CBN Sets $1m capital requirement for IMTOs, Introduces other guidelines

By

-

February 1, 2024

In a major regulatory development, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has introduced robust measures to enhance oversight and transparency within the international money transfer sector, adding to several other regulatory policies it announced recently.

The guidelines, officially released on January 31, 2024, outline stringent requirements for International Money Transfer Operators (IMTOs), signaling the CBN’s commitment to fostering a secure financial environment.

Minimum Operating Capital and Application Process

The cornerstone of the new guidelines is the establishment of a minimum operating capital requirement for IMTOs. Foreign entities must maintain a minimum operating capital of $1 million, while local IMTOs are required to meet an equivalent amount in the local currency. This move is aimed at ensuring the financial stability of IMTOs and safeguarding the interests of both the operators and the consumers.

Applicants seeking to operate in Nigeria are mandated to adhere to the CBN’s regulations on anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, and countering proliferation financing of weapons of mass destruction. These regulations, originally designed for licensing banks and other financial institutions, are now extended to cover IMTOs, underlining the importance of regulatory compliance across the financial spectrum.

To initiate operations, IMTOs must submit comprehensive applications to the director of the trade and exchange department. The application process includes a non-refundable fee of N10 million or an amount specified by the CBN. Additionally, applicants must furnish necessary documentation such as approval to operate in other jurisdictions, evidence of tax clearance, and incorporation documents for indigenous IMTOs.

Documentation Requirements and Transparency Measures

The documentation process also demands a clear understanding of the ownership structure of the IMTO, board approval to operate international money transfer services, and detailed profiles of the company’s board and management. To ensure financial soundness, the CBN mandates information on beneficial owners (BO) of the company, along with credit reports from licensed credit bureaus for shareholders and key officers.

These stringent documentation measures aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance within the international money transfer sector. IMTOs are expected to provide ongoing information, documents, and reports specified by the CBN to maintain regulatory standards and keep the authorities informed about their operations.

Mandatory Annual Renewal Process

The CBN also introduced a mandatory annual renewal process for IMTOs, further highlighting its commitment to regulatory oversight in the financial sector. IMTOs are required to undergo the renewal process, subject to a fee of N10 million or an amount specified by the CBN, payable annually by January 31. This fee structure contributes to the cost of maintaining regulatory compliance and ensures the continued integrity of money transfer services.

Crucially, the renewal of IMTO approval must be completed within the first quarter of every year, emphasizing the CBN’s dedication to a timely and efficient renewal process. Failure to comply with this timeframe could lead to severe consequences for IMTOs, including potential suspension of operations.

To enforce strict compliance, the guidelines direct IMTOs to provide their agent banks with a copy of the CBN renewal for the current year within the first quarter. Failure to furnish this documentation would prompt the agent bank to cease any further transactions with the non-compliant IMTO, reinforcing the consequences of non-compliance.

Prohibitions and Aligning with BOFIA 2020

The guidelines explicitly prohibit banks from directly operating IMTO services; instead, they are authorized to act solely as agents. Financial Technology Companies have also been barred from obtaining approval for IMTO, aligning with the provisions outlined in the Banking and Other Financial Institutions Act of 2020 (BOFIA 2020).

These regulations extend the prohibition of certain individuals’ employment in banks to the realm of IMTOs. Shareholders and officers of companies involved in IMTOs are now barred from undertaking International Money Transfer Operations, ensuring alignment with BOFIA 2020 and its stipulations regarding the management of financial institutions.

Permissible Activities and Restrictions

The permissible activities for IMTOs are tightly defined, focusing solely on inbound international money transfer transactions. These activities include accepting funds for the purpose of transmitting them to individuals residing in Nigeria, cross-border personal money transfer services, and services for foreign tourists in Nigeria. Transactions are structured on a “person to person,” “business to person,” and “business to business” basis, subject to periodic reviews by the CBN.

IMTOs are expressly prohibited from engaging in any other business beyond the stipulated permissible activities. Outbound transactions and the purchase of foreign exchange from the domestic foreign exchange market for settlement are strictly off-limits, emphasizing the CBN’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of the financial sector and ensuring the security of money transfer services within Nigeria.

NYSC Act: A Protest for Total Overhaul

By

Stanley Alieke

-

February 1, 2024

0

There is an ongoing uproar on social media against organizations (both private and public) that hire the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members as associates and do not pay them at all or do not pay them well. There is a strong demand that such organizations should at least pay the corp members in their employ the minimum wage.

