DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6530

The Users’ Impending Exodus From Facebook

0

Three friends of mine deleted their Facebook accounts. When I asked, they insisted they just don’t like Facebook anymore. I couldn’t help wondering why anyone wouldn’t like the type of opportunity offered by Facebook, where one can easily reconnect with old friends and acquaintances as well as make new ones. But now I’m beginning to see their reasons.

Facebook is usually one of the first social network platforms people that have internet access join. As of today, this platform enjoys up to 2.45 billion monthly users and the number is still growing. But it is possible that in the nearest future this number may drop, not because better social media houses opened (which may happen, anyway) but because some of its users may drop out of it as a result of dissatisfaction and disappointments.

I personally have started having reservations about Facebook. I still have an account there but I no longer have that zeal to check into it. Sometimes I don’t login into my account for weeks, or even months on end. And when I do so and see the number of pending notifications, connection requests and messages, I just log out with the intention of coming back soon to check on them. But I never do that for weeks to come.

A lot of people may not understand why Facebook is receiving thumbs-down from someone like me. I want to make it clear that I’m not discouraging people from signing up with this social media platform, because there are so many things to gain there. The essence of this post is to expose some negative attitudes exhibited by Facebook users and to get the Facebook team to find ways to discourage them.

Well, here are some of the attitudes exhibited by some Facebook users that are pushing others away.

  1. Throwing Random Insults and Trolling

I believe this is the major thing that keeps me away from Facebook. People seem to enjoy insulting others as they comment under their posts. In fact, the more savage, uncouth and personal insult is, the more “likes” and encouragement the assaulter receives. Anyone that decides to send posts into Facebook should be prepared for unnecessary verbal assaults from commentators. Some people don’t mind these negative comments and reactions but a lot do, especially if they attracted other insults.

  1. Use of Foul Language

This is easily found in Facebook groups. Some people are more interested in showing off their stock of taboo words and expressions than in contributing to important matters on the ground. I’m not saying that every group on Facebook condones the use of abusive and offensive terms, but it’s very common among them. People that can’t stand such language avoid being a part of it.

  1. Aggression

I don’t know if anybody else has noticed this. Most Facebook users are aggressive in nature –even outside Facebook. Aggression here isn’t about “business aggression” that is encouraged, but about hostility and violence that comes from exposure to unhealthy social environment. It is hard to see any form of argument in Facebook that doesn’t turn aggressive. And in most of them, the participants focus more on subduing and killing the voice of their opponents than in being logical. By the end of the day, no one learnt anything.

  1. Lack of Control over Posts

Most viral posts on Facebook are gory pictures and videos that shouldn’t be let out into the world. People stream live murders, rapes and suicides on Facebook and other users spread their posts like wildfire. Do you know that gruesome pictures and news of accidents and accident victims go up on Facebook long before the FRSC (Road Safety), Fire Service and the NPF (police) get to the accident scenes? Mind you, the news didn’t go up because the “broadcasters” wanted to help the victims, but because they wanted cheap popularity for themselves (or just to have fun). The strangest thing here is that most Facebook users prefer this kind of post to the ones that impact positively on them. This shows the frame of mind of some of these users. It also shows that most of them are immature and shouldn’t be there. Anyway, the people that seek more meaningful posts look elsewhere.

  1. Rowdy and Less Impactful

One of my friends said that Facebook is “too noisy”. Another one said people go there to show off and compete with others. And then, we have those that are there just to “monitor” the progress of others. As difficult as it is to explain these phenomena using words, it is true that Facebook is not the right place for those looking for platforms that will provide opportunities for serious thinking, planning, innovations and growth. A lot of Facebook users that discovered other social networking platforms like LinkedIn always comment on how Facebook wasted their time. This is not to say that it is not possible for people to send up impactful posts on Facebook, but the “noise” there drowns the voice of such people and only allows that of “empty vessels” to be heard. And when these “serious” people find no voice in Facebook, they pack their belongings and look for where they can connect with other “serious” minded persons.

Every person that left Facebook has complained that the team needs to listen to. There is serious need to regulate Facebook before it gets out of hand.

Lagos State Government Calls on Dangote Group to Rehabilitate State Roads

0

Bad roads are increasingly becoming part of Lagos State that its notoriety has instigated a session on the causes of road decay in the State House of Assembly. The state lawmakers were on Monday, deliberating on many issues that they pointed as being responsible for bad conditions of the roads.

The Lagos State House Assembly fingered, among other things, Dangote trucks as major instrument of road damage in the state.

The House therefore, in a motion moved by Hon. Abiodun Tobun, resolved to call on Dangote Group to see road rehabilitation as part of its Corporate Social Responsibility, and support the state in reconstruction of failed roads since the company’s trucks have been hugely responsible for the spoils.

