DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4994

MTN Nigeria Is Now “osisi na ami ego” As H1 2022 Profit Hits N181 Billion

1

Ego. Kudi. Owo. You take your language – MTN knows how to grow it: “Multinational mobile telecommunications company, MTN, has announced that the firm made a total profit of N181 billion for the first half of the year 2022. This profit with a 28% increase, was disclosed to be higher than the amount that was recorded in the same period of last year which was at N141.8 billion.”

As you grow that digital business and move more activities from the meatspace to the cyberspace, you create more opportunities for MTN, Airtel, etc, since they are the companies that will power that future. Indeed, when we hire and pay search engine experts to make it easier for Google to discover our websites (and in the process Google becomes more valuable), little do we argue that in the real sense, Google should pay for those experts, since they are working for it!

Of course, that is not the case because just like MTN, Google has a strategic positioning. In business, when a company has a strategic positioning in the market, it becomes “osisi na ami ego” [ a tree that produces money as the fruits]. MTN is setting new standards in Nigeria.

H1 2022 – MTN Nigeria Reports N181 Billion Profit In 6 Months

 

H1 2022 – MTN Nigeria Reports N181 Billion Profit In 6 Months

0

Multinational mobile telecommunications company, MTN has announced that the firm made a total profit of N181 billion for the first half of the year 2022. This profit with a 28% increase, was disclosed to be higher than the amount that was recorded in the same period of last year which was at N141.8 billion.

Shares in the company gained at 5.3 percent on Friday. Its financial reports show that this profit is attributed to the boost in the company’s revenue in the first half of the year by 20% in spite of the double-digit inflation witnessed during the period. The total revenue of the firm for the first six months was N950 billion, a 20% increase from 791 billion in the first half of last year.

The highlights of the results include; Mobile subscribers increased by 7.6% to 74.1 million (Added 5.7 million subscribers in H1 2022); Active data users increased by 13.2% to 36.8 million (Added 2.5 million active users in H1 2022); Active fintech subscribers rose by 87.3% to 11.5 million (4.2 million registered (2.4 million active) MoMo wallets since the launch of PSB on 19 May 2022).

Other include Service revenue increased by 19.9% to N947.9 billion; Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) grew by 22.1% to N509.3 billion; EBITDA margin increased by 0.9 percentage points (pp) to 53.6%; Profit before tax (PBT) grew by 24.9% to N268.6 billion;

Earnings per share (EPS) rose by 28.1% to N8.92 kobo; Capital expenditure (Capex) rose by 67.1% to N311.6 billion (up 78.6% to N204.5 billion, excluding the right of use assets); Interim dividend of N5.60 kobo per share, up by 23.1%.

Commenting on the significant increase in profit of the firm, MTN Nigeria CEO, Karl Toriola disclosed that during the first quarter of the year 2022, the company made massive progress by strengthening the resilience of the business in the face of inflation that put a strain on the spending of consumers.

Also, the impact of the Russian-Ukraine war put a strain on the global supply chains across the globe, and the firm had to accelerate capital expenditure for network expansion to mitigate global supply chain and exchange rate risks.

MTN deployed Capex of N311.6 billion to accelerate the rollout of the 4G network which presently covers 75.3%, compared to 65.1% in the first quarter of the year. This doesn’t come as a surprise at all, seeing the huge profit MTN made in the first quarter of 2022. The company relentlessly continues to improve and enhance the quality and coverage of its network to accommodate the increasing demand for data.

Recall when the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), earlier this year issued a directive for all operators to restrict outgoing calls for subscribers whose SIMs are not associated with NINs. MTN, knowing full well that such a directive will affect so many of its users, had to actively engage their affected customers by supporting the NIMC in accelerating NIN enrolment of its users.

This aggressive drive of gross connection of its users to aid in NIN enrolment and Sim registration greatly benefited the firm as they added 2.5 million active data subscribers in the first half of the year 2022.

Also, following MTN’s entry into the fintech space with its MOMO payment service bank(PSB), since the launch, the company recorded 4.2 million registered MoMo wallets of which 2.4 million are active, generating MoMo transaction volume of approximately 7 million within six weeks of operations.

The FTC Files Lawsuit to Stop Meta’s Acquisition of Within

0

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is taking a legal step to stop Facebook parent Meta from purchasing virtual reality (VR) content maker Within Unlimited.

The move is part of the regulator’s anti-monopoly fight that has intensified against Big Tech recently.

