DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 45

Flying Tulip’s Intent and Supporter Participation Goes Live 

0

Flying Tulip, the on-chain financial system and DeFi protocol founded by Andre Cronje known for Yearn.finance and other projects, has announced that its Intent and Supporter participation (whitelist rounds) for the public token sale is now live.

This comes ahead of the broader public sale phase starting on February 16, 2026, with tokens becoming transferable during the week of February 23, 2026 aligning with the Token Generation Event or TGE timeline.

Allocations submitted during the intent phase are guaranteed until February 13, 2026. Refunds are available anytime (principal protection via Perpetual PUT option). Secondary trading of PUT options is possible. On-chain fund allocation is viewable publicly. Initial products launching first: ftUSD (likely a stable asset) and margin lending, followed by spot trading, leverage, and total return swaps.

Flying Tulip’s sale mechanics stand out in the current market:Token price fixed at $0.1 per FT. Total supply: 10 billion FT (deflationary; refunded tokens burn supply). FDV starts based on total raised targeted around $1B max, but scales down if less raised — no inflation or manipulation via market makers.

100% unlock at TGE, but wrapped in a Perpetual PUT structure allowing holders to hold for upside, redeem principal anytime, or trade the position. Raised funds deploy into on-chain strategies, with yields funding buybacks and burns for sustainable value.

Prior phases performed strongly: Highest raise ever on Impossible Finance/Curated (~$55M). 3rd highest on CoinList (~$10M, concluded recently). Institutional backing includes Brevan Howard Digital, CoinFund, FalconX, Lemniscap, Nascent, Susquehanna Crypto, Amber Group, and more.

This setup emphasizes capital preservation, principal protection, and deflationary tokenomics while building a unified DeFi platform. This marks a critical phase for one of the most innovative—and debated—DeFi launches in recent cycles.

Flying Tulip, positions itself as a unified on-chain financial system combining spot trading, margin lending, perpetuals, leverage, total return swaps, and a native delta-neutral stablecoin (ftUSD).

The standout feature is its Perpetual PUT mechanism (embedded as an NFT wrapper for primary-sale participants), which provides principal protection: holders can hold for upside, redeem their original contribution at any time by burning tokens (pro-rata from reserves), or unwrap for free trading (forfeiting protection permanently).

Redeemed funds trigger open-market buybacks and burns, creating deflationary pressure. This flips traditional crypto risk: principal is safeguarded on-chain via segregated reserves deployed conservatively into yields like Aave/Ethena/Spark, targeting low-single-digit to mid yields.

It reduces “rug” fears, aligns incentives for long-term holding, and could attract institutional/retail wary of volatility. Fixed 10B total supply (no inflation/team allocation); tokens minted only proportional to raised capital (FDV scales with actual raise, e.g., $400M raised ? $400M starting FDV at $0.1/token).

Yield from reserves + protocol fees funds perpetual buybacks/burns, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel if adoption grows. $225M+ already raised privately (Brevan Howard Digital, CoinFund, FalconX, Lemniscap, Amber Group, etc.). Highest raise on Impossible Finance ($55M), solid CoinList performance ($10M).

ftUSD and margin lending launch first, with more products following—potentially capturing fragmented DeFi liquidity. 100% unlock at TGE (no vesting cliffs), secondary trading of PUT options possible, transparent on-chain fund views. Some see it as “risk-managed” or even “near risk-free” for primary buyers due to redemption rights.

Hyped for $1B target, but current sentiment (depressed market, some skepticism around Andre Cronje’s past projects) shows slower fill rates in public phases. Lower raise = lower starting FDV, but also less capital for yields and buybacks—potentially muting upside flywheel.

Smart contract relies on third-party protocols for yields; vulnerabilities, black swans, or low DeFi activity could impair returns/redemptions. No explicit insurance mentioned beyond the PUT structure. Full-stack DeFi is competitive; success hinges on real usage (TVL, trading volume) to generate meaningful revenue for buybacks.

Some view it as overhyped or question if protection truly eliminates downside. In a bearish/feared market, “protected” doesn’t mean profitable—some participants see better asymmetric bets elsewhere.

