DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3

Nvidia’s H200 Sales to China Stall as U.S. Security Review Exposes Deepening Tech Tensions

0

Nvidia’s H200 AI chip remains caught in a familiar but increasingly consequential bind: approved in principle, constrained in practice, and emblematic of how U.S.-China technology relations now operate in slow motion rather than absolutes.

Nearly two months after U.S. President Donald Trump gave the green light for exports, sales of the H200 to China have yet to resume in any meaningful way. The delay, as reported by the Financial Times, is not a technical issue nor a question of demand. It is the product of a layered national security review that has exposed fault lines within the U.S. government itself and reinforced uncertainty for Chinese buyers already wary of sudden policy reversals.

At the center of the impasse is the licensing process imposed in January, when the Commerce Department eased export curbs on the H200 but required applications to be reviewed not just internally, but also by the departments of State, Defense, and Energy. That structure reflects how AI chips are no longer treated as ordinary commercial goods, but as strategic assets with implications for military capability, intelligence gathering, and long-term economic power.

According to people familiar with the discussions, Commerce has completed its assessment, suggesting that from a technical export-control standpoint, the H200 can be sold under defined conditions. The sticking point appears to be the State Department, which has argued for tighter restrictions to prevent China from deploying the chips in ways that could undermine U.S. national security. That includes concerns around large-scale AI model training, dual-use applications, and the potential for civilian infrastructure to be repurposed for state or military ends.

This internal pushback matters because it signals that even when export rules are formally relaxed, enforcement and interpretation can remain fluid. For Nvidia, that creates a grey zone where executive assurances do not immediately translate into purchase orders.

Chinese customers, according to the FT, are holding off on placing H200 orders until it becomes clear not only whether licenses will be granted, but also what strings may be attached. Those conditions could include limits on volumes, end uses, data center configurations, or post-sale compliance obligations.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has publicly expressed hope that sales will proceed, saying last week that the license is being finalized. His comments point to confidence that a pathway exists, but they also underscore how dependent the company has become on regulatory discretion rather than straightforward market access.

Over the past two years, Nvidia has repeatedly redesigned and repositioned chips to fit within U.S. rules, turning export compliance into a core part of product strategy.

Reuters reported last month that China approved its first batch of H200 chips for import, a move seen as a pragmatic shift by Beijing. China’s leadership faces its own balancing act: sustaining rapid AI development in the near term while accelerating domestic chip capabilities to reduce reliance on U.S. suppliers. Allowing limited imports of the H200 fits that approach, buying time for local players even as Washington seeks to cap how much advanced capacity China can access.

The uncertainty reinforces a trend already underway for Chinese firms. Cloud providers, AI startups, and research institutions are diversifying supply chains, testing domestic alternatives, and adapting software stacks to work across multiple hardware platforms. Even if Nvidia ultimately secures licenses, the stop-start nature of access weakens its long-term position by encouraging customers to plan for a future where U.S. chips cannot be assumed to be available.

From Washington’s perspective, the drawn-out review reflects a deeper debate about the effectiveness of export controls. Tight restrictions risk pushing China to innovate faster at home, potentially eroding U.S. leverage over time. Looser controls, meanwhile, raise fears of enabling technological advances that could narrow the strategic gap in areas Washington considers sensitive.

The H200 sits squarely in that tension: powerful enough to matter, but already a step behind Nvidia’s most advanced offerings reserved for unrestricted markets.

The episode also illustrates how inter-agency dynamics now shape global tech markets. Decisions are no longer binary approvals or bans, but negotiated outcomes influenced by competing priorities across departments. That means longer timelines, higher compliance costs, and greater revenue volatility for companies like Nvidia.

Until the national security review concludes and license conditions are spelled out, Nvidia’s H200 is expected to remain in a holding pattern. The delay may eventually be resolved, but the broader message, which is: access to advanced AI hardware is now a matter of statecraft as much as commerce, has already been sent.

AMD Shares Slide as AI-Fueled Optimism Collides With Cautious First-Quarter Outlook

0

Shares of Advanced Micro Devices fell sharply in early premarket trading on Wednesday after the chipmaker’s first-quarter revenue outlook failed to live up to the market’s loftiest expectations.

