DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5677

Smile Identity Raises $7m in Series A Round

0

As the world battles with the identity crisis, struggling through the challenge to differentiate one face from the other through proof of identity that involves an estimated one billion people who lack official proof of identity, it beckons a huge task.

Though taking on the proof of identity challenge presents a mammoth task, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where 81% of the involved 1 billion people live, according to World Bank Group’s report, Smile Identity is taking on it with uncommon determination.

The company provides ID verification and KYC compliance for African faces and identities, and it is getting the needed funding. On Thursday, the company announced that it has closed a $7 million Series A funding that new and existing investors participated in.

Costanoa Ventures co-led the investment with pan-African venture firm CRE Venture Capital. Other investors that participated include VCs like LocalGlobe, Intercept Ventures, Future Africa and unnamed angel investors. Existing investors, including Khosla Impact, ValueStream Ventures, Beta Ventures, 500 Startups and Story Ventures, also participated.

TechCrunch reported on the company’s journey since 2017, moving from an idea to a working solution to the world’s identity crisis.

Mark Straub founded Smile Identity with William Bares in 2017. As an investor, Straub took regular trips between Mumbai and Nairobi, spending up to a decade in the former. In the early 2000s, it was incredibly frustrating to get SIM cards or provide identity checks in India. But things began to change in 2009 when the India Stack was set in motion. The stack is a unified software platform via APIs that provide governments, businesses, startups and developers with seamless identification, verification and authentication processes across multiple industries.

People could easily do things like KYC to sign a document digitally, to share or federate documents across a company or school, to prove a birth certificate, or to prove an educational credential, he said to TechCrunch. It really unleashed this wave of innovation, entrepreneurship activity and fundamentally changed financial services and eventually shared economy services in India.

While India greatly advanced with this effort, Africa has largely played catch up. Most businesses on the continent still find it daunting to onboard new customers, salespeople or employees without spending lots of time and energy on people, processes and paperwork.

I’d seen for 10 or 15 years how long Indians had been waiting and how many problems this set of new national ID combined with these different software protocols solved. I saw how much friction the Stack removed from people’s lives. And I thought if only there was an Africa stack.

Straub said he began brainstorming with some entrepreneurs in Nairobi and figured that if an African Stack was to be built, three factors needed to come into play: cost, government independence and spot-on technology. It also happened that at that time, open-source face recognition algorithms on a wide range of smartphones had flooded the market and advanced the state of verification dramatically.

Leveraging camera technology, Straub and his partners started Smile Identity and developed de-biased face recognition that was ultimately more accurate for Africans than the base level open-source algorithms published in U.S. colleges.

We were able to combine that over time by matching selfies against either identity documents or photos on file at ID issuing authorities. And it was really the combination of those two technologies – the face recognition and all the liveness checks and, and anti-fraud checks that go with it, combined with verifying for the source of truth.

Four years on, Smile Identity is now present across six markets in Africa: Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Rwanda and Uganda. It covers more than 250 million identities and verification for 15 different ID types while performing over one million identity checks every month.

Its software is used in banking, fintech, ride-sharing, worker verification, public social welfare programs and telecommunications. Smile Identity says it has about 80 customers who are charged on a per-query basis. Some include payments companies like Paystack, Paga and Chipper Cash; neobanks like Kuda and Umba; traditional banks like Stanbic IBTC; cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Luno and Paxful; and supply-chain businesses like Twiga.

Finding product-market fit took a while for Smile Identity at first. There was little or no playbook to follow, so the company had to figure out the right mixture of features and pricing favourable for African markets, smartphones and the internet.

We have had to build SDKs and mobile wrappers that work for Android and iOS but also things like React Native and Flutter and make them work on mobile web browsers. Almost every one of these solutions we came up with was because we hit some friction point with customers that forced us to innovate. A lot of those were either device issues that we ran into or low internet connection or low or no internet connection conditions.

But with continuous iteration and working with different clients, Smile Identity is on track for another level of growth. In the past couple of months, there have been numerous talks on fintechs and regulatory requirements ranging from local data protection laws and consent requirements to privacy policies and data impact assessments. These requirements are hard to keep up with, and Straub says Smile Identity is working on templates its clients can use to navigate them.

Prof Ndubuisi Ekekwe To Speak in Osaka, Japan

0

I cancelled last time due to Covid-19 and they have re-invited. Yes, I have accepted the invitation of the Committee of Smart Devices Symposium 2022(SDS2022) to speak in their conference which comes up in Osaka Japan, May 18-20, 2022. The theme of the conference is “Intelligent Devices, Intelligent Materials and Intelligent World”. My presentation will be on  “Blitzscaling Civilization with Natural Computing” – and I will lay out how everything will end where it began: nature.

The presentation will draw from one of our startups in Silicon Valley where I serve as a Technical Design Mentor. Covid-19 needs to go so that we can have our lives back.

People, let’s do what engineers do: build and discuss great designs.