This is a bold experiment in “reversible” fundraising that prioritizes preservation over pure speculation, potentially setting a new standard for DeFi launches if it delivers sustainable yields and adoption. However, it’s still high-risk: redemption mechanics add complexity, and success depends on execution amid volatile conditions.

The structure offers strong guarantees for primary participants, but post-unwrap trading carries full market risk. This is not financial advice; crypto/DeFi remains speculative.

Implications of Binance’s $300M Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) Funds

0

Binance has confirmed that its Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) recently purchased 4,225 Bitcoin worth approximately $300 million using stablecoins.

This occurred amid a market dip where Bitcoin was trading around the $68,000–$69,000 range in various reports. This move is part of Binance’s broader plan, announced in late January 2026, to convert roughly $1 billion in SAFU stablecoin reserves into Bitcoin over a 30-day period.

The fund includes a safeguard: if the BTC holdings drop below $800 million in value, Binance will top it up to maintain the $1 billion target. Total SAFU Bitcoin holdings after this purchase: 10,455 BTC. Approximate current value: Around $720–$734 million depending on exact BTC price at reporting time.

Progress toward $1B goal: Roughly 73% complete based on recent tranches. Binance shared the update directly, including the SAFU BTC wallet address and transaction ID for transparency. The purchase aligns with on-chain data tracked by platforms like Arkham Intelligence and analysts such as Lookonchain.

This isn’t a one-off; Binance has been steadily adding BTC to SAFU in recent weeks prior buys like ~3,600 BTC for ~$233 million earlier in February. It signals strong institutional confidence in Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset, especially during periods of market fear and volatility—often interpreted as a bullish indicator since it removes supply from circulation and adds sustained demand.

SAFU was originally created in 2018 and boosted after the 2019 hack as an emergency insurance fund to protect user assets in case of breaches or failures. Shifting it heavily into BTC represents a treasury strategy pivot toward “hard assets” over stablecoins.

Similar large buys from entities like MicroStrategy adding BTC around the same time contribute to narratives of “smart money” accumulating during dips. This reinforces Bitcoin’s role in major exchange risk management and could support price stability or recovery in volatile conditions.

The Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) is Binance’s dedicated emergency reserve fund designed to protect user assets in the event of extreme circumstances, such as major security breaches, hacks, platform failures, or other catastrophic events that could lead to user losses.

SAFU acts as an insurance-like mechanism to fully compensate affected users if Binance experiences a security incident or similar issue that results in loss of funds under its responsibility. It provides an extra layer of protection beyond standard security measures like cold storage, multi-factor authentication, and insurance partnerships, ensuring users’ funds remain safe even in worst-case scenarios.

It demonstrates Binance’s commitment to user safety, risk management, and building trust in the volatile crypto industry. The fund is held in secure, verifiable cold wallets (offline storage), with transparency through on-chain addresses and periodic updates.

In addition to its primary emergency role, portions of SAFU have been used for regulatory compliance. Binance officially launched SAFU around July 2018 in various reports. This came amid a wave of high-profile exchange hacks in the crypto space during 2017–2018, highlighting the need for stronger user protections.

Binance committed to allocating 10% of all trading fees collected on the platform to continuously build and grow the fund. This ongoing contribution helped it accumulate value over time without relying on external insurance or user fees.

In May 2019, Binance suffered a significant security breach where hackers stole approximately 7,000 BTC worth tens of millions at the time. Binance used the SAFU fund to fully reimburse all affected users, restoring their balances without any direct impact on unaffected accounts.

This real-world use case proved the fund’s effectiveness and reinforced its credibility. By November 2022, Binance topped up SAFU to reach a $1 billion valuation during a broader crypto market downturn (crypto winter), signaling strong commitment amid industry uncertainty.

The fund has historically held a mix of assets, including BNB, BTC, and stablecoins e.g., BUSD or USDC equivalents, all in separate cold wallets for security. As of early 2026, SAFU maintains a target value around $1 billion, with recent strategic shifts to enhance long-term resilience and align with “hard asset” treasury strategies.