Contractors are also fingered by the House as many of their actions were noted to contribute immensely to the decay the state’s roads are currently in.

The Nation reported that the State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu was called upon by the House to ensure that contractors are not paid contractual emoluments when their qualification is not ascertained, and the State Treasury Office (STO) should live up to its responsibility in this regard.

The Special Adviser on works and infrastructure was urged to ensure that road projects in the state are executed with the best practices through quality supervision. And that includes making sure that right of way is given to the contractors before the commencement of construction works.

The need for good roads in Lagos State has been a topic of discussion year after year; a fact Tobun, who is the chairman, House Committee on Works and Infrastructure acknowledged and added that there is a need for the State to ensure there is quality network of roads.

Tobun noted that there is little to justify the huge amount the State is raking in revenues when it comes to roads. He said that most of the construction works are not properly handled and some are abandoned even though the funds have been paid fully for the projects.

“The House is further concerned that after most of the roads are repaired, heavy duty vehicles ply the road without regard for the damage done to the roads.

“We should urge Governor Babajide sanwo-Olu to ensure that contractors are not paid mobilization fee unless they are ready for the work.

“The Commissioner for Works and Infrastructure should also ensure that only contractors with requisite experience are given the job to do,” he said.

He also noted that the roads have become death traps to motorists, and people are getting killed at an alarming rate on the daily, citing the entourage of the Oba of Epe that was fatally hit by an articulated vehicle on Sunday, resulting in the death of many.

The Speaker of the House upheld the motion, urging those in charge of road construction in the State to up their game, by most of all, making sure that contractors do their jobs effectively.

Another House member who added his voice to the matter is Hon. Bisi Yusuf, representing Alimosho Constituency 1. He said the State is spending more for less quality roads, and there should be value for money spent on road construction in the state. He used Kudirat Abiola way, Oregun, Ikeja as an example. The road he said has lasted for 14 years since it was commissioned and it is still in good condition.

Expressing his view on the matter, Hon. Rotimi Olowo, representing Shomolu constituency 1 repeated what Tobun said that many contractors bolt after collecting mobilization fees. He added that the State Government is losing a lot of money due to insurance bond, and that every stage of the project, the APG must be alive and it should not be for mobilization fee alone but other payment in the life of the project.

However, as glaring as the blames seem, asking Dangote Group to take on the construction of Lagos State roads because of its trucks that have been seen as contributors to road damages has been described by many as mischievous. The argument is based on the fact that Dangote Group, like many other companies in Lagos are paying taxes to enable the Government to, among other things, rehabilitates the roads.

It is believed that the factors mentioned by the members of the State House of Assembly are mainly of the State Government’s misdoings, situations that is believed, if corrected will put an end to, not only bad roads, but so many other infrastructural lapses of the State.

Capitalism Will Save Africa

2
Five ways to raise capital

If you want to make money, look for a problem and solve”

This statement in itself is one of the reasons we have lots of failed startups scattered across Africa. I don’t want to go too far, let’s stay within the confine of Nigeria.

For some time, I’ve heard lots of business speakers give advises to wantpreneurs or early startup founders on why they should look for a problem in Africa and solve then charge people for it.

While it’s true that we have so many problems in Nigeria at the moment, it’s also true that we really need to address how to approach them.

Firstly, I’d say that we need ideas that would generate money for both the problem solver and in turn affect the economy than people who just solve problems.

In order words, if we really want to solve problems, we must also consider how the solution will sustain itself. Sustainability is the key word here.

We need entrepreneurs to think sustainability than solving problems. This is what we lack in Nigeria.

I have seen so many people cling to the idea of being part of the sustainable development goals (SDG) goals and I wonder what exactly they’re saying.

Once they present their ideas to me, I discover they are only concerned about solving the problems and they are not thinking in 10 years time.

I think that we really do not understand what the word sustainable means. Sustainable means it has the ability to keep itself from going down at least for some time.

But how else can an idea keep itself from going down if it’s not making money?

I love the ideas of NGOs and I believe some people have small NGOs as an act of philantropism, but when we talk about tackling major problems we’re facing, then NGOs are the wrong approaches.

Take a look at the educational dysfunction and the high unemployment rate it has caused. Remember, there are tens of millions of unemployed youths littered everywhere.

How can we solve this situation without building structures, spending money, and spending more money.

Where do you get the money from?

Grants? Aids?

Would we depend on these forever to keep it running? That would be fatal.

Now back to my point, some start-up founders don’t run NGOs but their business models look like they’re running such.

I want to briefly explain why these startups founders are prepared to fail from day 1 and connect it to why solving problems is not the right mindset for startups.

The mindset of solving problems works in a way that you look for problems within the environment and think about solving.

