DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3840

Nigerian Passport Backlogs to Be Cleared in Two Weeks – Minster

0

The Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, has stated that the clearance of all passport backlogs should not exceed two weeks, emphasizing that there is no justification for passport delays in Nigeria.

Tunji-Ojo, who made the statement during a live appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today programme on Tuesday, added that the delay around fresh passport issuance and renewal fuels corruption in the sector.

The newly-appointed Minister of Interior inherited a backlog of issues, including scarcity of passport notes, from his predecessor Rauf Aregbesola. But he said clearing all backlogs shouldn’t take more than two weeks.

“After clearing these backlogs, no Nigerian should wait for more than two weeks,” he said, adding that “it’s a right and not a privilege, and Nigerians want that right to be actually theirs, not by somebody offering you your right.”

He stated that it is unacceptable for any Nigerian to face disrespect due to a passport application.

According to him, what Nigerians desire to witness are solutions, and the President has consistently emphasized this: no room for excuses.

“In line with the directive of Mr President, it can no longer be business as usual. We have critically analyzed all these scenarios – from the point of going online to fill the form to the point of payment, to the point of picking a date, to the point of biometrics, to the point of issuance of passports. And we understand the service providers involved and we have been able to see one or two things to put right,” he said.

Tunji-Ojo, who has touted partnerships with several other institutions for accelerated service delivery, also said he is in talks with service providers and the Nigeria Immigration Service to digitize and decentralize the process of fresh passport issuance and renewal.

“We have to digitize and we also have to decentralize the whole enrolment system and make it (possible) for people to walk into the nearest post office, people can walk into may be financial institutions and some many other ways. We are still playing with so many ideas,” he said.

Nigeria’s passport challenge has lasted for years, but it escalated beyond containment in the last eight years. The situation has been attributed to many factors led by corruption, including an insufficient supply of leaflets, which stymied swift printing and issuance of passport applications.

In 2021, Aregbesola announced a series of changes designed to curtail the challenge Nigerians face in getting their passports. He said among other things, that special centers have been created for expedited services.

According to him, these special centers, which will be opened all over the country, will run on a public-private partnership basis.

Aregbesola said the goal is to have one in each local government area, university campuses, institutions of higher learning, and other relevant public places.

He also said that a timeline for the collection of passports will be fixed for every application. This will be six weeks. This is to allow for enough time to investigate, verify, and validate personal information supplied by the applicants.

The then minister said the list of the backlog of ready passports that are yet to be collected by the owners will be published on the NIS website, and the owners will be required to go to the state commands to collect them.

“With these changes, it is my firm belief that we will arrive at a new dawn in passport application processing,” he said.

Unfortunately, the measures failed to provide a solution to the challenge. While Nigerians are desperately expecting a positive change, they’re also concerned that the current minister’s promises may end up like his predecessor’s.

The Nigeria’s Big Game Tomorrow – A Presidential Election Tribunal Ruling

0

Do not underestimate the implications of tomorrow’s Nigeria’s Presidential Election Tribunal ruling. The soul of a nation is on the altar of justice. Left or Right, Nigeria will be redefined. This is the most important ruling in the history of this Tribunal since 1999.

I am looking for how the judges will rule considering that in 18,000 polling stations, the results were blurred, with the total accredited voters above the margin of APC victory over PDP. In Abia (2015), Osun (201x), Kano (2019), and countless races, when the margin of victory is below the total accredited voters, you request a re-rerun in the affected areas . Because INEC does not have those results, PDP has a real case.

Do you know the exact time this ruling game will begin? I cannot wait because it is going to be like Nigeria playing at the World Cup Finals, with everyone connecting.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: Prof., Yes,18,000 polling was blurred on IREV server but in osun election case, the court rule that IREV is not the primary source of counting valid votes. Also, the opposition party didn’t provide evidence from their agents or police showing they won the 18,000 polling unit. In all honesty, the opposition didn’t present a good case and was very disorganised during election i.e no coordination room where agents from the field sent there hard copy results, many polloing units across the country, they have no agents and none of the opposition score 25% in 24 states.

My Response:” in Osun election case, the court rule that IREV is not the primary source of counting valid votes. ” – you may be confusing the ruling with the recent one for the latest Osun elections. My reference is for the previous election in Osun, which the current governor lost; that was the case as INEC did a re-run. Indeed, there was no contest on IREV or whatever as they did a re-run. Check the data.