This online protest, I can say started from an X (twitter) user posting that his primary place of assignment (PPA) pays him a meagre sum of N2000 as a monthly salary and he shared the receipt of payment for the month of January which was N2000.

The million-dollar question is, are organizations that hire corp members statutorily obligated to pay them?

The payment of “corpers” as we all know, does come directly from the government and legally speaking, there is nowhere it is provided in any statute that places Nysc members attached for their “PPA” should pay them at the end of the month.

What the NYSC act (cited as The national youth service corps act cap n84 lfn, 2004) provided in section 18 is that organizations should provide accommodation and means of transportation for the corpers in their employ and if there is no accommodation and means of transportation available, such organization should pay the corper 250 naira as an allowance for accommodation monthly and 150 naira as an allowance for transportation monthly.

Here are the full provisions of section 18 of the NYSC Act which provided for the statutory requirements of employers to the Nysc associates.

18: “An employer of corps members shall provide the following, that is (a) basic accommodation and where it is not available, pay the minimum sum of N250 per month in lieu of accommodation;

all welfare facilities normally provided for the regular staff including Medical Service
transport or where it is not available, pay the minimum sum of Nl50 per month in lieu of transport”.

Therefore, by statutory implication, employers are not statutorily obliged to pay their Nysc associates, it is a matter of personal volition that an employer can choose to pay an Nysc associate. No doubt that these laws are long due for amendments as they were passed in the 70s and have been extant till date when N250 cannot buy you a cup of rice.

I for one no longer see the need for this mandatory one-year youth service and I have never failed to call for it to be scrapped whenever I get the opportunity, especially in my previous essays but if the government feel that the youth service corps should still be kept in operation then laws should be amended so that at least the Nysc associates should be paid, not just be paid, but be paid properly or at least paid they should be paid the minimum wage and be treated as workers (properly so called) and every rights and benefits that accrue to a Nigerian worker as provided in the labour act and other relevant statutes should be accruable to Nysc associates including right to fair wages/allowances, right to a paid leave, right to health benefits etc.

On the other hand, organizations who apply/request for Nysc associates or accept Nysc associates should also be willing and eager to pay them. If you cannot afford to pay them, then you should not request them or accept them. Do not use corpers that you do not pay to boost your staff strength, that is wickedness, to say the least; even the holy book mandated that “a labourer deserves to be paid”.

The Population Crisis is Real

By

Paul Ugbede Godwin

-

February 1, 2024

0

The population crisis is real, and it is affecting our planet in many ways. I will discuss some of the causes and consequences of the population crisis, as well as some possible solutions.

The population crisis refers to the situation where the human population exceeds the carrying capacity of the Earth, meaning that there are not enough resources to sustain the current and projected number of people. According to the United Nations, the world population reached 7.9 billion in 2020 and is expected to grow to 9.7 billion by 2050 and 10.9 billion by 2100. Some of the causes of the population crisis below.

Falling Mortality Rate

One of the primary causes of population growth is the decline in mortality rates, especially among infants and children. Thanks to advances in medicine, sanitation, nutrition and education, more people are surviving and living longer than ever before.

The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that the global infant mortality rate has decreased from 8.8 million deaths in 1990 to 4.1 million deaths in 2017. This is a welcome public health achievement, but it also means that more people are adding to the demand for resources and services.

Underutilized Contraception

Another cause of population growth is the lack of access to or use of contraception among women of reproductive age. According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), there are 218 million women in developing regions who want to avoid pregnancy but are not using a modern method of contraception.

This results in unintended pregnancies, high fertility rates and rapid population growth. Some of the barriers to contraceptive use include lack of availability, affordability, information, education, social norms and gender inequality.

Lack of Education for Girls

A third cause of population growth is the low level of education for girls in many parts of the world. Education is a key factor in empowering women and reducing fertility rates. Studies have shown that women with higher levels of education tend to have fewer children, marry later, have better health outcomes and contribute more to the economy and society. However, millions of girls are still out of school or drop out early due to poverty, discrimination, violence and cultural practices.

Migration

People move from rural to urban areas or from poorer to richer countries in search of better opportunities, services, and living conditions.

Some of the consequences of the population crisis are:

Environmental degradation: More people mean more demand for natural resources such as land, water, energy, and food, which leads to deforestation, soil erosion, water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity loss.

