DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3797

JP Morgan Exploring Blockchain-Based Payments

0
Hong Kong, October 08 2017: JPMorgan Chase & Co. building in Central, Hong Kong . JPMorgan is a Swiss global financial services company, One of big financial company in the world

JPMorgan, one of the largest banks in the world, is looking into how blockchain technology can improve its payment systems. Blockchain is a distributed ledger that records transactions in a secure and transparent way, without the need for intermediaries. Blockchain has the potential to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and enhance security for both the bank and its customers.

JPMorgan has been experimenting with blockchain since 2015, when it launched its own private network called Quorum. cis based on Ethereum, a popular public blockchain platform that supports smart contracts, or self-executing agreements that can automate business processes. Quorum allows JPMorgan to create customized applications for different use cases, such as trade finance, capital markets, and asset management.

Blockchain technology is a revolutionary innovation that has the potential to transform the way we conduct transactions, store data, and verify identities. JPMorgan, one of the world’s leading financial institutions, has been actively experimenting with blockchain since 2015, and has developed or joined several projects that aim to leverage the benefits of this technology for various purposes.

One of the most notable applications that JPMorgan has developed on Quorum is JPM Coin, a digital currency that facilitates instant cross-border payments. JPM Coin is backed by US dollars held in JPMorgan’s accounts and can be exchanged for other currencies or assets on the blockchain. JPM Coin is currently being tested by a select group of clients, and aims to improve the speed, efficiency, and security of international payments.

Quorum is a permissioned version of Ethereum, developed by JPMorgan in collaboration with other financial institutions, that aims to provide high scalability, privacy and security for enterprise applications. JPM Coin is designed to facilitate instant and secure payments between JPMorgan’s clients, using blockchain technology to reduce transaction costs and settlement times. JPM Coin is not a cryptocurrency, but a stablecoin, meaning that it is pegged to the US dollar and backed by JPMorgan’s reserves.

Unlike other stablecoins, such as Tether or USDC, JPM Coin is not available to the public, but only to JPMorgan’s institutional customers who have undergone regulatory checks and compliance procedures. JPM Coin is currently in the pilot phase, with a small number of clients testing its functionality and performance.

JPMorgan plans to expand the use of JPM Coin to other markets and currencies in the future, as well as to explore other applications of Quorum, such as tokenization of assets, smart contracts and decentralized finance. JPMorgan’s move to create its own digital currency is a significant milestone for the adoption of blockchain technology in the banking sector, as it demonstrates the potential benefits and challenges of integrating this innovative technology into existing financial systems and processes.

Blockchain technology has the potential to transform the way payments are made and processed across different platforms and systems. One of the challenges that the financial industry faces is the lack of interoperability between various payment networks, which can result in inefficiencies, delays and high costs. JPMorgan, one of the leading global banks, is exploring how blockchain can address this challenge and enable seamless and secure transactions between different payment systems.

In a recent blog post, JPMorgan’s head of blockchain research, Umar Farooq, explained how the bank is leveraging its own blockchain platform, Quorum, to create solutions that can connect different payment networks and facilitate cross-border payments. Quorum is an enterprise-grade version of Ethereum that JPMorgan developed in collaboration with other partners. It is designed to offer high scalability, privacy and security for various use cases in the financial sector.

One of the solutions that JPMorgan is developing on Quorum is the Interbank Information Network (IIN), which is a network of over 400 banks that share information and process payments using blockchain. IIN aims to reduce the friction and costs associated with cross-border payments by enabling faster and more transparent communication and verification among participating banks. IIN also allows banks to exchange data on sanctions screening, compliance checks and fraud prevention.

Another solution that JPMorgan is working on is the JPM Coin, which is a digital token that represents a fiat currency (such as US dollar or euro) and can be used for instant settlement of transactions on Quorum. JPM Coin can enable faster and cheaper transfers of value between different payment systems, such as SWIFT, PayPal or Alipay. JPM Coin can also be used for other purposes, such as tokenizing assets, issuing stablecoins or facilitating smart contracts.

JPMorgan’s blockchain initiatives demonstrate how the bank is embracing innovation and technology to improve its services and operations. By using blockchain to enable interoperability between different payment systems, JPMorgan can offer its clients more efficient, secure and cost-effective solutions for their payment needs.

