DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 28

Tinubu Approves Cancellation of $1.42bn, N5.57 Trillion NNPC Debts to Federation Account

0

President Bola Tinubu has approved the cancellation of about $1.42 billion and N5.57 trillion in outstanding debts owed by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) to the Federation Account, a move that significantly reshapes the fiscal relationship between the state-owned oil firm and the federal government.

The approval was contained in a document issued by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) and presented at the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) meeting held in November 2025. The development was disclosed in a statement published on Monday on the official X page of the Presidency.

“President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has approved the cancellation of a substantial portion of NNPC Ltd’s outstanding debts owed to the Federation Account, effectively wiping out approximately $1.42 billion in legacy obligations,” the statement said.

Scope of the debt cancellation

According to the document, the cancelled liabilities relate to legacy obligations incurred by NNPC Ltd up to December 31, 2024. These include debts arising from production sharing contracts (PSCs), domestic crude oil supply obligations, repayment agreements, modified carry arrangements, as well as joint venture and PSC royalty receivables owed to the Federation.

The presidency said the decision followed recommendations by the Stakeholder Alignment Committee, which was established to reconcile long-standing debts between NNPC Ltd and the Federation Account. It added that the necessary accounting adjustments have already been effected to reflect the write-off.

However, the government clarified that obligations incurred between January and October 2025 were excluded from the cancellation. Those debts remain outstanding and are being actively tracked and recovered.

Reform push amid scrutiny

The debt write-off comes as the Tinubu administration continues reforms in the oil and gas sector, aimed at resolving legacy financial issues, stabilizing public revenues and improving transparency at NNPC Ltd, which was commercialized under the Petroleum Industry Act.

In recent years, the national oil company has faced sustained criticism over governance, transparency and accountability, particularly amid Nigeria’s fuel supply challenges and declining oil output.

The latest report by the Auditor-General of the Federation, published in September and recently submitted to the National Assembly, highlighted what it described as systemic violations of financial regulations within NNPC Ltd. The audit cited weak internal controls, unexplained payments and irregularities linked to controversial contracts.

The report accused the company of fund misappropriation, inflated contracts, irregular payments and failure to deduct and remit statutory taxes.

One example cited was NNPC’s failure to deduct the statutory one percent stamp duty on payments totaling N24.7 billion and $52.98 million made to contractors and service providers. According to the audit, this resulted in unpaid taxes of N247 million and $529,863. The anomalies, which occurred between 2020 and 2021, involved more than $51 million in questionable settlements.

Unresolved under-remittance dispute

The NUPRC document presented at FAAC also referenced a separate and long-running dispute over an alleged under-remittance of $42.37 billion between 2011 and 2017. That claim, which has featured in previous audits and legislative reviews, remains unresolved.

NNPC Ltd has consistently rejected the allegation, insisting that all revenues due to the Federation during the period were properly accounted for.

“A separate, long-running dispute over an alleged under-remittance of $42.37 billion (2011–2017) remains unresolved, with NNPC Ltd rejecting the claims and insisting all revenues were properly accounted for,” the presidency said.

The debt cancellation eases pressure on NNPC Ltd’s balance sheet and could improve cash flow for the commercialized entity, but it also raises fresh questions about accountability and the long-term handling of public oil revenues. Analysts say the move underscores the scale of legacy financial entanglements in Nigeria’s energy sector, even as the government pushes for stricter oversight and reform.

The challenge for the Tinubu administration now lies in ensuring that new obligations do not add to the pile of unresolved debts, while outstanding audit issues and disputes over past remittances are conclusively addressed.

Verisk Abandons $2.35bn AccuLynx Acquisition After FTC Review Delay, Setting Stage for Legal Dispute

0

Verisk has terminated its planned $2.35 billion acquisition of roofing software firm AccuLynx after U.S. antitrust regulators failed to complete their review by the deal’s final deadline.

The development pinpoints how prolonged regulatory scrutiny continues to reshape the calculus for large technology and data-driven transactions.

The data analytics company said on Monday that it pulled the plug after being notified by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission that the agency had not finished reviewing the deal by December 26, the termination date set under the merger agreement. The transaction, announced in July, had initially been expected to close by the third quarter of 2025 before regulatory delays pushed the timeline back.