The sharp pullback in early Wednesday trading underscored a growing reality in the AI-driven chip rally: strong earnings are no longer sufficient when expectations are stretched to extremes.

The stock slid about 9% in premarket trading after the company’s first-quarter outlook failed to fully satisfy investors who had been positioned for an even more aggressive forecast, given the scale of global spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure. The selloff came despite AMD delivering a solid fourth quarter that beat Wall Street estimates and reinforced its status as one of the most important challengers to Nvidia in the AI chip market.

AMD reported fourth-quarter revenue of $10.27 billion, topping LSEG consensus estimates of $9.67 billion. The result capped a year in which the company benefited from surging demand for data-center processors, particularly graphics and accelerator chips used in AI training and inference.

For the first quarter, AMD projected revenue of $9.8 billion, plus or minus $300 million. While the midpoint was still above the broader market estimate of around $9.38 billion, some analysts had expected a more forceful signal that AI-related demand would drive a steeper sequential ramp.

That disconnect between expectations and guidance proved costly for the shares.

“Expectations were pretty sky high,” said Chris Rolland, a semiconductor analyst at Susquehanna, in comments on CNBC.

He added that AMD’s disclosure of China-related revenue shipments in the quarter, which were not fully reflected in analysts’ models, made the headline beat appear stronger than it otherwise would have been.

“When you account for that, the beat was far less substantial than we would’ve thought,” Rolland said.

China exposure and regulatory risk

The reference to China highlights a sensitive area for U.S. chipmakers. Export controls imposed by Washington have limited the types of advanced AI chips that can be sold into the Chinese market, forcing companies like AMD and Nvidia to redesign products to comply with restrictions.

Any revenue tied to China is closely watched by investors, both for sustainability and for the risk of further regulatory tightening. AMD did not provide extensive detail on how much of its recent growth was linked to China-specific products, but the mere presence of that revenue added complexity to the market’s assessment of underlying demand.

Despite the near-term disappointment, there was little indication that AMD’s longer-term AI story has weakened. Demand for its data-center products remains strong, and analysts say the company continues to signal large-scale deployments ahead.

Rolland noted that AMD has hinted at multi-gigawatt AI contracts, a scale that underscores how rapidly computing requirements are expanding as companies race to deploy and monetize AI systems.

That trajectory is reinforced by AMD’s recent strategic partnerships. In October, the company announced a landmark agreement with OpenAI, under which the ChatGPT developer could take up to a 10% equity stake in AMD. As part of the deal, OpenAI plans to deploy 6 gigawatts of AMD Instinct GPUs over several years, starting with an initial 1-gigawatt rollout in the second half of 2026.

The partnership positions AMD as a core supplier in one of the world’s most visible AI ecosystems and marks a significant endorsement of its hardware roadmap.

In addition, Oracle said it will deploy 50,000 AMD AI chips beginning later this year as it expands cloud capacity to meet rising demand for AI workloads from enterprise customers.

Valuation pressure in an AI market

AMD’s stock has more than doubled over the past year, fueled by optimism that it can capture meaningful share in a market long dominated by Nvidia. That rally, however, has also raised the bar for performance.

Investors are increasingly demanding not just growth, but clear evidence that AI-related revenue will scale rapidly enough to justify current valuations. Any hint of moderation — even in the context of a beat-and-raise quarter — risks triggering sharp reactions.

The response to AMD’s guidance mirrors a broader pattern across AI-linked stocks, where earnings season has become less about whether companies are benefiting from AI, and more about how quickly that benefit is accelerating.

Looking ahead, the focus will be on how quickly AMD can convert its growing list of AI partnerships into sustained revenue growth, particularly in its data-center segment. Investors will also watch for clearer disclosure around the mix of training versus inference workloads, competition with Nvidia’s next-generation chips, and the impact of export controls on international sales.

For now, Wednesday’s selloff suggests that the AI boom has entered a more demanding phase. For AMD, the long-term opportunity remains intact, but the market is signaling that optimism alone is no longer enough.

