DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4160

New Aviation Minister Festus Keyamo Suspends Nigerian Air Project

0

The Air Nigeria project has been suspended by the newly-appointed Minister of Aviation, Festus Keyamo. The decision came after he visited the Murtala Muhammed International Airport Lagos, where he also directed all international airlines operating from the old international terminal building to move out.

The minister said the directive to move their operation to the new terminal, given to airlines, will take effect from October 1, 2023. This is to allow for a complete shutdown and repair of the old terminal.

The Nigerian Air project, which was in May exposed by investigative journalist David Hundeyin as fraudulent, has drawn a lot of controversy. The project was conceived by Muhammadu Buhari’s administration in 2016 but was dragged through the rest of his time in office.

Keyamo, who promised reforms in the aviation sector, said all arrangements under his predecessor, Hadi Sirika, including the planned Nigeria Air, have been put on hold, to enable proper audit of contracts.

Background of the Nigerian Air launch

Sirika hurriedly launched the Nigerian Air toward the end of May last year, sparking suspicion that the whole project was mired in fraud. Further investigation reveals that the single plane unveiled at the launch was rented from the Ethiopian Airline.

Aviation expert and analyst, Captain Ado Sanusi, also said in a June interview with ChannelsTV that it would be practically impossible for Nigerian Air to commence commercial passenger operations within a mere two days, considering the intricate processes involved. This aligns with Hundeyin’s report, which contends that the launch is fraudulent.

During the investigation, the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) informed the committee that the aircraft bearing Nigerian colors was on a chartered flight to Nigeria. This information was corroborated by other stakeholders who affirmed NAMA’s statement, emphasizing that a chartered flight can be painted in any color and bear any inscriptions.

In his testimony before a Senate committee on Aviation, Capt. Dapo Olumide, the Interim Managing Director of Nigerian Air, confirmed that the unveiled Nigerian Air aircraft had been chartered. He explained that the plane that arrived and departed was a legitimate chartered flight, a service available to anyone without a license as long as the requisite payment is made.

During the meeting, Senator Biodun Olujimi, who chairs the Senate Aviation Committee, expressed her curiosity regarding why the former Minister of Aviation rushed to unveil a national carrier on the final day of the Muhammadu Buhari administration.

Hundeyin would later report that the rented plane, which was repainted with the Nigerian Air color, was returned to the Ethiopian Airlines fleets and services.

In June, seasoned aviator Girma Wake stepped down from his position as Chairman of Ethiopian Airlines amid the controversy surrounding the establishment of Nigeria’s national carrier.

Nigeria’s Senate and House of Representatives Committees on Aviation had both labeled the launch of the Nigeria Air as a fraud.

Olumide reiterated his confirmation during his testimony before the Senate committee. He clarified that the Nigerian Air currently possesses an airport license, which constitutes one of the two necessary licenses for airline operation. However, this license does not authorize the carrier to conduct commercial service operations.

He went on to elaborate that for Nigerian Air to obtain the required license and gain approval from the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority for operation, it would need to have a minimum of three registered aircraft in its fleet.

US Federal Reserve to Adopt Gradual and Cautious Approach to Developing CBDC

0

The Federal Reserve is expected to adopt a gradual and cautious approach to developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), according to a report by RBC Capital Markets. The report, published on Wednesday, analyzes the potential implications of a US CBDC for the financial system, the economy and the Fed’s monetary policy. The report also compares the US approach to that of other countries, such as China, which has been aggressively testing its own digital yuan.

The report argues that the Fed is unlikely to rush into launching a CBDC, given the complex and uncertain challenges that such a project would entail. The report cites several factors that could slow down the Fed’s progress, such as:

  • The need to ensure interoperability and compatibility with existing payment systems and infrastructures.
  • The need to address legal, regulatory and privacy issues, as well as potential cyber threats.
  • The need to balance the trade-offs between efficiency, security and inclusion.
  • The need to preserve the role of commercial banks and other intermediaries in the financial system.
  • The need to avoid disrupting the Fed’s monetary policy framework and tools.

