DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3609

Why The Big Media Is Losing Relevance

1

When my generation was growing up, Nigeria was able to condition us via NTA (Nigerian Television Authority). Through NTA, they passed everything, and the nation was in control of everything. But as the internet began to diffuse into Nigeria, providing other sources for people to have access to news and broad information, Nigeria began to lose control of its capacity to control what people watched, read, etc. Yes, even the highly popular Sunday sitcom tonic – Masquerade with Zebrudaya, Ovuleria, Apnea, Jegede Sokoya, etc – faded on NTA channels. 

Interestingly, the unbounded and uncontrolled nature of the internet makes it disruptive. You win it today but it will enable new competitors to take you down. 

Where am I going? I saw this stat on American big media and was like “really”? Bear with me, I do not flatly believe any non-financial and -economic news on the big media. That means I do not rely on them on geopolitics and broad global affairs because in those two areas, they are not offering journalistic values.

And in this age when Trump is not the president to drop bombastic statements to push ratings up on air and online, geopolitics is dominating the bit-wares and airwaves, and many people are going for citizen-journalism which provides “fair and balanced” perspectives on global issues. From Ukraine to Gaza, big media danced naked on the altar of agenda journalism, and they’re paying the prices.

Of course, this is not new. What happens now is that through the web, we can read the other viewpoints unlike in the past when only what the big media packaged was the absolute truth. Business 101: never take your customers for granted.

Supreme Court’s Ruling Upholds Trump’s Presence on Colorado’s Republican Primary Ballot

0

Former President Donald Trump secured a significant legal victory as the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Colorado’s bid to exclude his name from the state’s Republican primary ballot.

The decision, announced on Monday, not only reaffirms Trump’s eligibility to participate in the primary race but also underscores his resilience amid mounting legal challenges and political controversies.

“We conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency,” the top US court said.

The ruling marks a critical juncture in Trump’s quest to secure the Republican nomination for the upcoming presidential election, reaffirming his frontrunner status in the race. “BIG WIN FOR AMERICA!!!” Trump jubilantly declared on his Truth Social platform following the Supreme Court’s decision, signaling the significance of the ruling for his political ambitions.

At the heart of the legal dispute was Colorado’s attempt to disqualify Trump from the primary ballot under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. This amendment contains a provision prohibiting individuals from holding public office if they have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. Trump’s alleged role in inciting and supporting the violent attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, served as the basis for Colorado’s challenge.

The court’s ruling not only rebuffs Colorado’s efforts but also has broader implications for similar challenges in other states, including Illinois and Maine. These challenges, rooted in Trump’s contested role in the events of January 6th and his attempts to undermine the integrity of the 2020 election, have faced setbacks in light of the Supreme Court’s decision.

The timing of the ruling is particularly significant, coming just a day before Super Tuesday, a crucial milestone in the presidential primary calendar. With the largest number of states holding their primaries and caucuses on this day, Trump’s presence on the ballot solidifies his position as a formidable contender for the Republican nomination.

In its opinion, the Supreme Court emphasized the limitations of state authority in enforcing provisions of the 14th Amendment against federal officeholders and candidates. The court underscored that such matters fall within the purview of Congress, rather than individual states, particularly concerning federal offices such as the presidency.

While the ruling may be perceived as a victory for Trump and his supporters, critics have voiced disappointment with the decision. Noah Bookbinder, President of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), lamented the Supreme Court’s failure to address the gravity of the situation, stating that the court “failed to meet the moment” by allowing Trump back on the ballot.

“The Supreme Court had the opportunity in this case to exonerate Trump, and they chose not to do so,” he said.

“Every court — or decision-making body — that has substantively examined the issue has determined that January 6th was an insurrection and that Donald Trump incited it. That remains true today.”

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold expressed similar sentiments, expressing disappointment in the Supreme Court’s ruling and highlighting the erosion of states’ ability to enforce the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause.

“Colorado should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrections from our ballot,” she wrote on X.

Despite his legal victories, Trump remains embroiled in ongoing legal challenges related to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Criminal cases in federal court in Washington, DC, and at the state level in Georgia continue to loom over his political future. 

Nevertheless, Trump has vehemently denied any wrongdoing and dismissed the cases as politically motivated attempts to undermine his re-election campaign. As the presidential race intensifies, Trump’s resilience in the face of legal scrutiny and political opposition remains a defining characteristic of his candidacy.

US AGs allege SEC overstepped on Kraken’s Lawsuit, Hong Kong SFC Issues Warning on BitForex

1

A group of state attorneys general has filed a brief in support of Kraken, the cryptocurrency exchange that is facing a lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its alleged unregistered offering of digital assets.

