Simply, Nigerian bank executives can only serve a cumulative tenure of 20 years across the banking industry: “The tenure of executive directors (ED), deputy managing directors (DMD) and managing directors (MDs) shall be in accordance with the terms of their engagement approved by the board of directors of banks, subject to a maximum tenure of ten (10) years.”
Good People, that is an earthquake and changes are already happening, in First Bank and Zenith Bank where the deputy managing directors have retired. But those are the easy fishes; expect the real shake-ups in the next few weeks.
Personally, I find this very fascinating and unfortunate at the same time. On the fascinating part, absolute power could corrupt and capping the tenure may help on corporate governance and succession. Yet, punishing brilliant minds for just rising fast would be painful. In other words, we can see stars being cut early in their careers.
In a gala night party a few years ago, I delivered the evening oratory (the academic version of what comedians do), and when I was done, a lady came and handed me her business card, saying “I am Lady Rothschild…and my family business has been operating for more than 200 years… I enjoyed your presentation and please connect”. I did and she made some connections in New York and Zurich. Like the Agnelli Family of Italy (owners of Juventus FC club), the Rothschild Family is a family empire – and they run the shows. By this rule, the Central Bank of Nigeria does not want that model in the nation.
Please read this explanation by Premium Times
The Central Bank of Nigeria has announced a revision of the tenure limit for executive management and non-executive directors of banks and financial institutions.
According to the review, the executives can only serve a cumulative tenure of 20 years across the banking industry.
In a circular addressed to all deposit money banks, signed by the director of financial policy and regulation department, Chibuzor Efobi, the bank said the review is part of measures aimed at strengthening governance practices in the banking industry.
“The tenure of executive directors (ED), deputy managing directors (DMD) and managing directors (MDs) shall be in accordance with the terms of their engagement approved by the board of directors of banks, subject to a maximum tenure of ten (10) years,” the central bank said in the circular, dated 24 February.
“Where an executive who is a DMD becomes the MD/CEO of a bank or any other DMB before the end of his/her maximum tenure, the cumulative tenure of such executive shall not exceed twelve (12) years.
“However, for an executive (ED) who becomes a DMD of a bank or any other DMB, his/her cumulative tenure as ED and DMD shall not exceed 10 years.”
The bank said that non-executive directors (NEDs), with the exception of independent non-executive directors (INED), shall serve for a maximum period of twelve (12) years in a bank, broken into three terms of four years each.
“EDs, DMDs and MDs who exit from the board of a bank either upon or prior to the expiration of his/her maximum tenure, shall serve out a cooling-off period of 1 year before being eligible for appointment as a NED to the board of directors.
“NEDs who exit from the board of a bank either upon or prior to the expiration of his/her maximum tenure of 12 years (three terms of four years each), shall serve out a cooling-off period of 1 year before being eligible for appointment to the board of directors of any other DMB,” he CBN said.
Affected bank executives
Checks by PREMIUM TIMES showed that top executives affected by the new directive included Segun Agbaje of GTB, Tony Elumelu of UBA, Jim Ovia of Zenith and Herbert Wigwe of Access.
Comment 1: I don’t see the similarity with the Rothchilds example.
My Response: I will not waste time asking you how or why or not. But if you care, you can explain. I respect your style of commenting, saying a lot but not helping anyone. The Agnelli family has a holdco which manages all their empires. There are many interests across industrial sectors. That holdco is run by a scion from the family.
In Nigeria, we have holdcos now managed or run by owners or sit-tight executives; right there, they control. Why the Nigerian version is young (3 decades vs hundreds of years), the pattern is the same. In one bank, the son picked from the father in Nigeria in the holdco and it is likely a family member will keep that holdco even as people are changed in the banks, etc. That is the similarity, from my angle. My note that CBN does not want that is that CBN is going all the way to holdco, not just the banks, meaning it does not want the scions to exclusively run the holdco.
Comment 2: I think that the comparison of CBN’s new guidelines with a supposedly endless tenure of private held non financial services business is not quite the same. Most Banks in Nigeria are supposedly public companies in name, in reality they’re set up to collect and collate money to be lent to favored friends and cronies. They suffer from high capital inadequacy and are mostly on the life support of the CBN. So entrenching goons as leaders of these institutions for a long term will injure the national economy. Even businesses like Rothschild have not been managed by same executives for the 200 years. CBN isn’t divesting ownership by its guidelines. It’s only making sure that management tenures don’t become too long to the injury of the institutions. Jack Welch and GE is a good example.
My Response: “private held non financial services business ” – how do you know there are non-financial? “The Rothschild family is the most famous of European banking dynasties”. “He [Agnelli] created his own bank, enabling people to purchase his cars on credit. In order to manage this empire, he founded IFI in 1927, a holding company he controlled, now known as Exor.” So, they were involved in financial services.
“Even businesses like Rothschild have not been managed by same executives for the 200 years.” – not sure since none is doing that in Nigeria for 200 years. The families do have scions run the shows for decades though!
I am not really for or against CBN policy, I only said it does not want the same playbook.
Comment 2R: Ndubuisi Ekekwe I said ‘even Rothschild hasn’t been managed by the same executives for its long life’ . It’s more common to have elongated tenure or even life tenure in privately held non financial services business.Please differentiate ownership of shares in financial services like Rothschild or Bakeshire Hathaway does from direct banking franchise like Chase and Bank of America.
My Response: ” It’s more common to have elongated tenure or even life tenure in privately held non financial services business.” I used the Rothschild and Agnelli because they have financial services under them -and they run the holdco most times exclusively by family members.
I understand your point but I want you to agree that these families do have control and command. John Elkann was about 21 when he was chosen by the Agnelli and at 28, he assumed the top job. From there, he hired the CEOs of Fiat, and financial services firm within the holdco. (See below and you can trace it back decades).
I understand Berkshire Hathaway, but I did not give it as an example; it was never a family business.
Like this:
Like Loading...