The issue is not that people do not know they have the problems. The problem is that they can live comfortably with the problems.

The only problem people cannot do without is food, clothing, housing and the desperation to pretend to be who we’re not.

If you provide a solution around these, be rest assured you will run sustainable. However, it’s obvious that these are not the only problems we’re facing.

Matter of fact, the problems we’re facing asides these are grave and terrible. So do we only face problems that people are willing to pay for?

Of course not!!

People are not willing to pay for education. I don’t mean schooling, I mean to learn stuff that would make them relevant.

Yet we’d see lots of people still coming up with solutions to solve the education problem. So how do you run a sustainable business amidst this?

This is why I simply explained that sustainability should be the mindset of entrepreneurs.

That in itself is capitalism.

Since people are not willing to pay, should we leave the problem alone. No. There are many problems in this particular problem itself that would lead to money and I tell you it’s beyond solving problem skills.

One of the hardest thing to do is to create a structure that would take money away from people. Yet, that’s what we need for these ideas to be sustainable.

Taking money for your idea is way harder than solving the problem and if you don’t think in the money making direction, you’d not get it right.

If you get it right, you can scale up, move across territories and help more people. I used the word help because despite the fact that you’re taking their money, you’re exchanging help in return.

Are startups founders really ready to go this hard way to figure out how to make money from their ideas?

Well, you should pin this down and ponder on it as an entrepreneur.

Think like a capitalist.

Last Decade Was Not So Good For Kids

0

As 2019 winds to its end, a look at major events around the world shows that the decade was characterized by developments of proportionate impacts on humanity – the good, the bad and the ugly. From economic downturns to health crisis to armed conflicts, and the most vulnerable amongst all – children, had their full share of them all, but especially from armed conflicts.

According to news report published by the charity, Save the Children, nearly one in five children live in areas affected by armed conflict and war.

In 2017, about 420 million children were living in conflict-affected areas, a staggering number that has broken every record of conflict effect on children for the past 20 years, the report stated.

The research report, “Stop the War on Children” carried out by the Peace Research Institute Oslo stated that among the hardest conflict-hit areas were Afghanistan, South Sudan, Yemen, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Central African Republic, Mali, Somalia and of course Nigeria.

According to the report, the reason for the increase in children living in conflict-affected areas in 2017, is that modern warfare has changed the lines of engagement, and fighting in urban areas among civilian populations became more common while international rules of engagement were disregarded.

The Save the Children charity report defined affected children as those living within 50 kilometers (30 miles) of where one or more conflict events took place in a year within a country’s borders.

The result of this has been grave violations of children’s rights and their being abused in so many ways that include getting maimed, killed, recruited or abducted by armed groups. There were also sexual assaults, school attacks and denial of humanitarian aid. The excesses of 2017 heightened the previous figure of 2010, from 10, 000 to 25, 000, and according to United Nations data analyzed in the report, it’s the highest number ever recorded since 2010.

Analysis of the reports showed that children were specially targeted and lack of protective measures for them spiked their vulnerability.

The President and CEO of Save the Children, Carolyn Miles said the rate and style at which these conflicts happen is an indication that children are suffering more than ever.

“The way today’s wars are fought is causing even more suffering for children.

“Our analysis clearly shows the situation is getting worse for children and the world is allowing this travesty to happen. Every day, children come under attack because armed groups and the military forces disregard international laws and treaties. From the use of chemical weapons to rape as a weapon of war, war crimes are being committed with impunity,” she said.

Another notable challenge that has been successfully birthed in areas of conflict, especially in Africa is lack of education for the affected children. In the Northeast Nigeria, occurrence of school attacks by Boko Haram became so rampant that many schools were shut. In 2016, in the same region, over 1 million school children were left out of school due to Boko Haram activities.

The most notorious of the abductions was the Chibok School Girls in April 2014, when 276 girls were taken from their school’s hostel. The attacks on schools continued with so many more kids being abducted.

It was deemed unreasonable to subject schools kids to further attacks from the Islamist armed group, when the Nigerian Military was reportedly using these schools as bases. A report by Human Rights Watch titled “They Set The Classroom on Fire: Attacks on Education in Northeast Nigeria” noted increase in brutal assault by Boko Haram on schools. It stated that between 2009 and 2015, the terrorist group destroyed more than 910 schools and forced at least 1,500 more to close. The conflict led to the death of over 611 teachers and 19, 000 others were forced to flee. There were also cases of abduction involving more than 2, 000 civilians, among them were large groups of students made up of a lot of girls.

The onslaught continued, leading to internal displacement of communities, destroying every basis of education in the region. The number of out-of-school children consequently increased, and many of them were scattered around places of shelter and safety with no access to education.