The brief, submitted by 21 state AGs led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, argues that the SEC has exceeded its statutory authority and violated the principles of federalism by attempting to regulate cryptocurrencies as securities.

The state AGs claim that cryptocurrencies are not securities, but rather commodities or currencies that fall under the jurisdiction of other federal and state agencies, such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) or the Treasury Department.

They also contend that the SEC’s lawsuit against Kraken is an example of “regulation by enforcement”, which creates uncertainty and confusion for market participants and stifles innovation in the emerging crypto industry.

The brief states:

The SEC’s enforcement action against Kraken is not only legally flawed, but also represents a dangerous overreach that threatens to undermine the constitutional balance between federal and state authority. The SEC’s attempt to regulate cryptocurrencies as securities is contrary to Congress’s intent, the SEC’s own regulations, and decades of judicial precedent.

Moreover, the SEC’s aggressive and inconsistent enforcement actions create uncertainty and deter innovation in a field that offers immense potential for economic growth, social development, and individual freedom.

The state AGs urge the court to dismiss the SEC’s complaint against Kraken and to affirm the primacy of state regulation over cryptocurrencies.

Kraken, which is based in San Francisco, was sued by the SEC in April 2021 for allegedly raising over $1.3 billion through the sale of digital tokens that the SEC deemed to be securities. Kraken has denied the allegations and argued that its tokens are not securities, but rather utility tokens that provide access to its platform and services.

Kraken’s CEO Jesse Powell has welcomed the support from the state AGs and expressed his hope that the case will set a precedent for the crypto industry.

He tweeted:

I’m grateful for the leadership of KenPaxtonTX and 20 other state AGs in standing up for crypto innovation and state sovereignty. This case is bigger than Kraken. It’s about the future of crypto and who gets to decide it: the people or unelected bureaucrats.

IRS’s hires two crypto Natives on its Digital asset Team

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has recently announced the addition of two new members to its team of digital currency experts. Joining the team are Sulolit “Raj” Mukherjee, the former global head of tax at Consensys, and Seth Wilks, the former vice president of government relations at crypto tax software firm TaxBit who have both been working in the crypto industry for over a decade and have extensive knowledge and experience in the field.

According to a LinkedIn post, Mukherjee and Wilks have been long-time industry colleagues and friends. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel noted in a press release reviewed by Blockworks that the digital asset space was an “evolving sector” with major tax administration implications.

They are not only well-known figures in the crypto community, but also long-time colleagues and friends. They have collaborated on several projects and initiatives related to digital currency regulation, compliance, education, and innovation. They have also been vocal advocates for the adoption and integration of crypto technologies in various sectors and industries.

According to the IRS, the duo will play key roles in developing and implementing the agency’s strategy and policies regarding the taxation and oversight of crypto transactions. They will also provide guidance and support to other IRS divisions and offices, as well as external stakeholders, on crypto-related matters.

The IRS has been ramping up its efforts to address the challenges and opportunities posed by the growing use and popularity of digital currencies. In recent years, the agency has issued guidance, updated forms, launched enforcement actions, and partnered with other agencies and organizations to enhance its understanding and capabilities in this area.

The hiring is seen as a positive sign by many in the crypto industry, who hope that their expertise and perspective will help the IRS adopt a more balanced and nuanced approach to crypto taxation and regulation. Some also hope that their presence will foster more dialogue and collaboration between the IRS and the crypto community, leading to more clarity, fairness, and innovation in the field.

Hong Kong SFC issues warning against crypto exchange, BitForex

Meanwhile, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a warning against BitForex, a cryptocurrency exchange platform that claims to be licensed in the city. The SFC stated that BitForex is not authorized to offer any regulated activities in Hong Kong and advised investors to exercise caution when dealing with the platform.

According to the SFC’s website, BitForex is not registered as a licensed corporation or an associated entity of a licensed corporation under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). The SFC also noted that BitForex’s purported address in Hong Kong does not exist, and that its website does not provide any contact details for its Hong Kong office.

The SFC warned that unlicensed platforms may not have adequate systems to safeguard client assets and may operate outside the legal and regulatory framework that governs the securities and futures markets in Hong Kong. Investors who trade on such platforms may not be protected by the SFC’s investor compensation fund, which covers losses arising from defaults by intermediaries licensed by the SFC.

The SFC urged investors to check the SFC’s Public Register of Licensed Persons and Registered Institutions before engaging in any investment activities, and to report any suspected scams or frauds to the SFC or the police.

