DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6

AI Boom Keeps Memory Markets Tight as Micron CEO Warns RAM and Storage Shortages Will Last Beyond 2026

0

One of the world’s largest memory chipmakers is signaling that the global shortage of RAM and storage is no longer a cyclical blip but a prolonged structural challenge, as the explosive growth of artificial intelligence continues to outstrip supply across the semiconductor industry.

Micron Technology CEO Sanjay Mehrotra delivered the warning during the company’s latest earnings call, telling investors that tight conditions across memory markets are likely to persist for years rather than quarters. The imbalance, he said, reflects a sharp acceleration in AI-related demand colliding with the hard physical limits of semiconductor manufacturing.

“Sustained and strong industry demand, along with supply constraints, are contributing to tight market conditions and we expect these conditions to persist beyond calendar 2026,” Mehrotra said, tempering expectations that new capacity will quickly ease shortages.

At the heart of the supply crunch is the scale of AI data center expansion. Mehrotra said customers have significantly upgraded their buildout plans in recent months, forcing Micron and its peers to revise demand forecasts sharply upward.

“Over the last few months, our customers’ AI data center buildout plans have driven a sharp increase in demand forecast for memory and storage,” he said. “We believe that the aggregate industry supply will remain substantially short of the demand for the foreseeable future.”

AI workloads consume vastly more memory than traditional computing. Training and running large language models requires high-bandwidth memory, advanced DRAM, and large volumes of NAND storage, often deployed in dense, power-hungry server configurations. As AI adoption spreads from hyperscalers to enterprises and governments, memory intensity per server continues to rise, compounding pressure on supply.

Mehrotra said these dynamics are affecting both major memory segments. “Together, these demand and supply factors are driving tight industry conditions across DRAM and NAND and we expect tightness to persist through and beyond calendar 2026,” he noted.

Supply growth constrained by long lead times

While demand has surged, the industry’s ability to respond remains limited. Building new semiconductor fabs or expanding existing ones is a multiyear process that requires massive capital investment, access to advanced lithography tools, and a highly specialized workforce.

Even with aggressive spending, new facilities can take several years before reaching meaningful output. Advanced memory products such as high-bandwidth memory add another layer of complexity, with lower yields and more intricate manufacturing steps than conventional DRAM.

Mehrotra acknowledged that Micron is already operating under strain.

“Despite significant efforts, we are disappointed to be unable to meet demand from our customers across all market segments,” he said, underscoring that shortages are not confined to AI alone but are spilling into other end markets.

Industry discipline reinforces tightness

Micron’s outlook aligns with recent signals from its main competitors, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, both of which have cautioned that memory constraints are likely to linger. Rather than rushing to add capacity, leading manufacturers are exercising restraint, shaped by hard lessons from past boom-and-bust cycles.

Samsung has previously said it prefers maintaining long-term profitability and balance sheet strength over aggressive expansion that could trigger another oversupply crash. SK Hynix has similarly highlighted the risks of overbuilding, particularly given the capital intensity and technical difficulty of scaling advanced memory for AI accelerators.

This discipline means that even as prices rise, supply growth will remain measured, reinforcing Mehrotra’s view that shortages are structural rather than temporary.

Broader implications for tech and pricing

For customers, prolonged tightness in memory markets is likely to keep prices elevated, raising the cost of AI infrastructure and pressuring margins for cloud providers, hardware makers, and enterprise IT budgets. Consumer electronics manufacturers could also face higher component costs, especially as devices increasingly rely on larger memory configurations to support AI features.

For memory producers, however, the environment supports stronger pricing power and improved profitability, provided they can execute on advanced products and manage capacity carefully.

Mehrotra’s comments point to a broader shift underway in the semiconductor industry. The AI boom has fundamentally altered demand patterns for memory, and the supply side is structurally constrained from responding at the same pace. Rather than a short-lived shortage, Micron is warning of a new normal in which tight memory markets extend deep into the second half of the decade.