A report by Reuters said the FTC, in a request filed on Wednesday in federal court in San Francisco for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, called Facebook a “global technology behemoth,” noting its ownership of popular apps including Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp, and said its “campaign to conquer VR” began in 2014 when it acquired Oculus, a VR headset manufacturer.

Deciding through 3-2 vote, the FTC argued that the acquisition portrays monopoly given Facebook’s influence in the VR market. The social media company’s acquisition of Oculus has already given it a dominant position in the market.

Facebook agreed to buy Within, which has a popular fitness app called “Supernatural”, in October 2021 for an undisclosed sum. Within was founded in 2014 and has since become a big name in creating original content for virtual reality.

The FTC separately had filed an antitrust lawsuit against Facebook in 2020. The Commission has become more proactive since Lina Khan was appointed its chair last year.

The ultimate goal is to limit the freedom of the Big Tech, flexing their financial muscle, from buying every company they see as a competitor.

Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft have been subjects of debate in the US Congress in recent times over anti-competition inquiries. Meta’s acquisition of Instagram was a reference point.

The FTC’s lawsuit against Meta denotes the regulator’s stern position on further acquisition by any member of the Big Tech, particularly companies in the same line of business with the tech firms.

Meta said in a statement that it disagreed with the FTC’s analysis of the market.

“The FTC’s case is based on ideology and speculation, not evidence. The idea that this acquisition would lead to anticompetitive outcomes in a dynamic space with as much entry and growth as online and connected fitness is simply not credible,” the company said.

“We are confident that our acquisition of Within will be good for people, developers, and the VR space,” Meta said.

The FTC has maintained that the acquisition is monopolistic. In its complaint, the Commission argued that the planned acquisition was a way for Meta to dominate virtual reality. VR industry revenues are expected to grow from $5 billion last year to more than $12 billion in 2024, the FTC said in its complaint.

Meta already has the best-selling VR headset, the Quest 2, and controls a Meta Quest Store with hundreds of apps. It has bought game makers like Beat Games, Sanzaru and Ready at Dawn Studios, among others, the complaint said.

“Meta already owns a best-selling virtual reality fitness app, and it had the capabilities to compete even more closely with Within’s popular Supernatural app,” said John Newsman, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, in a statement. “But Meta chose to buy market position instead of earning it on the merits. This is an illegal acquisition, and we will pursue all appropriate relief.”

2022 Global Fragile State Index: Nigeria Has Maintained Top Decile Position since 2007

0

Based on the strength and potency of their institutions and apparatuses to create the social good which includes security, welfare and happiness of the people, states are often described as functional, failed or fragile. A state is generally considered to have failed when it is no longer able to consistently and legitimately enforce its laws or provide its citizens with basic goods and services.

A fragile state is a state whose central government is so weak or ineffective that it has little practical control over much of its territory, characterized by inadequate or no provision of public services, widespread corruption and criminality; refugees and involuntary movement of populations and sharp economic decline.
The fragile states index provides a quantitative approach to understanding the fragility of a state; it measures the vulnerability of a state in pre-conflict, conflict and post-conflict situations.

The index comprises twelve conflict risk indicators that are used to measure the condition of a state at any given moment which includes; security apparatus, factionalized elites, group grievances, economic decline, uneven economic development, human flight and brain drain, state legitimacy, public service, human rights and rule of law, demographic pressures, refugees and IDPs and external interventions.

Since 2005, the index has included all UN member states and has been published annually by the fund for peace and the magazine foreign policy. Countries are ranked on a score of 120 with the highest rated most fragile and the lowest rated the least fragile.

According to the 2022 report, Yemen tops the fragile index with a score of 111.7 followed by Somalia (110.5), Syria (108.4), South Sudan (108.4) and the Central African Republic (108.1). Finland at 179th position is the least Fragile country in the world with a score of 15.1 followed by Norway (15.6), Iceland (17.1), New Zealand (17.5) and Denmark (18.1). The US is at the 140th position with a score of 46.6, Ukraine 92nd position and Russia is at 75th position.

