DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 684

Binance Lists USELESS for Perpetual Futures as Hyperliquid Achieves Record-Breaking Goal and Surpassing Circle in 24-hour Revenue

0

Binance Futures launched the USELESSUSDT perpetual contract on August 15, 2025, at 12:15 UTC, offering up to 50x leverage. The listing led to a 6% surge in the USELESS price, reflecting strong market interest and increased trading activity.

USELESS, a meme token from the LetsBonk ecosystem, also saw over $311K in short liquidations, becoming the hourly liquidation leader. The token, already on Binance Alpha and Binance.US, rallied to a one-week high of $0.31.

Perpetual futures allow traders to speculate on price movements without owning the asset, attracting both retail and institutional investors. This amplifies trading opportunities and market exposure for USELESS, a low-cap memecoin from the LetsBonk ecosystem.

The listing reinforces the memecoin market’s characteristic volatility. USELESS, like other memecoins such as The AI Prophecy (ACT) and Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT), saw rapid price spikes post-listing, with some tokens surging over 200–1,000% in 2024.

The high leverage (50x) offered by Binance Futures can exacerbate price swings, as seen with the $316.65K in short liquidations for USELESS, creating short squeezes and rapid rallies. This volatility attracts speculative traders but poses risks for retail investors unprepared for sudden dumps.

USELESS, marketed as a “pointless” memecoin with no utility, thrives on community engagement and social media hype, a common trait among Solana-based memecoins. Its listing on Binance, a major exchange, validates its community-driven model and draws attention to the LetsBonk ecosystem, potentially fueling further speculative interest.

However, this reliance on sentiment makes memecoins like USELESS vulnerable to pump-and-dump schemes, as critics have alleged with Binance’s 2024 memecoin listings, where 80% of listed tokens saw significant post-listing surges.

Binance’s listing of low-cap memecoins like USELESS has sparked accusations of enabling pump-and-dump schemes that favor insiders. Critics, including Leonidas from Ord.io, argue that Binance targets low-cap tokens controlled by a few holders, allowing them to pay high listing fees and profit from rapid exits, harming retail investors.

The lack of transparency in Binance’s listing process and fees fuels skepticism, with calls for stricter criteria to protect investors from manipulative practices. Binance’s focus on memecoins, with 60% of its 2024 listings on Solana, reflects a shift toward prioritizing community support and popularity over traditional metrics like utility or market cap.

Impact of Memecoin Market Volatility on Crypto Accessibility

Memecoins like USELESS, with low initial prices (starting at $0.012 in May 2025), make crypto accessible to retail investors with limited capital. The low-cost, high-throughput Solana blockchain further reduces transaction fees, enabling broader participation compared to high-fee networks like Ethereum.

Memecoins’ lack of complex utility (e.g., USELESS’s “pointless” branding) appeals to newcomers who may find DeFi or utility-driven tokens intimidating. Their humor and community focus create an approachable entry point into crypto. The volatility of memecoins, exemplified by USELESS’s 2,175% year-to-date gain and post-listing surges, attracts speculative traders seeking quick profits.

High-profile listings on Binance amplify visibility, drawing in new users who view crypto as a high-risk, high-reward opportunity. This speculative allure can onboard users who might not otherwise engage with crypto, as seen with tokens like PNUT, which gained traction via viral narratives (e.g., Elon Musk’s endorsement).

The SEC’s view of memecoins as distinct from unregistered securities provides regulatory leeway, making them a safer entry point for retail investors wary of legal risks. However, ongoing scrutiny of Binance’s listing practices could lead to stricter regulations, potentially limiting accessibility if compliance costs rise.

While memecoins lower barriers for retail investors and attract new users through speculative appeal, they also expose participants to manipulation and losses, potentially undermining trust. For sustained accessibility, the crypto industry must balance memecoin-driven onboarding with transparent practices and investor protections to ensure long-term adoption without sacrificing market stability.

Hyperliquid Achieving a Record-Breaking Goal and Surpassing Circle in 24-hour Revenue Shows DeFi’s Resilience in the Crypto Market

Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives exchange, surpassed Circle in 24-hour revenue on August 15, 2025, in daily fees.

This milestone coincided with Hyperliquid achieving a record-breaking $29 billion in 24-hour trading volume, marking an all-time high for the platform. The surge in activity reflects growing user engagement and demand for on-chain derivatives trading.

Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, traded at $48.23, up 2% that day, with bullish momentum supported by strong on-chain metrics and institutional interest, including custody support from Anchorage Digital Bank. Hyperliquid surpassing Circle, a centralized stablecoin issuer, in daily fees highlights the growing competitiveness of decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.

It signals a shift in user preference toward on-chain derivatives trading, which offers transparency, lower counterparty risk, and permissionless access compared to centralized alternatives. Hyperliquid’s record-breaking $29 billion in 24-hour trading volume and $7.7 million in fees on August 15, 2025, reflect maturing DeFi infrastructure.

Platforms like Hyperliquid are now capable of handling institutional-grade volumes, challenging traditional finance’s grip on derivatives markets. Support from institutions like Anchorage Digital Bank for Hyperliquid’s HYPE token indicates growing confidence in DeFi’s scalability and regulatory potential. This could attract more institutional capital, further boosting liquidity and innovation.

Hyperliquid’s fee generation underscores the profitability of DeFi protocols. Unlike centralized entities like Circle, which rely on stablecoin issuance and reserve management, DeFi platforms generate revenue directly from user activity, creating sustainable economic models.

Circle’s stablecoin dominance (USDC) faces indirect pressure as DeFi platforms capture more trading volume and fees. If DeFi continues to scale, centralized players may need to innovate or integrate with decentralized systems to stay relevant.

How DeFi Growth is Accelerating

Layer-2 solutions and cross-chain interoperability (e.g., Arbitrum, where Hyperliquid operates) have reduced transaction costs and improved scalability. This enables DeFi platforms to handle high-frequency trading and complex derivatives, attracting both retail and institutional users.

DeFi’s user base is expanding due to its accessibility and yield opportunities. Hyperliquid’s 24-hour volume spike to $29 billion reflects growing retail and whale activity, driven by the allure of high leverage (up to 50x) and transparent markets.

DeFi’s total value locked (TVL) across protocols has been climbing, with estimates suggesting over $100 billion in 2025. Capital is flowing into yield-generating platforms, perpetual futures, and lending protocols, fueled by high returns and low barriers to entry.

While regulatory hurdles persist, jurisdictions like Singapore and the EU are crafting frameworks that legitimize DeFi. This reduces uncertainty, encouraging developers and investors to commit to the ecosystem. DeFi is expanding beyond simple swaps and lending.

Platforms like Hyperliquid offer sophisticated instruments like perpetual futures and options, rivaling centralized exchanges. This attracts traders seeking advanced strategies without custodial risks. Decentralized governance models empower users to shape protocols, fostering loyalty and innovation.

Hyperliquid’s community-driven approach, coupled with its native token HYPE’s 2% price increase on August 15, 2025, exemplifies this trend. Despite L2 advancements, network congestion and gas spikes during high volatility could hinder user experience. Global crackdowns on DeFi (e.g., potential U.S. restrictions) could slow growth if not navigated carefully.

Hacks and exploits remain a risk, with DeFi losses historically exceeding $1 billion annually. Hyperliquid’s feat is a microcosm of DeFi’s accelerating growth, driven by technological innovation, user adoption, and institutional interest. As DeFi platforms capture more market share from centralized finance, they reshape the financial landscape, though scalability and regulatory challenges must be addressed to sustain this momentum.

Citigroup’s Foray into Stablecoin Payment Services Reflects a Broader Trend of Institutional Adoption

0

Citigroup is actively exploring the addition of payment services and custody for stablecoins, as well as custody services for cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

This move is part of the bank’s broader strategy to expand into the digital asset space, driven by recent U.S. regulatory changes, particularly the GENIUS Act, which requires stablecoin issuers to back tokens with assets like U.S. Treasuries or cash.

Biswarup Chatterjee, global head of partnerships and innovation for Citigroup’s services division, indicated that the bank is prioritizing custody services for these high-quality assets backing stablecoins. Citigroup is also considering issuing its own stablecoin and is developing blockchain-based payment solutions, including tokenized U.S. dollar transfers for instant, 24/7 global transactions.

These efforts aim to streamline cross-border payments and compete with players like Coinbase, which currently dominates crypto ETF custody. Citigroup’s entry into stablecoin payment services and custody signals growing institutional interest in digital assets.

As a major global bank, Citigroup’s involvement lends credibility to stablecoins, potentially encouraging other traditional financial institutions to follow suit. This could accelerate mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, which are seen as less volatile and more suitable for payments and settlements.

Citigroup’s move to offer custody for stablecoins and crypto ETFs challenges existing players like Coinbase, which currently dominates the crypto ETF custody market. Increased competition could drive innovation, lower fees, and improve service quality for institutional clients.