The MultiChoice’s limited Choices on $4.5 Billion Tax Burden in Nigeria

1

MutiChoice Nigeria and MultiChoice Africa are under severe paralysis right now: Nigeria’s tax agency, FIRS, has asked commercial banks to freeze and recover N1.8 trillion ($4.5 billion) from the accounts of these firms. According to the government, the companies have refused to open their books, servers, etc for independent audit, and the necessary high voltage searchlighting: “The companies would not promptly respond to correspondences, they lacked data integrity and are not transparent as they continually deny FIRS access to their records. Particularly, MCN has avoided giving the FIRS accurate information on the number of its subscribers and income. The companies are involved in the under-remittance of taxes which necessitated a critical review of the tax-compliance level of the company.”

Executive Chairman, FIRS, Mr Muhammad Nami, stated: “Information currently at the disposal of FIRS has revealed a tax liability for relevant years of assessment for ?1.8 trillion and $342.5 million.

FIRS is powered in Section 49 of the Companies Income Tax Act Cap C21 LFN 2004 as amended, Section 41 of the Value Added Tax Act Cap V1 LFN 2004 as amended and Section 31 of the FIRS (Establishment) Act No. 13 of 2007.

With these relevant sections, all bankers to MCA and MCN in Nigeria are therefore appointed as Collecting Agents for the full recovery of the aforesaid tax debt.

In this regard, the affected banks are required to sweep balances in each of the above-mentioned entities’ accounts and pay the same in full or part settlement of the companies’ respective tax debts until full recovery.

This should be done before the execution of any transaction involving the companies or any of their subsidiaries. It is further requested that the FIRS be informed of any transactions before execution on the account, especially transfers of funds to any of their subsidiaries.

It is important that Nigeria puts a stop to all tax frauds that had been going on for too long and all companies must be held accountable and made to pay their fair share of relevant taxes including back duty taxes owed especially VAT.”

Nigeria’s main grudge is that despite the success of MultiChoice in the land, the nation is not seeing the impact on the tax collected: according to the government, MultiChoice is alleged to have paid zero VAT in Nigeria since inception. Is that really possible? Should that be the case, EFCC should open files for all auditors, tax officers and former FIRS etc who ratified the books of the companies. Bear with me, I am finding it hard to believe that one, but who knows – this is Nigeria.

Nollywood, you have a script here: how to make $billions and pay zero VAT in Nigeria. Sure, DStv and Gotv may not come along!

“The issue with Tax collection in Nigeria, especially from foreign-based Companies conducting businesses in Nigeria and making massive profits is frustrating and infuriating to the FIRS.

Regrettably, Companies come into Nigeria just to infringe on our tax laws by indulging in tax evasion. There is no doubt that broadcasting, telecommunications and the cable-satellite industries have changed the face of communication in Nigeria.

However, when it comes to tax compliance, some companies are found wanting. They do with impunity in Nigeria what they dare not try in their countries of origin,” 

MutiChoice denies the accusation via a statement: “MultiChoice Nigeria respects and is comfortable that it complies with the tax laws of Nigeria. We have been and are currently in discussion with FIRS regarding their concerns and believe that we will be able to resolve the matter amicably.”

Yet, if this comes out in “affirmative”, using marine radio slang, MutiChoice will have limited choices in Nigeria.

Tekedia Institute Congratulates Felix Rwang-Dung for His Appointment

0

Join me to congratulate Felix Rwang-Dung. CISA, a Tekedia Mini-MBA alum and member (I think he has prepaid for next year!), for his appointment as Director General Plateau State Infrastructure And Development Commission by the Executive Governor of Plateau State Barrister Simon Lalong. Felix, we wish you great success as you serve your state and nation.

Ghana Not Sure if AfCFTA Can Deliver Them the Biggest Market in the Continent, Nigeria

1

Nigerians have been doing business in Ghana for years.  It was perfectly legal, and an absolute entitlement under the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Protocol.

Excerpts from the protocol affording rights to member citizens:

Article 3d) of the protocol:  the establishment of a common market through: i) the liberalization of trade by the abolition, among Member States, of customs duties levied on imports and exports, and the abolition among Member States, of non-tariff barriers in order to establish a free trade area at the Community level; ii) the adoption of a common external tariff and a common trade policy vis-à-vis third countries; iii) the removal, between Member States, of obstacles to the free movement of persons, goods, service and capital, and to the right of residence and establishment; e) the establishment of an economic union through the adoption of common policies in the economic, financial social and cultural sectors, and the creation of a monetary union…. and …

3i) the harmonization of national investment codes leading to the adoption of a single Community investment code;

So what went wrong?

Well, it all started with an organization called ‘The Ghana Union of Traders Association (GUTA)’ , looking to leverage a Ghanaian law brought out in 2013 called the Ghana Investment Promotion  Centre Act (GIPC) 2013 (Act 865)

Subsection (2) of this law states:

‘A person who is not a citizen may engage in a trading enterprise if that person invests in the enterprise, not less than one million United States dollars in cash or goods and services relevant to the investments.

An enterprise referred to in subsection (2) shall employ at least twenty skilled Ghanaians’

The problem is, that the law was never intended to target individuals or companies from the ECOWAS community and was conceived to protect the Ghana local market, and its businesspeople, from exploitation by distant nations, particularly non-African.

