DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 27

Crypto Momentum Is Weak, Yet Ozak AI Rockets Forward — Investors Say It’s Becoming the Sector’s Strongest Outlier

0

The major cryptocurrencies are having difficulty regaining their momentum, and the cryptocurrency market is bearish. One project is rising, indicating a positive trend in the cryptocurrency market, while the majority of cryptocurrencies are slowing down and declining. During the bear market, Ozak AI, an early-stage token in its presale phase, is displaying enormous presale funding. Ozak AI’s presale is growing more quickly than before, making it one of the year’s top emerging AI-based tokens despite the market’s general weakness. Ozak AI has strong presale momentum and advanced AI utility, making it one of the strongest AI-based tokens of the year, according to analysts. There are many AI tokens on the market that are based just on hype, but Ozak AI is not among them.

Presale Momentum: The Clearest Sign Ozak AI Is Breaking Away From the Market Trend

Ozak AI’s Presale Phase is one of the most talked-about Crypto events in the market. The Token has raised over $5.73 million, nearing the $6 million milestone. Over 1.095 billion OZ tokens have been sold so far. Even in the bearish market, the early-stage token is gaining massive momentum, and this massive pre-sale funding is very rare to see nowadays in the market. Currently, the token is priced at $0.014 in its 7th pre-sale phase. The token has grown 14x from the initial launch phase, which was launched at $0.001. Pre-sale growth shows how the token is gaining massive growth momentum in a short period of time, making the token one of the top emerging AI-based tokens. While the overall market is down, Ozak AI is experiencing massive growth potential, showing how investors are entering the early age of the Ozak AI token rather than staying in stable cryptocurrencies.

AI Is the Only Sector Still Growing, And Ozak AI Is at the Center of It

The AI adoption is accelerating across every major Blockchain. AI-based tokens are showing positive momentum in the bearish markets. Ozak AI is leading the list, as it is backed by the Strong Advanced AI utility, not just the hype. The Ozak AI’s core technology combines cutting-edge predictive models, real-time data streaming, and a decentralized infrastructure (DePIN) into one powerful ecosystem. While most of the AI tokens run on centralized servers, Ozak AI’s Advanced AI technology has the Decentralized Infrastructure (DePIN), which is a 3-layer decentralized network comprising the AI layer, Data Layer, and OSN Layer. The Data Layer is an IPFS-based encrypted storage for secure financial data and OSN layer nodes that bring in real-time on-chain and off-chain data. The AI layer runs AI calculations on GPUs for predicting prices. This makes Ozak AI censorship-resistant, faster during heavy loads, more secure, and fully decentralized. This makes Ozak AI censorship-resistant, more secure, Fully Decentralized, and faster during high loads.

Strategic Partnerships Strengthen Ozak AI’s Position

Collaborating with Gremory AI and IQ Wiki, Ozak AI proves that it is making its ecosystem stronger. Partnering with IQ Wiki, which is one of the biggest blockchain encyclopedias, brings every project detail from the auditing to its technology and tokenomics details. Partnering with Gremory AI, which is a Solana liquidity engine, helps to relocate liquidity across DLMM pools like Metera before the market prediction is done by the Ozak AI.

Market Momentum Is Weak, But Ozak AI Is Showing the Opposite Trend

The major altcoins and Bitcoin are struggling under the macro pressure. Liquidity is thinning, and fear levels are increasing in the market. But Ozak AI is showing the exact opposite, providing the massive Presale success, Whale accumulation increases, More buyers entering despite the poor market conditions, rapid Presale Sellouts, Real AI utility, and increasing community growth, showing Ozak AI is emerging as the strong outlier of 2026.

Conclusion: When the Market Weakens, True Outliers Emerge and Ozak AI Is One of Them

While Ozak AI is moving in the opposite direction and indicating positive momentum, the majority of cryptocurrencies follow market trends. The Ozak AI is one of the strongest outliers of 2026 because of its tremendous Presale momentum, Real AI utility, strategic partnerships, enormous ROI potential, and strength even during market weakness. The early investors who participated in the presale phase would profit greatly if the token keeps up its momentum.

 

For more information about Ozak AI, visit the links below:

Website: https://ozak.ai/

Twitter/X: https://x.com/OzakAGI

Telegram: https://t.me/OzakAGI

From Investable to Indispensable Again: How China Defied Investor Fears and Delivered Outsized Returns in 2025

0

At the beginning of 2025, China looked like the global market almost everyone wanted to avoid. The investment case appeared broken on multiple fronts at once. A protectionist Trump administration was returning to Washington with renewed threats of tariffs and technology controls. China’s property sector, long the backbone of household wealth and local government finances, was still wobbling under the weight of unfinished projects and debt-laden developers. A possible U.S. ban on TikTok threatened to gut ByteDance, one of China’s most valuable technology champions.

