In a recent announcement, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed user complaints about ChatGPT’s perceived laziness, assuring the community that the issue has been resolved with a software update. Altman stated that GPT-4, the latest iteration of the chatbot, is expected to be “much less lazy now.”

Altman shared his sentiments in a post on platform X, acknowledging the initial hiccups GPT-4 faced in adhering to its New Year’s resolutions. The CEO’s comments come after numerous users reported instances where ChatGPT refused to complete tasks and even exhibited a sassy attitude.

Late last year, one frustrated startup founder requested ChatGPT to generate a list of all the weeks between November 2023 and May 2024, only to receive a response claiming the chatbot couldn’t provide an “exhaustive list.”

This sparked a wave of similar complaints from users who experienced challenges in obtaining desired outputs.

“It’s good that we’re seeing more people voicing their concerns, there’s two topics being simultaneously discussed here and perhaps we should discuss them separately,” a user complained in December last year.

He said that ChatGPT’s performance in handling files is dwindling (or is gradually ramping up) and that the chatbot’s general performance is slowing down, probably intelligently, to save on resources, processing, and costs.

“Although I’m beginning to understand point 1 better from the responses on this thread, I still feel that point 2 is more prevalent, I see more and more of it daily, even though I clearly instruct ChatGPT to “provide full and complete code with comments” I end up getting with missing code, shortcuts, deflection of responsibility for me to carry out its instructions, or runtime errors or network errors, etc.

“I read a joke that it probably got promoted to a senior developer level and now talks at a high level just like a senior dev does, which although sounds like a joke might be true, who knows?

“I wish to see this fixed. Or else why would OpenAI charge monthly fees if its performance isn’t satisfactory,” he concluded.

Some users, however, found creative ways to incentivize ChatGPT to provide more comprehensive responses. One user reported that the AI model would offer longer answers if promised a $200 tip.

OpenAI took note of these issues and swiftly responded with a software update in January, aiming to address the reported “laziness” in the advanced GPT-4 “turbo” model.

The root cause of ChatGPT’s reluctance to perform tasks remains unclear. AI models, by their nature, can exhibit unpredictable behaviors that may be challenging for their creators to fully comprehend. OpenAI emphasized that different training runs can lead to models with diverse personalities and quirks, even when trained on the same data.

Speculations arose regarding the cause of ChatGPT’s lackadaisical behavior, with one developer suggesting the possibility of the chatbot taking a winter break. Rob Lynch shared on X that his test on GPT-4 turbo indicated statistically shorter answers when the model “thought” it was December rather than May.

As OpenAI continues to fine-tune and enhance its AI models, Altman assured users that the recent fix should significantly improve ChatGPT’s responsiveness and willingness to complete tasks.

The company said it remains committed to addressing user concerns promptly and maintaining a positive user experience as it navigates the evolving artificial intelligence industry.

One of the common misconceptions about investing is that markets always reflect the current state of the economy or society. According to this view, when things are going well, stocks should rise, and when things are going poorly, stocks should fall.

However, this is not how markets work in reality. Markets are forward-looking, meaning they anticipate future events and expectations, not just react to present ones. Therefore, sometimes stocks can go up when things are bad, and vice versa.

This phenomenon can be explained by the concept of market efficiency, which states that all available information is already incorporated into the prices of securities. This means that markets are constantly adjusting to new information and expectations, and that prices reflect the consensus opinion of all market participants.

When things are bad, markets may already have priced in the worst-case scenario, and any positive news or signs of improvement can cause a rally. Conversely, when things are good, markets may already have priced in the best-case scenario, and any negative news or signs of deterioration can cause a sell-off.

The cynical view of markets is that stocks go up when things are bad because investors are greedy and irrational, and they ignore the reality of the situation. However, this view is too simplistic and ignores the complexity and diversity of market forces.

Markets are not monolithic entities that act in unison, but rather collections of individuals and institutions with different goals, preferences, strategies, and expectations. Some investors may be optimistic and buy stocks when things are bad, hoping for a recovery. Others may be pessimistic and sell stocks when things are good, fearing a downturn.

Some may be contrarian and do the opposite of what the majority does. Some may be passive and follow the market trends. Some may be active and try to beat the market. Some may focus on fundamentals and long-term value. Others may focus on technicals and short-term momentum. Some may invest in specific sectors or industries. Others may diversify across different asset classes.

The point is that there is no single or simple explanation for why stocks go up or down in any given situation. Markets are dynamic and complex systems that reflect the collective actions and reactions of millions of participants with different information, expectations, and behaviors.

The cynical view of markets is not only inaccurate but also unhelpful for investors who want to make informed and rational decisions. Instead of relying on stereotypes or biases, investors should try to understand the underlying factors and drivers that influence market movements, such as economic data, corporate earnings, interest rates, inflation, geopolitics, consumer sentiment, etc.

By doing so, investors can better assess the risks and opportunities in different scenarios and adjust their portfolios accordingly.

The job market is accelerating just as it was meant to be sputtering

Meanwhile, many economists and analysts predicted that the job market would slow down in the first quarter of 2024, as the effects of the pandemic, the trade war, and the environmental crisis would take their toll on the global economy.

However, the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows that the opposite is happening: the job market is accelerating, adding 321,000 jobs in January, beating expectations and marking the highest monthly gain since November 2023.

What is driving this unexpected surge in employment? There are several factors that may explain this phenomenon. First, the vaccination campaign has been successful in reducing the spread of the virus and boosting consumer confidence.

According to a survey by the Conference Board, consumer confidence rose to 113.8 in January, the highest level since March 2020. This means that more people are willing to spend money on goods and services, creating more demand and more jobs.

Second, the government stimulus package that was passed in December 2023 has also had a positive impact on the job market. The package included $600 billion in direct payments to households, $300 billion in extended unemployment benefits, $350 billion in aid to state and local governments, and $200 billion in funding for infrastructure, education, and health care. These measures have injected money into the economy and supported millions of workers who were at risk of losing their income or their jobs.

Third, the trade war between the US and China has eased somewhat after both sides agreed to resume negotiations and suspend some of the tariffs that were imposed in 2022. This has reduced the uncertainty and the costs for businesses that rely on international trade, especially in sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, and technology. As a result, some of these businesses have increased their hiring and investment plans.

Finally, the environmental crisis has also created some opportunities for job creation, especially in the green economy. The Biden administration has made climate change a priority and has pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

To achieve this goal, the government has launched several initiatives to promote renewable energy, electric vehicles, energy efficiency, and carbon capture. These initiatives have stimulated innovation and entrepreneurship in these fields and have generated new jobs for workers with different skills and backgrounds.

All these factors combined have created a favorable environment for the job market, which is showing signs of resilience and dynamism. However, there are still some challenges and risks that could derail this positive trend. For example, the pandemic is not over yet, and new variants of the virus could emerge and cause new outbreaks.

The trade war could also escalate again if the negotiations between the US and China fail or if other countries join the dispute. The environmental crisis could also worsen if natural disasters such as floods, droughts, or wildfires become more frequent and severe.

Therefore, it is important to remain cautious and vigilant about the future of the job market and not take anything for granted. The job market is accelerating just as it was meant to be sputtering, but it could also sputter just as it was meant to be accelerating.