Gadget Habits of Pokies Bonus Finder Fans

0

The rise of smart accessories has changed not just how people pay in casinos, but also how they interact with games. On stay tune with pokiesbonusfinder.com, Australian casino platforms now offer more than just fast banking, as players expect enhanced experiences and services.They demand seamless, responsive, and optimised play across devices. With gadgets now an extension of the gambling environment, serious pokies users invest in performance-enhancing setups as deliberately as they choose their game providers.

Optimising Online Pokies for Real Money

Many Australians now access online Free Pokies Australia real money games from home setups that resemble a content creator’s studio more than a typical gamer’s nook. Multi-screen rigs allow for tracking jackpots, wagering conditions, and live promotions simultaneously. Meanwhile, mechanical keyboards and precision mice deliver the tactile control required for customisable slots interfaces and enhanced autoplay functionality.

Even players who prefer mobile pokies that use PayID payments are looking beyond the basics. Rugged devices with cooling pads, extra battery packs, or wireless charging pads help maintain session longevity during tournaments or streak-heavy games.

Tech Toolkit of a PayID Pokies Fan

When it comes to pokies that use Free Bonus, convenience starts with fast deposits—but the gear used to enjoy these pokies can greatly shape outcomes and enjoyment. Below is a breakdown of the most-used tech tools among real money gamblers.

Device or Accessory Purpose in Pokies Play Popular Models
Gaming Tablet Large screen pokies play, multi-tab navigation iPad Pro, Samsung Galaxy Tab S9
Smartphone Grip Improved mobile hold, prevents accidental taps Backbone One, Razer Kishi
Bluetooth Headphones Immersive sound effects and notification cues Sony XM5, AirPods Pro
Screen Magnifier Enhances visual clarity for older players MoKo 12-inch, Fanlory 3D Screen Enlarger
Wearable Payment Band Hands-free instant Real Money Casino withdrawal pokies access PayWear by Westpac, Fitbit Pay

Many of these accessories double as lifestyle tech, making them a worthwhile investment even for casual players. The goal is simple: eliminate distractions and create a stable, responsive environment for pokies interaction—especially when real money is at stake.

Mobile Accessories for PayID-Based Pokies

As PayID online pokies continue to dominate the Australian landscape, players seek more agility. Here’s a look at key mobile add-ons that elevate performance without breaking the bank.

  • Snap-on cooling fans to avoid device overheating during long autoplay sessions.
  • Clip-on macro triggers to replicate slot spins with higher precision.
  • Battery cases or power banks for uninterrupted access during tournaments.
  • Dedicated poker gloves with touchscreen sensitivity for grip comfort.

These enhancements cater to high-volume players who expect flawless gameplay even in casual environments like commutes or holidays. The demand for tech that keeps pace with gaming sessions continues to push accessory makers into niche designs tailored to gamblers.

Free Credit Tech and Responsible Play

With free credit pokies PayID offers often used to attract new users, there’s a growing conversation around smart limits and play tracking. Some players are turning to screen time tracking apps, gaming analytics platforms, or even integrated device-level limits that encourage balance. These tools offer transparency about playing patterns and are especially valuable in the best online pokies Australia PayID space where credit deals can become frequent temptations.

New wearables like the Oura Ring or Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 now offer stress level detection and alert players when physiological strain builds up—another layer of tech-enabled responsible play for those engaging with pokie PayID platforms.

Smart Gambling is Smart Tech

While some still see pokies as chance-driven, today’s real-money gaming ecosystem reflects calculated setup, intuitive gear, and rapid payment frameworks. As online casino Australia pokies options grow, so does the expectation that the tech surrounding them keeps pace—not just for convenience but for peak gaming enjoyment.

Dangote Blames Taxes, Levies for Nigeria’s Expensive Cement as Export Prices Undercut Local Market

0

Nigerian billionaire industrialist Aliko Dangote has offered a detailed explanation for why cement produced in Nigeria often sells for less abroad than it does at home, explaining that the country’s heavy tax burden and regulatory structure, rather than production inefficiencies, are the primary drivers of high domestic prices.