DOJ Document Shows Epstein Reportedly Invested $3M in Coinbase During Early Days 

0

Recently released U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) documents from early February 2026 confirm that Jeffrey Epstein invested approximately $3 million in Coinbase in December 2014.

This occurred during Coinbase’s Series C funding round, when the company was valued at around $400 million (Coinbase is now valued at over $50 billion as a public company). The investment was made through Epstein’s US Virgin Islands-based entity, IGO Company LLC, and amounted to roughly $3,001,000 according to asset listings in the files.

The opportunity was facilitated by Brock Pierce (co-founder of Tether and Blockchain Capital), who had a prior relationship with Epstein. It was structured as a direct investment rather than through a fund.

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam appears to have been aware of Epstein’s involvement, with emails showing discussions about meeting him and forwarding wire transfer details.

In 2018, Epstein reportedly sold half his stake back to Blockchain Capital for around $11–15 million, representing a significant return (several times the original amount), while possibly retaining the other half. This revelation surfaced in the latest batch of unsealed Epstein-related files, highlighting his access to early-stage tech and crypto investments even after his 2008 conviction.

This fits into broader patterns of Epstein’s documented interest in cryptocurrency and tech, including ties to Bitcoin-related projects like Blockstream.

The revelation that Jeffrey Epstein invested approximately $3 million in Coinbase during its 2014 Series C funding round at a ~$400 million valuation has surfaced in the latest February 2026 DOJ document releases, sparking renewed scrutiny but limited immediate fallout for the now-public company valued at over $50 billion.

Reputational Risk for Coinbase and Early Crypto

The emails show Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam was aware of Epstein’s involvement, with discussions about arranging a meeting like Ehrsam noting availability for a potential in-person discussion in New York. No evidence suggests wrongdoing by Coinbase or its team, and the investment was a tiny fraction (<1%) of the round, which included major VCs like Andreessen Horowitz and DFJ.

Still, it highlights the opaque, “move fast” nature of early crypto fundraising—where due diligence on investors may have been lax amid the industry’s outsider status. This fits broader patterns in Epstein’s tech ties like Blockstream investments, MIT DCI funding for Bitcoin Core devs, raising questions about how convicted figures accessed elite networks post-2008 conviction.

Epstein reportedly sold half his stake back to Blockchain Capital via Brock Pierce around 2018 for $11–15 million (a ~4–5x return at then-valuations of $1.6–2 billion), possibly retaining the rest. This was a private secondary transaction with no public market impact.

Today, the original stake’s hypothetical value (if held) would be enormous given Coinbase’s growth, but any remaining shares likely passed to his estate post-2019 death. No ongoing Epstein-linked ownership is indicated in current filings.

Coverage from Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Decrypt, frames it as a “bombshell” footnote in crypto history, emphasizing Epstein’s interest in Bitcoin/crypto for discreet wealth movement. Social media shows crypto communities discussing it—some tying it to broader “decentralization myths” or custody risks, others dismissing it as irrelevant ancient history.

No major stock price drop for Coinbase (COIN) is tied directly to this in reports; reactions lean toward optics and ethics rather than fundamentals. Some users criticize Coinbase’s past “Clarity Act” stances or stablecoin yield issues in the same breath, but it’s more narrative noise than coordinated backlash.

Reinforces calls for stronger KYC/AML in early-stage crypto VC, especially as the sector matures and faces institutional/regulatory scrutiny. Fuels speculation about “hidden influences” in crypto infrastructure, though documents show no control or ongoing leverage—Epstein was a passive investor via intermediaries.

No allegations of illegality against Coinbase; the focus remains on Epstein’s network. It underscores how small early bets could yield outsized returns in a high-growth space. This is more a historical embarrassment and reminder of crypto’s wild-west origins than a current crisis.

Coinbase has not issued a public response in the reports, and the story hasn’t dominated mainstream finance headlines beyond crypto-specific outlets. It adds to the Epstein files’ pattern of exposing uncomfortable elite connections without derailing major players like Coinbase today.

Tether’s $946M Mint of Tokenized Gold Product Reinforces its Gold Strategy 

0

Tether has minted approximately $946 million worth of its tokenized gold product, XAUt (Tether Gold), on the Ethereum blockchain. This occurred around late January to early February 2026.

