DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4121

SEC Approves First Leveraged Bitcoin Futures ETF

0

In a historic move, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved the first leveraged Bitcoin Futures ETF, which will start trading on Tuesday, June 23, 2023. The ETF, sponsored by Volatility Shares, will offer investors exposure to bitcoin price movements through futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). This is a significant milestone for the crypto industry, as it opens the door for more institutional and retail investors to gain exposure to bitcoin without having to buy and store the underlying asset.

A futures-based ETF is different from a spot-based ETF in several ways. A spot-based ETF would directly hold bitcoin and reflect its current market price. A futures-based ETF, on the other hand, would hold contracts that promise to deliver bitcoin at a specified date and price in the future. These contracts are subject to fluctuations in supply and demand, as well as premiums and discounts, which may cause them to deviate from the spot price of bitcoin.

The leveraged bitcoin futures ETF is expected to attract both bullish and bearish investors who want to bet on or against bitcoin’s price movements. The ETF will also provide an alternative way for investors to access crypto exposure without having to buy or store actual bitcoins. However, the ETF will not necessarily reflect the exact price of bitcoin, as it will depend on the supply and demand of futures contracts, as well as the premiums or discounts that they trade at relative to the spot market.

The leveraged bitcoin futures ETF will also have a higher risk profile than a regular bitcoin futures ETF, as leverage can magnify both gains and losses. Investors should be aware of the potential for margin calls, liquidations, and volatility spikes that could affect the performance of the ETF. Additionally, the ETF will incur higher fees and expenses than a regular bitcoin futures ETF, as it will have to pay interest and other costs associated with borrowing funds.

The SEC has been reluctant to approve a spot-based bitcoin ETF, citing concerns about market manipulation, fraud, custody, and investor protection. However, it has been more receptive to a futures-based bitcoin ETF, as it falls under the regulatory oversight of both the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which regulates the CME. The SEC also believes that a futures-based bitcoin ETF would be less susceptible to manipulation and more transparent than a spot-based one.

The leveraged bitcoin futures ETF will allow investors to amplify their returns by using borrowed funds to buy more futures contracts than they could with their own capital. The ETF will have a target leverage ratio of 2x, meaning that it will aim to deliver twice the daily return of bitcoin futures. For example, if bitcoin futures rise by 10% in a day, the ETF would aim to rise by 20%. Conversely, if bitcoin futures fall by 10%, the ETF would aim to fall by 20%.

The first futures-based bitcoin ETF to launch was the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO), which started trading on October 19, 2021. It was followed by the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTF), which debuted on October 22, 2021. Both ETFs have seen strong demand from investors, with BITO reaching over $1 billion in assets under management in its first week of trading.

The approval of a futures-based bitcoin ETF is a positive development for the crypto space, as it shows that the SEC is willing to accommodate innovation and provide more options for investors. However, it is not a substitute for a spot-based bitcoin ETF, which would offer more direct and efficient exposure to bitcoin. Many crypto enthusiasts are still hoping that the SEC will eventually approve a spot-based bitcoin ETF, as it would be a game-changer for the adoption and mainstream acceptance of bitcoin.

Tinubu Explains Why He Suspended Central Bank of Nigeria Governor Godwin Emefiele

0

Weeks after the suspension of Godwin Emefiele, the former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, President Bola Tinubu has explained why he made the decision at a critical phase of Nigeria’s economy.

The President said, while holding an interactive session with Nigerians in France and neighboring countries, that he decided to suspend the CBN Governor because he messed up the nation’s financial system.

Emefiele was suspended on June 9, 2023, to give room for investigations into allegations leveled against him as the head of Nigeria’s apex bank.

“Then the financial system was rotten. Few people made bags of money and then you yourself, you stopped sending money home to our poor parents. Several windows. But that is gone now. It’s gone.

“The man is in the hands of the authorities. Something is being done about that. They will sort themselves out,” the president said.

Before his suspension, the Department of State Services (DSS) had made attempts to arrest Emefiele, alleging that he was involved in terrorism financing and other financial crimes. Perceived to have been protected by Buhari’s government, Emefiele was subsequently arrested following the presidential inauguration of Tinubu.

The DSS has listed in an affidavit of facts presented in court while seeking an order to detain the embattled ex-governor, allegations bordering on economic crimes and undermining national security.

The secret service said Emefiele was arrested “upon reasonable suspicion of committing acts which constitute a criminal breach of trust, incitement to violence, criminal misappropriation of public funds, economic sabotage, economic crimes of national security dimension and undermining the security of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

On these grounds, the DSS and the Office of Attorney General of the Federation (OAGF) on Tuesday asked the Federal Capital Territory High Court not to grant Emefiele bail, describing him as a “flight risk.”

However, despite Tinubu’s explanation, the belief that he is being vindictive over the naira redesign policy, which he decried during the presidential campaign as a ploy to scuttle his presidential ambition, has continued to be upheld by many.

Emefiele introduced the naira redesign policy late last year, before electoral campaigns. The president believed the policy, which resulted in a nationwide cash scarcity, was part of a ploy by elements in Buhari’s government who did not want him to succeed.