FBI says North Korea’s Lazarus Group was behind $41M Theft

0

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has issued a warning that a notorious cybercrime group from North Korea, known as Lazarus Group, was responsible for stealing $41 million worth of cryptocurrency from a platform called KuCoin in September 2020.

North Korea’s Lazarus Group is one of the most notorious cybercrime organizations in the world. The group is believed to be behind some of the most high-profile cyberattacks in recent years, such as the Sony Pictures hack in 2014, the Bangladesh Bank heist in 2016, and the WannaCry ransomware outbreak in 2017. The group’s activities are not only motivated by financial gain, but also by political and ideological objectives. The group is closely linked to the North Korean regime and its cyber warfare capabilities.

According to the FBI, the hackers used a sophisticated malware campaign to compromise the security of KuCoin and access the private keys of its hot wallets, which store funds online for quick transactions. The hackers then transferred the stolen funds to multiple wallets and exchanges, using a technique called “chain hopping” to evade detection and tracing.

The FBI said that Lazarus Group, also known as Hidden Cobra or APT38, is a state-sponsored cyber threat actor that has been active since at least 2009. The group is known for conducting cyberattacks against financial institutions, critical infrastructure, government agencies, and private sector entities around the world. The group has been linked to some of the most notorious cyber heists in history, such as the $81 million theft from Bangladesh Bank in 2016, the $60 million theft from Taiwan’s Far Eastern International Bank in 2017, and the $10 million theft from Banco de Chile in 2018.

The FBI urged cryptocurrency platforms and users to enhance their security measures and report any suspicious activity to law enforcement. The FBI also advised users to use cold wallets, which store funds offline, for long-term storage of cryptocurrency, and to enable multi-factor authentication and encryption for their online accounts.

The FBI’s warning comes as the US government is ramping up its efforts to combat cyber threats from North Korea and other adversaries. In April 2021, the US Department of Justice announced the creation of a task force to address ransomware attacks, which have become increasingly prevalent and disruptive in recent years. In June 2021, the US Department of Treasury imposed sanctions on several individuals and entities associated with Lazarus Group, accusing them of facilitating money laundering and evading sanctions.

North Korea’s Lazarus Group is one of the most notorious cybercrime organizations in the world. The group is believed to be behind some of the most high-profile cyberattacks in recent years, such as the Sony Pictures hack in 2014, the Bangladesh Bank heist in 2016, and the WannaCry ransomware outbreak in 2017. The group’s activities are not only motivated by financial gain, but also by political and ideological objectives, such as disrupting the enemies of the North Korean regime and advancing its nuclear weapons program.

The Lazarus Group operates with a high level of sophistication and stealth, using a variety of techniques to evade detection and attribution. The group employs multiple layers of proxies, malware, and encryption to hide its tracks and communicate with its command-and-control servers. The group also leverages legitimate services and platforms, such as cloud computing, social media, and cryptocurrency exchanges, to conduct its operations and launder its illicit funds. The group has also been known to use false flags and decoys to mislead investigators and divert attention from its true identity and motives.

The Lazarus Group poses a serious threat to the global cybersecurity landscape, as it continues to target various sectors and regions with its malicious campaigns. The group has shown a willingness and capability to cause significant damage and disruption, as well as to steal large amounts of money and sensitive information. The group’s activities also pose a challenge to the international community, as they undermine the stability and security of cyberspace and the rules-based order. The Lazarus Group is not only a criminal enterprise, but also a strategic asset of the North Korean regime, which uses it as a tool of coercion, deterrence, and retaliation.

Major Hacks by the Lazarus Group

Youbit was a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange that was hacked twice by the Lazarus Group in 2017. The first attack occurred in April 2017, when the hackers stole 4,000 bitcoins (worth about $5 million at the time) from the exchange’s hot wallet. The second attack happened in December 2017, when the hackers managed to access both the hot and cold wallets of the exchange and stole 17% of its assets (worth about $35 million at the time).

The hackers used phishing emails to deliver malware to the employees of Youbit. The malware was disguised as legitimate software updates or security patches, and contained a backdoor that allowed the hackers to remotely control the infected machines. The hackers then used the compromised machines to access the exchange’s internal network and steal the private keys of the wallets. The second attack was so devastating that Youbit had to file for bankruptcy and shut down its operations.