On-chain data from Etherscan showed Tether minting roughly 192,000 to 192,657 XAUt tokens in this batch. Each XAUt token is backed 1:1 by one troy ounce of physical gold (LBMA-certified bars) stored in secure vaults, primarily in Switzerland.

At the time of the mint, this equated to about 6 metric tons of physical gold, given prevailing gold prices around $4,900–$5,000+ per ounce during that period. This issuance reflects strong demand for tokenized gold as a digital store of value and hedge, especially amid gold’s rally to record highs surpassing $5,000/oz in recent months and broader interest in real-world assets (RWAs) on blockchain.

Tether has been aggressively expanding its gold operations: The company is one of the world’s largest private holders of physical gold, with reserves around 140 tons valued at roughly $24 billion at recent prices, acquired at a pace of up to 1–2 tons per week.

XAUt’s market cap has hit new highs, recently reported around $2.9 billion or more, and it dominates a significant share around 50–60% of the global gold-backed stablecoin/tokenized gold market.

This mint contributes to Tether’s strategy of diversifying reserves beyond US Treasuries which back its flagship USDT stablecoin and capitalizing on gold as a safe-haven asset. The move came during a period of crypto market volatility, highlighting a potential shift toward perceived stability in tokenized commodities.

Tether’s overall gold-backed token supply has grown rapidly—up 38% in Q4 2025 alone in earlier reports—outpacing even USDT growth in some quarters. For context on current pricing as of early February 2026 data: XAUt trades around $4,900–$5,050 per token closely tracking spot gold.

Total tokenized gold sector continues expanding, with whale accumulation and institutional interest driving liquidity. This is part of Tether’s broader push into commodities and RWAs, positioning it as a major player bridging traditional finance and crypto.

Tether’s gold reserves represent a major component of its overall asset strategy, primarily serving to back its tokenized gold product XAU? (Tether Gold) and diversify the reserves supporting its flagship USDT stablecoin.

Tether holds approximately 140 metric tons of physical gold in total, valued at roughly $23–$24 billion depending on fluctuating spot gold prices, which have recently exceeded $5,000 per troy ounce. This positions Tether as one of the largest known private (non-governmental, non-central bank) holders of physical gold globally, surpassing the official reserves of several countries and rivaling major institutions outside of central banks and ETFs.

Around 16.2 metric tons precisely 520,089.350 fine troy ounces as per the latest attestation report http://gold.tether.to . Each XAU? token is backed 1:1 by one fine troy ounce of LBMA-certified physical gold, with the circulating supply closely matching this about 520,089 tokens in circulation, market cap around $2.6–$2.7 billion.

This makes XAU? the dominant player in the tokenized/gold-backed stablecoin market, holding roughly 60% share. Additional reserves primarily for USDT diversification and corporate holdings: The bulk of the 140 tons, including gold acquired beyond direct XAU? backing.

Earlier USDT reserve audits e.g., end of Q3 2025 showed significant gold exposure around $12.9 billion, equating to ~104 tons at then-prices, with further additions in Q4 2025 (27 tons reported). All physical gold is stored in secure, high-security vaults in Switzerland often described in reports as former nuclear bunkers or “James Bond”-style facilities for emphasis on security.

It consists of LBMA Good Delivery standard bars, ensuring high purity and tradability. Tether has aggressively accumulated gold, especially in 2025–2026 amid gold’s strong rally (prices up significantly due to safe-haven demand, inflation concerns, and geopolitical factors): Purchases of 1–2 tons per week equating to potentially over $1 billion monthly at current prices.

In Q4 2025 alone, ~27 tons were added. Over the past year, more than 70 tons were acquired overall. This is part of CEO Paolo Ardoino’s stated goal to allocate 10–15% of Tether’s broader investment portfolio to physical gold, viewing it as a hedge against economic uncertainty and a diversification away from heavy reliance on US Treasuries which remain the primary backing for USDT.

Tether publishes quarterly reserves reports for XAU? on its dedicated site, including attestations confirming at least 1:1 backing. Broader USDT reserves which include some gold are attested by firms like BDO. Users can verify allocations, though full independent Big Four audits for gold specifically are noted as a priority in some regulatory contexts.