Meanwhile, American firms seemed to be sprinting ahead in artificial intelligence, raising fears that China was permanently losing ground in the most strategically important industry of the next decade.

Twelve months later, the story looks very different. China did not just stabilize. It delivered one of the strongest equity rebounds anywhere in the world, rewarding investors who stayed put and embarrassing those who exited at the height of pessimism.

The turnaround was not driven by a single catalyst, but by a series of developments that collectively defied the prevailing narrative. Beijing, under pressure to restore confidence, leaned decisively into economic support. Fiscal stimulus, easier financial conditions, and a clear signal that authorities would not allow markets to spiral further helped calm nerves.

Listed companies responded with a surge in share buybacks, effectively stepping in where foreign investors had retreated. The result was a steady tightening of supply in the equity market and a re-rating of stocks that had been trading at deep discounts to global peers.

Crucially, the worst fears around China’s tech sector failed to materialize. The TikTok standoff, once framed as a potential death blow to ByteDance, evolved into a negotiated outcome. ByteDance sold a majority stake in its U.S. TikTok operations, easing political pressure while preserving the core economics of the business.

But far from being diminished, ByteDance emerged more valuable than ever. HSG, the venture capital firm formerly known as Sequoia China, recently pegged ByteDance’s valuation at between $350 billion and $370 billion, placing it firmly among the most valuable private companies in the world.

That outcome mattered beyond TikTok. It sent a broader signal that even in a fractured geopolitical environment, commercial compromises were still possible, and that outright destruction of Chinese tech champions was not inevitable.

Artificial intelligence, another area of deep concern at the start of 2025, also delivered surprises. By the end of 2024, the consensus view was that U.S. companies had established an insurmountable lead, backed by superior access to capital, chips, and cloud infrastructure. Chinese firms, constrained by export controls, were expected to fall further behind. Instead, China’s AI ecosystem proved more resilient and adaptive. Startups such as DeepSeek demonstrated that Chinese developers could still compete at the frontier, even with tighter hardware constraints.

That resilience was reinforced this week when the U.S. government said Nvidia would be allowed to sell its powerful H200 AI chips to Chinese companies. While export controls remain in place and the policy environment is far from predictable, the decision marked a softening from the most restrictive scenarios investors had feared. It suggested Washington was balancing national security concerns with the realities of global supply chains and corporate interests.

For hedge funds that leaned into China when sentiment was bleak, the rewards were striking. Bridgewater Associates generated a 34.2% return in its China Total Returns fund in 2025, according to a person close to the firm. Tekne Capital, run by Beeneet Kothari, posted gains of more than 50%. Kothari’s approach was unapologetically contrarian. His fund invested in companies such as DiDi Global, online recruiter Kanzhun, and data-centre operator GDS, businesses he argued had been punished more for macro fear than for company-specific weakness. As he told Business Insider last year, the hostile backdrop had made strong companies “very cheap.”

Performance across the sector told a similar story. HSBC’s Hedge Weekly report showed that China-focused funds delivered some of their strongest returns in years. Pinpoint Asset Management’s China strategy gained more than 24%, while its Asia-wide multistrategy fund rose 11.6%. Golden China, run by George Jiang, returned close to 33%. Epimelis Capital, led by Hutchin Hill and former Goldman Sachs banker Fei Sun, delivered about 35%. Hedge Fund Research estimates that the average China-focused fund rose nearly 18% in 2025, comfortably ahead of the global hedge fund average of 10.7%.

What made these returns particularly notable was the starting point. At the beginning of the year, positioning in China was exceptionally light. Many global funds had reduced exposure to near-zero, meaning even modest positive developments forced rapid reallocation. As confidence improved, inflows accelerated, amplifying gains.

Looking ahead into 2026, few investors are declaring victory, though structural challenges remain. The property sector is stabilizing but far from healthy. Consumption is improving unevenly. And the U.S.-China relationship remains volatile, particularly around trade, technology, and Taiwan. Any sharp escalation would quickly test the durability of China’s rebound.

ByteDance, backed by global investors such as Tiger Global and Coatue, will remain under scrutiny as it continues to grow amid regulatory complexity. Semiconductor policy will also be critical. While the Nvidia decision was welcomed, investors know it could be reversed as quickly as it was granted.

