DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 31

SoftBank Seeks Up to $40bn Bridge Loan to Fund OpenAI Investment Ahead of Expected IPO

0

SoftBank Group Corp. is in advanced discussions with banks to secure a bridge loan of up to $40 billion, primarily to finance its deepening investment in OpenAI, according to a Bloomberg News report, citing people familiar with the matter.

The facility, which would mark SoftBank’s largest-ever borrowing denominated solely in U.S. dollars, is structured with a 12-month tenor and is being underwritten by four lenders, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. Talks remain ongoing, and terms could still evolve, the report noted. The loan comes on the heels of SoftBank’s completion of a $41 billion investment in OpenAI, finalized in December 2025, which has positioned the Japanese conglomerate as the AI startup’s largest financial backer with an approximately 11% ownership stake.

The commitment was first announced in March 2025, when SoftBank agreed to invest up to $40 billion in a for-profit subsidiary of OpenAI, structured as a combination of direct capital from SoftBank Vision Fund 2 (SVF2) and syndicated co-investments from third-party participants. The funding was executed in two closings. The first, in April 2025, involved $7.5 billion through SVF2. The second closing, completed December 26, 2025, added $22.5 billion from SVF2, plus an oversubscribed $11 billion from co-investors, bringing the total to $41 billion.

This exceeded the initial $40 billion pledge, reflecting strong external demand and SoftBank’s confidence in OpenAI’s trajectory. SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son has described the OpenAI bet as central to his “all-in” strategy on artificial intelligence, viewing the company as a linchpin in the emerging “Intelligence Revolution.” The investment aligns with Son’s long-term vision of AI as a transformative force, building on SoftBank’s earlier stakes in Arm Holdings (ARM), Alibaba (BABA), and other tech giants.

OpenAI’s latest funding round valued the company at $840 billion post-money, a figure that could climb to $1 trillion in an anticipated initial public offering (IPO) later in 2026, according to Reuters reporting from 2025. To fund the first tranche of the OpenAI investment, SoftBank reportedly relied on an $8 billion bridge loan, as it lacked sufficient cash on hand at the time.

Sources indicate the company may draw on up to $11.5 billion in undrawn margin loans backed by its stake in Arm Holdings to cover portions of the remaining commitment. This reliance on leverage has raised some investor concerns, with  SoftBank’s credit default swaps (CDS) spreads widening in recent months amid broader market volatility in AI-related assets.

S&P Global Ratings has warned that SoftBank’s increasing leverage and concentration of assets around OpenAI could pressure liquidity metrics and credit spreads if market conditions deteriorate. The company’s debt-to-equity ratio has climbed in recent quarters, driven by aggressive AI bets, though strong performance from Arm (whose shares have risen 65% since its 2023 IPO) has provided a buffer.

Analysts at Jefferies noted in a February 2026 report that SoftBank’s finances remain “manageable” but emphasized the need for disciplined capital allocation to avoid overextension.

OpenAI’s IPO preparations are well underway, with the company raising $110 billion in its latest round from investors including SoftBank ($30 billion), Nvidia ($30 billion), and Amazon ($50 billion). The funds are earmarked for expanding AI research, data center infrastructure, and global operations. Reuters reported in January 2026 that OpenAI is targeting a $1 trillion valuation for its public debut, which would make it one of the most valuable listings in history, surpassing Saudi Aramco’s 2019 IPO.

SoftBank’s $41 billion stake, now valued at over $90 billion based on OpenAI’s latest post-money valuation, represents a substantial unrealized gain, underscoring the success of Son’s AI pivot after earlier Vision Fund setbacks. The bridge loan would provide immediate liquidity to fulfill commitments without liquidating other holdings, such as Arm shares, which Son has described as “core” to SoftBank’s portfolio.

The investment, however, has met some controversy. In 2025, MIT Sloan professor Michael Cusumano characterized Nvidia’s parallel $30 billion commitment as “kind of a wash,” noting the circular nature of AI investments where chipmakers fund model developers who, in turn, purchase massive volumes of GPUs. SoftBank’s loan-backed approach adds another layer of financial engineering to this ecosystem, potentially amplifying returns but also risks if AI adoption slows or valuations correct.

Market reaction to the Bloomberg report was muted Tuesday, with SoftBank shares dipping modestly in Tokyo trading amid broader Asia-Pacific weakness driven by Middle East tensions. Investors appear focused on SoftBank’s ability to manage leverage while capitalizing on OpenAI’s growth — especially with the IPO on the horizon.