As the decade drew close to its conclusion, there were over 11 million out-school-children in Nigeria alone. These children were exposed to the devastating reality of lack of education and hunger. Efforts by humanitarian groups were not enough to quell the menace of the organized onslaught against western education that has done more than deny children basic education and nourishment.

In other parts of the world where there is relative peace, the problem has been more of economic hardship. Parents who could barely provide for their families have watched their children helplessly as they grow through hunger and malnutrition.

However, the bleak situation of education in the Northeast Nigeria has made the region a typical example of children’s woes in the world. This is because, according to Unicef, a lot of factors have come into play to create a dysfunction that has altered the essence of education in the region.

The education deprivation in northern Nigeria is driven by various factors, including economic barriers and socio-cultural norms and practices that discourage attendance in formal education, especially for girls” – Unicef.

The solution has been tied to the Sustainable Development Goals 4, which advocates the prioritization of education and target children who are likely to receive the least education.

The aim of UNICEF’s education programme is to support the government in achieving SDG 4 by 2030 through improved planning and by addressing some of the systemic barriers that hinder the implementation of an effective education strategy” – Unicef.

The Nigeria’s Financial Bill And Magic of Tax-free $70,000-Turnover Companies

0

The Nigerian Financial Bill was recently passed by the Senate. While it awaits the assent of the president, the Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Zainab Ahmed, said the Bill will exempt companies and businesses with turnovers less than N25 million from Companies Income Tax (CIT)

She added that companies with turnovers of N25 million to N100 million yearly will be paying 20 percent as Companies Income Tax, but those earning over N100 million will pay 30 percent of their profit as income tax.

Presently, all companies are required to part with 30 percent of their profit as CIT to the Federal Government, but the Minister said there is going to be consideration to businesses earning less to enable them to expand.

“Not only will small businesses be able to do more because they are not paying taxes, we are also working together with the trade authorities to also encourage people in the formal sector to become formalize because they will see other businesses like them that are not registered doing well.

“Their productivity will increase, they will employ more Nigerians and at the end of the day, they will grow to the level of a medium size business and begin to pay taxes.

“Our assessment is that any business that has a turnover of less than N25 million needs that break, not being taxed so they can invest in their business.

“We reduce the tax for medium size businesses from 30 percent to 20 percent so they can have more resources that they can plough back in their business.

“These are the largest employers of labor. The federal and state governments have a total labor force of less than one percent of the population,” she said.

The CIT rate is currently 30 percent, assessed on a preceding year basis. For small companies in the manufacturing industry and wholly export-oriented companies with turnover not exceeding N1 million, the Company Income Tax is reduced to 20 percent in the first five calendar years of operation.

Resident companies are placed under corporate income tax on their worldwide income, while non-resident are subject to CIT on their Nigeria-source income. In business profit aspect, if a company is a Permanent Establishment (PE) or a fixed base in Nigeria, it will be taxed based on profits attributable to the fixed base.

However, the 2019 Financial Tax Bill made many changes to the already existing rules, aimed at easing the tax burden on businesses. The Bill seeks to promote fiscal equity, align domestic laws with global best practices, in support of micro, small and medium enterprises. It aims to help the government implement policies that will enable increased revenue for the government. But it also has demerits as Deloitte Nigeria analysis shows.

The key policy changes have come in these areas.

Wider base for taxing Non-Resident Companies (NRCs). Through provisions that create a taxable presence for NRCs operating digitally in areas of consultancy, technical management etc. in Nigeria, as long as there is Significant Economic Presence (SEP) and resultant profits from the activities thereof.

While this provision is a welcome development as its objective is to ensure activities with an economic base in Nigeria, it does not give definition to what constitutes SEP. It leaves the decision at the discretion of the Finance Minister, who wields autonomous power to determine SEP through executive order.

Without the executive order, the ambiguity surrounding the significant economic presence remains.

Under the Bill, Insurance companies would be able to carry forward losses indefinitely as opposed to the 4-year restriction currently in place. Life and non-life businesses would no longer be liable to special minimum tax provision and all wholly, exclusively, reasonably and necessarily incurred expenses will be tax deductible.

Moreover, “taxable investment income” would be limited to “income derived from the investment of shareholders funds.” The change seeks to clarify taxable income and limits it to income accruing to the insurance company as against income accruing to insurance fund.

The analysis noted the exception on Excess Dividend Tax (EDT) provisions. Currently, where a company pays a dividend in excess of its taxable profits, such dividend is subject to CIT at 30%. It does not matter if the income from which the dividend is paid has been taxed or the underlying income is altogether exempt from tax.

Mrs. Ahmed however decried the faux against VAT increment to 7.5%, saying that the Financial Tax Bill, when passed, would cushion the effects.