Still, the lesson of 2025 is hard to ignore. China did not need a perfect policy environment or a clean geopolitical slate to deliver strong returns. It needed expectations to be excessively low. When fear became consensus, valuations followed, and for investors willing to absorb volatility and political risk, the payoff was substantial.

Libya Bets on Misurata Free Zone to Break Oil Dependence With $2.7bn Foreign Investment Drive

0

Libya is attempting to reset the narrative around its fragile economy by anchoring growth in trade, logistics, and manufacturing, as it prepares to sign a strategic partnership with international firms to expand and develop the Misurata Free Zone in a deal expected to attract about $2.7 billion in foreign investment.

Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah said the agreements, involving companies from Qatar, Italy, and Switzerland, would significantly expand the scale and commercial relevance of the Misurata port complex, turning it into one of the most important logistics hubs in the central Mediterranean. The project is projected to generate around $500 million in annual operating revenues, a meaningful figure for a country whose public finances remain heavily tied to oil exports.

At its core, the initiative is an attempt to tackle Libya’s most persistent economic vulnerability: overreliance on hydrocarbons. Oil still accounts for more than 95% of Libya’s economic output and almost all government revenue, leaving the state exposed to price swings, production outages, and political disputes that have repeatedly shut down oilfields and export terminals over the past decade. By contrast, the Misurata Free Zone project is being pitched as a vehicle for steady, diversified income driven by trade volumes, industrial activity, and services rather than commodity cycles.

“This project not only enhances Libya’s position among the region’s largest ports in terms of size and capacity, but it also relies on direct foreign investment within a comprehensive international partnership,” Dbeibah said in a statement, underlining the government’s effort to attract capital without adding to public debt.

Misurata’s geographic position is central to the strategy. Located about 200 kilometers east of Tripoli, the city sits along key Mediterranean shipping routes linking Europe, North Africa, and the eastern Mediterranean, while also offering potential access to land routes toward sub-Saharan Africa. Officials believe that expanding the port’s capacity to around 4 million containers annually could allow Misurata to compete more directly with established regional hubs, particularly as global shipping lines look to diversify routes and reduce congestion risks elsewhere.

The free zone itself spans roughly 190 hectares, offering space not just for container handling but for light manufacturing, assembly, warehousing, and re-export operations. Government officials and project backers argue that this integrated model could encourage companies to carry out more value-added activities inside Libya rather than simply moving goods through its ports, helping to build a domestic industrial base that has long been stunted by conflict and underinvestment.

Job creation is another central selling point. Dbeibah said the project would create about 8,400 direct jobs and as many as 60,000 indirect roles, figures that matter politically in a country where unemployment, particularly among young people, remains high and the public sector dominates employment. Shifting labor into private, trade-linked industries would mark a structural change for Libya’s economy, even if progress is likely to be gradual.

The choice of partners also signals Libya’s broader diplomatic and economic calculus. Italy has strong incentives to support stability and development in Libya, given its reliance on Libyan energy supplies and its exposure to migration flows across the Mediterranean. Qatari investment reflects Doha’s long-standing involvement in Libya’s post-2011 political and economic landscape, while Swiss firms are often associated with logistics, finance, and industrial management expertise that Libyan officials see as critical to the project’s credibility.

Still, the scale of ambition contrasts sharply with Libya’s political reality. The country has been plagued by instability since the NATO-backed uprising in 2011, and a formal split between eastern and western factions in 2014 left it with rival administrations and fragmented institutions. Although large-scale fighting has subsided in recent years, governance remains divided, and investors continue to cite legal uncertainty, weak enforcement mechanisms, and security risks as major obstacles.

Previous attempts to attract foreign capital outside the oil sector have often faltered for these reasons, with projects delayed or abandoned amid power struggles, funding disputes, or deteriorating security conditions. Infrastructure bottlenecks, unreliable electricity supply, and bureaucratic complexity add further layers of risk, particularly for industrial and logistics operations that depend on predictable operating environments.

Against this backdrop, the Misurata Free Zone is therefore more than a port expansion for Dbeibah’s government. It is a test of whether Libya can translate relative calm into durable economic progress, and whether foreign investors are willing to commit long-term capital despite unresolved political questions. Officials are framing the project as evidence that Libya can still leverage its strategic location and state assets to generate sustainable, non-oil revenues, even in the absence of a comprehensive political settlement.

