DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3678

Unlock 10x Returns in 2024 with Hedera, Lido Dao, and Scorpion Casino Token

0

In the world of cryptocurrency, the hunt for the next big project is a relentless pursuit. The good news is, your search might just be over once you read this article. Here are three tokens that promise to not just catch your attention but redefine the crypto landscape for the foreseeable future.

  1. Scorpion Casino Token
  2. Hedera
  3. Lido DAO

1.  Scorpion Casino Token – Where Gaming Meets Crypto

Scorpion Casino Token is the fusion of blockchain technology and online gaming, taking crypto entertainment to the next level. It’s not just about investment; it’s about having a great time with online gambling and the added benefit of crypto tokenization. The platform is fully accessible and regulated by the Curacao EGaming Authority, ensuring credibility and accountability. But that’s not all; the Scorpion team is all about innovation and community incentives. They have a whopping 250k Giveaway reserved exclusively for SCORP presale holders. And if that’s not enough, presale holders can enjoy daily passive staking income added to their wallets, even during the presale period.

2.  Hedera (HBAR) – One Of The Stand Out Players

Hedera Hashgraph, or HBAR, is making waves in the booming DeFi crypto sector. It’s not just another token; it’s a versatile platform that facilitates transactions and application development, overseen by a consortium of industry giants. What sets HBAR apart is its distinctive approach to transaction finality. By prioritizing selected nodes in determining transaction history, it ensures rapid finality and minimizes the potential for changes. What’s even more impressive is that major players like LG, IBM, and Boeing are part of this system. Founded by Leemon Baird and Mance Harmon, Hedera is emerging as a significant player in the crypto investment arena.

3.  Lido Dao (LDO) – Changing the Game in Staking

Lido Dao (LDO) is rewriting the rules in the crypto world by addressing the staking challenges of Ethereum. Launched just before Ethereum’s “Merge,” Lido’s Liquid Staking innovation is a game-changer. It enables users to overcome the 32 Ether staking requirement, offering access to the locked value of staked tokens via stTokens. This approach provides users with flexibility to participate in the DeFi market and boost their returns. Lido doesn’t stop at Ethereum; it’s expanding to support other Proof of Stake blockchains like Polygon and Solana. Governed by the LDO token, Lido simplifies decentralized staking for a broader audience.

Limited Time Only Bonus Code!

Your Ticket To Crypto Success

Exploring Hedera (HBAR), Lido Dao (LDO), and Scorpion Casino Token (SCORP) reveals a vibrant tapestry of crypto innovation. Each token brings unique features and solutions, shaping the ever-evolving landscape of decentralized finance and blockchain technology. As the crypto journey unfolds, these tokens remain at the forefront of innovation, unlocking the future of the digital economy.

 

Find out more:

Presale: https://presale.scorpion.casino/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/ScorpionCasino

Telegram: https://t.me/scorpioncasino_official

Two Interesting Recommendations from Nigeria’s Presidential Tax Reform Report

0
The coat of arm of Nigeria

The Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee has submitted its report, chronicling ways Nigeria can use taxation and other means to fix its economic paralysis. Here are the two most interesting:

  • “Expand the official foreign exchange market to incorporate BDCs, forex apps, and retail fx dealers, and outlaw transactions in the black market”. Yes, government will OUTLAW black market. How do you do that? It may even be illegal to do so (I agree that I know nothing about law).

-“Imposition of excise tax on foreign exchange transactions outside the official market”. In other words, make black market more expensive by adding tax components to it. I am not sure how the government will do that as people exchange Naira and US dollars under the mango tree.

Good People, people willingly pay taxes when taxes are working in their lives. Let’s pursue that symbiotic relationship in Nigeria.

The Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee was established by the government. The committee’s purpose is to review and advise on reforms to Nigeria’s fiscal policy and tax system. The committee’s terms of reference include: Fiscal governance, Revenue transformation, Economic.