Social problems: More people mean more competition for scarce resources such as jobs, housing, education, and health care, which leads to poverty, inequality, conflict, crime, and violence.

Economic challenges: More people mean more pressure on the infrastructure, public services, and social security systems, which requires more investment and expenditure from governments and individuals.

Some of the possible solutions to the population crisis are:

Family planning: Providing access to contraception, information, and education to enable people to make informed choices about their reproductive health and rights.

Empowering women: Promoting gender equality, education, employment, and political participation for women to reduce their vulnerability and dependency on men and enhance their autonomy and decision-making power.

Sustainable development: Adopting policies and practices that balance the economic, social, and environmental needs of the present and future generations without compromising the well-being of either.

Population control: Implementing measures to limit or reduce the growth rate of the human population such as incentives or disincentives for having children, voluntary or compulsory sterilization, or one-child policies.

Technological innovation: Developing and applying new technologies that can increase the efficiency and productivity of resource use, reduce waste and pollution, and improve the quality of life for people.

Implication of PayPal firing 9% of its staff, approximately 2,500 employees

By

Paul Ugbede Godwin

-

February 1, 2024

0

PayPal, the online payment giant, announced on Tuesday that it has laid off 9% of its global workforce, affecting around 2,500 employees. The company said the move was part of a restructuring plan to streamline its operations and focus on its core business.

The layoffs come as PayPal faces increasing competition from rivals such as Stripe, Square, and Apple Pay, as well as regulatory challenges in some markets. PayPal also reported lower-than-expected earnings for the fourth quarter of 2020, with revenue of $6.12 billion and earnings per share of $0.86, missing analysts’ estimates of $6.17 billion and $0.88, respectively.

PayPal CEO Dan Schulman said in a statement that the company is “making significant changes to position PayPal for future growth and success”. He added that the company is “grateful for the contributions of the impacted employees and will support them through this transition”.

PayPal said it expects to incur pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $70 million in the first quarter of 2021, related to severance and other employee-related costs. The company also said it expects to save about $300 million annually from the layoffs.

PayPal has more than 28,000 employees worldwide and serves over 375 million customers and merchants in more than 200 markets. The company said it will continue to invest in new products and services, such as cryptocurrency, buy now pay later, and QR code payments, to enhance its value proposition and drive growth.

The decision came as a shock to many PayPal workers, who were notified of their termination via email or phone calls. Some of them took to social media to express their anger and frustration, while others shared their stories of working at PayPal and thanked their colleagues for their support.

Many customers also reacted to the news, with some expressing sympathy for the laid-off workers and others questioning how the layoffs will affect the quality and security of PayPal’s services.

PayPal CEO Dan Schulman said in a statement that the layoffs are necessary to “align our resources with our long-term strategic vision” and to “create a more agile and efficient organization”. He added that the company will provide “generous” severance packages and outplacement services to the affected employees, and that it will continue to invest in its core businesses and growth opportunities.

However, some analysts and industry experts are skeptical about the rationale and impact of PayPal’s move. They argue that the company is facing increasing competition from rivals such as Stripe, Square, Venmo, and Apple Pay, and that it needs to innovate and improve its customer experience rather than cut its workforce.

They also point out that PayPal has been profitable for years, and that it generated $6.1 billion in revenue and $1.2 billion in net income in the third quarter of 2023.

Some critics also accuse PayPal of being insensitive and irresponsible in handling the layoffs, especially amid the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and the economic downturn. They say that the company should have communicated better with its employees and customers, and that it should have explored other alternatives to reduce costs, such as voluntary buyouts, salary cuts, or furloughs.

PayPal’s stock price dropped by 4% after the announcement, reflecting the negative sentiment among investors and analysts. The company is expected to face more challenges and scrutiny in the coming months, as it tries to execute its restructuring plan and maintain its market position.

Tesla’s $55.8 Billion Compensation Package for Elon Musk Voided by Delaware Court

By

Samuel Nwite

-

February 1, 2024

0

Delaware Chancery Court Chief Judge, Kathaleen McCormick, has ruled to void Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s extravagant $55.8 billion compensation package, stating that it was excessive and marred by an insufficiently independent process.

The court found that Musk’s significant influence over Tesla, combined with the lack of independence in the decision-making process, rendered the compensation plan invalid.

“This decision dares to boldly go where no man has gone before, or at least where no Delaware court has tread. The collection of features characterizing Musk’s relationship with Tesla and its directors gave him enormous influence over Tesla,” Judge McCormick remarked in her ruling.

