DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6

July’s Strong Seasonal Record Faces a Reality Check as CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Remains Weak

0

July has historically been one of Bitcoin’s stronger months, often delivering positive returns even during challenging market cycles. Over the past decade, the month has closed in the green more often than not, reinforcing the idea that seasonal trends can influence investor sentiment.

Bitcoin gained approximately 20% in July 2018 despite trading in the aftermath of the 2017 bull market collapse. Similarly, the cryptocurrency rallied about 17% in July 2022, recovering from one of its steepest drawdowns amid tightening monetary policy and widespread market uncertainty.

These historical performances have encouraged traders to view July as a potentially favorable period for accumulating digital assets.

Seasonal optimism often attracts renewed buying interest as investors anticipate a repeat of previous recoveries. However, experienced market participants understand that history provides context rather than certainty. Every market cycle is shaped by a unique combination of macroeconomic conditions, liquidity, investor psychology, and on-chain activity.

This year, the optimism surrounding July is being tempered by a key on-chain indicator from CryptoQuant. The firm’s Bull Score currently stands at just 20, significantly below the threshold of 60 that it considers necessary to support a sustained bullish rally.

The metric combines several indicators designed to measure the overall strength of Bitcoin’s market structure, including network activity, demand, liquidity, and investor behavior. A Bull Score of 20 suggests that the market lacks the broad participation typically associated with powerful upward trends.

While prices may experience temporary rallies or short-term rebounds, the underlying fundamentals do not yet indicate the kind of widespread demand that has historically fueled major bull markets. In previous cycles, sustained price appreciation was often accompanied by stronger on-chain metrics, increased capital inflows, rising transaction activity.

The disconnect between Bitcoin’s favorable seasonal history and its current Bull Score highlights the importance of looking beyond historical averages. Markets evolve constantly, and seasonal patterns can be overridden by broader economic forces.

Factors such as global interest rate expectations, institutional investment flows, regulatory developments, and geopolitical uncertainty continue to influence cryptocurrency prices. These external variables can either reinforce or negate traditional seasonal trends.

The current environment presents both opportunity and caution. If historical patterns repeat, July could once again provide positive returns and improve market sentiment. Even modest gains could encourage sidelined investors to re-enter the market, creating momentum that supports higher prices.

However, without stronger underlying fundamentals, any rally may struggle to sustain itself over the longer term. The coming weeks will therefore be closely watched for signs that on-chain conditions are improving.

Rising exchange inflows, stronger network usage, increased whale accumulation, and higher institutional participation could all contribute to lifting CryptoQuant’s Bull Score toward the critical 60 level. Achieving that threshold would suggest that bullish momentum is becoming more fundamentally supported rather than driven solely by market optimism.

July’s impressive historical record offers reasons for cautious optimism, but past performance alone cannot guarantee future results. CryptoQuant’s subdued Bull Score serves as a reminder that strong rallies require more than favorable seasonal trends—they require robust market participation, healthy liquidity, and growing investor confidence.

Until those conditions strengthen, Bitcoin’s seasonal advantage may face a significant test.

Elon Musk’s xAI Introduces Grok 4.5 to Challenge the AI Industry’s Leading Models

0

Elon Musk’s xAI has officially released Grok 4.5, marking the latest advancement in its rapidly evolving AI lineup.

Announcing the launch, the company said via a blog post,

“Today, we’re launching Grok 4.5, SpaceXAI’s smartest model built to excel at coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work. It’s our strongest model ever and was trained alongside Cursor”.

Grok 4.5 raises the bar for AI engineering with smarter reasoning and faster performance. The model has been trained on a broad and carefully curated dataset spanning coding, science, engineering, and mathematics, positioning it as one of the most capable AI models for tackling complex technical challenges.

Designed with both intelligence and efficiency in mind, the model demonstrates strong performance across real-world engineering tasks, surpassing many comparable leading AI systems in these domains.

Grok 4.5 was developed using tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs, supported by advanced training and stability techniques tailored for large-scale AI development.

Rather than relying solely on massive token volumes, the development process placed significant emphasis on data quality. Extensive filtering, deduplication, quality scoring, and domain-specific curation ensured that the training data remained comprehensive, relevant, and high in signal.