However the wording of the Act was not sufficiently well defined, and this notionally criminalizes any non-Ghanaian, even ECOWAS citizens such as Nigerians, from operating in Ghana without bringing in the required capital, and/or failing to employ the required minimum of locals.

Initially, Ghanaian authorities more or less ignored the law when they saw the obvious disconnect, in respect to ECOWAS citizens in Ghana.

It is a global phenomenon that Police and other agencies with enforcement powers, are not obliged to prosecute each and every infringement they discover. They are entrusted by the nation they serve with the entitlement to exercise discretion.

There is a law in many countries called ‘jaywalking’, which is crossing a road on foot, without due care and attention, and in a manner that puts both oneself and other road users at risk. However, while road-crossing in an unsafe manner is quite common, it rarely gets prosecuted.

It is required of Police and Enforcement Agencies to use their experience and specialist skills with public engagement to understand infringement context, recognize mitigating circumstances and see gaps between what is on statute and what works on ground.

This is critical in their shepherding of the public in the adherence to laws.

However, as Nigerian small-medium businesses in Ghana began to give indigenes competition, conflicts began to appear. This was mostly in traditional market environments with businesses operating from converted container freight units, kiosks, and small ‘lock-up’ shops.

Then  GUTA began supporting its members to drive Nigerians out of their businesses quoting the law.

In August of last year, The General Secretary of the All Nigerian Community, Mr Isaac Osahon Ekhator, said some members of the association were contemplating leaving behind their goods and move back to Nigeria because of the difficulties they were facing following the closure of their shops.

He expressed surprise that their government did not seem concerned about their plight in Ghana and pointed out that if it were to be in another country, their government would come to their aid.

“On behalf of citizens of Nigeria in Ghana, we appeal to the Federal Republic of Nigeria to urgently consider this burning issue and promptly intervene to bring hope and lessen the plight of her citizens,” Mr Ekhator stated.

Nigeria responded by closing borders.

Parallel to this however, we have had the ongoing progress of AfCFTA taking various twists and turns.

In March 2018, President Muhammadu Buhari requested a committee to review the AfCFTA’s text, saying   ‘continental aspirations must complement Nigeria’s national interests’ and this especially means not permitting Nigeria to become ‘a dumping ground for finished goods’.

This followed on Nigeria’s refusal to sign the ECOWAS-EU Economic Partnership Agreement, and opposing Morocco’s ascension to the union at the end of 2017.

This is Nigeria’s current playbook –  to consolidate its economic power in West Africa through domestic market protectionism.

However, the second biggest market on the Continent, South Africa, has also backpedalled somewhat on AfCFTA.

My own concerns on AfCFTA are well noted, not on the principle which I broadly support, but on confines and boundaries being properly set up, so that it results in benefiting the member nations as intended, rather than loosening control measures regulating non-member actors to member markets.

I have been particularly vocal on the automotive sector.

 

https://www.linkedin.com/embed/feed/update/urn:li:share:6735258973328470016

‘GHANA – THE NEW BACKDOOR INTO NIGERIA FOR FOREIGN VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS’

 

Fast forward to the present, and a new report  a few days ago by BALARABE ALKASSIM for News Express

‘The Ghanaian Speaker, Alban Kingsford Sumana, says his country has raised a seven-man committee as its delegation to the Joint Committee of Eminent Persons of Legislature between it and Nigeria to end trade disputes and other issues’

They will interact with their Nigerian counterparts towards passing the “Ghana-Nigeria Friendship Act”, which is intended to be a bi-national trade agreement. The Act will then pass into both Ghanaian and Nigerian Law.

The act is also offering to mitigate Nigerians against the requirements of  GIPC Act 2013 (Act 865)

This happened speaking to House of Rep. in Abuja just Wednesday.

But you have to ask the obvious question…

If the #2 powerhouse in ECOWAS has to approach the #1  ECOWAS (and African) powerhouse for a bi-national trade agreement…

Doesn’t this leave AfCFTA looking rather toothless?

 

 

References and Acknowledgements (Not in main body text):

Ghanaian GIPC Act: gipc.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/GHANA-INVESTMENT-PROMOTION-CENTRE-GIPC-ACT-865.pdf

https://www.peacefmonline.com/pages/comment/features/202008/425647.php

thenationonlineng.net/one-million-dollars-levy-is-xenophobia-in-disguise-say-nigerian-traders-in-ghana

www.linkedin.com/posts/ndubuisi-ekekwe-36068210_the-ghanas-great-disintermediation-playbook-activity-6817047127974305792-kNMh

Revised ECOWAS Agreement: www3.nd.edu/~ggoertz/rei/rei260/rei260.23tt1.pdf

South Africa, Nigeria and the AfCFTA : www.africaportal.org/features/south-africa-nigeria-and-afcfta-6-key-questions-answered/

newsexpressngr.com/news/127704-Ghana-raises-cttee-with-Nigeria-to-end-trade-disputes