The term “SAFU” originated from a viral 2018 YouTube meme video by creator Bizonacci titled “Funds Are Safu.” It quickly became a community slogan, with Binance adopting “Funds are SAFU” in announcements to reassure users during high-load periods, incidents, or market volatility. Today, it’s a widely recognized phrase in crypto culture symbolizing security and reliability.

SAFU started as a proactive response to industry risks in 2018, evolved into a proven safety net (most notably in 2019), and continues to grow as a cornerstone of Binance’s user protection strategy—now backed by roughly $1 billion in assets and transparent on-chain management.

Wintermute Says It Remains Committed to Bridging Traditional Finance with Crypto 

0

Wintermute’s CEO, Evgeny Gaevoy, has publicly debunked or expressed strong skepticism toward recent rumors in the crypto market suggesting that a major institution or fund has “blown up” i.e., suffered a catastrophic collapse or liquidation.

This appears to stem from market volatility around early February 2026, including a sharp drop in Bitcoin and broader crypto prices, which sparked speculation about hidden leveraged blowups—possibly tied to hedge funds, perpetual futures positions, or other entities.

In a detailed post on X Gaevoy stated he remains “pretty skeptical” about claims of “somebody blew up,” or at least about any meaningful mid- to long-term impact. Rumors lack credible sources: Unlike past crises like  Three Arrows Capital after Terra/Luna or FTX, where news spread rapidly through private industry channels, counterparties, and desks, current whispers mostly come from anonymous social media accounts with no confirmation.

Even if some individual institution faced issues, there’s no evidence of systemic contagion or broader market disruption. Much of today’s leverage is in transparent perpetual futures contracts on exchanges rather than opaque off-chain lending like in prior cycles, making risks more contained and orderly.

Gaevoy emphasized that the crypto market feels more manageable now, with controllable risks. Note that Wintermute itself, a major crypto market maker and trading firm has faced past rumors of issues—such as during the October 2025 market crash—but those were also debunked or clarified by Gaevoy in earlier instances.

The episode highlights ongoing crypto market sensitivity to liquidation fears amid volatility, but Gaevoy’s view is that these particular theories are unsubstantiated noise rather than a sign of deeper trouble.

Wintermute is a prominent global algorithmic trading firm and one of the leading market makers in the cryptocurrency industry. Founded in 2017 by CEO Evgeny Gaevoy who previously built and led Optiver’s European ETF trading desk, the company specializes in providing liquidity to digital asset markets, making trading more efficient, stable, and accessible.

Wintermute acts as a market maker by continuously quoting buy (bid) and sell (ask) prices for a wide range of cryptocurrencies. This narrows bid-ask spreads, reduces slippage for traders, and helps stabilize prices during volatile periods.

They aim to remain delta-neutral (hedging positions to avoid directional market exposure) and operate in a highly rules-based, technology-driven manner. The firm provides liquidity across over 60 centralized exchanges (CEXs) and decentralized platforms (DEXs).

It handles hundreds of millions in assets under management, with reported daily trading volumes often exceeding $5 billion and peaks even higher in some reports. They support spot trading, derivatives (perpetuals, futures), and OTC (over-the-counter) trades for large institutional or high-volume deals.

Technology-Driven Approach

Wintermute positions itself as a tech-first company rather than a traditional hedge fund. It uses advanced algorithmic trading, quantitative models, and high-frequency techniques adapted from traditional finance to handle the chaos of crypto markets. They emphasize building efficient systems to create value for exchanges and the broader ecosystem, rather than short-term speculation.

OTC Desk

A significant part of their operations involves an OTC desk that facilitates large, off-exchange trades in spot and derivatives, often serving as a source of deep liquidity for institutions, projects, or high-net-worth individuals. Market makers like Wintermute are crucial in crypto because many tokens have thin natural order books and low retail demand without external support.

By stepping in to absorb trades—especially during liquidations or volatility—they prevent extreme price swings and ensure markets remain functional. However, this role has sparked debates.

Some criticize practices like the “loan option model” (lending tokens to projects in exchange for fees or options) as potentially enabling dumps or manipulation. Others note that in extreme crashes, Wintermute and similar firms may pause trading if internal risk rules are breached, which can amplify short-term illiquidity.