The decision immediately sparked a dispute between the two companies. AccuLynx has notified Verisk that it believes the termination is “invalid,” while Verisk said it “strongly disagrees” with that assessment and intends to “vigorously defend” its position. The standoff raises the prospect of a legal battle over whether Verisk was contractually entitled to walk away once the regulatory clock expired.

Verisk shares rose 1.7% in afternoon trading, suggesting investors were largely relieved by the outcome or saw limited strategic damage from the abandoned deal. Analysts at Raymond James said the termination could free up capital and potentially lead to incrementally higher share repurchases in 2026, now that Verisk will not need to deploy cash for the acquisition.

The deal had faced mounting uncertainty since October, when the FTC requested additional information from both Verisk and AccuLynx, a step that typically signals a deeper antitrust review and can extend timelines by several months. At the time, Verisk executives said discussions with regulators were progressing, but the extended review ultimately prevented the transaction from closing within the agreed window.

Verisk is believed to have given regulators additional time to complete their work by extending the termination date to December 26. When that deadline passed without clearance, the company opted to abandon the deal rather than face what could have become a protracted regulatory and legal process. In similar cases, companies often must choose between litigating against regulators—a process that can take years and carry reputational and financial risks—or walking away from the transaction altogether.

Founded in 2008, AccuLynx provides cloud-based software designed to help roofing contractors manage sales, estimates, production workflows, and overall business operations. The acquisition was intended to deepen Verisk’s exposure to construction and property-related analytics, complementing its core businesses that serve insurers, risk managers, and corporate clients with data-driven insights.

The transaction would have been one of Verisk’s largest strategic moves in recent years, reflecting a broader push among data and analytics firms to expand vertically into software platforms that generate proprietary operational data. Regulatory scrutiny of such combinations has intensified as authorities examine whether data consolidation could reduce competition or create barriers for smaller rivals.

With the acquisition now off the table, Verisk said it plans to redeem the $1.5 billion of debt it issued to finance the deal, reversing a key component of the transaction’s capital structure. That move is expected to strengthen the company’s balance sheet and restore financial flexibility, particularly as uncertainty persists around the pace of deal approvals in the U.S.

China Announces Tariff Cuts on Key Commodities and Medical Products Starting 2026

0

China will implement tariff reductions on a range of imported products beginning January 1, 2026, including resource-based commodities and medical supplies, as part of ongoing adjustments to its trade policy.

The cuts, detailed in a statement from the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council on Monday, aim to lower costs for critical inputs, support domestic industries, and enhance access to advanced technologies amid global supply chain shifts and economic recovery efforts. Key reductions target resource-based commodities such as recycled black powder used in lithium-ion batteries—a vital material for EV and energy storage production—reflecting China’s push to secure sustainable supply chains for its dominant battery sector, which controls over 80% of global manufacturing capacity.

The country will also lower levies on medical products, including artificial blood vessels and diagnostic kits for certain infectious diseases, to facilitate imports of advanced healthcare technologies and reagents, building on post-pandemic priorities for public health resilience. The commission specified that provisional import tariff rates for 935 products will be set below the most-favored-nation rates applied to all World Trade Organization members, granting preferential access to selected goods.

While the full list of affected items was not immediately released, the adjustments are expected to cover high-tech components, raw materials for strategic industries, and essential consumer goods, continuing a pattern from previous annual revisions that involved similar numbers of products in sectors like machinery, chemicals, and agriculture. The move comes as China balances import facilitation with domestic protectionism.

In 2025, the country has navigated trade tensions—including retaliatory duties on EU dairy (up to 42.7% from December 23) and ongoing U.S. tariff disputes—while promoting high-tech self-reliance under the Made in China 2025 framework. Lowering duties on battery materials supports the nation’s EV dominance and circular economy goals, such as recycling targets under the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025), which emphasize green manufacturing and resource efficiency. Medical cuts align with efforts to bolster healthcare innovation, following investments exceeding 1 trillion yuan in biotech and pharmaceuticals this year.