The report suggests that the Fed will likely pursue a “two-tiered” model for a CBDC, in which the Fed would issue and distribute the digital currency through commercial banks and other regulated entities, rather than directly to the public. This would allow the Fed to leverage the existing financial system and minimize the risks of disintermediation and financial instability.

The Federal Reserve has been exploring the possibility of issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) for the United States, a digital form of money that would be backed by the central bank and could be used for payments and settlements. A CBDC could offer several benefits, such as enhancing financial inclusion, improving efficiency and security, and supporting innovation in the payment system. However, a CBDC also poses significant challenges and risks, such as affecting monetary policy, financial stability, privacy, and cybersecurity.

One of the key design choices for a CBDC is whether it should be account-based or token-based. An account based CBDC would require users to have an account with the central bank or an intermediary institution, and transactions would be verified by identity. A token based CBDC would not require an account, and transactions would be verified by cryptography. An account-based CBDC could offer more oversight and control, while a token-based CBDC could offer more anonymity and accessibility.

According to a recent report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, the Fed will likely pursue a “two-tiered” model for a CBDC, where both account-based and token-based forms of digital money would coexist and complement each other. The report argues that this model would balance the trade-offs between the two approaches and provide users with more options and flexibility. The report also suggests that the Fed would not directly issue or manage the CBDC, but rather rely on a network of intermediaries, such as banks and fintech firms, to distribute and operate the digital currency.

The two-tiered model is not without its challenges, however. The report acknowledges that there are still many technical and legal issues to be resolved, such as how to ensure interoperability, scalability, and security of the CBDC system, how to protect users’ privacy and data, and how to prevent illicit activities and fraud. The report also notes that the Fed would need to coordinate with other central banks and international organizations to ensure global compatibility and cooperation.

The Fed has not yet made a decision on whether to issue a CBDC, but it has been conducting extensive research and experimentation on the topic. The Boston Fed is collaborating with MIT to develop a prototype platform for a CBDC, which is expected to be completed by mid-2024. The Fed is also planning to release a discussion paper on the benefits and risks of a CBDC later this year and solicit public feedback on the potential design and features of a digital dollar.

However, the report also warns that a US CBDC could pose significant challenges and risks for the Fed, such as:

  • Increasing the operational complexity and responsibility of the Fed.
  • Eroding the profitability and viability of commercial banks and other intermediaries.
  • Creating new channels for cyberattacks and fraud.
  • Affecting the demand for cash and other forms of money.
  • Altering the transmission and effectiveness of monetary policy.

The report recommends that the Fed should continue to conduct extensive research and experimentation on CBDCs, as well as engage with stakeholders and the public to solicit feedback and build trust. The report also urges the Fed to collaborate with other central banks and international organizations to coordinate standards and best practices for CBDCs.

Your Account Setup Instructions for Tekedia Mini-MBA Edition 12 (Sept 11 – Dec 2, 2023) 

0

Hello,

Greetings. Thanks for joining us at Tekedia Institute. We have created or upgraded your account at https://school.tekedia.com/ with your email address (the very one you are receiving this invitation for account setup). This is a different location from where you read the ebooks.

There are three steps; Step 3 is compulsory. If you do not do Step 3, you will not see your course in your profile. Here is the instruction for account setup – https://school.tekedia.com/support/support/ . (Please note the support video on the page as it may be helpful)

Once you complete the setup, you will see a post under LESSONS titled “Board12: Program News, Zoom Schedules and WhatsApp Link”. Please read it and join the WhatsApp Group, and note the Live Zoom schedules. The Week 1, Week 2, etc will drop as we progress in the program.

Class begins on Sept 11, 2023. 

Regards,

Tekedia Mini-MBA TEAM

Twitter (Now Called X) Plans to Roll-Out Option For Users to Share Their Email With Creators

0

X (formerly Twitter), is reportedly working on adding an option for users to share their email when they Subscribe to a creator.

This according to Musk could be for a newsletter function to allow creators to easily take their email list with them to other platforms.

Announcing the proposed launch of the feature, Musk said,

“This platform will provide email addresses of subscribers (who opt-in) to content creators so that creators can leave this platform easily & take their subscribers with them if they want.