Bithumb is another South Korean cryptocurrency exchange that was targeted by the Lazarus Group in 2017. The hackers stole personal information of over 30,000 users, including their names, email addresses, phone numbers, and cryptocurrency holdings. The hackers also managed to steal about $7 million worth of cryptocurrencies from some of the users’ accounts.

The hackers used a similar phishing technique as in the Youbit case, but this time they impersonated a security company that claimed to offer a free security check for Bithumb users. The phishing emails contained a malicious attachment that installed a keylogger and a screen capture tool on the victims’ computers. The hackers then used these tools to collect the users’ login credentials and access their accounts. Bithumb reported the incident to the authorities and compensated the affected users for their losses.

DragonEx was a Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange that was hacked by the Lazarus Group in March 2019. The hackers stole about $7 million worth of cryptocurrencies from the exchange’s hot wallet, including bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, ripple, and several other altcoins.

The hackers used a Trojan horse program called Worldbit-bot to infiltrate the exchange’s network. The program was disguised as a cryptocurrency trading bot that claimed to offer high returns for users. The program was distributed through various channels, such as social media, chat groups, and forums. Once installed, the program connected to a command-and-control server controlled by the hackers, and downloaded additional malware modules that enabled them to access the exchange’s wallet servers. DragonEx announced the breach on its official Telegram channel and asked for help from other exchanges and law enforcement agencies to recover the stolen funds.

The US government has also been working with its allies and partners to coordinate responses and share information on cyber threats. In July 2021, the US joined the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, and NATO in publicly attributing the Microsoft Exchange Server hack to China’s Ministry of State Security. The hack, which occurred in March 2021, affected tens of thousands of organizations worldwide and exposed sensitive data and intellectual property.

LayerZero Labs Faces Legal Action from FTX

0

LayerZero Labs, a blockchain development company that claims to offer “zero-trust solutions for decentralized finance”, is facing a lawsuit from FTX, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. The lawsuit alleges that LayerZero Labs used insider information to withdraw their funds from FTX before the exchange temporarily suspended withdrawals due to a technical issue.

According to the complaint filed by FTX, LayerZero Labs had access to confidential information about FTX’s operations and security protocols as part of a partnership agreement. The complaint claims that LayerZero Labs breached the agreement and violated the fiduciary duty of loyalty and good faith by using this information to withdraw their funds from FTX on September 8, 2022, just minutes before the exchange announced that it was pausing withdrawals due to a “network congestion” problem.

FTX claims that LayerZero Labs’ withdrawal caused significant losses to the exchange and its users, as it reduced the liquidity and stability of the platform. FTX also accuses LayerZero Labs of spreading false rumors and misinformation about the exchange’s solvency and integrity, in an attempt to damage its reputation and market share.

FTX is seeking compensatory and punitive damages from LayerZero Labs, as well as an injunction to prevent them from further accessing or disclosing any confidential information about FTX. FTX’s new CEO, who took over the role from the founder Sam Bankman-Fried in August 2023, said in a statement that FTX will not tolerate any “unethical or illegal behavior” from its partners or competitors, and that it will “vigorously defend” its interests and rights in court.

LayerZero Labs has not yet responded to the lawsuit or the allegations. The company’s website and social media accounts have been inactive since September 8, 2023. LayerZero Labs was founded in 2021 by a team of former engineers and researchers from Google, Facebook, and Microsoft. The company claims to have developed several innovative products and protocols for the DeFi sector, such as LayerZero Swap, LayerZero Vault, and LayerZero Bridge.

FTX claims that LayerZero Labs breached its contract and caused damages to the exchange by taking advantage of a “network congestion” issue that affected FTX’s withdrawal system. LayerZero Labs, on the other hand, argues that it acted in self-defense and that FTX was trying to prevent it from accessing its funds. First, let us review the facts of the case. According to the complaint filed by FTX, LayerZero Labs is a DeFi project that aims to create a “zero-trust” platform for cross-chain transactions.