The $40 billion facility, if completed, would yield the unprecedented scale of capital required to fuel the AI boom, and it underlines SoftBank’s willingness to leverage its balance sheet aggressively. It also highlights the symbiotic relationship between infrastructure providers like Nvidia and model builders like OpenAI, with SoftBank acting as a key financier, bridging the two.

Gulf Countries Considering Invoking Force Majeure Clauses on Contracts with the United States 

0

Amid the escalating conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran—which began with joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian territory around February 28, 2026, resulting in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and subsequent Iranian retaliatory missile and drone attacks across the Gulf region.

Several Middle Eastern countries, particularly Gulf states, have initiated discussions about withdrawing significant investments from the U.S. to mitigate economic pressures. This comes as Iran has targeted U.S. allies in the region, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman, leading to disruptions in energy infrastructure, heightened security costs, and broader regional instability.

The war has rapidly expanded beyond Iran, with retaliatory strikes affecting Gulf countries that host U.S. military bases or have aligned with American interests. Iran has launched waves of drones and missiles, causing material damage to civilian and military sites, such as hotels and residential buildings in Bahrain’s Manama and intercepted attacks on Saudi Arabia’s Prince Sultan Air Base.

Gulf states, which had previously urged President Donald Trump to avoid military action and pursue diplomacy with Iran, now find themselves “caught in the middle,” facing direct threats despite not initiating the conflict. UAE billionaire Khalaf al-Habtoor publicly criticized Trump, stating, “Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war with Iran? And on what basis did you make this dangerous decision?”

He accused the U.S. of placing Gulf Cooperation Council countries “at the heart of a danger they did not choose.” U.S. officials, including Admiral Brad Cooper of U.S. Central Command, have reported progress in degrading Iranian capabilities, with a 90% decrease in ballistic missile attacks and an 83% decline in drone strikes since the conflict’s onset, alongside the sinking of over 30 Iranian vessels.

However, the ongoing hostilities—expected by Trump to last four to five weeks but with potential for prolongation—have disrupted key trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz, which handles about 20% of global oil and gas supplies. Key Gulf economies—Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar—are jointly reviewing billions of dollars in overseas investments, including those in the U.S., as a direct response to the war’s financial toll.

These nations manage some of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds and had pledged hundreds of billions in U.S. investments following Trump’s regional visit in 2025. According to reports, officials are assessing whether to invoke force majeure clauses in contracts to withdraw from commitments, while redirecting funds toward defense, security, and domestic stability.

A Gulf official cited in the Financial Times stated that these countries have “begun an internal review to determine whether force majeure clauses can be invoked in current contracts while also reviewing current and future investment commitments in order to alleviate some of the anticipated economic strain from the current war.”

This potential pullback is framed as a way to avenge or counter the “imposition” of the war, with some viewing it as leverage to pressure the White House into seeking a quicker resolution. An adviser to a Gulf government noted that the prospect of such reviews “had caught the White House’s attention,” potentially amplifying calls for diplomacy.

The conflict has triggered sharp market declines across the Middle East: Saudi Arabian and Egyptian stocks fell significantly, with Egypt’s main index dropping over 8% since mid-February 2026. Global markets plunged on March 2, with U.S. crude oil prices jumping 8%, U.S. stock futures down 1%, and European shares down 2%.

Treasuries pulled back amid renewed inflation concerns from potential oil supply disruptions. Capital market activities, including fundraisings and mergers, are disrupted, with travel halted and Chinese investors pausing talks on Middle Eastern assets.

Volatility persists, with trading halts and fears of sustained declines if hostilities continue. From a Gulf viewpoint, the U.S. alliance is under scrutiny, with questions about whether investments in America are “funding peace or war” while exposing the region to risks.

Iranian perspectives, as reflected in X posts and analyses, portray this as a successful attrition strategy weakening U.S. regional hegemony. U.S. and Israeli stances emphasize dismantling Iran’s military infrastructure, but some investors see long-term potential for a “peace dividend” if the Iranian regime falls, leading to greater Middle East stability.

However, the immediate outlook remains uncertain, with risks to energy supply chains and cross-border investments.

US Dollar Held Steady Friday, Heads for Sharpest Weekly Gain in a Year As Middle East Conflict Drives Investors to Safe-haven Assets

0

The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) held firm on Friday and was headed for its sharpest weekly gain in more than a year as intensifying hostilities in the Middle East pushed investors toward traditional safe-haven assets.