“It’s vital that creators be able to leave our platform at any time and take their subscribers with them. We want to give peace of mind to creators that they’re not trapped here if they build a large audience.”

Reports reveal that creators are already getting popup messages to opt in to receive subscribers’ email addresses.

The message reads,

“Please ensure you have an email address associated with your account and email notifications enabled to receive the email addresses. By Opting in, you agree to let X collect and share with you the email addresses of your subscribers who have opted to share them for the purpose of off-platform communications. You further accept the Email Sharing Terms which require, for example, you to be solely responsible for the data and maintain a privacy policy”.

The soon-to-be-launched feature has been lauded by different X users who stated that it will be a game changer for creators. It is understood that creators want their followers to stay connected with them over multiple platforms as it allows them to easily communicate with them.

Also, it will offer creators security, in case their account is blocked or compromised, they can still keep in touch with their followers via email. This feature even assures creators that they can leave the platform at any time without losing their core subscribers, and having to start from scratch.

Different users and analysts have said that enabling data portability like X could be another way to lure creators and brands that have considered building their presence on the platform, with many more now likely to factor in how they might be able to leverage this element, to expand their connections and build business, both on and off-platform.

One interesting thing about this feature is that it is not just creators that would benefit. Brands, for example, would be able to leverage the feature by offering special deals via subscriber-only tweets, and then use those collected emails to build their direct mailing lists.

Notably, X email feature, which is related to some form of newsletter function, could see the platform compete better with other popular platforms when it comes to creators focused on long-form writing, such as substack, and medium, amongst others.

As X continues to evolve its platforms and offerings, the implementation of this feature is poised to offer creators enhanced versatility in managing their subscriber interactions and leveraging their subscriber data.

Wale Edun’s “Decade” Statement And Why Efficiency Was Key Over Oil Money

2

Interesting comments explaining away the core thesis of Mr Wale Edun (Nigeria’s finance minister) statement where he noted that Nigeria had the most stable economic indicators during 2013-2015: “If we think back to when was the last time when the economy was stable, when it was growing, when inflation was low, when the exchange rate was stable, and when interest rates were affordable; that period was about a decade ago.”

I expanded that conversation by adding that Nigeria during that period experienced the highest GDP per capita ever recorded. You can read some of the comments here, and the core message was this: Jonathan stabilized the exchange rate, inflation rate, etc because oil prices were high.

But one comment there wrote: “we can’t push competent, capacity and networking aside.” Good People, that is the deal. If you look at the numbers, and focus on the national budgets, under Buhari, in absolute Naira and USD dollars, Buhari’s government spent more money than Jonathan’s, on yearly average, and what oil money did not provide to the administration, they borrowed. Because Naira is Naira, whether from oil sale or debt, the issue here is efficiency on its management and deployment. Follow me:

  • Nigeria 2013 budget: N4.99 trillion 
  • Nigeria 2014 budget: N4.69 trillion
  • Nigeria 2015 budget: N4.5 trillion 
  • Nigeria 2016 budget: N6.06 trillion
  • Budget 2019:  N8.92 trillion
  • Budget 2022:  N16.39 trillion

Here is my summary: if spending money is what matters, irrespective of how that money was obtained, it may not be fair to say that Jonathan stabilized our economy because of oil. Most times, it goes beyond balance sheets to TRUST and operational capabilities. Here is the fact, despite not governing under an oil boom, Buhari spent more  money in absolute Naira and US dollars, and yet did not stabilize those indicators the minister was talking about.

I seem to admire Mr. Edun as he seems to be a technocrat who is not interested in calling black white and vice versa. When we tend to explain away a prudent and capable management team with high oil prices, we make it look like we cannot control inflation, FX, etc unless oil price goes up.

(Disclosure: I supported Jonathan over Buhari in 2015).


Comment 1: While it’s essential to acknowledge moments of economic stability and growth, especially in a country as populous and economically diverse as Nigeria, it’s equally important to provide a more comprehensive perspective on the issue.
The points need to be considered.

  1. Context Matters: Economic stability depends on multiple factors, not just one administration’s actions. Global economic conditions, commodity prices, and previous policies play significant roles.

