the other. The crypto space is moving fast in 2026.

Ghost Orders is the flagship privacy feature of Genius Trading also called Genius Terminal or Genius Pro, a cross-chain, self-custodial on-chain trading terminal.

It addresses a core pain point in decentralized trading: on public blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and others, large trades are fully visible in the mempool or on explorers. This transparency often leads to front-running bots or MEV searchers jumping ahead to profit from your intent, slippage from market impact, or copy-trading/sniping of strategies by others watching whale wallets.

Ghost Orders use advanced techniques—primarily Multi-Party Computation (MPC) combined with smart, user-directed order splitting—to execute large or sensitive trades discreetly while keeping everything non-custodial (you always control your keys) and auditable on-chain.

Key mechanics include: Splitting large orders across multiple wallets up to 500 or more, user-managed or orchestrated clusters. Instead of one whale wallet broadcasting a massive buy and sell, the trade fragments into many smaller, seemingly unrelated transactions executed simultaneously.

MPC orchestration coordinates these splits securely without any single party including Genius seeing the full picture or holding funds. This hides concentration of supply and positions and obfuscates the trader’s overall intent and strategy.

Temporary wallet groups/clusters are created for the execution, allowing complex strategies e.g., spot, perps, cross-chain to run across chains without bridging or exposing links between addresses. The result: trades appear as normal, smaller activity on-chain or even “invisible” in some descriptions for certain networks like Solana/BNB/ETH, reducing signal leakage while maintaining cryptographic verifiability and full auditability.

This creates CEX-like privacy where orders aren’t public until filled in a fully decentralized setup—no custody, no relayers holding assets, and protection from common on-chain exploits like sandwich attacks or MEV extraction on your flow. Reduces front-running and slippage for large positions.

Protects strategies from being copied or countered in real time. Works across 10+ chains (Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, etc.) with aggregated liquidity from 300+ DEXs and perps. Fully compliant with on-chain transparency rules—trades remain verifiable, but intent is masked.

It’s positioned as a key differentiator for professional/whale traders who want DeFi’s self-custody and settlement but hate the “information leakage” of public chains. The platform backed by YZi Labs and with CZ as advisor emphasizes this as critical infrastructure for scaling on-chain trading privacy.

This is based on public announcements and reports around the January 2026 funding news—details may evolve as the privacy layer rolls out fully. Genius clarifies it’s a unified terminal connecting to perp DEXs, so Ghost Orders enhance execution across existing venues.

If you’re trading there, early volume especially swaps earns Genius Points (GP) toward potential future rewards.

Senate Markup on CLARITY Act Delayed for Agriculture Committee Version 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The Senate markup on the crypto market structure bill often referred to in connection with frameworks like the CLARITY Act or building on prior FIT21 legislation has been delayed for the Senate Agriculture Committee version.

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) announced on January 12-13, 2026, that the planned markup—originally aligned with the Senate Banking Committee’s session on January 15—has been postponed to the last week of January.

This is to allow more time for bipartisan negotiations to finalize remaining details and secure broad support. Key sticking points include treatment of decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoin yield/rewards where banks have lobbied against competitive yields on stablecoins to protect deposits, and clarifying jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

The Senate Banking Committee chaired by Tim Scott, R-SC had been on track for its markup on January 15, but recent developments show pushback: Coinbase withdrew support from the latest draft citing issues like restrictions on stablecoin rewards and other provisions seen as worse than the status quo, leading to reports of postponement or cancellation of that session as well, with negotiations continuing.

This legislation aims to provide long-sought regulatory clarity for digital assets, dividing oversight like spot crypto markets under CFTC as commodities, securities under SEC, building on prior laws like the GENIUS Act for stablecoins. However, intense lobbying from banks concerned about deposit flight if stablecoins offer yields and crypto advocates has complicated progress.