LayerZero Labs deposited about $1.6 million worth of various cryptocurrencies on FTX in order to trade and hedge its positions. However, on September 7, 2022, LayerZero Labs decided to withdraw all its assets from FTX, citing concerns about the security and reliability of the exchange. LayerZero Labs claims that it noticed that FTX was experiencing a “network congestion” problem that delayed or failed some withdrawal requests from users. LayerZero Labs alleges that this problem was caused by FTX’s own negligence or malfeasance and that it posed a serious risk to its funds.

FTX, however, denies these allegations and accuses LayerZero Labs of acting in bad faith and violating its terms of service. FTX admits that it had a “network congestion” issue on September 7, 2022, but claims that it was due to an external factor beyond its control: a sudden spike in gas fees on the Ethereum network. FTX argues that this issue affected all Ethereum-based transactions, not just withdrawals from FTX, and that it was resolved within a few hours. FTX also asserts that it notified its users about the issue and advised them to wait until it was fixed before requesting withdrawals.

FTX contends that LayerZero Labs ignored this advice and exploited the situation by submitting multiple withdrawal requests in rapid succession, hoping to bypass FTX’s security checks and withdraw more funds than it was entitled to. FTX claims that this behavior constituted a breach of contract and fraud and that it resulted in losses for FTX and other users.

Based on these facts, we can analyze the legal and ethical implications of this dispute. From a legal perspective, the outcome of the lawsuit will depend on how the court interprets the contract between FTX and LayerZero Labs and whether it finds evidence of fraud or negligence on either side. The contract, which is available on FTX’s website, states that users are responsible for their own transactions and that FTX is not liable for any losses or damages caused by “network delays, computer failures or malicious attacks”.

The contract also gives FTX the right to suspend or terminate users’ accounts if they violate its terms of service or engage in any illegal or unethical activities. However, the contract also stipulates that users have the right to withdraw their funds at any time and that FTX will process their requests as soon as possible.

Therefore, the key legal questions are: Did LayerZero Labs violate the contract by withdrawing its funds during a “network congestion” issue? Did FTX breach the contract by failing to process LayerZero Labs’ withdrawal requests in a timely manner? Did LayerZero Labs commit fraud by trying to withdraw more funds than it had? Did FTX act negligently or maliciously by causing or prolonging the “network congestion” issue? These questions will require further investigation and evidence from both parties.

From an ethical perspective, the outcome of the lawsuit will depend on how one evaluates the motives and actions of both parties. One could argue that LayerZero Labs acted ethically by withdrawing its funds from FTX, as it had a legitimate reason to do so: protecting its assets from a potential security breach or loss. One could also argue that FTX acted unethically by suing LayerZero Labs, as it had no valid reason to do so: preventing its users from accessing their funds or punishing them for leaving its platform.

Alternatively, one could argue that LayerZero Labs acted unethically by withdrawing its funds from FTX, as it had no valid reason to do so: taking advantage of a technical glitch or stealing from other users. One could also argue that FTX acted ethically by suing LayerZero Labs, as it had a legitimate reason to do so: enforcing its contract or recovering its losses.

Therefore, the key ethical questions are: Did LayerZero Labs have a moral duty to keep its funds on FTX or to withdraw them? Did FTX have a moral duty to process LayerZero Labs’ withdrawal requests or to deny them? Did LayerZero Labs have a moral right to withdraw its funds from FTX or to forfeit them? Did FTX have a moral right to sue LayerZero Labs or to drop the case? These questions will require further reflection and judgment from both parties.

The lawsuit between FTX and LayerZero Labs is a complex and controversial case that involves legal and ethical issues. The answer to the question: Does FTX have the moral ground suing LayerZero Labs? is not clear-cut and may vary depending on one’s perspective and values. However, one thing is certain: this case will have significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency exchanges and DeFi projects and will likely set a precedent for similar disputes in the future.

The Environmental Effects of Bitcoin Mining

0

Bitcoin is the most popular and valuable cryptocurrency in the world, with a market capitalization of over $900 billion as of September 2023. However, Bitcoin also has a significant environmental impact due to its high energy consumption and carbon emissions.

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that operates on a peer-to-peer network of computers called nodes. Nodes validate transactions and blocks of transactions using a consensus algorithm called proof-of-work (PoW). PoW requires nodes to solve complex mathematical puzzles that are hard to compute but easy to verify. The node that solves the puzzle first gets to add the block to the blockchain, the public ledger of all Bitcoin transactions, and receives a reward in newly minted bitcoins and transaction fees.