The objectives of the tax reforms include: 

  • Improving service delivery to the public
  • Boosting non-oil tax revenue
  • Consistently reviewing tax laws to curb tax evasion and avoidance
  • Improving tax administration
Nigeria is aiming to reduce the number of taxes levied by federal and state governments from more than 60 to fewer than 10. This is part of changes to make it easier to conduct business and to boost revenues.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella Says Giving Up On Windows Phone And Mobile Was A Mistake

0

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has become the third chief executive of the technology giant to openly admit to the company’s significant missteps in the mobile industry.

Nadella, who succeeded former CEO Steve Ballmer in 2014, recently discussed Microsoft’s challenges in the mobile sector, particularly the handling of the acquisition of the Nokia phone business.

In an interview with Business Insider, Nadella admitted that Microsoft’s exit from the mobile phone business could have been managed more effectively.

When asked about a strategic mistake or regrettable decision during his tenure, Nadella responded: “The decision I think a lot of people talk about — and one of the most difficult decisions I made when I became CEO — was our exit from what I’ll call the mobile phone business as it was defined back then. In retrospect, I think there could have been ways we could have made it work by perhaps reinventing the category of computing between PCs, tablets, and phones.”

Microsoft’s foray into the mobile industry faced numerous challenges, including the ill-fated acquisition of Nokia’s phone business, which resulted in a $7.6 billion write-off a little over a year after Nadella took the helm.

Microsoft officially declared the end of Windows Phone a few years after the Nokia write-off. Despite subsequent attempts with products like the Android-powered Surface Duo and Surface Duo 2 handsets, the company has not outlined a clear mobile strategy. The lack of software updates and a successor for the Surface Duo have left questions about Microsoft’s future in the mobile space.

Satya Nadella is not the first Microsoft CEO to acknowledge the company’s mobile missteps. Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder and former CEO, referred to losing to Android as his “greatest mistake ever.” Google acquired Android in 2005 for $50 million. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt admitted in 2012 that their initial focus was competing with Microsoft’s early Windows Mobile efforts.

Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer also recognized the company’s slow response to the Android and iPhone threat. Ballmer initially focused on Windows Mobile and famously dismissed the iPhone as the “most expensive phone in the world” that didn’t appeal to business customers due to its lack of a physical keyboard.

In 2013, Ballmer expressed regret about not prioritizing the development of mobile devices earlier, stating, “I regret there was a period in the early 2000s when we were so focused on what we had to do around Windows [Vista] that we weren’t able to redeploy talent to the new device called the phone. That is the thing I regret the most.”

In recent years, Microsoft has shifted its focus to developing apps for Android and iOS platforms, including Microsoft Office suites. The company has been continually updating its Phone Link app to connect Android and iPhone devices with Windows.

Moreover, Microsoft has established close partnerships, such as with Samsung, to preinstall mobile Office apps on Android handsets, showcasing the company’s evolving strategy in the mobile landscape.

It’s been a tough week for the “Magnificent Seven” — Apple, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia, Tesla and LinkedIn parent Microsoft — as lower-than-expected quarterly earnings took $200 billion from their market value. Amid conflict in the Middle East and higher interest rates at home, the AI-fueled optimism of earlier in the year has cooled, says Bloomberg, pushing the S&P 500 down 8.8% from its 2023 peak and raising the specter of a correction. Alphabet alone saw its “biggest single-session market value wipeout” on Wednesday, losing about $180 billion in value after reporting smaller-than-expected profit for its cloud division.

Directors’ Proceedings and Remuneration Under Nigerian Law – CAMA 2020

0
CAC

Proceedings of Directors are regulated by the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020  through its provisions which along with its provisions on the topic of directors’ remunerations constitute the focus of this article.

Main Provisions of CAMA 2020 on Directors’ Proceedings

– The act provides that a Company’s directors may meet together for the dispatch of business,adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings as they think fit, and the first meeting of the directors shall be held not later than six months after the incorporation of the company.

– Unless the articles provide otherwise, any question arising at any meeting is decided by a simple majority of votes, and in case of an equality of votes, the chairman has a second or casting vote.