A key differentiator of Grok 4.5 is its reinforcement learning (RL) framework, which prioritizes per-token intelligence. The model underwent training across hundreds of thousands of tasks, with a strong emphasis on multi-step software engineering, complex technical reasoning, and other engineering-focused workflows.

These tasks were evaluated using automated and model-based grading systems, enabling continuous refinement of reasoning capabilities.

The training infrastructure also supports highly asynchronous learning, allowing agentic rollouts to run for extended periods while training simultaneously continues across tens of thousands of GPUs.

This approach has resulted in more intelligent, efficient, and reliable reasoning for software development and other complex engineering applications.

Grok 4.5 also stands out for its coding capabilities. From solving advanced Rust and C/C++ programming challenges to building complete applications from a single prompt, the model consistently demonstrates the ability to generate production-ready software with minimal user specification.

Its end-to-end development capabilities enable users to move from concept to functional application quickly and efficiently. Performance has also been optimized for speed. Grok 4.5 operates at approximately 80 tokens per second (TPS) while delivering roughly twice the token efficiency of competing leading models on comparable tasks.

This combination enables faster responses, lower computational costs, and more efficient execution of demanding workloads.

The model now serves as the default engine behind Grok Build, where its capabilities extend beyond software development. It can create sophisticated Excel workbooks that incorporate web-based research, multi-sheet formulas, and embedded notes for future reference.

In addition, Grok 4.5 can produce polished Microsoft PowerPoint presentations using native shapes to design complex diagrams and layouts, while also generating well-structured, professional documents in Microsoft Word.

By combining advanced reasoning, large-scale training, efficient inference, and versatile productivity features, Grok 4.5 represents a significant advancement in AI-powered engineering, software development, and workplace productivity.

The new model, which recently completed private beta testing at SpaceX and Tesla, is now available to users and promises significant improvements in reasoning, coding, speed, and overall performance.

Musk and the xAI team position it as a direct competitor to leading models like Anthropic’s Claude Opus, with claims of matching or exceeding performance in key benchmarks while offering better token efficiency and lower costs.

Industry observers note the accelerated pace of development at xAI, which continues to leverage unique datasets and computational resources from Musk’s ecosystem of companies.

The launch comes amid intense competition in the AI sector, with xAI pushing for frequent updates and rapid iteration.

Asian Investors Grow More Selective on AI, Shifting Focus From Hype to Long-Term Winners

0

Artificial intelligence remains the dominant investment theme in global markets, but some of Asia’s largest investors are becoming increasingly selective as soaring valuations, record infrastructure spending and uncertainty over future returns prompt a reassessment of where the biggest opportunities lie.

Rather than chasing every company linked to AI, institutional investors are increasingly positioning portfolios around businesses they believe can either withstand AI-driven disruption or benefit from the technology’s expansion without depending on uncertain breakthroughs in AI applications.

The shift in sentiment was evident at the Reuters NEXT Asia conference in Singapore, where senior executives from some of the region’s largest investment firms said the next phase of the AI investment cycle will require greater discipline as markets begin asking tougher questions about valuations and profitability.

For much of the past two years, global equity markets have been propelled by enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence. Technology companies developing AI models, semiconductor manufacturers, cloud computing providers, and data center operators have all benefited from an unprecedented wave of investment.

That rally has lifted stock markets to record highs, but investors are increasingly debating whether corporate earnings can continue expanding fast enough to justify current valuations and whether the trillions of dollars being committed to AI infrastructure will ultimately generate attractive returns.

Rohit Sipahimalani, Chief Investment Officer of Singapore state investment company Temasek, said investors cannot afford to focus solely on companies building AI technology.

“You want to ride that trend,” Sipahimalani said during an interview at the Reuters NEXT Asia event.

“But the equally big issue is disruption because of AI to many other businesses.”

He explained that Temasek has increased its investments in businesses backed by tangible assets, arguing those companies are less vulnerable to disruption from rapid advances in artificial intelligence.

“We’ve increased our exposure to businesses that are more around hard assets, which are likely to be less disrupted by AI,” he said.

