DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4463

Osun State Gov. Ademola Adeleke, Sacked by Tribunal, Vows to Challenge Judgment

0
Osun local government

The election petitions tribunal has nullified the election of Osun State governor Ademola Adeleke, declaring his opponent, the past governor of the state, Adegboyega Oyetola, the winner of the July 16 2022 election.

Oyetola had approached the tribunal after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s candidate the winner of the election. Oyetola, who was defeated as incumbent, alleged that the election was marred by irregularities, including over-voting, which took place in several polling units in the state.

Based on these claims, the electoral tribunal annulled the election of Adeleke, declaring the All Progressive Congress Oyetola the winner. Justice Tetsea Kume held that INEC did not comply substantially with the constitution and the provisions of the Electoral Act.

However, the verdict has triggered mixed reactions across the country, with supporters of Adeleke taking to the streets in protest. Adeleke has also criticized the judgment, describing it as “miscarriage of justice.” The disappointed governor said he will challenge the ruling at the Appeal Court while urging his supporters to remain calm.

“I call on our people to remain calm. We will appeal the judgment and we are sure justice will be done. Let our people be reassured that we will do everything possible to retain this widely acclaimed mandate,” the governor said in a statement signed by his spokesman, Olawale Rasheed, on Friday.

Adeleke criticized the resolution of the over-voting question in favor of Oyetola, describing it as “an unfair interpretation against the will of majority of voters.”

Also, reacting to the judgment, the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) described it as a “black market purchased judgment.”

In a statement issued on Friday by the Co-National Spokesperson for CUPP, Mark Adebayo, the coalition said it’s however optimistic that Adeleke will eventually get justice.

“We are not perturbed because justice will eventually be done on this case. The same way that fuel scarcity is biting hard across the country and motorists have to resort to the black market to buy fuel is the same way that we consider this judgment as a black market purchased judgment that we are confident will eventually be overturned by higher courts.

“It is a temporary attempt to rob the Osun State people of their sovereign will and the judicial processes through its remedial mechanisms will do real justice to correct this anomalous injustice in the name of judgment. That it was a split decision judgment says a lot about its lack of merit.

“The mandate willfully given by the Osun State people to Governor Adeleke remains intact and any attempt to steal it will fail woefully,” the CUPP said.

The tribunal’s verdict has added to the growing number of times that the courts have to decide the outcome of an election in Nigeria. The trajectory has been decried by democracy advocates, who expressed concern that it is hurting the essence of democracy. They said if it is not curtailed, the outcome of elections will no longer be determined by the will of the people.

Lawsuit Against Google Over Its Dominance Of Advertising Tech Could Help Rivals – Experts

0

A group of experts have recently disclosed that the lawsuit by the U.S justice department against Google over its dominance of advertising technology could help rivals and websites that sell Ad space.

Chief Executive of Ad tech company Attain, Brian Mandelbaum stated that tech giant company Apple which is steadily growing its Nascent advertising business could greatly benefit if eventually Google Ads become less effective.

In his words, “Apple has an ability to be a new dominant force in advertising because Apple has data through its ownership of phones, its Safari web browser and the distribution of apps through the App Store”.

Also, few Ad industry executives have expressed concerns over Google’s dominance, stating that the company places Ads on websites it does not own, which they feel is too dominating.

These executives disclosed that if the lawsuit finally becomes successful, it could be the beginning of serious business model changes for Google, which could result in Google losing key data that helps target ads to relevant consumers.

They further disclosed that If Google loses access to data signals, advertisers could see their Google ads become less effective.

Recall that the Justice Department and eight states on Tuesday, sued Google, accusing the company of harming competition with its dominance in the online advertising market, calling for it to be broken up, a move that marks Biden’s administration first blockbuster antitrust case against a big tech company.

The eight states joining the suit include California, Connecticut, Colorado, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Virginia.

In the complaint filed, the justice department alleges that Google actively and illegally maintained its dominance by engaging in a campaign to thwart competition. The tech giant company is accused of gobbling its rivals through anticompetitive mergers, bullying publishers and advertisers into using its proprietary ad technology products.

The U.S government therefore called for Google to be broken up and for the court to order the company to spin off at least its online advertising exchange and its ad servers for publishers.

The suit marks the U.S government second anti-trust complaint against Google since 2020, when Donald Trump’s administration sued the tech giant over alleged anticompetitive harms in search and searching advertising

For a very long time, Google’s critics have claimed that the company’s extensive role in the digital ecosystem enables advertisers to place ads, and for publishers to offer up digital ad space, represents a conflict of interest that Google has exploited anticompetitively. 

Twitter Faces Legal Challenge in Germany Over Anti-Semitic Hate Speech

0

Twitter is currently facing a legal challenge in Germany over how the platform handles antisemtic hate speech.

The lawsuit filed by hateaid, a digital rights organization and the European Union of Jewish students, argues that Twitter has failed to enforce its own rules against antisemitic content including holocaust denial.

The organization claims that appalling Tweets on Twitter was not taken down where a user was hell-bent on refusing to remove a comment related to holocaust denial, which is criminalized in Germany and has an imprisonment period of up to five years.

Part of the lawsuit reads,

Although Twitter prohibits antisemiic hostilities in it’s rules and policies, the platform leaves a lot of such content online. Even if the platform is alerted about it by users. The current studies prove that 84% of posts containing antisemitic hate speech were not reviewed by social media platforms, as shown in a study by the center for countering digital hate, and Twitter acted on just 11% of antisemitic posts reported, the second lowest rate across major platforms.

