The recent events surrounding the former President Donald Trump have indeed raised concerns about political violence in the United States. It is a serious issue that affects not only the individuals directly involved but also the fabric of American society. Political violence, or the threat of it, undermines the democratic process and the principles of dialogue and peaceful disagreement that are foundational to the functioning of any democracy.

On Sunday there was a second attempt on Donald Trump’s life in this election campaign. In July a would-be assassin shot at him during a rally, nicking his ear and killing a bystander. This time the Secret Service spotted a rifle sticking out of a fence beside the golf course in Florida where Mr Trump was playing. The suspect was quickly arrested, and Mr Trump confirmed he is safe and well. The incident puts the Secret Service under new scrutiny. As for its impact on the election, Republicans and Democrats must again try to avoid politicizing a failed assassination.

The incidents involving Donald Trump have prompted a bipartisan call for the condemnation of violence and a reflection on the state of political discourse in the country. It is a moment that requires leaders and citizens alike to reaffirm their commitment to a politics free from violence and intimidation.

In these times, it is crucial to remember the importance of civil discourse and the power of words to either inflame or soothe tensions. The responsibility falls on everyone—politicians, media, and the public—to engage in conversations that promote understanding and progress, rather than division and fear. Political violence has been a recurring and unfortunate aspect of human history, often emerging during periods of intense social and political upheaval.

Here are some historical examples of political violence:

Assassination of Abraham Lincoln (1865): The 16th President of the United States was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, an actor and Confederate sympathizer, at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D.C. This event marked the first assassination of a U.S. president.

Wilmington Insurrection (1898): In Wilmington, North Carolina, white supremacists overthrew the local government, which was elected with a significant African American voter base, in a violent coup that left many African Americans dead or expelled from the city.

The Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (1914): The heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne was assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist, leading to the outbreak of World War I.

The October Revolution (1917): The Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, overthrew the Russian Provisional Government in a coup, leading to the establishment of the Soviet Union.

The Assassination of Mahatma Gandhi (1948): Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the Indian independence movement against British rule, was assassinated by Nathuram Godse, a Hindu nationalist.

The Troubles in Northern Ireland (Late 1960s-1998): A complex conflict characterized by sectarian violence, paramilitary operations, and political strife between mainly Protestant unionists and mainly Catholic nationalists.

The Rwandan Genocide (1994): Political violence escalated into a genocide against the Tutsi population, with estimates of up to a million people killed.

The Assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (1995): Rabin was assassinated by Yigal Amir, an Israeli ultranationalist, due to his role in the signing of the Oslo Accords.

These examples illustrate the diverse contexts and motivations behind political violence, from ideological conflicts to power struggles and ethnic tensions. It is a reminder of the importance of dialogue, tolerance, and the rule of law in preventing such tragedies. For a more detailed exploration of political violence in American history, you can refer to the articles by TIME on the recent history of political violence in America and America’s long history of political violence.

As the nation moves forward, it is hoped that this can be a turning point towards a more respectful and safer political environment for all, regardless of party affiliation or political beliefs. The focus must remain on finding common ground and working together to address the challenges facing the country, while firmly rejecting any form of violence as a means of political expression.

In a move to reduce the higher costs associated with road distribution and ease the burden on Nigeria’s congested road infrastructure, Dangote Refinery has announced its intention to transport 75% of its local petroleum product supply via sea routes.

This decision is part of a broader effort to improve the efficiency of product evacuation from the refinery while lowering transshipment costs for consumers. Key destinations targeted by this shift include Warri, Port Harcourt, and Calabar, among others.

Speaking to Arise News on Sunday as the refinery began distributing Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), Devakumar Edwin, Vice President (Oil & Gas) at Dangote Industries Limited, revealed the new transportation plans, highlighting the benefits of leveraging Nigeria’s sea routes.

“We have both exporting facilities by sea and by road. 75% of the production can be evacuated through sea. In fact, now we are ramping up to make it even 100%,” Edwin stated, noting the company’s commitment to adopting sea transportation to reduce reliance on Nigeria’s overburdened road network.