Demand for the greenback surged as the conflict between Israel and Iran widened into a broader regional confrontation, sending oil prices sharply higher and raising concerns about a fresh wave of global inflation. Currencies tied to economies dependent on imported energy — including the Euro and Japanese Yen — remained under pressure as investors recalibrated expectations for monetary policy across major central banks.

The dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of major currencies, rose to around 99.14, putting it on course for a weekly gain of roughly 1.5% — the strongest since November 2024. The euro slipped about 0.16% to $1.159 and was set for its steepest weekly decline since September 2022, while the yen weakened to around 157.77 per dollar. British Pound Sterling also edged lower to roughly $1.3347.

The currency moves highlight how quickly global markets have been reshaped by the war’s economic fallout. What began as hopes for a contained confrontation has evolved into a wider regional escalation that is now threatening global energy supply chains and forcing traders to reassess the trajectory of interest rates worldwide.

Fresh uncertainty gripped markets after heavy military exchanges between the two sides. Israeli forces launched extensive air strikes on Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs of Beirut and began what officials described as a “broad-scale” wave of attacks targeting infrastructure in Tehran. Iran responded by saying it had fired missiles at the heart of Tel Aviv.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump signaled a more aggressive posture from Washington. The U.S. president said he wanted a role in choosing Iran’s next head of state after joint U.S. and Israeli strikes killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, during the early phase of the conflict. Trump also encouraged Iranian Kurdish groups based in Iraq to intensify pressure on Tehran, a move that analysts say risks widening the war even further.

Energy, The Major Concern

For financial markets, the dominant concern has become energy.

Iran has reportedly expanded its retaliation beyond direct military targets, striking or threatening oil infrastructure across the region. Energy installations linked to producers in Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been targeted, heightening fears that the conflict could severely disrupt supplies from the world’s most important oil-exporting region.

Those fears have already pushed crude prices sharply higher and injected fresh volatility into currency markets. Analysts say the extent of the energy shock will determine how long the dollar’s rally lasts.

Lee Hardman, senior currency analyst at MUFG, said the outlook for the greenback hinges largely on how severely energy prices surge.

“The key driver will ultimately be the scale of the energy price shock,” Hardman said. “If we were to see oil prices continue to jump higher and remain higher for longer, that would be the most supportive outcome for a stronger dollar.”

Conversely, he said, a cooling of the conflict that leads to a retreat in crude prices could quickly unwind some of the dollar’s gains.

The surge in oil has also begun reshaping expectations for global monetary policy. Higher energy costs typically feed directly into inflation, complicating efforts by central banks that had been preparing to ease interest rates after months of moderating price pressures.

Traders have already pushed back expectations for rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. According to the CME Group FedWatch tool, the probability of a June rate cut has dropped to roughly 34%.

Markets have also scaled back expectations for easing by the Bank of England, while money markets have even begun pricing in the possibility that the European Central Bank could raise rates again later this year if inflation surges due to energy costs.

Currency traders say the shift in the macroeconomic backdrop has been abrupt. Only weeks ago, many investors were preparing for synchronized monetary easing across major economies as inflation cooled. The sudden spike in oil has complicated that narrative and forced markets to reassess the global outlook.

Nathan Swami, head of FX trading for Japan, Asia North, and Australia at Citigroup in Singapore, said clients have broadly moved to cut exposure to riskier currencies.

“Broadly speaking, we are seeing most clients reduce risk across both G10 and EM currencies,” he said.

The shift reflects a wider retreat from risk assets. Equities and bonds have both come under pressure during the week’s volatile trading sessions. Even traditional safe-haven assets such as gold have experienced bouts of selling as investors raise cash and rotate toward the dollar.

Stability, When?

Energy security concerns are also intensifying debate over the effectiveness of Western military efforts to stabilize shipping routes and oil supply infrastructure. The U.S. Navy and allied forces have been considering expanded escort operations for tankers moving through the region’s key maritime corridors, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints.

Yet many analysts doubt that naval protection alone will prevent the market disruption already unfolding.

Given how rapidly the conflict has escalated — and with Iran targeting energy infrastructure across multiple Gulf states — market participants say escort operations may do little to prevent an oil shock if the fighting continues to widen.

Oil facilities scattered across the Gulf remain difficult to fully protect from missile and drone attacks, and even temporary disruptions could send energy prices significantly higher. For major importing economies in Europe and Asia, that scenario would amplify inflation pressures just as central banks had hoped to begin loosening policy.