Temasek already holds stakes in AI companies, including OpenAI and Anthropic, and announced this week that it intends to increase its exposure to artificial intelligence significantly. The sovereign investment company plans to raise AI-related investments to as much as 15% of its portfolio over the next five years, up from approximately 6% today.

Even with that ambitious expansion, Sipahimalani said the investment approach will remain diversified.

“You’ve got to look at the entire value chain,” he said.

“There are some areas where there’s froth, the other areas where there’s real cash flows.”

“We try to play across the entire spectrum.”

This underscores a growing distinction within financial markets between companies benefiting from genuine commercial demand and those whose valuations have been driven primarily by investor enthusiasm. That distinction is becoming increasingly important as AI-related stocks experience sharper swings in share prices.

Investors have repeatedly questioned whether the rapid appreciation of AI companies and semiconductor manufacturers risks creating another speculative bubble similar to previous technology booms. Instead of attempting to predict which AI applications will ultimately dominate the market, some investors are choosing a simpler strategy.

Stephanie Hui, Head of Private and Growth Equity for Asia-Pacific at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, said her firm is concentrating on the infrastructure supporting AI rather than the applications themselves.

“I am not smart enough to tell you today which applications are going to be winning, it’s way too early,” Hui said during a panel discussion.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management has invested in businesses that supply the underlying infrastructure required for AI deployment, including companies specializing in liquid cooling systems and data centers, rather than betting on individual AI software companies.

As AI models become more powerful, they require more energy-intensive computing infrastructure. Advanced liquid cooling technologies are becoming essential for preventing overheating in densely packed AI servers, while new data centers continue to be built to accommodate rising computational demand.

“We are not going for the front end at this moment,” Hui said.

“We are going for the simple stuff that facilitates an end proxy for AI adoption.”

The strategy points to what many investors describe as a “picks and shovels” approach, borrowing from the California gold rush, where suppliers of essential equipment often generated more consistent returns than miners searching for gold.

Investors hope to benefit regardless of which companies ultimately emerge as long-term winners by investing in infrastructure providers rather than AI application developers.

Even among supporters of artificial intelligence, concerns about valuation are becoming more prominent.

Fred Hu, Chairman of Chinese investment firm Primavera Capital Group, said he remains convinced that AI will reshape industries but warned against excessive optimism in financial markets.

“I’m a big believer in the AI revolution but as valuations keep going up, as more and more capital goes into AI… it begs the question, how much is enough,” Hu said.

There has been growing unease that investor enthusiasm may be running ahead of commercial reality. Technology companies have announced hundreds of billions of dollars in spending on AI infrastructure, including data centers, advanced semiconductors and networking equipment.

While those investments have driven strong earnings for companies supplying AI hardware, investors now want evidence that businesses deploying AI can generate sustainable revenue growth sufficient to justify those enormous capital expenditures.

Satoshi Ueyama of Bain Capital Japan said the investment opportunities remain significant but stressed that infrastructure spending alone cannot sustain the industry’s momentum. For AI investments to generate attractive returns, businesses must ultimately create products and services that customers are willing to pay for.

“There were ample investment opportunities,” Ueyama said, but he cautioned that AI infrastructure requires end-users if the economics are to make sense.

His firm’s strategy is therefore focused on identifying companies capable of using AI to improve products and services in sectors such as consumer applications and business services.

“AI is real but at the same time there’s no denying some parts of the markets are over-excited,” Ueyama said.

“Not all AI investment is going to be successful at this stage.”

Being a major institutional investor suggests that the AI investment narrative is entering a more mature phase. During the early stages of the generative AI boom, investors largely rewarded companies simply for announcing AI strategies or increasing spending on AI infrastructure.

Today, attention is shifting toward more fundamental questions about business models, profitability, and long-term returns.

Rather than abandoning artificial intelligence, investors appear to be refining their strategies, seeking exposure across the AI value chain while avoiding areas where valuations have become detached from underlying cash flows.

Morningstar CIO Warns Surging Stock Market May Be Flashing Signs Of Excessive Optimism

0

The sharp rally that has propelled U.S. stocks to record highs may be creating conditions for a market pullback, according to Philip Straehl, Chief Investment Officer at Morningstar Wealth, who says several indicators suggest investor optimism has reached unusually elevated levels.