Wintermute plays a foundational role in bridging traditional finance expertise with crypto, fostering more mature and liquid markets. Their official site describes this as “harnessing the chaos of digital assets into liquid and efficient markets.”

As of February 2026, they remain one of the most influential players in crypto trading infrastructure.

Jumia Posts 34% Revenue Growth, Slashes Cash Burn in Strong Q4 2025 Performance

0

Jumia, the pan-African e-commerce marketplace, has reported a solid financial performance for the fourth quarter (Q4) ended December 31, 2025, reflecting accelerating revenue growth, improved operating efficiency, and a significant reduction in cash burn.

The company posted revenue of $61.4 million, up from $45.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, representing a 34% year-over-year increase, or 24% growth in constant currency. This growth was supported by rising order volumes, stronger customer engagement, and improved execution across its core markets.

Operating losses narrowed considerably to $10.6 million, compared to $17.3 million in the same period last year, marking a 39% year-over-year reduction. On an adjusted basis, Adjusted EBITDA loss declined to $7.3 million from $13.7 million, an improvement of 47% year-over-year, highlighting growing operating leverage as transaction volumes scaled.

Loss before income tax also improved, falling to $9.7 million from $17.6 million in Q4 2024, a 45% year-over-year decline. Jumia ended the quarter with a liquidity position of $77.8 million, with cash usage of just $4.7 million, a sharp improvement compared to the $30.6 million decline recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Net cash flow used in operating activities stood at $1.7 million, down significantly from $26.5 million in Q4 2024 and $12.4 million in Q3 2025. This performance was supported by a positive working capital contribution of $9.6 million, underscoring improved cash discipline.

Commenting on the report, Jumia CEO Francis Dufay said,

“We closed 2025 with clear momentum across the platform, delivering strong GMV and revenue growth, improving customer engagement, and continued progress on our path to profitability. Demand strengthened as the quarter progressed, driven by disciplined execution across our markets and, ongoing enhancements to our value proposition and customer experience, resulting in a successful Black Friday campaign. In the fourth quarter of 2025, we also meaningfully reduced cash burn, reflecting improving operating leverage as volumes scale and better working capital management.”

Operational Performance Highlights

Jumia’s operational performance in the Q4 remained robust. Orders grew 32% year-over-year, reflecting resilient consumer demand across key categories, while quarterly active customers ordering physical goods increased by 26%, signaling stronger retention and engagement.

Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) rose 38% year-over-year, driven by improved supply availability and execution, although this was partially offset by lower corporate sales in Egypt as Jumia continued to deprioritize that segment. Nigeria stood out as a key growth engine, delivering 33% growth in orders and 50% growth in GMV year-over-year.

International sourcing also gained traction, with gross items sold from international sellers increasing by 82%, supported by expanded direct sourcing capabilities and the opening of a new sourcing office in Yiwu, China.

Notably, in February 2026, Jumia announced its decision to cease operations in Algeria, a market that accounted for approximately 2% of GMV in 2025. While the exit is expected to have short-term financial impacts such as employee termination costs, lease termination costs, and asset liquidation, the company believes the move will enhance long-term operational efficiency.

By refining its geographic footprint, Jumia aims to concentrate resources on markets with stronger growth momentum and clearer profitability paths.

Focus on Profitability and Outlook

As Jumia enters its next phase of scaling, the company disclosed that Adjusted EBITDA will now serve as its primary profitability metric for guidance, as it more accurately reflects underlying operating performance and leverage. This shift does not alter Jumia’s broader economic objectives.

Looking ahead, CEO Dufay noted that in 2026 the company will prioritize scaling usage across existing markets, deepening customer engagement, and improving availability, affordability, and reliability across its platform.

He added,

“A more stable macro environment and local currencies provide a supportive backdrop for both consumers and vendors. We remain focused on unlocking operating leverage, optimizing our cost structure and refining our market footprint. Our priority is driving usage growth in our core markets with the objective of achieving Adjusted EBITDA breakeven and positive cash flow in the fourth quarter of 2026 and delivering full-year profitability and positive cash flow in 2027.”