They do not need to provide if INEC does not have the result. In all the former rulings, all you needed to establish was: margin of victory below accredited voters. You never ask to be declared winner; rather, you ask for a re-run. So, the issue is being declared by claiming you win. The matter here is on what basis did INEC call the results when it did not hold elections in those areas since it had no results!

Comment 2: I do not think this narrative here is consistent with the argument in court unless you’d throw more light on the 18,000 Polling Booths issues.

While the result sheets in 18,000 Polling Booths were blurry (on IREV), their interpretation can not be compared to the cases you cited. In those cases, it was established that the margin issues were known and can be inferred. The burden of proof will most likely play out.

The jaundiced nature of the process makes it bad and both LP and/or PDP could have bring out the certified copies of the 18,000 polling units (from their Agent) and made a stronger case. They weren’t able to do that.

By and large, as long as the party in power continues to nominate who runs INEC, it will take a gang-up (like what happened to GEJ in 2015) to win them with the existing Electoral Acts. It’s similar problems in majority of the States where the party in power always win the Local Government elections.

My Response: “The burden of proof will most likely play out.” – what do you need to prove if not to show the accredited number of voters and the margin of victory?

“I’d appreciate any Obi fanatics to…” – that is not necessary. Can we debate things in Nigeria on its merit and forget always reading meanings into allegiances? If we’re fearful of even commenting on simple things, we lose the nation.

My Response: “The jaundiced nature of the process makes it bad and both LP and/or PDP could have bring out the certified copies of the 18,000 polling units (from their Agent) and made a stronger case. ‘ technicality I guess. But looking from the other angle, INEC was unable to also provide evidence on its call. That is why as noted, I am going to see how they rule on it. If INEC cannot provide the data to support its ruling, it does mean, in future elections, you can upload tissue papers, allocate results and declare winners.

Comment 4: Were you really expecting an intelligent discuss when your 2nd paragraph already exposes a bias? It would have helped to stay neutral at this point since the various parties have provided evidence and made their pleas. Same way you isolated the arguments of one side, you must know that the other side also presented evidence to support its claim, including attacking the evidence provided by the claimants. The judges will consider all in coming to their decision. Stacking obstacles against the judges as you have done, choosing to amplify one part’s submission, isn’t helpful.

My Response: I am neutral and apolitical. But I do not think anything is off-limits. If you have a superior point, make it. Political ruling is what we discuss daily here, from Osun to Kano to Abia, etc. You think discussing this is off-limit, I say it is unfortunate. Everyone in Nigeria is intimidated because that is how we want our nation to be. A SAN was asked a simple question on TV, he stammered.

What is wrong with we Nigerians? That discussing a court case is seen as treacherous. Tell them that is not how Ndubuisi lives. That I am waiting to see how a court will rule on a case is biased for you?

NAFDAC Guidelines For Food Hygienic Practices in Nigeria

0

This revised edition of The NAFDAC Guidelines For Food Hygienic Practices in Nigeria (NGFHP) is a follow up to the publication of the first edition which was in fulfillment of one of NAFDAC’s mandate, which is the compilation of guidelines for the production, importation and exportation, sales and distribution of food. 

The NGFHP has been produced with extensive reference to Codex texts and NAFDAC’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and presented in a booklet format to allow its wide use and understanding by the food industries, food handlers, consumers, Non – Governmental Organizations (NGOs), regulatory authorities, enforcement authorities and all tiers of government.

The provisions of these guidelines will constitute the focus of this article.

What are the objectives of the NGFHP?

The objectives of NAFDAC in developing these guidelines for Food Hygienic Practice” are to:

-Identify critical segments of the food chain where consumers must be adequately protected from illness or injury that could be caused by food consumption.

-Provide public confidence that freely sold food is suitable and safe for consumption.

-Provide clear cut principles and guidance on food hygiene practices to the industry, food handlers and consumers.

-Encourage the use of food safety management systems by the industry and other food handlers. 

-Provide guidance for the development of in-house hygiene manual by the industry and food handlers.

-Maintain confidence in internationally traded food.

– Encourage education of food safety managers in the industry on food safety management system.

What is the scope, use and definition of relevant terms under the guidelines?

Scope

-This document follows the food chain from primary production to the primary level, setting out the necessary hygiene conditions for producing food, which is safe and suitable for consumption.

-The document provides a baseline structure for the more specific codes and guidelines or regulations applicable to particular sectors of the food industry.

Roles of other Tiers of Governments, Industry, Community Based Organisations (CBOs) Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and Consumers.

– State Governments, Local Governments and Ward Leaders can consider the guidelines and how best they can encourage and collaborate in its usage to attain the aforementioned objectives . This could be in the form of State Laws, Bye Laws, e.t.c.

– The food industry should apply the hygiene practice set out in this document to:

  • Provide food that is safe and suitable for consumption.
  • Ensure that consumers have clear and easy- to- understand information by way of labeling and other appropriate means, to enable them protect their food from contamination and growth/survival of food borne pathogens by storing, handling and preparing it correctly.
  • Establish post marketing surveillance to ensure proper handling of their products in their distribution network e.g. refrigerating yoghurt and not displaying margarine, etc. in direct sunlight.
  • Maintain confidence in internationally traded food.

– Community Based Organisations (CBOs) and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) that are concerned with safety and quality of national food supply may use this document in advisory and extension activities such as food safety monitoring and surveillance, data gathering and information dissemination, researches, surveys and studies, educating consumers on safe food hygienic practices, developing and coordinating active consumer groups etc.

-Consumers and domestic food handlers should recognize their roles and possibilities by following relevant instructions and applying appropriate food hygiene measures, as contained in this Guideline.

Use

-The underlying principle in this document is the safety and wholesomeness of any food available to consumers in Nigeria. This runs throughout the various sections of this text which started from primary production spanning through food production in establishments within the country; food production and distribution through mobile facilities, food preparations at homes for family consumption and hygiene precautions for imported foods to maintain their integrity.

-The document presents a general basic application, which may not apply in some instances. Such exceptions where there is the need for specific applications not contained here, or where there may not be need for any application could easily be identified with such phrases as “where appropriate” “inappropriate cases”, “where necessary” Food Safety Management Systems such as Good Management Practices (GMP), Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP), Risk Analysis, etc are the basic tools for the control of food hazards .

Definitions

For the purpose of this guideline, the following expressions have the meaning stated:

-Cleaning – the removal of soil, food residue, filth, grease or other objectionable matter.

-Contaminants – any biological or chemical agent, foreign matter or other substances not intentionally added to food, which may compromise food safety or suitability.

-Disinfection – the reduction, by means of chemical agents and/or physical methods, of the number of microorganisms in the environment, to a level that does not compromise food safety or suitability.

-Establishment – any building or area in which food is handled and the surroundings under the control of the same management. For the purpose of this text, this will include factories, warehouses, cold rooms, hotels, restaurants, supermarkets, kitchen, markets, fast foods and grocery shops, retail shops, etc.

-Food Hygiene – all conditions and measures necessary to ensure the safety and suitability of food at all stages of the food chain.

-Hazard – a biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect.

-HACCP – a system, which identifies, evaluates and controls hazards, which are significant for food safety.

-Food Handler – any person who directly handles packaged or unpackaged foods, food equipment and utensils, or food contact surfaces and is therefore expected to comply with food hygiene requirements.

-Food Safety – assurance that food will not cause harm to the consumer when it is prepared and/or eaten according to its intended use.

-Food Suitability – assurance that food is acceptable for human consumption according to its intended use.

-Primary Production – those steps in the food chain up to and including, for example, harvesting, slaughtering, milking, and fishing.

-‘Bukateria’ – a makeshift structure/premises where food is prepared, sold and eaten by consumers.

-Roadside Food Seller – a stationary food seller without any protective structure carrying out his or her operations in the open.

-Food Hawker – a mobile food seller displaying the wares either on her head or in cart/wheel barrow.

-Food Preparation – those activities like purchasing, washing, trimming, peeling, blanching, grinding, boiling, cooking, roasting, frying, etc. that leads to availability of ready – to – eat foods.

-Domestic Food Handler – a person involved in food preparation at home and not for commercial purposes.

-Food Chain – an imaginary linkage joining all the activities and step involved in food production right from the planting stage onto the consumption by the consumers

-Primary (Food) Producers – these are basically the farmers, and livestock rearers, fishermen etc.

What are the provisions of the guidelines on primary production?

Objectives

-To reduce the likelihood of introducing a hazard which may adversely affect the safety of food, or its suitability for consumption at later stages of the food chain. 

-Primary production should be done/managed in a way that ensures that food and its sources are safe; and the food is suitable for its intended use. Where applicable, this will include:

  • Avoiding the use of areas where the environment compromises the safety of food.
  • Controlling contaminants, pests and diseases of animals and plants in such a way as not to pose a threat to food safety.
  • Application of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Hygienic Practices (GHP).
  • Adapting practices and measures to ensure food is produced under appropriate hygienic conditions.
  • Avoiding the use of food and water from sources that pose a threat to food safety.

What are the provisions of the guidelines on environmental hygiene?

-Potential sources of contamination from the environment should be considered. In particular, primary food production should not be carried out in areas where the presence of potentially harmful substances would lead to an unacceptable level of such in food. 

Hygienic Production at Food Sources

-The potential effects of primary production activities on the safety and suitability of food should be considered at all times. In particular, this includes identifying any specific points in such activities where a high probability of contamination may exist and taking specific measures to minimize the probability. 

-The HACCP – based approach may assist in the taking of such measures.Producers should as far as practicable implement measures to:

  • Control contamination from air, soil, water, feedstuffs, fertilizers (including natural fertilizers), pesticides, veterinary drugs or any other agent used in primary production.
  • Control plant and animal health so that it does not pose a threat to human health through food consumption, or adversely affect the suitability of the product; and
  • Protect food sources from faecal and other contamination.

Handling, Storage and Transport

-Procedures should be in place to:

  • Sort food and food ingredients to segregate material, which is evidently unfit for human consumption.
  • Label boldly in words and pictures, segregated materials, chemicals and other materials in order to avoid cross contamination.
  • Dispose of any rejected material in a hygienic manner.
  • Protect food and food ingredients from contamination by pests, or by chemical, physical or microbiological contaminants or other objectionable substances during handling, storage and transport.

Care should be taken to prevent, as far as reasonably practicable deterioration and spoilage through appropriate measures, which may include controlling temperature, humidity, and/or other controls.

Cleaning, Maintenance and Personnel Hygiene at Primary Production

-Appropriate facilities and procedures should be in place to ensure that:

  • Any necessary cleaning and maintenance is carried out effectively.
  • An appropriate degree of personal hygiene is maintained.

Record Keeping/Documentation

Adequate record keeping procedures must be in place for control measures, sorting, storage, batch releases, etc. is strictly for informative purposes and neither constitutes legal advice nor a valid lawyer/client relationship.

Understanding Binance Smart Chain (BSC)

0

Binance Smart Chain (BSC) is a blockchain platform that runs in parallel with the Binance Chain, the native blockchain of the Binance cryptocurrency exchange. BSC was launched in September 2020 and aims to provide a fast, low-cost and scalable infrastructure for decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi) and interoperability with other blockchains.

BSC is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), which means that it can run smart contracts and dApps that are written in Solidity, the most popular programming language for Ethereum-based projects. This also means that BSC can support most of the existing Ethereum tools and protocols, such as MetaMask, Remix, Truffle, Web3.js, etc. Moreover, BSC can leverage the existing liquidity and user base of the Binance ecosystem, which includes the Binance Chain, the Binance DEX and the Binance Smart Chain Wallet.

BSC uses a consensus mechanism called Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA), which combines elements of Proof of Authority (PoA) and Proof of Stake (PoS). In PoSA, there are 21 validators who take turns to produce blocks and validate transactions. These validators are chosen by BNB holders, who can stake their tokens to vote for their preferred candidates.

Validators receive rewards in the form of transaction fees and cross-chain transfer fees. BNB is the native token of both Binance Chain and Binance Smart Chain, and it is used for paying gas fees, staking, governance and other functions on both platforms.

BSC boasts a high performance and low cost compared to other blockchains. It can achieve a block time of about 3 seconds and a throughput of about 2000 transactions per second (TPS). The gas fee on BSC is also much lower than on Ethereum, ranging from $0.01 to $0.05 per transaction, depending on the network congestion. This makes BSC an attractive alternative for developers and users who are looking for a cheaper and faster way to deploy and interact with dApps and DeFi products.

BSC also supports cross-chain communication and transfers with other blockchains through the Binance Bridge and the Binance Smart Chain Wallet. The Binance Bridge is a service that allows users to swap their tokens from one blockchain to another, such as from Ethereum to BSC or vice versa.

The Binance Smart Chain Wallet is a browser extension that allows users to access their funds and dApps on both Binance Chain and Binance Smart Chain. Users can also use the wallet to connect to other platforms that support BSC, such as PancakeSwap, BakerySwap, Venus, etc.

BSC has seen a rapid growth in its ecosystem since its launch. According to Bsc Scan, there are over 2.5 million unique addresses and over 100 million transactions on BSC as of August 2021. There are also over 600 dApps and over 1000 tokens on BSC, covering various sectors such as DeFi, NFTs, gaming, etc. Some of the most popular projects on BSC include:

PancakeSwap: A decentralized exchange (DEX) that allows users to swap tokens, provide liquidity, farm yields and participate in lotteries and NFT sales.

BakerySwap: A DEX that also offers features such as NFT marketplace, gamification and launchpad.

Venus: A decentralized money market protocol that allows users to borrow and lend crypto assets, earn interest and mint stablecoins.

CryptoBlades: A role-playing game that allows users to earn tokens by defeating enemies, crafting weapons and trading items.

Axie Infinity: A game that allows users to collect, breed and battle digital pets called Axies.

BSC is constantly evolving and improving its features and functionalities to meet the needs and expectations of its users and developers. BSC has a governance mechanism that allows its community to propose and vote on changes and upgrades to the platform. BSC also supports innovation and experimentation through its testnet and innovation zone, where developers can test their DApps before launching them on the mainnet.

BSC is a blockchain platform that offers high performance, low fees, cross-chain compatibility, rich ecosystem and support, innovation and governance for developers who want to deploy their DApps on a scalable, secure and interoperable platform. BSC is one of the fastest growing and most popular blockchain platforms in the world, with over 2 million active wallets and over 100 billion dollars in total value locked (TVL) as of September 2023.

2012 Protests Against Fuel Subsidy Removal Were All Politics – Kayode Fayemi

0

Dr. Kayode Fayemi, a former Governor of Ekiti State, stated on Tuesday that the protests that occurred following the fuel subsidy removal during President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration in 2012 were driven by political interests.

Fayemi made this statement during his keynote address at a national dialogue held to commemorate the 60th birthday of Professor Udenta Udenta, the founding National Secretary of the Alliance for Democracy and a Fellow at the Abuja School of Social and Political Thought, in Abuja.

The programme was graced by former president Jonathan, former Minister of Education, Dr. Oby Ezekwesili; former Minister of Aviation, Osita Chidoka, among others.

In 2012, the Nigerian Labour Congress led a coalition of civil society organizations – backed by opposition political parties – under the aegis of Occupy Nigeria, to stage weeklong protests across the country over the decision by then president Goodluck Jonathan, to remove fuel subsidy.

The attempted removal of the fuel subsidy resulted in the adjustment of the petrol pump price from N65 to N141 per liter. However, the protests forced the government to reverse its decision, readjusting fuel price to N97 per liter.

The protests, backed by different political parties such as the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Congress for Progressives Congress (CPC), and All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) that would later merge to form the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC), paved way for the emergence of Buhari in 2015.

More than a decade after these protests, fuel prices have been repeatedly increased particularly under former president Muhammadu Buhari, who had promised to reduce the price from N87 to N40.

One year into his presidency, Buhari astonished the nation by raising the pump price from N87 to N145. Following his re-election for a second term, fuel prices continued to climb, reaching N161 per liter in 2020. By November of that same year, the price had risen further to N170. Upon his departure from office on May 29, a liter of fuel was being sold at N210.

All these happened without protests.

While confessing that the 2012 protests were politically motivated, Fayemi said that Nigeria’s democracy is not working. He said the challenges facing the nation today cannot be solved unless the country embraced proportional representation, where the spoils of elections are shared between contestants.

He also acknowledged that the last time Nigeria experienced economic development was during Jonathan’s administration, adding that Nigeria needs to do away with politics of hate and division.

Fayemi said: “Today, I read former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s interview in The Cable saying our liberal democracy is not working and we need to revisit it, and I agree with him. We must move from the political alternatives. I think we are almost on a dead end of that.

“What we need is alternative politics and my own notion of alternative politics is that you can’t have 35 percent of the vote and take 100 percent. It won’t work! We must look at proportional representation so that the party that is said to have won 21 percent of the votes will have 21 percent of the government. Adversary politics bring division and enmity.

“All political parties in the country agreed and they even put in their manifesto that subsidy must be removed. We all said subsidy must be removed. But we in ACN at the time, in 2012, we know the truth Sir, but it is all politics.

“That is why we must ensure that everybody is a crucial stakeholder by stopping all these. Let the manifesto of PDP, APC and Labour Party, be put on the table and select all those who will pilot the programme from all parties.”