The resulting dynamic has strengthened the dollar’s appeal. Historically, the U.S. currency tends to rally during periods of geopolitical turmoil because of its status as the world’s primary reserve currency and the depth of American financial markets.

Investors will also be watching incoming U.S. economic data for clues about how resilient the American economy remains amid the turmoil. Markets are awaiting February’s employment report, which economists surveyed by Reuters expect to show that nonfarm payrolls increased by around 59,000 jobs after January’s gain of 130,000. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at 4.3%.

Hardman said a stronger-than-expected jobs report could amplify the dollar’s rally by forcing markets to further dial back expectations for interest-rate cuts. A robust labor reading could trigger additional selling in global bond markets and push the dollar even higher as investors adjust to the prospect of tighter financial conditions.

Recent labor indicators have already suggested resilience. Data released Thursday showed the number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits held steady last week, while layoffs declined sharply in February — signs that the job market remains relatively stable.

Beyond currencies, the geopolitical turmoil has also spilled into digital asset markets.

Bitcoin slipped about 0.96% to roughly $70,459, while Ether dropped about 1.21% to near $2,055 as investors trimmed exposure to volatile assets amid the uncertainty.

For now, currency strategists say the trajectory of the war, particularly its impact on global energy supply, will remain the dominant force shaping markets. If the conflict broadens further and oil infrastructure across the Gulf continues to come under attack, analysts warn that the world could be facing a new energy shock with wide-ranging consequences for inflation, interest rates, and the global financial system.

KuCoin and Several Entities Operating in Dubai without Required Licenses 

0

Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA)—the emirate’s dedicated crypto regulator—has issued a public investor and marketplace alert stating that KuCoin and several affiliated entities has been operating without the required license.

VARA explicitly named entities including Phoenixfin Pte Ltd, MEK Global Limited, Peken Global Limited, and KuCoin Exchange EU GmbH—all commercially advertising as KuCoin via the domain kucoin.com—as providing virtual asset services to Dubai residents without necessary regulatory approvals and misrepresenting their licensing status.

KuCoin does not hold any license to provide virtual asset services in or from Dubai. The regulator ordered these entities to immediately cease and desist all unlicensed virtual asset activities. Any promotion, advertising, or solicitation related to KuCoin in Dubai has not been approved.

VARA warned investors that using unlicensed platforms carries significant financial and legal risks, urging residents to verify providers against its public register of licensed entities and avoid unregulated services. This action aligns with Dubai’s broader push to enforce strict compliance in its ambition to become a regulated crypto hub—while licensing players like Binance and Bybit, it has previously fined and issued cease-and-desist orders to unlicensed firms.

KuCoin has faced similar regulatory challenges elsewhere recently, including restrictions in the EU and earlier U.S. actions, but this Dubai move is a targeted local enforcement rather than a full global shutdown. The exchange has reportedly indicated it will cooperate with regulators and respects local laws.

If you’re in Dubai or using KuCoin, it’s advisable to review your exposure and consider licensed alternatives. KuCoin has encountered regulatory challenges in multiple jurisdictions beyond Dubai, often involving unlicensed operations, compliance failures especially AML/CTF, or outright restrictions and bans.

These stem from its offshore roots originally Seychelles-based, later re-domiciled to Turks and Caicos Islands in 2025 and efforts to expand into regulated markets without fully meeting local standards.

KuCoin faced major enforcement from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). It pleaded guilty to operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business violating FinCEN and CFTC rules and agreed to a $300 million settlement. This led to a mandatory 2-year ban from serving U.S. residents, with the exchange officially exiting the market in early 2025.

KuCoin remains restricted in the U.S., where it never held proper licenses. In February 2026, Austria’s Financial Market Authority (FMA) prohibited it from onboarding new customers, concluding new contracts, or launching new products. The reason: breaches in internal organization, specifically lacking suitable key compliance officers for anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorist financing (CTF), and sanctions observance.

Trading and deposit services were suspended starting February 4, 2026. This effectively halts new EU business until compliance gaps are fixed, marking one of the first strict enforcement actions under MiCA. KuCoin is under a permanent ban from the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and other provincial regulators.

It falls under broader restrictions from the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) Pre-Registration Undertaking regime, which forced many global exchanges to exit or face enforcement. Canadians are barred from using KuCoin services, with risks of account freezes for attempts to bypass geo-blocks. KuCoin officially restricts or does not support services in around 20 countries/regions per its terms of service.