–  A director may, and the secretary on the requisition of a director shall, at any time summon a meeting of the directors.

– The directors may elect a chairman of their meetings and determine the period for which he is to hold office, but if no such chairman is elected or if at any meeting the chairman is not present within five minutes after the time appointed for holding same, the directors present may choose one of them to be chairman of the meeting.

-The directors may delegate any of their powers to a managing director or to committees consisting of such member or members of their body as they think fit and the managing director or any committee so formed shall, in the exercise of the powers so delegated, conform to any regulations that may be made by the directors.

– A committee may elect a chairman of its meeting, and if no such chairman is elected, or if at any meeting the chairman is not present within five minutes after the time appointed for holding the same, the members present may choose one of them to be chairman of the meeting.

-A committee may meet and adjourn as it deems proper, and any question arising is determined by a majority of votes of the members present,and in the case of equality of votes the chairman has a second or casting vote.

– A resolution in writing, signed by all the directors for the time being entitled to receive notice of a meeting of the directors, is as valid and effectual as if it had been passed at a meeting of the directors duly convened and held.

– In all the directors’ meetings, each director is entitled to one vote.

Quorum

– Unless the articles provide otherwise, the quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of directors are two where there are not more than six directors, but where there are more than six directors, the quorum is one-third of the number of directors, and where the number of directors is not a multiple of three, then the quorum is one third to the nearest number.

– Where a committee of directors is appointed by the board of directors, the board shall fix its quorum, but where no quorum is fixed, the whole committee shall meet and act by a majority.

Failure to have a Quorum

– Where the board is unable to act because a quorum cannot be formed, the general meeting may act in place of the board and where a committee is unable to act because a quorum cannot be formed, the board mayact in place of the committee.

Notice of Meeting

-Every director is entitled to receive notice of the directors’ meetings, unless he is disqualified by any reason under the Act from continuing with the office of director.

– There shall be given 14 days’ notice in writing to all directors entitled to receive notice unless provided in the articles.

– Failure to give notice in accordance with the preceding paragraph above invalidates the meeting.

– Unless the articles provide otherwise, it is not necessary to give notice of a meeting of directors to any director absent from Nigeria, but if he has given an address in Nigeria, the notice shall be sent to such an address.

Remuneration of Directors

– The  act provides remuneration of the directors is determined by the company in general meeting and such remuneration is deemed to accrue from day-to-day.

– The directors may also be paid travelling, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from meetings of the directors, committee of the directors, general meetings of the company or in connection with the business of the company.

– Where remuneration has been fixed by the articles, it is alterable only by a special resolution.

– A company is not bound to pay remuneration to directors, but where the company agrees to pay, the directors shall be paid such remuneration out of the fund of the company.

-The amount of remuneration is a debt from the company so that if directors take office on the basis of the articles, they shall be able to sue the company on account of the debt or prove it in liquidation.

– A director who receives more money than he is entitled to, is guilty of misfeasance and is accountable to the company for such money.

– The remunerations of directors is apportionable.

Remuneration of a Managing Director

– A managing director receives such remuneration (whether by way of salary, commission, participation in profits, or partly in one way and in another) as the directors may determine.

– Where a managing director is removed for any reason under section 288 of CAMA 2023, he may claim for breach of contract if there is any or where a contract could be inferred from the terms of the articles.

-Where he performs some services without a contract, he is entitled to payment on a quantum merit (pro-rated/partial) basis.

Prohibition of Tax-free Payments to Directors

-It is not lawful for a company to pay a director remuneration (whether as director or otherwise) free of income tax, or calculated by reference to or varying with the amount of his income tax, or at or with the rate or standard rate of income tax, except under a contract which was in effect at the commencement of this Act, and provides expressly, and not by reference to the articles, for payment or remuneration.