In an exclusive interview with Business Insider Africa, Dangote said Nigeria’s fiscal framework places multiple layers of taxes and levies on locally sold cement, sharply inflating prices for domestic consumers. By contrast, cement exported from Nigeria enjoys extensive exemptions, allowing it to compete favorably with products from global manufacturing hubs such as Turkey, Russia, and China.

The issue has become increasingly contentious as Nigerians struggle with rising construction costs and the government pushes large-scale infrastructure and housing projects. Public debate has intensified around why a commodity produced locally, using largely domestic raw materials, remains priced beyond the reach of many Nigerians while being sold more cheaply overseas.

Dangote said the discrepancy becomes clear when one looks at the cost structure behind each bag of cement.

“When you look at my invoice, the cement I export is cheaper than the one I’m selling domestically, because that’s how exports work,” he said. “In export I’m saving a lot of money. I’m not paying 30% income tax, I’m not paying 2% education, I’m not paying 1% health, I’m not paying 7.5% VAT, and I’m not paying 10% withholding tax.”

According to him, these exemptions significantly reduce production costs for export markets, while domestic sales must absorb income tax, value-added tax, sector-specific levies, and other statutory charges. The cumulative effect, he said, is that Nigerian consumers end up paying more to compensate for structural inefficiencies embedded in the tax system.

Dangote stressed that expanding local manufacturing capacity alone is not enough to bring down prices if the operating environment remains unchanged. He noted that without reforms to taxation and regulation, manufacturers have limited room to reduce prices sustainably, regardless of scale or efficiency gains.

His comments come amid mounting pressure from policymakers who have repeatedly called on cement producers to lower prices, citing improved macroeconomic conditions. In February 2025, Nigeria’s Minister of Works, Senator Dave Umahi, urged manufacturers to cut prices to about N7,000 per 50kg bag. Umahi pointed to a stabilizing naira, trading around N1,400 to the dollar at the time, and falling petrol prices as evidence that cost pressures had eased.

Umahi criticized cement prices that were hovering around N9,500, noting that manufacturers had raised prices sharply when the naira weakened to nearly N2,000 per dollar but had not adjusted them downward as the currency recovered. He warned that persistently high cement prices were undermining the government’s infrastructure plans, particularly road construction projects that rely on concrete pavements for durability.

He also cautioned that some contractors were already considering reverting to asphalt, which is cheaper upfront but less durable over time, because of the high cost of cement. Such a shift, he said, could increase long-term maintenance costs for the government.
Umahi isn’t the only government official to publicly criticize cement manufacturers. In February 2024, the Minister of Housing and Urban Development, Musa Dangiwa, accused cement manufacturers of exploiting foreign exchange volatility to justify steep price increases. At the time, cement prices had jumped from about N5,500 to nearly N10,000 per bag, raising alarms about affordability and the viability of government-backed housing programmes.

Dangiwa warned that rising cement costs threatened the ministry’s housing delivery targets, particularly for low- and middle-income earners, and urged manufacturers to innovate and cut inefficiencies instead of passing rising costs directly to consumers.

Despite these calls, cement prices have remained elevated. Market surveys show that a 50kg bag currently sells for between N9,500 and N10,200, depending on location. The high prices have had ripple effects across the economy, pushing up the cost of housing, private construction, and public infrastructure projects.

Dangote’s intervention reframes the debate by shifting focus from manufacturers’ pricing decisions to Nigeria’s broader policy environment. While critics continue to argue that dominant players in the cement market wield significant pricing power, his remarks highlight a deeper challenge facing Nigeria’s industrial sector: how overlapping taxes, levies, and regulatory costs often erode the benefits of local production, leaving consumers to bear the burden.

Amid the government’s need for revenue and its goal to boost industrial output and affordability, Dangote’s comments add urgency to calls for a review of fiscal policies that may be undermining domestic competitiveness and worsening the cost-of-living pressures faced by Nigerians.

Google Pushes Back Timeline to Fully Replace Assistant With Gemini on Android

0

Google has pushed back its plan to fully replace Google Assistant with its Gemini AI across most Android devices, signaling that the company is taking a more cautious approach to one of the most consequential platform shifts in Android’s history.