If the project proceeds as planned, it could reshape Misurata into a regional trade gateway and provide a template for similar developments along Libya’s coastline. But it is also expected to reinforce skepticism about Libya’s ability to convert investment pledges into tangible economic transformation, if it stalls.

With Whales Capped at 50K, ZKP’s Presale Auction Attracts Analysts Predicting 200x to 10,000x ROI

0

In most digital asset sales, speed and wallet size decide everything. Large buyers enter early, absorb supply fast, and influence pricing before smaller participants even appear. This pattern often leads to fast swings, uneven distribution, and fragile price formation. Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) takes a very different path. Its presale auction is not built for rapid buying. It is built around order and balance. Across a fixed 450-day period, the network is not only releasing supply, but it is also spreading access over time in a way that favors steady participation rather than raw capital.

Each participant operates under the same rules set, including a firm $50,000 daily limit per wallet. That single rule reshapes behavior. No participant can overpower a round. No large wallet can bend the curve. Capital is forced to spread, creating smoother demand that rewards consistency instead of force. This is not a quick sale event. It is a measured process, and this controlled pace is where meaningful upside can begin to form.

With daily pricing resets and capped participation, price discovery remains stable. Large one-day inflows cannot distort the system. Instead, pricing adjusts every 24 hours based on actual engagement. This gives early participants an advantage rooted in time, not access. The benefit comes from entering earlier in the schedule, not from special treatment.

Why Time Turns Into the Real Limiting Factor

What clearly separates Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) from many presales is how it treats time as the primary constraint. Supply is not released all at once. It is issued gradually, day by day, over a window that never expands to meet demand. As more wallets join, competition increases, but daily availability stays fixed.

This produces a straightforward result. Early participants face fewer competing wallets per day, allowing their capital to translate into a larger share of daily distribution. As awareness grows and more participants enter the presale auction, that same daily amount secures less exposure. This shift is not driven by narratives or sentiment. It is driven by simple math.

Reviews of long-duration, anti-whale presale auction models often reach the same outcome. Entry timing consistently outweighs size. Those who participate early and remain consistent tend to build positions at levels that do not return later. Under steady participation, modeled results for early entries often fall between 200x and 700x, with broader adoption scenarios extending into four-digit multiples.

In the case of Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP), the 450-day structure strengthens this effect. Each passing day tightens conditions. Time itself becomes the edge that compounds value.

Capital Discipline Shapes a More Balanced Market

Many launches treat distribution as a short-term liquidity moment. Capital floods in, supply rushes out, and stability becomes uncertain. Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) avoids this approach completely. Its presale auction design enforces discipline by encouraging repeated participation instead of single large entries.

This framework changes behavior patterns. Rather than chasing one ideal moment, participants engage across weeks or months. This steady involvement aligns them with the network as it develops, not just with short-term pricing. It also smooths inflows, reduces sharp pressure, and allows the infra and network to grow alongside distribution.

Because meaningful exposure requires daily return participation, short-term churn drops. Participants naturally become long-term holders by structure, not messaging. This results in a stronger base for price formation once trading begins, since supply has already been distributed gradually instead of being concentrated early.

As demand increases and daily allocations grow more competitive, later participants enter at structurally higher levels. Early participants gain more than just lower pricing. They secure positioning before scarcity tightens further, and that gap widens over time.

Why Entry Timing Is Often Overlooked

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) does not offer gated access. Anyone can join the presale auction. What it provides instead is a time-weighted advantage. Daily limits ensure equal conditions, but outcomes depend heavily on when participation begins. Earlier entries operate under less crowded conditions.

This is where many misread the opportunity. Some wait for special rounds or deeper discounts. Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) offers neither. The system rewards those who commit earlier and remain consistent within fixed rules.

If participation continues and the network gains traction while the presale auction remains live, the advantage of early positioning becomes clearer. In scenarios where tooling, usage, and on-chain activity expand before the presale auction ends, models extend toward 1,000x to 10,000x outcomes. These projections are driven by compounded timing inside a closed structure, not by excitement cycles.

Later participants still have access. Their difference lies in higher entry levels, tighter competition, and reduced time exposure.

Final Remarks

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) is not running a promotional cycle. It is operating a controlled capital framework. By limiting daily participation, stretching release across 450 days, and applying equal rules, it changes how value forms before trading begins.

Early participants are not relying on momentum. They are securing positioning before scarcity becomes visible. In an environment where many launches favor insiders and punish patience, Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) reverses that logic. Time shifts from being a risk into becoming a practical tool.