Which means that Twitter knows Jews are being publicly attacked on the platform every day and that antisemitism is becoming a normality in our society, and that the platform’s response is by no means adequate”.

While speaking in an interview, the president of the European Union of Jewish students Avital Grinberg described Twitter’s holocuast posts as disgusting.

In her words, “The tweets are truly disgusting, very scary and saddening to read. We are not just talking about discriminatory speech, we are talking about hate speech that is illegal in German law”.

Meanwhile, Twitter CEO Elon Musk has repeatedly made claims that Twitter will respect all laws in the countries where it operates (including European speech laws). Although he is yet to make any public comment on the lawsuit filed against his company.

In 2021, Twitter partnered with the Campaign against Antisemitism, before Musk took over the company. The campaign claimed that Twitter’s policies were failing and the social media platform was able to remove only 400 of 1,000 tweets containing hateful content attacking Jews.

Meanwhile, since Musk took over as the company’s CEO, multiple accounts which were removed due to hate speech have been reinstated. Recall that Musk had offered ‘amnesty’ for previously banned accounts that hadn’t broken the law such as that of U.S rapper Kanye West, who was resuspended from the platform after tweeting an image of a swastika inside a Star of David.

Reports disclose that Antisemitic posts referring to Jews or Judaism soared more than 61 percent in the two weeks after Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.

The World’s Risk Now And The Message from Trump

0

People, there is a big problem in the world. And that problem can consume a big part of the human race. Yes, the US/NATO and Russia are now in an asymptotic relationship (flash back to secondary school Further Mathematics: an asymptote is a line which gets closer to a curve but never touches it in the finite distance).

Yes, as Russia ramps up in Ukraine, the US sends more weapons, and Russia ramps up, and the US ups its own game, and you have a vicious circle which will likely lead to something bad.

Ex-President Trump explained it clearly: it is a tank today, it could be nukes tomorrow. In other words, this thing will keep rising until one activates those nuclear warheads. This is very scary. And Trump is right on the money. As in asymptote, the construct is that the line will touch the curve at infinity. For geopolitical war games, that is the destruction of the human race.

Someone must #lead in this world.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: We have written severally on why they must pursue a peaceful solutions but it fell on deaf ears simply because of “ego”.

For now, let them settle the superiority agenda once and for all even if it is going to consume them.

One thing is sure, it won’t be world war but an European war.

No more colonies to be coerced into fighting for colonisers.

For once, Europeans will learn what it means to be a refugee.

Just my personal opinion/view and I may be totally wrong.

My Response: in primary school, my teacher explained that the northeast trade wind blows and brings the harmattan. In secondary school, in Geography, I had to plot that trajectory. If you check it, if you nuke any part of Europe, the chance the wind will blow into Africa is clear. So, do not think anyone is safe . You may pray it does not happen in Nov-March when the dust from the Sahara can cause more problems. The summary: any war between US and Russia is a world war and will affect all!

Comment 2: Dear Prof. I was wondering if you have written anything or come across an insightful piece that explores a viable way to end the war? Peacefully, of course. Please share with me.

My Response: I have read a lot actually but the solutions are apart. From RT (Ukraine should commit to not joining any military alliance and implement the Minsk agreement, an agreement to give some areas in Ukraine more autonomy. From NY Times, Russia should withdraw and allow Ukraine to follow its future.

Comment 3: At least for once you accepted Trump was right and Biden was wrong. Seems the Left is setting Biden up for eventual discard like Cuomo. His usefulness is over

My Response: I actually agree with Trump on most things even though I voted against him due to his education policies. I voted for Biden for one thing: expand opportunities for minorities in America via education. Nothing more as there is no difference between the two on core issues (if Trump is the president now, he will be doing what Biden is doing). For me, I believe that US govt should give more scholarships and forgive more student loans.

This is personal since without the govt scholarships I enjoyed, the $67,000 yearly school fees in Johns Hopkins would have prevented me from studying there.  I want everyone to have that opportunity and not just the 1%. So, I vote for one thing: who can open the pipeline for many via education. Trump reduced that fund. Biden has removed the lid. That is all I care about!

Comment 4: Prof, I never understood what an Asymptote was in secondary school. But with this explanation, I think it’s loud and clear. I hope the US/NATO line doesn’t meet the Russian curve.?

Amazon Planning on Launching Blockchain ‘NFT’ Gaming Initiative

0

E-commerce giant Amazon is launching an NFT initiative focusing on blockchain gaming and related NFTs in the spring of 2023, according to a Blockworks report.

The initiative is still in the development stage, but the deadline for the launch is set to happen in April, according to information from anonymous individuals shared with Blockworks. One of the use cases will allow Amazon users to play blockchain-based games and claim free NFTs, one source claimed.

Evolving Plans

In recent months, Amazon executives leading the initiative reached out to at least one family office, according to Blockworks. Even though the plan was to do at least one NFT collection drop with an artist, it quickly evolved into what it is today.

One of the sources stated:

We knew it was possible. But now it seems like it’s really happening. That’s going to affect the existing players in the space — if they execute and do this right and are smart about it.

The new initiative will be launched on “Amazon proper,” even though Amazon’s popular web hosting platform — Amazon Web Services (AWS) — posted job ads for Web3 developers over the past few months.

Amazon launched its loyalty-based coins program in 2013, which continues to exist separately from the new NFT initiative.

In April 2022, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy joined CNBC’s Squawk Box. Jassy said that he expected the NFT market to grow further and that Amazon could add crypto payments.

I expect that NFTs will continue to grow very significantly. We’re not probably close to adding crypto as a payment mechanism in our retail business. But I do believe over time you’ll see crypto become and it’s possible … it’s possible down the road.