– Any provision contained in a company’s articles or in any contract other than such a contract as mentioned in subsection (1), or in any resolution of a company or of a company’s directors for payment to a director of remuneration as mentioned in subsection (1), shall have effect as if it provided for payment, as a gross sum subject to income tax, of the net sum for which it actually provides.

-This provision does not apply to remuneration due before this Act comes into effect or in respect of a period before it comes into effectm

Prohibition of Loans to Directors in certain circumstances

– Under CAMA 2020, It is not lawful for a company to make a loan to any person who is its director or a director of its holding company, or to enter into any guarantee or provide any security in connection with a loan made to such a person as earlier mentioned by any other person :

Provided that nothing in this section applies:

(a) subject to the provision above, to anything done to provide any such person as mentioned in this subsection with funds to meet expenditure incurred or to be incurred by him for the purposes of the company or for the purpose of enabling him to properly discharge his duties as an officer of the company ; or

(b) in the case of a company whose ordinary business includes the lending of money or the giving of guarantees in connection with loans made by other persons, to anything done by the company in the ordinary course of that business.

–  This provision does not authorise the making of any loan, or the entering into any guarantee, or the provision of any security except-

(a) with the prior approval of the company given at a general meeting at which the purposes of the expenditure, the amount of the loan or the extent of the guarantee or security, are disclosed ; or

(b) on condition that, if the approval of the company is not given at or before the next annual general meeting, the loan shall be repaid or the liability under the guarantee or security shall be discharged, within six months from the conclusion of that meeting.

– Where the approval of the company is not given as required by any such condition, the directors authorising the making of the loan, the entering into the guarantee or the provision of the security, are jointly and severally liable to indemnify the company against any loss arising from it.

Obi Congratulates Nigeria For Winning The P&ID Case, Urges Judiciary to Imitate UK Court In Upholding Rule of Law

0

The Labour Party presidential candidate in the last general election, Peter Obi, has congratulated Nigeria for winning the case against Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID) Limited in the United Kingdom.

The former Anambra State governor also used the opportunity to urge the Nigerian judiciary to uphold the rule of law in the face of numerous cases putting its integrity to the test.

“I congratulate our dear nation, Nigeria, especially the legal team that handled the major judiciary victory recorded at the United Kingdom Court on Monday in the case against Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID) Limited,” Obi said.

“Thankfully, the case was decided in the United Kingdom, a nation known for its respect for the rule of law and where the judiciary delivers justice freely and fairly to the people. This, therefore, offers veritable lessons to Nigerians in general, and our judiciary in particular.”

Obi, who had earlier appealed to the Supreme Court to save Nigeria’s democracy through transparency ruling in the ongoing case challenging the victory of President Bola Tinubu, said democracy can only thrive when the rule of law is upheld.

“Every lawful society is built on a strong system of justice and every democratic society exists on the principle of the rule of law,” he said.

The Supreme Court is billed to rule on the appeals by both Obi and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Atiku Abubakar, on Thursday, October 26.

The bone of contention is the identity crisis of President Tinubu, his alleged forged certificate from Chicago State University, and the election he’s accused of stealing.

Using the UK court as an example, Obi said; “In handling the identity crisis, electoral disputes, and many high corruption cases that have bedeviled our nation, the judiciary has a bounding duty to protect our dear nation’s value system.”

The P&ID case has been a long-standing legal battle for Nigeria, culminating in a favorable outcome. However, it has also spotlighted other financial irregularities that have allegedly gone unaccounted for within Nigeria, with those responsible often escaping consequences.

“Nigeria won its bid to overturn an $11 billion damages bill involving the controversial P&ID deal, yet similar, or even greater amounts, have gone unaccounted for in Nigeria, and the culprits are freely walking the streets,” Obi said.

He urged public office holders, in different arms of government, to “understand that we have no other nation but Nigeria” and we all, “are bound to work together for the development of our nation.”

“As we have gladly received justice in a foreign land, may we learn to give justice to our countrymen so that our nation can enjoy peace, progress, and unity. A truly just and fair New Nigeria is possible if our judiciary embraces the spirit and message of change,” he said.