BitForex is one of the many cryptocurrency platforms that have been targeted by regulators around the world in recent months, as authorities seek to crack down on illicit activities and protect investors from potential risks.

In September 2021, China banned all cryptocurrency transactions and mining activities, while the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) banned Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, from operating in the country without proper authorization. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also filed lawsuits against several crypto platforms, including Ripple and Coinbase, for allegedly violating securities laws.

BitForex has not responded to the SFC’s warning or commented on the allegations of fraud. On February 23, 2024, BitForex went offline after $57 million was reportedly withdrawn from the exchange’s hot wallets. Users have reported difficulties accessing their accounts and withdrawing their funds since then.

The SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to BitForex’s website links and social media pages to prevent further potential fraud and protect investors.

The SFC has issued a warning to the public about the risks of dealing with BitForex and has instructed the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to its website links and social media pages.

The SFC stated that BitForex is not licensed or registered to conduct any regulated activities in Hong Kong and that it has received numerous complaints from investors who have lost money or encountered difficulties in withdrawing their funds from the platform.

The SFC also alleged that BitForex has made false or misleading representations on its website, such as claiming to have a high level of security, liquidity and compliance. The SFC urged investors to exercise caution and avoid any transactions with BitForex or any other unregulated cryptocurrency platforms.

The SFC also reminded investors to check the SFC’s website for a list of licensed or registered entities before engaging in any investment activities. The SFC’s action against BitForex is part of its ongoing efforts to combat illegal and fraudulent activities in the cryptocurrency market and to protect the interests of investors in Hong Kong.

Bitcoin market cap surpasses $1.3 trillion

0

In a historic milestone, the total market capitalization of Bitcoin has exceeded $1.3 trillion, making it the ninth-largest asset in the world by market value. This means that Bitcoin is now worth more than some of the most influential companies in the world, such as Facebook, Tesla, and Amazon.

Bitcoin crosses $66,000 per coin; it is not only breaking new records but also breaking new grounds.

Bitcoin’s remarkable rise has been driven by several factors, including increased institutional adoption, growing public awareness, and favorable regulatory developments. Some of the recent events that have boosted Bitcoin’s momentum include:

The launch of the first Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in Canada, which attracted over $400 million in assets under management in its first week of trading.

The announcement by Tesla that it had purchased $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin and would accept it as a form of payment for its products. The endorsement of Bitcoin by prominent figures such as Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey, and Michael Saylor, who have expressed their support and confidence in the cryptocurrency. The adoption of Bitcoin as a legal tender by El Salvador, which became the first country in the world to do so.

These events have demonstrated that Bitcoin is not only a viable store of value, but also a medium of exchange and a unit of account. Bitcoin has proven its resilience and innovation in the face of challenges and uncertainties, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, the halving event, and the network upgrades.

As Bitcoin continues to grow and mature, it is expected to attract more investors, users, and developers, who will contribute to its further development and adoption. Bitcoin has the potential to revolutionize the global financial system and create a more inclusive, transparent, and efficient economy for everyone.

Bitcoin crosses $66,000 per BTC.

The cryptocurrency market has witnessed a historic milestone as Bitcoin, the leading digital asset by market capitalization, has crossed the $66,000 mark for the first time ever. This comes after months of anticipation and speculation following the launch of the first Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the US in January 2024.

The Bitcoin ETF, which trades under the ticker BITO, allows investors to gain exposure to the price movements of Bitcoin without having to buy or store the actual coins. The ETF tracks the performance of a basket of Bitcoin futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). The ETF has attracted over $1 billion in assets under management in its first week of trading, signaling a strong demand for Bitcoin exposure among institutional and retail investors.

The surge in Bitcoin price also coincides with a positive sentiment in the broader crypto space, as several other major coins have also reached new all-time highs in recent days. Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, has surpassed $3,500, while Solana, Cardano, Binance Coin, and Polkadot have also recorded impressive gains.

The bullish momentum in the crypto market is driven by several factors, including the growing adoption of blockchain technology and decentralized applications (DApps) across various industries, the increasing innovation and competition among crypto projects and platforms, and the rising awareness and acceptance of digital assets among regulators, policymakers, and consumers.

As Bitcoin crosses $66,000 per coin, many analysts and experts are predicting that it could reach even higher levels in the near future. Some of the factors that could support further growth include:

The increasing scarcity of Bitcoin supply, as more than 18.8 million out of the total 21 million coins have already been mined, and many of them are lost or locked up in long-term holdings.