  2. Oil Dependency: Nigeria’s economy heavily relies on oil. The mentioned stability coincided with a short-lived oil price boom, but the country faced economic challenges when oil prices dropped.

  3. Socioeconomic Inequality: Increased GDP per capita doesn’t necessarily benefit everyone equally. Nigeria struggles with poverty and inequality, requiring attention beyond per capita income.

  4. Structural Challenges: Persistent issues like corruption and infrastructure deficiencies hinder long-term economic stability and growth.

  5. Long-Term Planning: Sustainable growth demands consistent policies and reforms addressing fundamental problems.

  6. Diverse Perspectives: Economic assessments should consider various viewpoints and acknowledge contributions from different administrations and individuals.

Comment 2: I am trying to understand how the “context” you provide explains the decline in the economy from 2015 to today

  1. Dependency on oil is the same now as it has been
  2. Global economic problems have not worsened. And they did not affect Nigeria any worse than other countries
  3. What has changed about the weaknesses of the GDP as a measure of prosperity?

Comment 3: One thing you must understand is that while I am not supporting the past President Buhari Administration, I am only looking at the economy from a balanced point of view.

The points you provided are valid and your question is in order but here is my response:

  1. Oil Dependency: Nigeria’s economy has historically been heavily dependent on oil exports. While the dependency on oil may appear to be the same, the global oil market has experienced significant fluctuations during this period. Oil prices plummeted in 2014-2016, affecting Nigeria’s revenue and foreign exchange earnings. Even though the dependency on oil remained constant, the volatility in oil prices and production disruptions due to militancy in the Niger Delta region have been ongoing challenges.

  2. Global Impact: Despite global economic problems not worsening, Nigeria’s economy was affected by its integration into the global market, impacting trade and foreign investment.

Hence; GDP, as a measure of prosperity, has limitations. It doesn’t account for income inequality, poverty, or overall quality of life. Nigeria’s economic decline highlighted these shortcomings as key facts.

Comment 4: Let me also put some figures to what Goodluck NNOROM is saying to help put things in perspective.

Average Crude Oil prices by year
2011 – $111.26
2012 – $111.63
2013 – $108.56
2014 – $98.97
2015 – $52.32 (Buhari Administration Started)
2016 – $43.67

Average daily Crude Oil production by year
2011 – 2,459,000 bpd
2012 – 2,409,000 bpd
2013 – 2,276,000 bpd
2014 – 2,273,000 bpd
2015 – 2,199,000 bpd (Buhari Administration started)
2016 – 1,898,000 bpd

In 2015 which was the start of Buhari’s administration, crude oil took a nose dive, there was a sharp decline in global prices of crude that year, meanwhile since 2011 there has been a gradual decline in Nigeria’s daily crude production which fell below 2,000,000 bpd in 2016 for the first time since 1998. As of 2022, Nigeria’s crude production stood at 1,450,000 bpd.

Please note, I am not trying to support any administration over the other, I am simply buttressing some of the facts the

Comment 5: I think we can’t push competent, capacity and networking aside. The last manager of our economy before the current administration lack some of this attributes.

How do you network and relate with your western colleagues if you aren’t at their level. Manager of our economy must have the international exposures and cloud to competitive favourably in global market.

Comment 6: I agree that efficiency does matter a lot, and if you want to look at it from another perspective, you will see why your thesis on efficiency of deployment of resources may actually be the primary explainer of Nigeria’s overall underperformance throughout the eight years of Buhari’s presidency.

Nigeria has had a primary source of revenue over the years which is its oil and gas industry. What has happened is that, that primary source of revenue has come under serious attack from criminals and economic saboteurs thereby leading to its near collapse.

And then Buhari watched our primary source of revenue collapse, he then went on a reckless money printing and borrowing spree to complete make up the shortfall in revenue, and this has led to where our economy is today. This has led to a situation where the little revenue that came into government coffers, now goes to debt servicing up to the tune of about 90% of its revenue if not more going to service debts.

Daily crude oil exports has fallen over the years and collapsed since 2021. Nigeria loses about 1 million barrels per day since 2021 from its usual highs for crude oil exports. That is the reason why there is huge dollar shortages required to defend the naira.