This gold strategy bridges traditional commodities with blockchain, fueling tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) while enhancing perceived stability for Tether’s ecosystem amid crypto volatility. The holdings continue to grow, reflecting strong demand for digital gold exposure.

Coinbase Adds DeepBook and WAL to its Listing Roadmap 

0

Coinbase has recently added DEEP from DeepBook and WAL from Walrus to its official asset listing roadmap. This update was announced via Coinbase’s blog and their CoinbaseMarkets account on X.

Both tokens are built on the Sui blockchain network. DeepBook (DEEP): Powers on-chain liquidity and order book functionality on Sui. Walrus (WAL): Focuses on decentralized storage solutions.

Adding tokens to the Coinbase roadmap means they’ve passed initial reviews including compliance, legal, and technical checks and are under consideration for full trading support. However, it’s not a guaranteed or immediate listing—trading availability depends on factors like sufficient market-making support and technical infrastructure readiness.

Coinbase will announce the specific trading start date separately once conditions are met. They also warn users not to send these assets to Coinbase until an official listing is confirmed. This news has generated buzz in the crypto community, especially for the Sui ecosystem, as it could bring more visibility and liquidity to these projects.

Many see it as a bullish signal for $SUI-related infrastructure tokens. The addition of DeepBook (DEEP) and Walrus (WAL) to Coinbase’s official asset listing roadmap carries several key implications for the projects, the Sui ecosystem, investors, and the broader crypto market.

For DEEP and WAL Tokens, Bullish Signal and Validation

Inclusion means both tokens have passed Coinbase’s initial due diligence on compliance, legal, security, technical, and other criteria. This acts as institutional-grade endorsement from one of the most regulated U.S. exchanges, boosting credibility and visibility.

Coinbase listings historically drive significant inflows from retail and institutional users, often leading to short-term pumps (sometimes 20-100%+ on announcement or listing day) due to hype and easier access. Past roadmap additions have frequently preceded price surges, though not guaranteed.

As of early February 2026, community chatter notes positive sentiment, with some tokens showing recovery or gains post-announcement. Trading isn’t live yet—launch depends on securing market-making support for tight spreads/liquidity and technical integration readiness.

Coinbase will announce the exact trading date separately. They explicitly warn: do not send DEEP or WAL to Coinbase wallets until confirmed, to avoid loss of funds. As Sui’s native decentralized central limit order book (CLOB) for on-chain liquidity, a Coinbase listing could accelerate adoption in DeFi, attracting more traders and volume to Sui’s orderbook infrastructure.

WAL (Walrus): Focused on decentralized storage (a growing niche like Filecoin/Arweave equivalents), this adds mainstream exposure and could drive usage for data-heavy apps on Sui. Both are core Sui infrastructure projects (built natively on Sui).

Coinbase spotlighting them highlights Sui’s maturing layer-1 status, especially in DeFi liquidity and decentralized storage—key for scaling real-world applications. This follows Sui’s push into high-performance chains. It signals broader validation, potentially attracting more builders, capital, and partnerships.

Community reactions emphasize this as a “big signal” for Sui’s core tech gaining global recognition. Easier access to DEEP/WAL on Coinbase could funnel more users/liquidity into Sui dApps, indirectly benefiting $SUI via higher TVL, transaction fees, or ecosystem growth.

Even in a mature market, Coinbase additions remain high-impact for altcoins—especially infrastructure tokens—due to the exchange’s U.S. user base and regulatory trust. It differentiates from hype-driven listings on less-regulated platforms.

Delays or non-listings happen if conditions aren’t met (e.g., insufficient liquidity providers). Short-term hype can lead to “sell the news” dumps post-listing. Crypto remains speculative; past performance isn’t indicative.

X discussions show excitement, with some users highlighting high APYs on Sui lending protocols for these tokens and viewing it as a long-term positive despite current market dips. This is a strong positive development for DEEP, WAL, and Sui—positioning them for greater adoption and liquidity—but treat it as a step toward (not confirmation of) full listing.