Analysts interpret the adjustments as strategic signals of selective opening. Some believe the targeted reductions prioritize inputs that complement China’s industrial strengths, reducing costs for manufacturers while maintaining leverage in broader negotiations.

The changes could lower import expenses by 5-15% for affected categories, benefiting sectors like renewable energy with a projected 20% growth in 2026, and healthcare, aiming for universal coverage enhancements. No immediate market reactions were observed in thin holiday trading, but sectors like battery manufacturers and medical importers may benefit from cost savings, potentially boosting stock performance in Shanghai and Shenzhen indices.

Globally, the cuts could ease pressures on suppliers from Australia’s lithium resources and Europe’s medical tech, amid a projected 3.5% rise in China’s imports to $3.2 trillion in 2026. As global trade dynamics evolve—with potential U.S. policy shifts and EU-China frictions—these tariff tweaks underscore Beijing’s calibrated approach to fostering imports that complement domestic strengths without undermining industrial policy objectives, while navigating a slowing economy with 4.7% GDP growth in 2025 and external uncertainties.

The full HS code list and exact rate reductions are expected in supplementary notices from the General Administration of Customs by year-end.

Nvidia Completes $5bn Intel Share Purchase, Offering Key Lifeline to Struggling Chipmaker

0

Nvidia has completed a $5 billion investment in Intel, finalizing a closely watched transaction that underscores both Intel’s financial strain after years of strategic missteps and Nvidia’s growing influence across the global semiconductor ecosystem.

In a filing on Monday, Intel confirmed that Nvidia purchased more than 214.7 million Intel common shares at a price of $23.28 per share, in line with the terms announced in September. The shares were acquired through a private placement, giving Nvidia a significant minority stake in the U.S. chipmaker at a time when Intel is undergoing one of the most difficult transitions in its history.

The deal had already received regulatory clearance, with U.S. antitrust agencies signing off earlier in December. A notice posted by the Federal Trade Commission indicated that the investment did not raise immediate competition concerns, despite Nvidia’s dominant position in artificial intelligence chips and Intel’s central role in both chip design and manufacturing.

The transaction is widely viewed as a crucial financial lifeline for Intel. The company has spent the past several years grappling with lost technological leadership, delays in advanced manufacturing processes, and fierce competition from rivals such as AMD and TSMC. At the same time, Intel has embarked on an ambitious and costly strategy to rebuild its manufacturing base, committing tens of billions of dollars to new fabrication plants in the United States and Europe as it seeks to become a major contract chipmaker for external customers.

Those capital-intensive expansions have weighed heavily on Intel’s balance sheet, draining cash flow and putting pressure on margins. The Nvidia investment provides a significant infusion of capital that can help support Intel’s turnaround plans, shore up investor confidence, and complement government subsidies Intel has secured under U.S. and European semiconductor industrial policies.

Nvidia, by contrast, is entering the deal from a position of exceptional strength. The company has surged to become the world’s most valuable firm, fueled by explosive demand for its AI accelerators, which are now the backbone of data centers powering large language models and other AI systems. While Nvidia does not manufacture chips itself and relies heavily on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, its investment in Intel signals a strategic interest in reinforcing the broader U.S. semiconductor supply chain.

Although neither company has described the transaction as a strategic partnership, the deal deepens financial ties between the two firms that have traditionally competed in data center processors and other segments. Analysts say Nvidia’s move may also be interpreted as a vote of confidence in Intel’s long-term manufacturing ambitions, particularly as geopolitical tensions and U.S. policy increasingly prioritize domestic chip production.

Market reaction to the completion of the deal was subdued. Nvidia shares slipped about 1.3% in premarket trading, while Intel stock was little changed, suggesting investors had largely priced in the transaction since its announcement in September.

The investment comes at a time when the semiconductor industry is being reshaped by artificial intelligence, geopolitical rivalries, and government intervention. Washington has made semiconductor self-sufficiency a strategic priority, encouraging private capital to complement public funding. Intel sits at the center of that effort, but execution risks remain high.