The company said it is adjusting its previously announced timeline, which had targeted the end of 2025 for making Gemini the default digital assistant on most Android phones. Instead, Google now expects the transition to continue into 2026, saying it wants to ensure a “seamless transition” for users. Further details on the revised roadmap will be shared in the coming months, suggesting that the final switchover could extend beyond early 2026.

The delay is attributed to the technical and strategic complexity of replacing Google Assistant, a service that has been deeply embedded in Android for nearly a decade, with a far more advanced and resource-intensive AI system.

Google Assistant’s retirement became all but inevitable once Gemini was unveiled and began inheriting Assistant’s core functions, including voice commands, app control, and smart home management. That shift became tangible in 2024, when Google launched the Pixel 9 series with Gemini set as the default assistant, effectively positioning Assistant as legacy software on Google’s flagship hardware.

Since then, Google has been steadily integrating Gemini across its product ecosystem, spanning Search, Gmail, Docs, Chrome, and Android. The company has also said Gemini will power experiences beyond smartphones, including tablets, in-car systems, and accessories such as smartwatches and wireless earbuds that connect to Android phones.

However, moving from a dual-assistant phase to a complete handover has proven more difficult than expected.

A key constraint is hardware compatibility. Google has confirmed that only devices running Android 10 or later with at least 2GB of RAM will be eligible for the Gemini upgrade. While modest by flagship standards, that threshold excludes a significant number of older and low-end Android devices, particularly in emerging markets where Android’s global dominance is strongest.

Google Assistant was designed to operate efficiently on a wide range of hardware, including entry-level phones. Gemini, by contrast, relies more heavily on on-device processing and cloud-based AI inference, placing greater demands on memory, processing power, and network reliability. Ensuring consistent performance across millions of devices with vastly different capabilities remains a major challenge.

Beyond hardware, Google appears wary of disrupting everyday user habits. Assistant handles a wide range of routine tasks, from alarms and reminders to navigation, dictation, and home automation. Any degradation in speed, accuracy, or reliability during the transition could undermine user trust, especially among those who rely heavily on voice interactions.

By extending the timeline, Google is effectively buying itself room to close feature gaps, improve latency, and ensure Gemini can handle edge cases that Assistant has refined over years of real-world use.

The delay also comes amid intensifying competition in AI assistants. Apple is rolling out deeper AI integration across iOS, Microsoft continues to embed Copilot across Windows and enterprise software, and Amazon is rebuilding Alexa around generative AI. In that context, Google faces pressure not just to replace Assistant, but to deliver a clearly superior experience that justifies the shift.

Internally, Gemini is central to Google’s broader AI strategy, positioning the company to defend its dominance in search, mobile software and advertising as user behavior evolves toward conversational and AI-driven interfaces.

For now, Google Assistant will continue to coexist with Gemini on many Android devices, with Gemini gradually assuming more responsibilities as updates roll out. The extended timeline suggests Google is prioritizing stability and user confidence over speed, even as it pushes aggressively to make Gemini the connective tissue across its products.

While Assistant’s days are clearly numbered, Google’s revised plan signals that the company would rather arrive late with a fully formed AI assistant than rush a transition that risks alienating its massive Android user base.

SoftBank Reportedly In A Race to Complete $22.5bn OpenAI Funding by End of 2025

0

SoftBank Group, the Japanese conglomerate led by billionaire CEO Masayoshi Son, is in a high-stakes sprint to fulfill a remaining $22.5 billion funding commitment to OpenAI by the end of 2025, leveraging a mix of asset divestitures, untapped borrowing facilities, and operational streamlining.

This aggressive maneuver, disclosed to Reuters by sources close to the matter, highlights the intensifying capital requirements in the artificial intelligence sector, where skyrocketing valuations and ambitious infrastructure projects are reshaping global tech investment landscapes.

The commitment forms part of a larger $30 billion pledge announced in April 2025, when SoftBank invested an initial $7.5 billion at OpenAI’s then-$300 billion valuation. OpenAI, the San Francisco-based pioneer behind ChatGPT, anticipates receiving the balance by December 31 as per contractual terms, despite not yet having the funds in hand. The infusion is contingent on OpenAI’s successful transition to a for-profit structure, achieved in October 2025—a move that positions the company for potential future public offerings amid its rapid growth.