If participation remains strong and adoption follows structure, this presale auction could stand as one of the more orderly and asymmetric launches seen in recent cycles. For those who recognize how restraint creates leverage, the difference between early and late entry is not guesswork. It is built into the system.

Find Out More about Zero Knowledge Proof:

Website: https://zkp.com/

Presale Auction: https://auction.zkp.com/

X: https://x.com/ZKPofficial

Telegram: https://t.me/ZKPofficial

Sequoia, GIC, and Coatue Lead $25bn Funding Round for Anthropic at $350bn Valuation

0

Venture capital giant Sequoia is joining Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC and U.S. investor Coatue in a massive funding round for Anthropic, the San Francisco-based AI startup behind the Claude chatbot, aiming to raise $25 billion at a $350 billion valuation, the Financial Times reported Sunday, citing sources familiar with the matter.

According to the report, GIC and Coatue are each expected to contribute $1.5 billion toward the round, with Sequoia anchoring the syndicate. Representatives for Anthropic, Sequoia, GIC, and Coatue did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Anthropic has emerged as one of the leading names in generative AI, attracting global attention for its Claude models, which are positioned as enterprise-friendly alternatives to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The startup last raised $13 billion in a Series F round in early 2025 at a $183 billion valuation and had also secured commitments for up to $15 billion from Microsoft and Nvidia. The proposed $25 billion round would not only more than double the company’s prior valuation but also mark one of the largest private funding rounds in the technology sector to date.

The astronomical valuations come amid low return on investment (ROI) for many AI startups. OpenAI, for example, has burned through more than $8 billion in 2025 alone while generating relatively modest revenue from subscription services such as ChatGPT Plus.

Analysts caution that much of the AI funding frenzy has been driven by investor confidence in the technology’s long-term transformative potential rather than current profitability. Investors appear willing to tolerate years of negative returns in the belief that AI could one day redefine entire industries, from enterprise software to cloud services and digital automation.

Sequoia’s participation underscores the continued faith of established venture capital in AI, even as valuations reach unprecedented heights. Founded in 1972, Sequoia has backed some of the most successful tech companies in history, including Google, Apple, YouTube, and Cisco. Its involvement signals strong confidence in Anthropic’s technology, enterprise adoption potential, and ability to compete with OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and other generative AI leaders.

The infusion of capital will allow Anthropic to expand its AI research, improve model robustness, scale cloud infrastructure, and accelerate enterprise sales and licensing. Market observers highlight that enterprise adoption has become the primary pathway for monetization, as subscription-based offerings, custom AI solutions, and cloud-powered deployments begin to generate measurable revenue streams.

However, given the scale of the funding and the current state of AI profitability, Anthropic will face intense pressure to convert capital into sustainable revenue while managing costs associated with compute-intensive model training.

Sovereign wealth funds, such as GIC, also play a strategic role in shaping the AI ecosystem. Singapore’s investment reflects the city-state’s ambition to cement its position as a global hub for artificial intelligence, leveraging both capital and policy to attract leading technology firms. Coatue’s participation further illustrates U.S. investor enthusiasm for high-value AI ventures, particularly those with proven technology and enterprise-ready offerings.

The round comes amid a broader surge of capital flowing into the AI sector, which analysts warn is reaching levels reminiscent of historic technology bubbles. While some startups like Google and Meta can rely on profits from existing businesses to fund AI research, companies such as OpenAI and, potentially, Anthropic operate with little revenue relative to cash burn.

OpenAI’s projected cash exhaustion within 18 months, according to analysts, exemplifies the high-risk nature of these investments. Yet, investors continue to back AI, betting that the first firms to dominate foundational models could capture enormous future value, making early losses tolerable.

With this new round, Anthropic is poised to solidify its position as one of the preeminent AI developers globally. The company’s Claude models compete directly with OpenAI’s offerings and are increasingly finding traction with enterprise clients seeking AI solutions optimized for productivity, compliance, and security. Yet the massive influx of capital also raises questions about market sustainability, given that valuations now outpace demonstrable revenue and ROI.

The funding round is likely to reshape the competitive landscape for AI, determining which startups have the resources to scale globally and which may fall behind. The bets are both enormous and speculative for investors: a successful deployment of Claude could cement Anthropic as a dominant player in AI, while failure could echo the fate of prior overhyped tech ventures.

Even so, the continued flow of capital into companies like Anthropic and OpenAI reflects the enduring belief among investors that artificial intelligence represents the next frontier of technological disruption, with potential returns that justify even extreme risk-taking today.