The refinery, the largest single-train facility globally, boasts an impressive capacity to load 40 tankers of PMS simultaneously within 40 minutes and can manage up to 2,900 trucks daily. However, this immense capacity poses a significant risk of traffic congestion along the Lekki-Epe corridor, where the refinery is located.

By prioritizing sea routes for product evacuation, the refinery aims to circumvent these potential bottlenecks.

“Anything going to Calabar, Port Harcourt, Warri, Apapa, Atlas can all be taken through the sea. So only what is imminently required by road can be taken. But I also have the facility to load 83% of my production also through road,” he said.

This flexibility allows the refinery to meet urgent demands by road while minimizing traffic congestion and the associated logistical bottlenecks.

Sea Transportation as a Solution to Cost and Regional Access

In addition to alleviating road congestion, the switch to sea transport is expected to significantly reduce the costs associated with road haulage, such as wear and tear on vehicles, fuel expenses, and delays due to poor road conditions or traffic. The refinery’s sea transportation plans, according to Edwin, will play a key role in cutting transshipment costs and ultimately lowering product prices for consumers.

The strategic use of sea routes will also enhance access to various parts of Nigeria. For instance, products destined for central Nigeria, including cities like Abuja and Jos, can be shipped from Port Harcourt and Warri, while those heading to the East and Northeast will be dispatched from Calabar.

“We can avoid all traffic congestion on the road by evacuating through sea and it will also bring down the cost of transhipment,” Edwin said.

While sea transportation offers multiple benefits, including cost reductions and reduced traffic, the refinery’s road capacity remains available to address urgent supply needs, particularly in regions that may not be fully serviced by sea routes. This built-in flexibility ensures that there will be no interruptions in supply, even as Dangote Refinery shifts toward maritime solutions.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) moved approximately 300 trucks to the 650,000-barrel-per-day Dangote Refinery in Lagos, initiating the first loading on Sunday, September 15, 2024.

As the largest single-train refinery in the world, Dangote Refinery’s operational capacity is immense, with the ability to manage thousands of trucks daily. However, the move to sea transportation reflects the company’s commitment to sustainable and cost-effective distribution.

In a statement on Monday, the refinery assured Nigerians of the availability of quality petroleum products and putting an end to the endemic fuel scarcity in the country.

Nigerians have placed high hopes on Dangote Refinery to address energy insufficiency and insecurity, which has bedeviled the economy in the past 50 years. The refinery’s vast capacity to produce and distribute petroleum products locally holds the potential to significantly reduce the country’s reliance on imported fuel. Thus, the plan to transit to sea transportation for effective distribution of petroleum products across the country, which paves the way for a more efficient and cost-effective supply chain, has been widely lauded.

However, some energy analysts caution that while the refinery’s use of sea transportation is a welcome development, it may take some time before these cost savings translate to noticeable reductions at the pump.

Intel will possibly spin off the foundry business into an independent company: “In a move to reinvigorate its competitive edge in the chip market, Intel on Monday announced a significant restructuring plan, which saw its shares surge by 8% in extended trading. The tech giant is set to transform its foundry business into an independent unit with its own board, with the potential to raise outside capital.”

Yet, that new company will still have to deal with two things: (1) it has to provide something new TSMC, an industry-leading contracting fab company, does not have, and (2) it needs to win Nvidia, Qualcomm, AMD and other fabless chip makers as customers.

But if you look at the big picture, this particular Intel’s decision is the right call. Why? TSMC is the premier semiconductor foundry which has most of the top fabless chip companies as customers, and Intel in its current format may not be seen as a great destination for these companies, since Intel is also a design company. Indeed, you should not expect AMD and Nvidia to ship designs to Intel to fab for them, making the core essence of the current form of Intel questionable.

But with the foundry business separated, that company can fight on its own, unconstrained by being associated with a potential competitor with its potential customers. CEO Pat Gelsinger made the right call. I expect Intel to evolve, as it focuses on designs, and with that, it will return to greatness. May the best WIN.

Intel Announces Plan to Turn Foundry Business Into A Subsidiary, Allowing for Fund Raising From Outside