Nigeria is currently the 16th most fragile state in the world with a score of 97.2 which indicates a slight improvement from 98 scored in 2021. However, since 2007, Nigeria has maintained the top decile position of fragile states in the world, oscillating between the alert zone (90-100) and the high alert zone (100-110). The worst zone is the very high alert zone which is 111-120

Since the FSI is based on global ranking, the unique internal pattern of a State’s fragility and its intensity across different years are often silent and overlooked. For example, in 2022 where Nigeria recorded FSI score of 97.2, the country has experienced worse economic shock compared with many years before. In June 2022, the country recorded an all time highest annual inflation rate at 18.6 percent month-on-month increase which is also predicted to further increase by the end of Q4, whereas in 2013 where the country recorded FSI score of 100.7, inflation rate was put at 8.48 percent. Even in 2016 where the highest FSI score of 103.5 was recorded, inflation rate in the country was 15.68 percent.

Between 2020 and 2022, the country has experienced the highest brain drain and human movement out of the country. The Central Bank of Nigeria reported that more than $US39billion was spent on schooling and accessing health care abroad between 2010 and 2020. More so, $220.86million was reported to have been spent on foreign education between December 2021 and February 2022.

Towards the end of 2021, the concept of Japa, which means to flee the country in search of better living conditions abroad had become a popular mantra in the day-to-day relations of many young Nigerians, showing more Nigerians are ready to leave the country to school or work abroad. Major destinations have been US, Canada, and UK. According to the CBN, the flight from the country and increase in demand for Dollars to settle foreign education bills has led to the free fall of Naira against the Dollar.

The Emerging Reign of Amazon Ad Business for Merchants

2

You are a merchant and you sell laptops; which scenario favours you?

Option A: You pay a company so that when people search “laptop”, it shows promoted links on top of the search results. Those people may not be looping for laptops to “Buy” but could be doing research on the specifications of laptops or just trying to understand how laptops work. If someone clicks on the space you have bided and won, you have “lost” money since  that person has no interest in actually buying a laptop. 

Option B: You pay a company which sells laptops so that when people come into its ecosystem and search “laptop”, your store comes on top of the search results. More than 90% of visitors are in the “spirit of buying” something when they visit that site. Yes, any click has a potential “Buy” trigger that can follow. 

Option A is  the Google search scenario while Option B goes for Amazon.  Amazon is now a huge ad company for merchants and it is growing every quarter: “Amazon generated $8.76 billion in advertising revenue in its second quarter. That revenue, which included things such as advertisements on the e-commerce website, contributed to an overall beat against Wall Street estimates”.

Amazon Ad could become another play for Amazon’s ecommerce one oasis. Indeed, the biggest threat to Google search (for merchants) is not Bing, but Amazon, because on merchant advertising, Amazon is winning that segment. Google gives you clicks, Amazon delivers sales into the bank accounts for merchants. If you understand that merchants spend a lot on adverts, it becomes easier to process why Amazon market cap rose by more than 10% yesterday. 

Facebook will be a waste of efforts if Amazon carries that item especially if you have a merchant store within Amazon. Both Google and Facebook will give you clicks from adverts; Amazon will deliver sales to the bank accounts. That makes Amazon ad business a superior business. If ads are to take users to commercial sites, Amazon wins because it is the grand-dominion of all digital commerce sites.

Why Merchants Like Amazon Ads – And Why it is Now a $31 billion Business

Feedback on LinkedIn

Comment: What’s missing in this analysis is that buyers do not always go straight to Amazon. More often than not, they would first search for where buy a laptop. So, there’s plenty of value for the seller outside of an Amazon.

Although it could be argued that they are the single largest forum, when one considers that it is not only Amazon selling laptops, limiting oneself to Amazon automatically cuts the market range for the seller’s product.

My Response: Certainly, I am not saying other channels are not useful. I am focusing on conversion efficiency and value on ads. Coca Cola can throw its money in any channel. But for a merchant with a $1,000 ad budget, that conversion rate matters. That is why Amazon has grown this from $0 to $32 billion in a very short time!

Comment follow: That conversion rate sure matters for a user with such limited ad budget. It will sure impact ad spend choices for maximum impact. Still I won’t ask them to go to Amazon by default. A number of other considerations will come: type of product and target market are critical.

I don’t know that Amazon has grown because of the ads. It is probably adding to it presently and it’s share will grow. Moving from 0 to 32bn has been a combination of innovation, customer obsession, diversification and sheer capital thrown at it. It took Amazon several years to break a profit.

My Response again: The $32b is specifically for the ad business, not other aspects of Amazon. Putting that number is to make a case that it is very viable and useful to small sellers. As I noted in the video, this is one oasis strategy because Amazon is collecting $32 billion to help people showcase things within Amazon and after they have sold, Amazon takes another cut on those sales. It is a massive positive loop!