Son, known for his bold bets through SoftBank’s Vision Funds, has framed this as a cornerstone of his vision to transform SoftBank into the “world’s No. 1 ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) Platform Provider,” as outlined in the company’s 2025 annual report. In a recent investor address, Son explained his decision to divest from high-performing assets like Nvidia, stating, “I didn’t want to sell a single share of NVDA, but I needed the money to invest in OpenAI and other opportunities. When superintelligence comes, at least 10% of global GDP will be replaced by AI and AI robots.”

This philosophy underpins SoftBank’s pivot toward AI dominance, even as it scales back broader dealmaking: Vision Fund investments now require Son’s personal approval for any deal over $50 million, effectively pausing non-AI activities. To marshal the necessary capital, SoftBank has executed several high-profile sales. It offloaded its entire $5.8 billion stake in Nvidia, the AI chip leader whose shares have surged amid the sector’s boom, and divested $4.8 billion in T-Mobile US holdings, retaining a 4% stake valued at approximately $11 billion as of September 30, 2025. Workforce reductions have also been implemented to conserve cash.

Looking ahead, the company is eyeing a partial exit from its investment in Didi Global, China’s ride-hailing giant, which is preparing for a Hong Kong relisting after a 2021 U.S. delisting due to regulatory pressures. A significant liquidity source lies in undrawn margin loans backed by SoftBank’s controlling stake in Arm Holdings, the British chip designer whose shares have tripled since its 2023 IPO.

SoftBank recently expanded this facility by $6.5 billion, bringing total undrawn capacity to $11.5 billion. As of September 30, SoftBank reported parent-level cash reserves of ¥4.2 trillion ($27.16 billion), providing additional flexibility alongside potential corporate bonds or bridge loans.

These mechanisms show the strain on even well-capitalized players in funding AI’s capital-intensive future. The urgency aligns with OpenAI’s escalating operational needs. Facing “code red” internal directives from CEO Sam Altman to enhance ChatGPT amid competition from Google’s Gemini—which has grown 3x faster in user engagement—OpenAI requires vast resources for model training and deployment. Altman has outlined ambitions for 30 gigawatts of computing capacity at a cost of $1.4 trillion, with goals to add 1 gigawatt weekly, each carrying a $40 billion price tag.

Current annualized revenue stands at around $20 billion, with profitability eyed for 2030, creating a yawning funding gap. Central to this is the Stargate project, a $500 billion joint venture announced in January 2025 between OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank, and others to build U.S.-centric AI data centers. By July, Oracle committed to 4.5 gigawatts of additional capacity, and in September, five new sites were revealed, putting Stargate on track to meet its 10-gigawatt target by year-end.

The initiative, starting with a flagship facility in Abilene, Texas, aims to counter geopolitical risks, including U.S.-China tech tensions, and support national AI ambitions. Michigan was selected in November for a multi-billion-dollar site, with construction slated for early 2026. SoftBank’s involvement extends to a November 2025 joint venture with OpenAI, “SB OAI Japan,” focused on “Crystal Intelligence” for corporate transformation.

This deal comes amid a broader AI investment frenzy. OpenAI’s valuation has ballooned, with recent talks—potentially involving Amazon—pushing it toward $830-900 billion, tripling from April and yielding substantial paper gains for early backers like SoftBank. However, concerns mount over an “AI bubble”: hefty capital outlays by hyperscalers like Meta (committing unprecedented sums to data centers) raise questions about returns if adoption lags.

SoftBank’s history adds scrutiny—its Vision Fund, once valued at $100 billion, has faced losses from bets like WeWork, though AI-focused recoveries via Arm and others have bolstered its recovery. Market reactions have been mixed. SoftBank shares dipped modestly post-announcement, reflecting investor wariness over leverage, but analysts point to potential upsides.

Meanwhile, SoftBank continues selective AI investments, including in startups like Sierra and Skild AI—the latter potentially raising over $1 billion at a $14 billion valuation with Nvidia’s involvement.