Emefiele’s involvement in politics was also fingered as part of the reasons the present administration is prosecuting him. The former CBN head had obtained a presidential nomination form under the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC) while still in office.

In March, Senator Shehu Sani, who represented Kaduna Central Senatorial District in the 8th Assembly, predicted that Emefiele’s life would be made miserable by the incoming administration of ‘president-elect’, Tinubu. The former lawmaker said “When Baba [Buhari] is gone, Emefiele will be like Zebra in the hands of Tigers.”

However, in its affidavit, the OAGF debunked the belief that Emefiele is being scapegoated. It said the former central bank head is neither being held for terrorist-related crimes nor being victimized for his involvement in politics and the botched naira redesign policy.

“Issues of terrorism financing and fraudulent activities are not part of the grounds for the arrest and detention of the applicant,” the OAGF stated.

The Political Economy of Deep-Sea Exploration and Titan OceanGate Submersible

0

Among all the creatures God created, humans have always had more opportunity to explore Earth because of the high reasoning level they possess. From land to water, God provides different resources for humans to live life the best way they can. However, what they wanted to enjoy positively sometimes becomes sour because of direct or indirect contravention of natural order to enjoy what interests them. Like the creation of different industries and businesses on land, humans, in their quest to explore water for more resources that would make them live a better life and experience life underwater, have over the years formed industries and created businesses that address different segments of the deep sea, which many sources describe as parts of the ocean between 200 and 500 meters.

The ocean, which invariably means blue economy, includes industries such as renewable marine energy, tourism, fisheries, and maritime trade. This economy has been exploited over the years for fish, minerals, and other uses. Our checks reveal that the exploitation of the ocean started becoming easier in the late 1950s, when technology started to advance enough to have machines that could dive deeper than 1000 feet (300 m) below sea level. This period was 38 years after the Royal Mail Ship (RMS) Titanic tragically sank. Information has it that thousands of people who believed in exploring the ocean paid different amounts for them to be passengers of the ship.

As noted previously, the advancement of technology has made people who have interest in exploring places and also possess the financial power see the reason for diving deep into the ocean. For instance, a submarine dive is an unforgettable experience that provides peace, silence, and insight into uncharted territory. It enables yacht owners and guests to explore deep underwater, where they may encounter whales, sharks, ancient shipwrecks, unusual rock formations, and rare creatures. This uncharted territory offers a one-of-a-kind and unforgettable experience.

People and businesses are not only diving into the depths of the ocean for fun. Another significant factor is the idea of improving life on Earth through resources in the ocean. Several reports and experts have stated that people, countries, and organisations that explore the bottom of the ocean are most likely to be the leaders in the global blue economy in the next two decades. This is premised on the fact that many of the land resources are nearing their depletion stage. Hence, there is a need to see and explore what water has to offer for human survival on Earth. Seafloor massive sulphides, cobalt-rich crusts, and polymetallic nodules are often mentioned as critical resources on the seabed that can provide copper, manganese, zinc, cobalt, platinum, and a host of other valuable metals for human usage on Earth.

While this background indicates that humans can explore both land and water for their survival on Earth, it is, however, imperative to examine the politics and economics of survival in light of the recent sinking of the Titan OceanGate submersible. Our examination of different views across the world about the incident underscores the need for transparent funding models for deep-sea exploration. We must ensure that scientific research and environmental preservation are prioritised over profit-driven motives.

The sinking of the Titanic Explorer is a reminder of the risks involved, but we should not shy away from innovation. Balancing economic interests and responsible practices is key. It has also highlighted the importance of international collaboration and regulatory frameworks for deep-sea exploration. A harmonised approach is needed to ensure equitable access, sustainable practices, and the protection of underwater cultural heritage.

The political economy of deep-sea exploration demands ethical considerations. The Titanic Explorer incident raises questions about the value we place on preserving historical sites and the responsibility of researchers and companies. We must prioritise ethical conduct and societal benefits.

Deep-sea exploration is a complex endeavour that requires substantial funding. The sinking of the Titanic Explorer is a reminder of the financial risks involved. Public-private partnerships and government support are essential to driving research, technological advancements, and safety measures.

As discussions continue, it is evident that the sinking of the Titanic Explorer has brought the political and economic aspects of deep-sea exploration to the forefront. Stakeholders, policymakers, and industry experts will need to navigate these complex issues to ensure that deep-sea exploration remains a force for scientific advancement, economic growth, and environmental stewardship.

Titanic Tragedy and Critical Discussion on Deep-Sea Exploration

0

The sinking of the Titanic Explorer submarine during the OceanGate expedition has sparked a critical discussion on various themes that connect with the Titanic and deep-sea exploration. Beyond the immediate concerns of safety and tragedy, this incident has prompted a deeper exploration of topics such as historical preservation, technological advancements, environmental impact, and the human fascination with the mysteries of the deep. Our analyst extracts these themes from a number of views expressed since June 11, 2023, when the Titan submarine vessel went missing.