The difficulty of the puzzles adjusts every 2016 blocks (about every two weeks) to maintain a steady rate of one block every 10 minutes. As more nodes join the network and compete for the reward, the difficulty increases, requiring more computing power and energy to solve the puzzles. This creates an arms race among miners, who invest in specialized hardware called application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) that can perform billions of calculations per second.

According to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, Bitcoin mining consumed an estimated 85 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year as of September 2023, equivalent to 0.38% of global electricity consumption and more than the annual electricity consumption of countries like Belgium and Finland. Another estimate by Digiconomist puts the figure at 130.3 TWh per year, equivalent to 0.59% of global electricity consumption and more than the annual electricity consumption of countries like Sweden and Argentina.

The energy consumption of Bitcoin mining depends on several factors, such as the number of active miners, the efficiency of their hardware, the cost and availability of electricity, and the price and volatility of Bitcoin. The higher the price of Bitcoin, the more profitable it is to mine, and the more incentive there is for miners to increase their computing power and energy consumption.

The environmental effects of Bitcoin mining are mainly related to its carbon footprint and electronic waste. The carbon footprint of Bitcoin mining is determined by the source and mix of electricity used by miners. According to Cambridge University, about 65% of Bitcoin mining takes place in countries that rely mostly on fossil fuels for electricity generation, such as China, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia, and the United States. These countries account for about 80% of Bitcoin’s carbon emissions, which are estimated at 22 to 22.9 million metric tons of CO2 per year. This is equivalent to the annual CO2 emissions from the energy use of 2.6 to 2.7 billion homes or 5.5 million cars.

The electronic waste generated by Bitcoin mining is another environmental concern. As mining hardware becomes obsolete due to increasing difficulty and competition, miners discard their old equipment and replace it with newer models. According to Digiconomist, Bitcoin mining produces about 37.8 kilotons of electronic waste per year, equivalent to the annual e-waste output of countries like Luxembourg or Estonia.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is not only limited to its direct effects on climate change and resource depletion. It also has indirect effects on social and economic aspects, such as human health, wildlife conservation, energy security, geopolitical stability, and financial inclusion.

What are some possible solutions to reduce the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining?

There are several possible solutions to reduce the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining, ranging from technical innovations to policy interventions. Some of these solutions are:

Switching to renewable energy sources: Miners can reduce their carbon footprint by using renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, or geothermal power for their operations. Some miners have already moved to regions with abundant and cheap renewable energy, such as Iceland, Norway, or Canada. However, renewable energy is not always available or reliable, and may require additional infrastructure and investment.

Improving energy efficiency: Miners can improve their energy efficiency by using more advanced hardware that can perform more calculations per unit of energy consumed. However, this may also increase the difficulty and competition among miners, leading to a rebound effect that negates some of the energy savings.

Adopting alternative consensus algorithms: Bitcoin can adopt alternative consensus algorithms that do not rely on PoW or require less energy-intensive computations. For example, proof-of-stake (PoS) is a consensus algorithm that selects validators based on their stake or number of coins they own, rather than their computing power. PoS is used by some cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum, Cardano, and Polkadot, and claims to be more energy-efficient and secure than PoW. However, PoS also has its own challenges and trade-offs, such as centralization, security, and governance issues.

Implementing carbon taxes or caps: Governments can implement carbon taxes or caps on Bitcoin mining to discourage its use of fossil fuels and incentivize its transition to renewable energy. However, this may also create regulatory uncertainty and compliance costs for miners and may drive them to relocate to jurisdictions with less stringent environmental policies.

Educating and engaging the public: Consumers and investors can educate themselves and others about the environmental impact of Bitcoin mining and make informed decisions about their participation in the cryptocurrency market. They can also engage with the Bitcoin community and stakeholders to advocate for more sustainable practices and innovations in the industry.