However, by finalizing the $5 billion share purchase, Nvidia has reinforced Intel’s near-term financial position while positioning itself closer to the policy and industrial currents reshaping the chip sector. Another highlight of the deal is that in today’s semiconductor landscape, fierce competitors can also become strategic partners as the industry adapts to unprecedented technological and political change.

Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Sets the Stage for a Tax-Driven U.S. Growth Push in 2026

0

In mid-2025, when the U.S. president Donald Trump presented his sweeping tax package dubbed “One Big Beautiful Bill, it swiftly became a subject of controversy – even from his close allies.

Now, Reuters reports that economists are increasingly pointing to the tax package as a central force shaping the trajectory of the U.S. economy in 2026, with wide-ranging implications for households, businesses, and federal finances.

The legislation locks in and expands major elements of Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, removing the looming expiry of several provisions and injecting fresh incentives aimed at boosting consumption, investment, and hiring. Analysts say the combined effect is likely to show up quickly, particularly in early 2026, when taxpayers begin to feel the impact through larger paychecks and refunds.

For individuals, the changes amount to a broad reset of the personal tax landscape. The law makes permanent the lower individual income tax rates introduced in 2017, which were previously scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. It also extends the higher standard deduction and expands relief from the alternative minimum tax, while lifting the estate tax exemption from $14 million to $15 million.

Beyond extending existing cuts, the bill introduces a series of targeted breaks that directly affect take-home pay. Workers who earn tips will be exempt from federal taxes on up to $25,000 of tipped income through 2029, a provision that phases out for earners above $150,000. The exemption excludes certain categories, such as automatic service charges and tips linked to pornographic activity.

Overtime pay receives similar treatment, with up to $12,500 exempt from taxation until 2029, again subject to income phase-outs. Older Americans also stand to benefit, with a new deduction of up to $6,000 for people aged 65 and above over the same period.

The law also targets specific spending decisions. Interest payments on auto loans of up to $10,000 will qualify for a tax break until 2029, but only for personal vehicles assembled in the United States, reinforcing the administration’s domestic manufacturing agenda.

One of the most politically sensitive provisions involves state and local taxes. The cap on SALT deductions is raised sharply from $10,000 to $40,000 through 2029, a change that disproportionately benefits higher-income households in high-tax states such as New York, New Jersey, and California. Economists say this could provide a meaningful boost to disposable income in those regions, though critics argue it tilts relief toward wealthier taxpayers.

On the business side, the bill is heavily weighted toward encouraging investment. The lower corporate tax rate from the 2017 law is made permanent, eliminating uncertainty that had been hanging over boardroom planning decisions. More significantly, companies regain the ability to fully expense certain equipment purchases, allowing them to deduct the entire cost immediately rather than spreading it over several years. This provision had begun phasing out in 2023 and was set to disappear entirely by 2027.

Research and development also receive a major boost. Firms can once again fully expense U.S.-based R&D costs, a change independent tax experts widely regard as one of the most effective ways to stimulate productivity and long-term growth. Small businesses are given additional relief, with the option to retroactively deduct R&D expenses incurred since 2022, potentially unlocking cash flow for expansion.

The law also relaxes limits on interest deductions. Restrictions introduced in 2022 tightened the calculation to earnings before interest and taxes, excluding depreciation and amortization. The new legislation broadens the definition again, making it easier for capital-intensive firms to deduct financing costs.

Owners of pass-through businesses — a vast category that includes freelancers, family-owned restaurants, law firms, medical practices, hedge funds, and private equity firms — see their tax break extended and expanded. Eligible owners can continue deducting up to 20% of their income, lowering effective tax rates. Views on the economic impact of this provision remain split. While supporters say it supports entrepreneurship, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center has said there is little evidence the deduction meaningfully boosts growth.

Taken together, economists expect the package to act as a short- to medium-term stimulus, with households likely to increase spending as withholding levels adjust and refunds rise. Businesses, meanwhile, may accelerate investment and hiring decisions, particularly in sectors that rely heavily on equipment and R&D.

At the same time, the scale of the tax cuts has renewed debate over fiscal sustainability. With deficits already elevated, critics warn the bill could add to long-term debt pressures unless offset by stronger growth or future spending restraint.