With revenue accelerating, losses narrowing, and cash burn significantly reduced, Jumia appears to be entering 2026 with improving fundamentals. Continued focus on core markets like Nigeria, disciplined cost management, and deeper customer engagement are expected to support its ambition of achieving Adjusted EBITDA breakeven by late 2026 and full-year profitability in 2027.

Public Liability vs. Employers’ Liability: The UK Differences

0

A single lawsuit following a workplace accident can bankrupt a small business that lacks the correct insurance protections. Many UK business owners mistake one form of liability cover for another, leaving dangerous gaps in their defensive strategy. Differentiating between these two types of insurance is a critical requirement for any commercial entity operating in the British market.

Mistakes in coverage selection often lead to severe financial penalties from the Health and Safety Executive or significant legal expenses. Many entrepreneurs utilize WBI to secure tailored policies that address their specific industry risks. This proactive approach ensures that the organization remains compliant with national laws while shielding its assets from unforeseen litigation.

Public Liability Insurance

Public liability insurance protects a business against claims made by the general public for injury or property damage. This cover is relevant for any company that interacts with clients, vendors, or passersby during its daily operations. It handles the costs of legal defense and any compensation payouts awarded to the claimant.

Interaction with the Public

This insurance is necessary if your business activities take place in public areas or if customers visit your premises. It covers incidents such as a client tripping over a loose carpet in an office or a contractor damaging a neighbor’s wall during a renovation project. Even a home-based business may need this cover if professional visitors attend meetings at the property.

Property Damage Protection

Damage to third-party property is a common source of high-value claims in the service and trade sectors. If a plumber causes a leak that destroys a client’s flooring, this insurance pays for the repairs. It ensures that the business does not have to settle expensive repair bills from its own cash reserves.

Legal Defense Costs

Lawsuits involving personal injury can take months or years to resolve in the UK court system. Public liability policies provide access to specialist legal teams who manage the case on behalf of the business. The insurer covers the solicitor fees regardless of whether the business is eventually found to be at fault.

Contractual Obligations

While not a legal requirement for every business, most clients will demand proof of public liability cover before signing a contract. Local authorities and large corporations typically require a minimum of five million pounds in indemnity. Failing to maintain this cover can result in the loss of lucrative tender opportunities.

Employers’ Liability Insurance

Employers’ liability insurance is a mandatory requirement for almost every UK business that employs staff. This policy covers the cost of compensation if an employee suffers an injury or illness as a result of their work. The law requires a minimum cover of five million pounds, though most policies provide ten million pounds as standard.

Legal Mandates

The Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 dictates that businesses must display their insurance certificate where staff can read it. Failure to have a valid policy in place can result in fines of up to 2,500 pounds per day. This regulation ensures that workers have a guaranteed route to compensation following a workplace incident.

Defining Employees

This insurance applies to a wide range of workers beyond just full-time staff members. Business owners must ensure their policy covers the following groups to remain compliant with the law:

  • Full-time and part-time employees under a contract of service
  • Temporary staff, seasonal workers, and casual laborers
  • Apprentices, volunteers, and students on work experience placements
  • Subcontractors who work exclusively for your business under your supervision.

Long-Term Illness Claims

Some workplace illnesses, such as respiratory conditions or repetitive strain injuries, may take years to manifest. Employers’ liability insurance covers claims made long after the individual has left the company. It provides protection against historical risks that could otherwise emerge as sudden financial threats.

Identifying Your Requirements

Selecting the correct combination of policies requires an honest assessment of your daily interactions and staffing levels. A sole trader who never meets clients in person has different needs than a retail shop with ten employees. Most insurers offer combined packages that simplify the administration of these essential covers.

Organizations should review their insurance needs based on the following operational factors:

  • The total number of staff members including temporary or voluntary workers
  • The level of physical interaction with members of the public or clients
  • Specific indemnity limits requested by current or prospective business clients
  • The physical risks associated with the work environment or site locations.

Maintaining the correct balance between these two liability types forms the backbone of a robust risk management strategy. It allows the business to expand with confidence, knowing that it meets its legal and ethical obligations to the community and its workforce. Regular reviews of policy limits ensure that the coverage evolves alongside the growth of the enterprise.