Bitcoin mining is a complex and controversial topic that has significant environmental implications for the planet. While Bitcoin offers some benefits as a decentralized and innovative digital currency, it also poses some challenges and risks as a high-energy-consuming and carbon-intensive activity. There is no simple or definitive answer to whether Bitcoin mining is bad for the environment, as it depends on various factors and perspectives. However, there are some possible solutions that can help reduce its environmental impact and make it more compatible with the global efforts to combat climate change and achieve sustainable development.

The Power Of Meme Coins Unleashed: Decoding The Crypto Ecosystem Evolution With Shiba Inu, Floki Inu, & Elonator

1

The world of digital finance is in awe as it witnesses the fascinating evolution of the entire crypto ecosystem thanks to innovative meme coins. No one can underscore the pivotal roles of decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi) projects, and non-fungible tokens (NFT) innovations in making this happen. We dive into Shiba Inu (SHIB), Floki Inu (FLOKI), and Elonator (ETOR)’s plans to strengthen their ecosystems and compare their strategies and investment potential.

<< Click Here To Learn More About Elonator Presale >>

How Meme Coins Reshape The Crypto Ecosystem

No one would have anticipated Shiba Inu to conquer the meme coin landscape. What primarily attracted the attention of investors and the general public (aside from the token’s cuteness) is its emphasis on ensuring no man is accountable in its ecosystem. Everyone has the freedom to be creative, and the SHIB community soon grew in numbers.

Floki Inu continued the dog-inspired theme. Although it started as a mere meme coin that hops on the trend, its goal widened to providing utility by creating its own crypto ecosystem and contributing to charity. The creators view FLOKI as a movement and not just a meme coin. SHIB and FLOKI aren’t the only coins that wish to go beyond their roots.

Elonator, a presale meme coin, developed a crypto ecosystem that allows everyone to earn crypto instantly, even without the necessary knowledge and skills. They attract early investors by promoting their unique staking model and lottery system. They will also provide reward opportunities (through vested bonuses and referral tokens) and host competitions where users can win huge prizes.

The Role Of DApps

The Shiba Inu crypto ecosystem has a main dApp called the ShibaSwap decentralized exchange. It’s designed to allow users to trade various tokens. This includes the SHIB token and its offspring tokens Bone ShibaSwap (BONE) and Doge Killer (LEASH). Unfortunately for SHIB, ShibaSwap faced security concerns, and the crypto community commented on how it’s similar to other decentralized exchanges.

The team behind FLOKI is still working on completing the coin’s roadmap, including the launch of its dApps in the Floki Inu ecosystem. At the time of writing, FLOKI had already launched Shop Floki and established the Floki Finance Pay partnership. Meanwhile, Elonator is still in the process of building the Elonator Swap. It’s an automated market maker (AMM) that offers users a seamless trading experience. Elonator Swap will leverage the infrastructure of Uniswap, which is Ethereum’s leading decentralized exchange.

Elonator Showcases Investment Potential

Shiba Inu has been soaring this year, and many think it’s because of the Shibarium blockchain. In fact, it’s primarily due to investors’ greed. Now, investors are more willing to take significant risks to earn greater rewards. Still, we can say that the impending launch of the Shibarium blockchain in its crypto ecosystem has a partial role in the coin’s surge.

Investment sentiment doesn’t favor Floki Inu that much, given that the coin didn’t receive any major push even after adding an NFT gaming metaverse in the Floki Inu ecosystem. By the looks of it, Elonator will soon be on the crypto stage to showcase its enormous investment potential. Firstly, ETOR attracts early investors with the chance to win substantial prizes like a brand-new Tesla car. Secondly, it introduces creative initiatives, such as organizing an NFT competition. Eventually, it will also open the Elonator Store, where anyone can buy merchandise designed by NFT artists.

<< Buy Into The Elonator Presale >>

The Inspiring Journey Of Meme Coins

Meme coins have reshaped the crypto ecosystem, and their journey to innovating for the sake of utility, community engagement, and investment potential is worth watching. Shiba Inu strengthens its ecosystem further by launching innovative projects, while Floki Inu continues to improve its roadmap. Meanwhile, Elonator empowers its community by launching innovative staking models, rewarding opportunities, and fostering a growing marketplace.

 

Invest In Elonator Today:

Presale: https://buy.elonator.com/

Website: https://elonator.com

Telegram: https://t.me/ElonatorCoin

Twitter: https://twitter.com/ElonatorCoin