Technological Advancements

The sinking of the Titanic Explorer has raised questions about the reliability and safety of deep-sea exploration technologies. Critics argue that despite significant advancements in submersible technology, accidents like this highlight the need for constant improvement in safety measures and the avoidance of complacency. The incident serves as a reminder that even with cutting-edge equipment, the depths of the ocean remain an inherently risky environment.

Environmental Impact

Environmentalists have seized upon the tragedy as an opportunity to emphasize the importance of responsible deep-sea exploration. They argue that the delicate ecosystems and fragile marine life found in the deep-sea should be protected from potential harm caused by research activities. Calls for stricter regulations, greater adherence to sustainable practices, and increased collaboration between scientists and conservationists have gained traction in the wake of the Titanic Explorer sinking.

Human Fascination

The enduring allure of the Titanic and the depths of the ocean has captivated the human imagination for over a century. The sinking of the Titanic Explorer, while tragic, has reminded us of our unyielding curiosity about the mysteries concealed beneath the waves. Some argue that this incident should not deter exploration but instead spur a renewed commitment to safer, more responsible deep-sea expeditions, driven by a shared fascination with the unknown.

Historical Preservation

The Titanic holds an iconic place in maritime history, and the tragedy has reignited the debate on how best to preserve its legacy. Some argue that deep-sea exploration is crucial for uncovering the past and learning from historical events, emphasizing the need for responsible expeditions. However, others question whether disturbing the resting place of the Titanic and other shipwrecks is ethical, urging a more conservative approach to preservation.

As discussions unfold around these critical themes, experts and stakeholders are engaging in thought-provoking debates. James Cameron, who directed the 1997 blockbuster Titanic and has previously dived to the wreck, compared the situation in which OceanGate was warned about the craft’s safety mechanisms but continued to make diving expeditions to the luxury liner’s wreckage to the Titanic’s sinking.

“I’m struck by the similarity of the Titanic disaster itself, where the captain was repeatedly warned about ice ahead of his ship and yet he steamed at full speed into an ice field on a moonless night. And many people died as a result,” the Oscar winner told ABC News.

In an interview with The Guardian UK, Stefan Williams, a professor of marine robotics at the University of Sydney said: “When you are putting people in a potentially dangerous position like this you want to be absolutely sure everything’s checked through before getting under way.”

Belgium’s FSDA Orders Binance to Stop Offering Crypto Services in the Country

0

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, has been ordered by Belgium’s Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) to stop offering any digital currency services in the country. The regulator said in a notice on Friday that Binance is not authorized to provide any investment services or to operate as a market infrastructure under Belgian law.

The notice also warned Belgian consumers that they should be wary of investing in cryptocurrencies and that they should check whether the platforms they use are registered and supervised by the FSMA. The regulator said that it has received several complaints from Belgian investors who have faced problems with Binance, such as difficulties in withdrawing their funds or accessing their accounts. The regulator also said that Binance does not comply with the rules on consumer protection, market integrity and transparency. The FSMA urged Belgian investors to stay away from Binance and to check its website for a list of unauthorized companies offering crypto services.

Binance has been facing increasing regulatory scrutiny and pressure from various authorities around the world, including in the UK, Japan, Germany, Italy, Thailand, Singapore and Canada. The exchange has said that it is committed to complying with local laws and regulations and that it is working with regulators to address their concerns. Binance has also announced several changes to its platform, such as limiting leverage trading, discontinuing stock tokens and futures products, and enhancing its KYC procedures.

Binance offers a wide range of services related to cryptocurrencies, such as trading, lending, staking, derivatives, savings, mining and education. The exchange also operates its own blockchain network and issues its own native token, BNB. According to its website, Binance has more than 15 million users globally and supports over 300 cryptocurrencies.

In a different twist, if you are a TUSD user you may have received an email recently that informed you that you can no longer redeem or create new TUSD due to issues with Prime Trust, one of the technology partners of TUSD. I wrote about the implications of incessant minting of TUSD and USDT by platforms.

This email caused some confusion and panic among TUSD users, as they feared that their funds were at risk or that TUSD had lost its dollar peg. In this blog post, we will explain what happened, why it happened, and what you can do about it. On June 10, 2023, TrueUSD announced on Twitter that the minting of TUSD via Prime Trust was paused until further notice. This means that users who wanted to create new TUSD by depositing US dollars or redeem existing TUSD for US dollars through Prime Trust were unable to do so.

The reason for this pause was not disclosed by TrueUSD or Prime Trust, but some speculate that it was related to the recent rumors of insolvency surrounding Prime Trust. Prime Trust is a fintech infrastructure provider based in Nevada that offers custody, payment, and compliance services for various crypto and traditional finance companies.

Prime Trust was also acting as a middleman for Binance.US, holding its customer funds through banking partners amid the debanking of crypto businesses in the United States. Prime Trust is set to be acquired by crypto custodian BitGo in a deal that was announced on June 8. If you are holding this stable coins you might want to consider monitoring and evaluating your portfolio to mitigate against future complications.