The US and Iran have been locked in a standoff over Iran’s nuclear program and its regional influence for decades. The tensions have escalated and de-escalated several times, but the core issues remain unresolved. In this blog post, I will examine the historical background, the current situation, and the possible outcomes of this long-standing conflict.
The origins of the US-Iran standoff can be traced back to the 1953 coup d’état that overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and restored the monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The coup was orchestrated by the CIA and the British intelligence, who feared that Mosaddegh would nationalize Iran’s oil industry and align with the Soviet Union.
The Shah ruled Iran with an iron fist, suppressing opposition and dissent, and relying on the US for military and economic support. He also embarked on a modernization and westernization program that alienated many traditional and religious sectors of Iranian society.
The Shah’s regime was toppled by the 1979 Islamic Revolution, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who established an Islamic Republic based on the principle of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). The revolution was a watershed moment in Iranian history, as it marked a rejection of foreign interference and a return to Islamic values and identity.
However, it also sparked a hostile reaction from the US, which severed diplomatic ties with Iran and imposed sanctions. The US also supported Iraq in its eight-year war with Iran, which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides.
The US-Iran standoff entered a new phase in 2002, when President George W. Bush labeled Iran as part of the “axis of evil”, along with Iraq and North Korea. Bush accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and supporting terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
The US also accused Iran of meddling in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the US had invaded and toppled the regimes of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban. Iran denied these allegations and insisted that its nuclear program was peaceful and that its regional activities were legitimate.
The standoff reached a critical point in 2015, when Iran and six world powers (the US, China, Russia, France, Britain, and Germany) signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal. The deal required Iran to limit its nuclear activities in exchange for relief from sanctions.
The deal was hailed as a diplomatic breakthrough that could pave the way for a broader dialogue and cooperation between Iran and the West. However, it also faced fierce opposition from Israel, Saudi Arabia, and some US lawmakers, who argued that it was too lenient and did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program and its regional role.
The standoff took a dramatic turn in 2018, when President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA and reimposed sanctions on Iran.
Trump called the deal “the worst deal ever” and vowed to exert “maximum pressure” on Iran to force it to renegotiate a more comprehensive agreement that would also curb its missile program and its support for proxy forces in the region. Iran responded by gradually reducing its compliance with the JCPOA and resuming some of its nuclear activities.
The standoff escalated further in 2020, when the US assassinated Qasem Soleimani, the commander of Iran’s elite Quds Force, in a drone strike in Baghdad. Iran retaliated by launching missile attacks on US bases in Iraq but avoided direct confrontation.
The standoff is now at a crossroads, as President Joe Biden has expressed his willingness to rejoin the JCPOA if Iran returns to full compliance. Biden has also signaled his interest in engaging with Iran on other issues of mutual concern, such as regional stability, human rights, and counterterrorism.
However, Biden faces several challenges and constraints, such as the opposition from Israel and some Gulf states, the skepticism from some US allies in Europe, the resistance from some US lawmakers from both parties, and the domestic pressure to prioritize other issues such as COVID-19 and climate change.
Iran also faces its own challenges and constraints, such as the upcoming presidential election in June 2021, which could bring a more hardline leader to power who may be less inclined to negotiate with the US.
Iran also faces economic hardship due to sanctions and pandemic, social unrest due to repression and corruption, security threats due to regional rivalries and conflicts, and environmental crises due to droughts and floods.
The outcome of the standoff is uncertain and depends on many factors. Some possible scenarios are:
A return to diplomacy: Both sides agree to revive the JCPOA and engage in further talks on other issues. This scenario would require mutual trust, goodwill, flexibility, patience, and coordination among all parties involved.
A continuation of stalemate: Both sides remain stuck in their positions and fail to reach an agreement. This scenario would entail more sanctions, more nuclear activities, more regional tensions, and more risks of miscalculation and escalation.
A spiral into war: Both sides resort to military action and trigger a wider regional conflict. This scenario would have devastating consequences for human lives, infrastructure, economy, environment, and security.
The US-Iran standoff is one of the most complex and consequential issues in the world today. It has implications not only for the two countries, but also for the region and the international community. It is a test of diplomacy, leadership, and vision. It is a challenge for peace, justice, and cooperation. It is a choice between war and peace.