The judge highlighted Musk’s multi-faceted role as the CEO, Chairman, and founder, coupled with his substantial equity stake of 21.9%, as factors that contributed to his dominance in the decision-making process. She noted that Musk controlled the Board of Directors (BOD), and the directors who approved the compensation plan were not truly independent. Importantly, shareholders were not adequately informed of this controlled relationship.

“The primary consequence of this finding is that the defendants bore the burden of proving at trial that the compensation plan was entirely fair. Delaware law allows defendants to shift the burden of proof under the entire fairness standard where the transaction was approved by a fully informed vote of the majority of the minority stockholders,” Judge McCormick explained.

However, the defendants failed to prove the stockholder vote was fully informed, as the proxy statement inaccurately described key directors as independent and omitted crucial details about the process. This left the defendants attempting to justify the fairness of the largest potential compensation plan in the history of public markets.

“Further, the shareholders who approved the compensation plan weren’t made aware of this controlled relationship. Hence, the $55.8B comp plan is voided,” McCormick ruled.

Musk’s compensation package, approved by around 80% of Tesla shareholders in 2018 when the company’s valuation was approximately $60 billion, required him to achieve significant market cap growth and meet ambitious revenue and profit targets. The milestones ranged from a $100 billion valuation to a final milestone of $650 billion. If Musk successfully reached these milestones, he would be entitled to the full $55 billion compensation package.

Remarkably, Musk achieved all the milestones, contributing to a substantial increase in Tesla’s market valuation, which currently stands at around $600 billion. The company’s financial success during this period has been characterized by robust revenue growth, profitability, and the creation of significant shareholder value.

However, shareholder Richard Tornetta filed a lawsuit in 2019, claiming that the compensation package was excessive and the board had not acted in the best interest of shareholders.

In the broader context of Musk’s compensation, it’s essential to note that his controversial compensation plan raised eyebrows when it was first proposed. Approved by the majority of shareholders in 2018, the plan set ambitious targets, tying Musk’s compensation directly to the company’s market valuation and financial performance.

However, the result of this legal challenge mounted by Tornetta, who held a mere 9 shares of Tesla, has held many in bewilderment.

“Rarely, if ever, does a Delaware court rescind a compensation agreement,” said Charles Elson, a corporate governance expert at the University of Delaware. “To my memory, it hasn’t happened.”

Now, Tesla finds itself at a crossroads. The company can choose to appeal the court’s decision, potentially escalating the legal battle to higher courts, including the Delaware Supreme Court and even the U.S. Supreme Court. Alternatively, Tesla may opt to develop an alternative compensation package for the contentious 2018 agreement.

Dan Ives, a Wedbush Tech analyst, views the court ruling as a potential turning point.

“Delaware Court ruling a shocker ruled against Musk/Tesla BUT this now clears the path for the Board to create a new pay package and incentives that could supersede this and could solve a lot of the Musk ongoing frustrations. Also could further lock Musk into Tesla,” he said.

Musk’s response to the court ruling included a recommendation to fellow entrepreneurs. He posted on Twitter, “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware,” emphasizing a dissatisfaction with the legal implications of the state’s jurisdiction. He followed up with a suggestion to incorporate in Nevada or Texas, especially if one prefers shareholders to have a more decisive role in company matters.

Musk even conducted a poll on his social media platform X, asking users whether Tesla should change its state of incorporation to Texas, where the company’s physical headquarters are located. An overwhelming 87% of respondents voted in favor of the move. Musk promptly declared that Tesla would initiate a shareholder vote to transfer the state of incorporation to Texas.

The public vote is unequivocally in favor of Texas!

Tesla will move immediately to hold a shareholder vote to transfer state of incorporation to Texas. https://t.co/ParwqQvS3d

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 1, 2024

The court’s ruling has cast a shadow over Musk’s fortune, threatening his position in the centi-billionaire league. Musk was recently dethroned as the world’s richest man by the French Businessman and CEO of LVMH, the world’s largest luxury goods company, Bernard Arnault.

Arnault’s fortune now stands at $207.8 billion, following a substantial increase of $23.6 billion on Friday, surpassing Musk’s $204.5 billion, per Forbes’ real-time billionaires list.

CBN Sets $1m capital requirement for IMTOs, Introduces other guidelines

Minimum Operating Capital and Application Process