The growing network effect of Bitcoin, as more users, merchants, and institutions adopt it as a store of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account. The improving security and resilience of the Bitcoin network, as more miners and nodes participate in validating transactions and securing the ledger.

The expanding innovation and development in the Bitcoin ecosystem, as more developers and entrepreneurs create new products and services that enhance the functionality and usability of Bitcoin. The rising interest and involvement of institutional investors, such as hedge funds, pension funds, endowments, and corporations, who are looking for alternative assets to diversify their portfolios and hedge against inflation and currency devaluation.

Bitcoin has come a long way since its inception in 2009, when it was worth less than a cent. It has overcome numerous challenges and obstacles, such as technical glitches, regulatory uncertainty, security breaches, market volatility, and fierce competition. It has proven its resilience and adaptability in the face of changing economic and social conditions. It has emerged as a global phenomenon that transcends borders, cultures, and ideologies.

Bitcoin is not just a currency or a technology. It is a social movement that represents a paradigm shift in how we perceive and interact with money and value. It is a vision of a more open, inclusive, and decentralized world where everyone can participate and benefit from the digital economy.

As Bitcoin crosses $66,000 per coin, it is not only breaking new records but also breaking new grounds. It is opening new possibilities and opportunities for individuals, businesses, and societies. It is challenging the status quo and inspiring change. It is showing us that the future of money is not only digital but also democratic.

The future of Blockchain and AI is not what you’ve heard

0

Blockchain and AI are two of the most popular buzzwords in the tech industry today. But what can they really do for each other? And how can they work together to create value and innovation?

Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that enables secure and transparent transactions among multiple parties, without the need for intermediaries or central authorities. It can also support smart contracts, which are self-executing agreements that encode the rules and logic of a transaction.

AI is a broad term that encompasses various technologies that enable machines to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, decision making, and natural language processing.

Some of the common claims about the synergy between blockchain and AI are:

Blockchain can provide trust, security, and privacy for AI data and models, which are often sensitive and proprietary. Blockchain can enable decentralized and collaborative AI, where multiple agents can share data and resources, and collectively learn from each other.

Blockchain can incentivize and reward AI participants, such as data providers, model developers, and validators, using tokens or cryptocurrencies. Blockchain can enhance the explainability and accountability of AI, by recording the provenance and audit trail of data and models and enabling verifiable claims and outcomes.

While these claims are not entirely false, they are also not as straightforward or easy as they sound. There are many technical and practical challenges that need to be addressed before blockchain and AI can truly integrate and complement each other.

Some of these challenges are:

Blockchain is not a silver bullet for AI data quality and security. While blockchain can ensure the integrity and immutability of data transactions, it cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the data itself.

Moreover, storing large amounts of data on a blockchain is costly and inefficient, due to its limited scalability and throughput. Therefore, blockchain may not be suitable for high-volume or high-frequency AI applications that require fast and frequent data access and processing.

Blockchain is not a magic wand for AI decentralization and collaboration. While blockchain can enable peer-to-peer communication and coordination among multiple AI agents, it cannot solve the fundamental issues of trust, alignment, and coordination that arise in multi-agent systems.

For example, how can we ensure that the agents have compatible goals and incentives? How can we prevent malicious or faulty agents from compromising the system? How can we handle conflicts or disputes among agents? These are complex problems that require sophisticated mechanisms and protocols beyond blockchain.

Blockchain is not a panacea for AI incentivization and reward. While blockchain can facilitate value exchange and distribution among AI participants, it cannot determine the optimal or fair allocation of rewards or costs.

For example, how can we measure the value or contribution of each participant? How can we balance the trade-offs between efficiency and equity? How can we prevent free-riding or cheating behaviors? These are challenging questions that require careful design and evaluation of economic models and incentive schemes.

Blockchain is not a guarantee for AI explainability and accountability. While blockchain can provide transparency and traceability for AI data and models, it cannot ensure the interpretability or understandability of the underlying logic or reasoning. Moreover, blockchain cannot enforce or verify the compliance or correctness of AI outcomes or actions.

For example, how can we ensure that the AI models are fair, ethical, or legal? How can we hold the AI agents responsible or liable for their decisions or actions? These are difficult issues that require rigorous standards and regulations.

Therefore, while blockchain and AI have great potential to work together to create value and innovation, they also have significant limitations and challenges that need to be overcome. Blockchain is not a one-size-fits-all solution for AI problems, nor is AI a plug-and-play component for blockchain applications. They are both complex and evolving technologies that require careful analysis and design to suit different contexts and objectives.