Over 100+ amendments were proposed in some drafts, highlighting ongoing debates.The delay reflects efforts to avoid a rushed or partisan outcome that could stall the bill entirely, especially with midterms approaching. If both committees advance reconciled versions later in January, it could move toward a full Senate floor vote relatively soon—but timing remains fluid amid these negotiations.

Crypto markets have shown volatility in response, with some assets reacting to the uncertainty. The treatment of DeFi (decentralized finance) in the ongoing Senate crypto market structure bill—often referred to as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act—is one of the most debated and unresolved aspects.

As of mid-January 2026, the bill remains in negotiation and markup delays pushed to the last week of January for the Senate Agriculture Committee, with the Banking Committee markup also postponed amid pushback, largely due to concerns around DeFi provisions, among other issues like stablecoin yields.

Core Approach to DeFi

The drafts from both Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees, reconciling elements of the House CLARITY Act aim to integrate DeFi into a formal regulatory perimeter without stifling genuine decentralization. This is a shift from the current enforcement-heavy status quo, where the SEC has often pursued DeFi protocols under securities laws if they involve investment-like elements.

Key elements include: Protections for developers and non-custodial activities — A major focus is shielding software developers, open-source contributors, and infrastructure participants from automatic classification as regulated intermediaries. Activities like:Writing/publishing/maintaining code

Running nodes or validating transactions. Operating non-custodial user interfaces/front-ends. Providing liquidity pools without custody/control. Developing wallets or decentralized messaging systems. These do not, by themselves, trigger registration or full compliance obligations under SEC/CFTC rules, provided the person does not custody user funds, exercise control over assets, or act as a centralized counterparty.

This draws from concepts in prior bills like FIT21 and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, emphasizing that code publication or protocol maintenance ? financial intermediation. Focus on identifiable intermediaries — Obligations target centralized or application-layer service providers, front-ends with significant influence, or entities exercising “control or sufficient influence” over protocols.

Truly decentralized protocols avoid broad burdens. BSA/AML compliance pathway — The bill directs the U.S. Treasury in coordination with SEC/CFTC to develop tailored rules for how DeFi platforms/protocols comply with Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money laundering (AML) requirements.

This is a first for statutory recognition of decentralized environments, avoiding outright bans but requiring feasible compliance via front-ends or identifiable operators rather than imposing impossible rules on pure code. SEC/Treasury rulemaking on DeFi — Agencies are instructed to clarify obligations for DeFi trading protocols, including securities law applicability, disclosures, and recordkeeping.

This promotes “responsible DeFi innovation” through studies, voluntary cybersecurity programs, and calibrated rules rather than defaults to enforcement. DeFi remains highly contentious: Groups like Coinbase argue some drafts impose overly restrictive rules on tokenized assets or protocol governance, potentially worse than the status quo by chilling innovation or creating compliance impossibilities for decentralized systems.

Banking/traditional finance concerns — Fears of regulatory arbitrage, where DeFi could enable less-regulated trading of tokenized securities or facilitate illicit finance. Over 100+ up to 137 reported amendments circulated, many targeting DeFi language.

Senators like Cynthia Lummis and Pete Ricketts pushed pro-DeFi revisions for developer protections; others from Democrats sought stronger controls on “influence” or illicit finance risks. No full safe harbor yet — Unlike narrower exclusions in some drafts, there’s no blanket immunity—enforcement for fraud/manipulation remains, and “decentralized” status may involve subjective tests.

Why the Delay Matters for DeFi

The postponement to late January gives more time for bipartisan tweaks to balance innovation protecting open-source DeFi with protections (AML, investor safeguards). If reconciled versions advance, DeFi could gain clearer boundaries, shifting from SEC enforcement actions to predictable rulemaking.

But if compromises fail, too much Treasury/SEC discretion, it risks stalling the bill or weakening pro-DeFi elements. This framework, if passed, would represent one of the most explicit U.S. legislative efforts to address DeFi directly.

1...262728...8,085Page 27 of 8,085

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy