DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4

JPMorgan Exploring Crypto Trading for Institutional Clients

0

According to a Bloomberg report published on December 22, 2025, JPMorgan Chase is actively exploring the possibility of offering cryptocurrency trading services to its institutional clients.

This includes potential spot trading; direct buying/selling of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and derivatives products. The initiative is in early stages, driven by growing client demand from hedge funds, pension managers, and other large investors seeking regulated, bank-grade access to crypto markets.

It would expand JPMorgan’s existing blockchain activities via its Kinexys platform, formerly Onyx, but mark a deeper entry into direct crypto trading—something the bank has historically avoided despite CEO Jamie Dimon’s longstanding criticism of Bitcoin.

No final commitment has been made; plans depend on sufficient demand, internal risk assessments, and regulatory feasibility.
JPMorgan declined to comment on the report.

This aligns with broader Wall Street trends: competitors like Goldman Sachs already operate crypto derivatives desks, Morgan Stanley plans to launch trading on ETrade in 2026, and Standard Chartered offers spot Bitcoin/Ether trading for institutions.

Recent U.S. regulatory shifts like OCC guidance allowing banks to intermediate crypto and the GENIUS Act for stablecoins have created a more favorable environment for such moves.While not yet operational, this signals accelerating institutional adoption of digital assets through traditional banks.

JPMorgan’s potential entry into offering spot and derivatives cryptocurrency trading to institutional clients like hedge funds, pension managers represents a major step in bridging traditional finance and digital assets. While still in early evaluation stages—with no firm commitment—this move, could have wide-ranging effects.

JPMorgan, the largest U.S. bank by assets managing over $4 trillion, entering direct crypto trading would signal strong mainstream validation for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. It addresses growing client demand for regulated, bank-grade access, as many institutions avoid retail platforms due to compliance, custody, and execution risks.

This aligns with broader Wall Street trends: Goldman Sachs already offers crypto derivatives, Morgan Stanley plans ETrade crypto trading in 2026, and Standard Chartered provides spot BTC/ETH trading. JPMorgan’s involvement could encourage more banks to follow, normalizing crypto as an asset class.

Increased institutional inflows could boost liquidity, reduce volatility from retail-driven swings, and stabilize long-term price trajectories for major assets like BTC and ETH. Potential for upward pressure: Similar moves have historically driven rallies and higher trading volumes.

Derivatives offerings could enable sophisticated hedging and speculation, deepening markets but also introducing new risks like amplified leverage. Dimon has long criticized Bitcoin calling it “fraud” or “worthless” in past years, yet the bank has expanded blockchain efforts.

This highlights a pragmatic business response to client demand and regulatory shifts, separate from personal views—common in finance where banks serve market needs despite executive opinions.

Driven by favorable U.S. changes: OCC guidance allowing banks to intermediate crypto, the GENIUS Act for stablecoins, and a pro-crypto stance under President Trump aiming to make the U.S. the “crypto capital”. Heightens competition among banks and platforms, potentially lowering fees and improving services.

Globally, it could pressure other regions to clarify rules, fostering cross-border institutional flows. Furthers the convergence of TradFi and crypto: Builds on JPMorgan’s existing activities vis BTC/ETH as loan collateral, tokenized funds on Ethereum/Solana.

Long-term could reshape payments, settlements, and asset management, with blockchain enabling faster, cheaper institutional transactions. Volatility exposure for banks, potential regulatory scrutiny if markets crash, or conflicts with ongoing “debanking” concerns in crypto circles.

If launched, this could mark a pivotal moment for crypto maturation in 2026+, attracting billions in new capital and reducing perceived risks. However, outcomes depend on demand, risk assessments, and regulatory feasibility—no timeline has been announced. This underscores crypto’s evolution from fringe to core financial infrastructure.

ETHZILLA’s $74.5M Sale Triggers Fear on Institutions Selling Pressure

0

ETHZilla, a Peter Thiel-backed firm, has indeed sold approximately $74.5 million worth of Ethereum specifically 24,291 ETH to redeem outstanding senior secured convertible notes and pay off debt.

This move marks a strategic pivot away from its digital asset treasury (DAT) model, which involved holding cryptocurrencies like ETH, toward a focus on real-world asset (RWA) tokenization and related income-generating initiatives.

The announcement comes amid broader market pressures, including a recent 30% drop in Ethereum’s price and dwindling net asset value (NAV) for ETHZilla, which has faced backlash from stakeholders.

This isn’t the first such sale—ETHZilla previously liquidated $40 million in ETH back in October 2025 to fund a stock buyback program, signaling a gradual shift of crypto profits into traditional equities and RWAs.

The liquidation has contributed to near-term weakness in ETH’s price and a plunge in ETHZilla’s shares, highlighting risks in crypto lending and liquidity for overleveraged entities in 2025.

The firm appears to be positioning itself for a prolonged “crypto winter” by emphasizing RWAs, which could involve tokenizing real estate, commodities, or other tangible assets for blockchain-based investment.

ETHZilla’s sale of 24,291 ETH averaging ~$3,068 per token to redeem senior secured convertible notes and its explicit shift from a digital asset treasury (DAT) model to real-world asset (RWA) tokenization carries several key implications across financial, market, and strategic dimensions.

The proceeds primarily fund debt redemption, reducing leverage and interest burdens in a declining ETH price environment down 30% in recent months. This strengthens the balance sheet, with remaining holdings at ~69,800 ETH $207M at ~$2,970 current price.

By discontinuing the mNAV dashboard which tracked market cap vs. ETH holdings, the company signals a move away from crypto-speculative metrics toward traditional ones: revenue, cash flow, and earnings from RWA operations like tokenizing auto loans, manufactured homes, real estate, aerospace equipment.

Success hinges on executing RWA deals e.g., partnerships like Zippy Inc.. If revenue materializes, it could restore investor confidence after stock declines ~7-8% post-announcement, down >90% from peaks. Failure risks further dilution or sales. Community reactions are mixed: some see it as pragmatic “balance sheet hygiene,” others criticize rapid pivots biotech ? DAT ? RWA in months.

The ~$74.5M sale adds to broader outflows e.g., ~107K ETH from treasuries/ETFs in recent weeks, totaling ~$670M. However, ETH’s deep liquidity absorbs this easily—price held around $2,960-$3,000 post-sale, with no major crash attributed directly.

Sentiment Impact — Highlights vulnerabilities in ETH-focused treasuries during “crypto winter.” Unlike Bitcoin treasuries, smaller ETH DAT firms face tighter constraints from price drops and debt. This could signal caution for similar entities, potentially leading to more sales.

The sale was mechanical, not bearish on ETH. RWA tokenization often builds on Ethereum or compatible chains, potentially increasing network utility/demand. Analysts note ETH fundamentals remain strong: low exchange balances, >30M staked ETH, institutional adoption like JPMorgan using ETH collateral.

ETH treasuries struggled more than Bitcoin ones due to ETH’s higher volatility and less mature corporate adoption. This pivot underscores that pure holding strategies are risky in downturns, pushing firms toward yield-generating or operational models.

Rise of RWAs 

Positions ETHZilla in a growing sector— RWA market ~$25B+, much on Ethereum. Institutional interest in tokenizing tangible assets for liquidity/fractional ownership could drive blockchain adoption, benefiting Ethereum if it remains a primary chain.

May encourage distressed DAT firms to pivot or liquidate. Contrasts with accumulators like BitMine continuing ETH buys. Highlights maturation: from speculation to utility/revenue focus.

This is a defensive move for ETHZilla amid market pressures, with potential upside if RWA execution delivers. For ETH, it’s a minor headwind in a broader outflow context but doesn’t alter long-term fundamentals. The pivot reflects evolving corporate crypto strategies: less “HODL,” more real-world integration.

Tariff-hit German Exports to the US Decline Sharply, Analysis Finds

0

German economy has witnessed a sharp decline in the German exports to the United States in 2025, largely attributed to U.S. tariffs imposed under President Donald Trump’s administration.

A December 2025 study by the German Economic Institute (IW), commissioned by the German Foreign Office and reported widely including by Reuters and Xinhua, found that overall German exports to the U.S. fell by approximately 7.8% year-on-year in the first nine months of 2025.

This reversed years of steady growth averaging nearly 5% annually from 2016–2024. Automotive— motor vehicles and parts: down ~14%, hardest hit, accounting for nearly half of the global export decline in this sector for Germany.

Mechanical engineering/machinery: down 9.5% impacted by 50% U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum inputs. Chemicals: down 9.5% partly due to tariffs, but also domestic factors like high energy prices.

These three sectors alone contributed over two-thirds of the total decline. Monthly exports to the U.S. showed volatility, with front-loading boosts early in the year like +8.5% MoM in February ahead of tariffs, followed by sharp drops, five consecutive monthly declines from April to August, hitting a low of €10.9 billion in August—a 4-year low.

By October 2025, exports to the U.S. were €11.3 billion down 7.8% MoM from September and 8.3% YoY. The tariffs stemmed from Trump’s “America First” policy, starting with higher rates, like 25% on vehicles initially, 50% on steel/aluminum, later moderated to a 15% baseline on most EU goods via an August 2025 EU-U.S. agreement.

Despite this partial relief, the elevated duties raised costs, reduced competitiveness, and prompted some price increases or production shifts by German firms like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz.

Economists note this represents a “new normal” for transatlantic trade, with limited prospects for quick recovery unless tariffs are rolled back—unlikely in the near term. Germany has partially offset losses by increasing exports to markets like China, but the U.S. remains a critical partner despite the downturn.

The sharp decline in German exports to the United States—down 7.8% year-on-year in the first nine months of 2025—has significant ripple effects across Germany’s export-dependent economy, exacerbating existing challenges like high energy costs and weak global demand.

Germany, already contracting in 2023 -0.3% and 2024 -0.2%, faced forecasts revised to zero growth or slight contraction in 2025 directly due to U.S. tariffs. The government and leading institutes like ifo and Bundesbank cited tariffs as the primary drag, potentially marking a historic third consecutive year without growth.

Analysts estimated tariffs shaved 0.1–0.3 percentage points off GDP, with risks of a “slight recession” if duties persisted. The hardest-hit sectors—autos (14% drop), machinery (9.5%), and chemicals (~9.5%)—accounted for over two-thirds of the total export decline.

These industries employ millions and drive innovation; reduced U.S. demand led to margin compression, potential layoffs, and scaled-back investments. German automakers  absorbed higher costs or passed them on, eroding competitiveness.

Germany partially offset U.S. losses by boosting exports to markets like China +5.4% in some months and non-EU countries overall. However, simultaneous weak demand from China compounded pressures on the export model.

Experts from the German Economic Institute (IW) described Q3 2025 export levels as a likely long-term baseline, assuming no major tariff rollback. The August 2025 EU-U.S. deal moderated duties to 15% on most goods with higher rates on steel/aluminum at 50%, but this still represented the most restrictive transatlantic regime in decades.

Tariffs highlighted vulnerabilities in Germany’s export-led growth, prompting calls for diversification to India, South America, reduced intra-EU barriers, and a shift toward services. Some forecasts suggested medium-term reallocation from industry to less tariff-sensitive sectors.

The policy contributed to broader protectionism concerns, disrupting supply chains and raising bureaucratic hurdles like the origin rules risking 200% punitive duties. While Germany suffered disproportionately as the U.S.’s largest EU trading partner, retaliatory risks loomed if negotiations failed.

While not catastrophic, the tariffs reinforced Germany’s economic fragility in 2025, delaying recovery and underscoring the need for adaptability in a more fragmented global trade environment. Limited prospects for quick U.S. relief suggest ongoing challenges into 2026.

ServiceNow strikes $7.75bn Armis Acquisition deal to deepen cybersecurity push as AI risks multiply

0

ServiceNow said on Tuesday it will acquire cybersecurity startup Armis in a cash deal valued at $7.75 billion, marking one of the company’s largest acquisitions to date as it moves to strengthen its security offerings amid rising artificial intelligence-driven threats.

Shares of the enterprise software company fell about 3% following the announcement.

ServiceNow said the acquisition will significantly expand its cybersecurity capabilities and more than triple its market opportunity for security and risk solutions, as companies grapple with increasingly complex digital environments and a surge in AI-powered attacks.

“This is about making a strategic move to accelerate growth, and we see the opportunity for our customers,” Chief Executive Bill McDermott said on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street. “In this AI world, especially with the agents, you’re going to need to protect these enterprises because every intrusion is a multimillion-dollar problem.”

The company said the deal is expected to close in the second half of next year and will be financed through a combination of cash and debt.

The acquisition underscores ServiceNow’s aggressive dealmaking in 2025 as it looks to sustain growth and position itself as a central platform for enterprise operations in an AI-driven economy. Earlier this year, ServiceNow agreed to buy AI agent platform Moveworks for $2.85 billion, and in early December announced plans to acquire identity security firm Veza.

McDermott said the Armis deal fits squarely into that broader strategy. “ServiceNow will have the only AI control tower that drives workflow, action, and business outcomes across all of these environments,” he said, pointing to the company’s ambition to unify IT operations, security, and automation under a single platform.

Armis, based in California, specializes in cyber exposure management, helping organizations identify and secure internet-connected devices, including those often overlooked by traditional security tools. That includes everything from medical devices and industrial equipment to operational technology systems increasingly connected to corporate networks.

Bloomberg had reported earlier this month that Armis was exploring a possible deal with ServiceNow at a valuation of around $7 billion, signaling growing interest in the company as cybersecurity spending accelerates.

In November, Armis said it raised $435 million at a valuation of $6.1 billion. At the time, co-founder Yevgeny Dibrov told CNBC that the company was considering an initial public offering in 2026 or 2027, but said his immediate focus was pushing the business past $1 billion in annual recurring revenue.

“The need for what Armis is doing and what we are building, in this cyber exposure management and security platform, is just increasing,” Dibrov said then, adding that demand for its tools was “very unique and huge.”

ServiceNow said Armis has now surpassed $340 million in annual recurring revenue, representing 50% year-over-year growth and up from about $300 million disclosed in August. That growth profile, combined with Armis’ focus on device-level security, appears to have made it an attractive target as enterprises expand their use of AI agents, automation, and connected systems.

The deal also reflects broader trends in the technology sector. With the initial public offering market only gradually recovering, many fast-growing startups are choosing to stay private longer or pursue acquisitions instead. Companies such as Stripe and Databricks have raised large sums in private markets, while strategic buyers with strong balance sheets are using M&A to secure growth and capabilities.

Cybersecurity has emerged as one of the hottest areas for consolidation. As AI lowers the barrier for launching sophisticated attacks, enterprises are increasing their spending to protect data, systems, and critical infrastructure. This year alone has seen several blockbuster security deals, including Google’s $32 billion acquisition of cloud security startup Wiz and Palo Alto Networks’ $25 billion agreement to buy CyberArk.

The Armis acquisition strengthens ServiceNow’s push to become a central operating layer for large organizations, combining workflow automation, AI agents, and security into a single platform. While investors initially reacted cautiously, the company is betting that tighter integration of cybersecurity into its core offering will pay off as enterprises confront higher risks and rising costs from breaches.

Nigeria’s $2.57bn Leads African Crude Exports to the U.S. in 2025, With Volumes Set to Rise Further in 2026

0

Nigeria has emerged as Africa’s largest exporter of crude oil to the United States in the first eight months of 2025, a development that underscores growing relevance in the U.S. energy supply chain even as its domestic refining capacity expands and reshapes regional oil flows.

Data released by the U.S. Mission show that between January and August 2025, Nigeria shipped 33.23 million barrels of crude oil to the United States, valued at about $2.57 billion. The volume represented more than half of all crude oil exports from Africa to the U.S. during the period, placing Nigeria well ahead of other African producers supplying the American market.

In a post on its official X handle, the U.S. Mission described Nigeria as the leading African exporter of crude oil to the United States over the period, noting that the strong trade relationship “creates jobs and drives prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic.”

Strong exports despite shifting trade patterns

The strong export performance comes at a time of notable changes in Nigeria–U.S. petroleum trade. In a historic reversal earlier this year, Nigeria briefly imported more crude oil from the United States than it exported, according to figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). This occurred in February and March 2025, reflecting a combination of reduced U.S. East Coast demand for Nigerian crude and rising domestic crude requirements within Nigeria.

EIA data show that U.S. crude exports to Nigeria climbed to 111,000 barrels per day in February and 169,000 b/d in March. Over the same period, U.S. imports from Nigeria dropped to 54,000 b/d and 72,000 b/d, respectively, from 133,000 b/d in January. The shift highlighted how quickly Nigeria’s oil trade dynamics are evolving as local refining capacity expands.

Dangote Refinery and the transition to refined exports

At the center of this transition is the Dangote Refinery, Africa’s largest, with a nameplate capacity of 650,000 barrels per day. The refinery began processing crude oil in January 2024 and is expected to reach full capacity soon. Its growing appetite for crude has altered Nigeria’s internal supply balance, temporarily reducing export volumes at certain points while increasing imports to optimize feedstock blends and logistics.

Looking ahead, analysts expect Nigeria’s crude exports to the U.S. to rise again in 2026, as the Dangote Refinery expands its markets for refined petroleum products, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel.

The expansion of refined product exports is also expected to reduce Nigeria’s dependence on imported fuels, free up foreign exchange, and improve the overall efficiency of the oil sector. For the U.S., increased imports of Nigerian refined products would add another layer to the energy relationship, shifting part of the trade from crude-only flows to higher-value petroleum products.

However, Nigeria’s position as the top African crude supplier to the U.S. reinforces its strategic role in transatlantic energy trade at a time when global oil flows are being reshaped by geopolitics, refinery closures in parts of the West, and changing demand patterns. Nigerian crude, which is relatively light and low in sulphur, remains attractive to U.S. refiners seeking flexibility and cleaner feedstocks.

For Nigeria, sustained demand from the U.S. provides a critical source of foreign exchange and revenue, supporting public finances and investment in upstream production, pipelines, and export terminals. It also strengthens bilateral economic ties, opening the door to deeper cooperation in energy infrastructure, technology, and downstream investments.

More broadly, the 2025 export figures point to the resilience of Nigeria’s oil sector despite persistent challenges, including production disruptions, security concerns, and global price volatility. Crude oil production has notably increased over the past year, with about 2mbpd being targeted in 2026.