While the benchmark S&P 500 has climbed 18% since its March 30 low, driven largely by a powerful rally in artificial intelligence-related companies and semiconductor stocks, Straehl believes the pace of gains is beginning to outstrip market fundamentals.

“I think it’s one signal that there might be excessive optimism in the market today, and so I think it leaves us with a cautious outlook for markets from this point on,” Straehl told Business Insider.

His warning comes after one of the strongest momentum-driven rallies in decades, which has reached levels not seen since the dot-com era.

According to Morningstar Wealth, the S&P 500 Momentum Index recorded its strongest two-month performance on record during April and May, returning 34%. The index, which tracks the 100 best-performing stocks in the S&P 500 over recent months, surpassed even the gains recorded during the height of the dot-com boom in 1999 and 2000.

Momentum investing typically attracts investors seeking to capitalize on stocks already rising rapidly. While the strategy can generate substantial gains during bull markets, analysts also view extreme momentum as a potential warning signal because it often reflects fear of missing out (FOMO) rather than improving corporate fundamentals.

History shows that periods of exceptionally strong momentum have sometimes preceded sharp market corrections as valuations become increasingly difficult to justify.

The recent weakness in semiconductor shares illustrates how quickly investor sentiment can reverse. After leading the market higher for months, memory chip stocks and other AI-related semiconductor companies have experienced increased volatility since early June, reflecting growing concerns about valuations following Samsung Electronics’ earnings report and questions about the sustainability of AI infrastructure spending.

The broader market’s advance has been fueled largely by companies benefiting from surging investment in artificial intelligence. Since the March lows, the iShares Semiconductor ETF has gained as much as 106%, dramatically outperforming the broader market as investors poured money into companies expected to benefit from expanding AI data centers, cloud computing and high-performance chips.

Technology giants including Nvidia, Broadcom, and other semiconductor companies have become major drivers of the S&P 500’s gains, helping push U.S. equities to fresh highs. However, Straehl believes the concentration of gains among AI-related stocks has also increased market vulnerability should investor expectations moderate.

Three Indicators Point to Growing Risks

Straehl said his market outlook is based on what he describes as a “mosaic” of indicators rather than any single measure. His assessment focuses on three broad areas: investor sentiment, market valuations, and capital supply.

The first pillar, investor sentiment, suggests markets have become increasingly speculative.

Beyond the surge in the Momentum Index, Straehl pointed to rising activity in zero-day options and leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs), both of which have become popular vehicles for traders seeking to amplify short-term market moves.

Zero-day options, which expire on the same day they are traded, have grown rapidly in popularity because they allow investors to make highly leveraged bets on intraday market movements. Market observers have warned that heavy use of these contracts can amplify volatility during periods of market stress.

Leveraged ETFs, which use derivatives to magnify daily returns, have also attracted strong inflows, another sign that investors are becoming more willing to take aggressive risks.

Valuations Appear Stretched

Straehl also expressed concern about equity valuations. He said several widely followed valuation metrics now suggest the market is trading at historically elevated levels.

Among the indicators he highlighted were the Shiller price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio, price-to-book multiples, price-to-sales ratios, and the equity risk premium. The Shiller CAPE ratio smooths corporate earnings over a 10-year period to provide a longer-term assessment of market valuation. Elevated readings have historically been associated with periods of lower long-term investment returns.

The equity risk premium, which measures the additional return investors receive for holding stocks instead of relatively risk-free government bonds, has also narrowed considerably as stock prices have risen, suggesting investors are receiving less compensation for assuming greater market risk.

Straehl described current valuation levels as “extreme,” indicating that future gains could become harder to sustain unless corporate earnings continue to grow rapidly.

Capital Markets Remain Active

The third component of Morningstar’s framework examines capital supply. Straehl noted that companies have increasingly taken advantage of favorable market conditions to raise money through equity offerings, debt issuance, and merger activity.

Recent examples include SpaceX’s initial public offering, Google’s $85 billion secondary share offering, and a wave of large merger and acquisition transactions. Heavy issuance often signals that corporate executives believe market valuations are attractive enough to justify raising fresh capital.