This includes mainland China, Singapore, and various others. In Nigeria, it paused P2P trading and naira services in 2024 amid SEC hints at broader P2P bans, though this predates recent events. Earlier issues include Seychelles regulatory changes in 2025 that prompted re-domiciliation after license pressures, and ongoing global scrutiny over AML/shortcomings.

These actions reflect a worldwide trend of regulators cracking down on unlicensed or non-compliant crypto platforms, especially as frameworks like MiCA in the EU and stablecoin rules in the U.S. mature. KuCoin has stated it aims to cooperate and comply where possible, but users in affected areas face risks like limited access, potential asset freezes, or legal exposure.

Coruna Exploit Kit Targets Older iOS Devices to Steal Cryptocurrency 

0

Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) has identified and detailed a powerful exploit kit called Coruna, which targets older iOS devices to steal cryptocurrency wallet data and potentially drain funds.

It primarily exploits iPhones running iOS 13.0 through iOS 17.2.1 (spanning releases from September 2019 to December 2023). Newer versions (iOS 17.3 and later, including the current iOS as of 2026) are not vulnerable because Apple patched the relevant issues in those updates.

This is a drive-by and zero-click style exploit delivered via malicious or compromised websites; often fake finance, gambling, crypto, or news sites, including some Chinese-language scam pages. When a vulnerable iPhone visits the site, the kit fingerprints the device.

If it’s on an outdated iOS version, it deploys a chain of exploits; five full exploit chains using at least 23 vulnerabilities, some previously undisclosed. This allows sandbox escape, root access, and deep system compromise. Once inside, it scans for and extracts sensitive crypto data: mnemonic seed phrases (BIP39 recovery phrases), private keys, QR codes, encrypted wallet files, login credentials from apps, etc.

Targeted Wallets and Apps

It specifically hunts data from popular crypto apps and wallets such as MetaMask, Phantom, Trust Wallet, Exodus, Uniswap, and around 18 others in total. First spotted by Google in early 2025. Initially linked to suspected nation-state actors; Russian intelligence targeting Ukrainian users via compromised “watering hole” sites.

Later repurposed for financially motivated cybercrime, especially via fake Chinese crypto and finance sites to mass-steal assets. It’s described as unusually sophisticated for commodity malware—more like commercial spyware or nation-state grade tools adapted for crypto theft.

Go to Settings > General > Software Update on your iPhone and install the latest iOS version available. This is the primary fix, as Coruna does not work on patched systems. If You Can’t Update (e.g., older hardware that no longer receives full updates): Enable Lockdown Mode (Settings > Privacy & Security > Lockdown Mode). This blocks the exploit chains and is explicitly recommended by Google and Apple for high-risk users.

Avoid clicking suspicious links or visiting untrusted sites especially anything promising crypto deals, airdrops, or urgent wallet actions. Use hardware wallets for large holdings instead of software and mobile wallets when possible. If your iPhone is on iOS 17.3 or newer, you’re not at risk from this specific kit.

Never enter seed phrases on any website or app unless you’re 100% sure it’s legitimate. Consider using a separate, up-to-date device for crypto activities if your main phone is older. This threat highlights how outdated devices become prime targets for sophisticated attackers shifting from targeted espionage to broader crypto theft.

Android users face several similar threats to the Coruna iOS exploit kit, though the Android ecosystem differs due to its open nature, sideloading risks, and widespread use of accessibility services abused by malware. Unlike Coruna’s sophisticated zero-click browser-based exploits targeting outdated iOS versions for crypto wallet data extraction, Android threats often rely on: Malware installed via phishing, fake apps, malvertising, or sideloaded APKs.

Abuse of Android’s Accessibility Services for remote control, UI automation, and silent data theft; opening wallet apps, capturing screens, extracting seed phrases and private keys. Overlay attacks, clipboard hijacking, or direct credential and seed phrase stealing.

Some RATs (Remote Access Trojans) enable live control to drain wallets during active sessions. These are frequently sold as Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS), making them accessible to lower-skill criminals for mass financial theft. Crypto-focused Android malware surged in 2025–2026, contributing to billions in overall crypto scam and fraud losses.

Albiriox: A rapidly evolving Android RAT and banking Trojan sold as MaaS. It provides live remote control over infected phones, allowing attackers to perform on-device fraud—quietly draining bank accounts and crypto wallets during real user sessions. It targets global finance and crypto services with structured modules for credential theft and transaction manipulation.