Although Straehl said current issuance has not yet reached historically extreme levels, he believes it represents another indication that companies are seeking to capitalize on strong investor demand.

Together, the indicators suggest investors should become more disciplined rather than assuming the recent rally will continue indefinitely.

“The overall reward for risk is not really good,” Straehl said.

“Our view is that you have to be more selective in today’s environment.”

His assessment does not necessarily imply that a market correction is imminent. Instead, it reflects growing concern that after months of powerful gains, particularly in AI-related technology stocks, equity markets have become increasingly dependent on optimistic expectations and elevated valuations. For investors, that could mean future returns become more uneven, with greater importance placed on company fundamentals, earnings growth and reasonable valuations rather than simply following momentum-driven trades.

From Writing Code to Designing AI Agents: Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Says AI Is Transforming Software Engineering

0

Jensen Huang says artificial intelligence is fundamentally changing the work of software engineers, shifting them away from writing routine code and toward designing AI agents that automate repetitive tasks, a transition he believes is creating new jobs rather than eliminating them.

In an interview published by Nvidia on Wednesday, Huang said the company’s engineers are embracing AI because it allows them to focus on more creative and higher-value work.

“These agentic systems are new skills, and now we have a lot of software engineers building agents,” he said.

He added: “If you ask me, every one of my software engineers prefers to be building agents than to be writing Python code.”

Huang explained that AI is changing the nature of software development at Nvidia. Instead of spending most of their time writing code line by line, engineers are increasingly designing AI systems capable of carrying out complex tasks autonomously.

AI agents are software systems that can plan, reason, and execute multi-step tasks by breaking larger objectives into smaller, manageable actions. Rather than simply generating code, these systems can perform research, automate workflows, evaluate results, and interact with other software with minimal human intervention.

According to Huang, Nvidia’s engineers now spend less time on routine programming and more time developing AI agents, creating benchmarks to evaluate their performance and building guardrails to ensure the systems operate safely and reliably.

“You’re taking all the mundane work, and you’re trying to get this agent to do it,” he said.

Huang further noted that developing these systems requires a different set of skills than conventional software engineering.

“That requires imagination, that requires creativity, a lot of technology,” he added.

Huang, who co-founded Nvidia in 1993, has repeatedly outlined a vision in which AI agents become embedded across every department of the company, assisting employees with routine work and improving productivity rather than replacing human expertise.

AI Creating New Jobs

During the interview, Huang pushed back against growing concerns that advances in generative AI will lead to widespread job losses among white-collar professionals.

Instead, he argued that deploying AI at scale is generating demand for entirely new types of work.

“The amount of work that we have to do to bring AI into the world is really quite incredible,” he said.

He continued, “So it’s creating a whole bunch of jobs. And, my software engineers love this.”

His comments contrast with the more cautious outlook expressed by some other technology executives. For example, Dario Amodei has warned that increasingly capable AI systems could significantly reduce demand for some white-collar occupations, while Andy Jassy has acknowledged that AI is likely to change the company’s workforce over time by automating certain roles.

Huang has consistently taken a more optimistic view, arguing that AI will reshape jobs rather than simply eliminate them.

In a television interview in May, he said: “This is the part that people don’t realize about AI. The first thing that AI is doing right now is creating an enormous number of jobs,” adding that “AI creates jobs. AI is the United States’s best opportunity to re-industrialize ourselves.”

Nvidia remains one of the biggest beneficiaries of the global AI boom, reaching the status of the world’s most valuable company with a market capitalization of about $4.7 trillion. The company’s graphics processing units (GPUs) power many of the world’s leading AI models and agentic AI systems, making Nvidia a central supplier for companies investing heavily in artificial intelligence infrastructure.

However, the evolution of AI has triggered a major shift in the tech industry. As AI coding assistants become increasingly capable of generating routine code, software engineers are expected to spend more time defining problems, designing AI workflows, validating outputs, establishing safety guardrails and integrating autonomous agents into business operations.

In Huang’s view, those changes are expanding the role of engineers rather than making them obsolete.