Citigroup’s blockchain-based payment solutions, including tokenized U.S. dollar transfers for instant, 24/7 global transactions, could disrupt traditional payment systems like SWIFT, which are slower and more costly. Stablecoin-based payments could reduce transaction costs and settlement times.

If Citigroup issues its own stablecoin, it could compete with major players like Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC). A Citigroup-backed stablecoin would likely prioritize regulatory compliance, appealing to risk-averse institutional clients and potentially capturing significant market share.

The involvement of a reputable institution like Citigroup could boost confidence in stablecoins, addressing concerns about their stability and backing. This is particularly relevant given past controversies around stablecoin reserves (e.g., Tether’s transparency issues).

Institutional-grade custody services could mitigate risks associated with hacks and mismanagement, further stabilizing the stablecoin market. Stablecoins are becoming a cornerstone of the crypto market, with a total market cap exceeding $200 billion as of mid-2025 (based on recent trends).

The approval of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in the U.S. has spurred demand for custody services, as institutional investors require secure storage for digital assets. Citigroup’s entry into this space aligns with the growing popularity of crypto ETFs, which saw inflows of over $17 billion in 2024 alone (per recent data).

Blockchain-based payment systems are gaining traction as alternatives to traditional financial infrastructure. Projects like Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM) focus on cross-border payments, and Citigroup’s tokenized U.S. dollar transfers align with this trend.

Stablecoins are integral to DeFi, enabling lending, borrowing, and trading without the volatility of other cryptocurrencies. Citigroup’s involvement could bridge traditional finance with DeFi, potentially leading to hybrid financial products that combine the benefits of both systems.

The growth of DeFi, with total value locked (TVL) exceeding $100 billion in 2025, underscores the increasing relevance of stablecoins in decentralized ecosystems. While stablecoins offer stability, the broader crypto market remains volatile, with Bitcoin and Ethereum experiencing significant price swings in 2024-2025.

By leveraging its expertise in traditional finance, Citigroup could enhance the credibility and efficiency of stablecoin ecosystems, driving competition and innovation. The broader market is moving toward greater integration with traditional finance, with stablecoins and blockchain-based payments at the forefront.

The NFL’s high-tech stadiums continue to impress fans

0

As discussed online in forums and on platforms like YouTube, the NFL’s population of American football fans is passionate about their sport. In the same way, soccer fans in the UK are tribal; the various NFL franchises in the league have loyal supporters behind them during an average season. These same fans also have world-class arenas to frequent, with some of the NFL’s high-tech venues being filled with state-of-the-art inclusions.

For fans who attend the biggest games on the calendar, these imposing sporting homes don’t just entertain the field. Catering to every type of supporter in the process, there is live music to listen to before the game starts, an array of food choices to sample, fans look at NFL odds while queuing up for the latest merchandise, and banners to display during some passionate chanting. Some high-tech inclusions supplement all this, although some stadiums feature more technology-based products than the rest.

So, with sports fans in America enjoying their favorite pastime in a selection of world-class arenas, we briefly highlight some of the NFL’s most high-tech stadiums, many of which highlight just how amazing the sporting landscape is.

SoFi Stadium

Home of the Rams and Chargers, SoFi Stadium tends to go down well with visiting fans. The home fans are also happy, with this unbeatable home possessing a whole host of plus points. This well-designed home is stunning and highly modern, from a huge ETFE translucent canopy with 302 panels to its amazing Infinity Screen suspended above the field. Rams and Chargers fans are undoubtedly lucky to call it their home.

Levis Stadium

If you’re lucky enough to experience San Francisco, you should consider visiting Levi’s Stadium. Home of the 49ers, this highly rated arena offers superb state-of-the-art technology, such as charging stations and giant screens, while also housing their Yahoo Fantasy Football Sports Lounge, which is packed full of impressive tools. A venue NFL fans tend to rave about, Levi’s Stadium is one of the top stadiums in America.

Sun Life Stadium

Home of the Miami Dolphins, the Sun Life Stadium is widely regarded as one of the most spectacular homes in the NFL. Sure, the fact that it’s in Miami works in its favor, given its lush surroundings. Still, this glorious home field also houses some high-tech inclusions, including various analytics tools around the stadium. With the help of IBM, the Dolphins’ hierarchy has added IBM Cloud, a platform that gives fans immediate access to scores, stats, and other up-to-date findings on their smartphone devices. These interactive tools are engaging and supplemented by alternatives like massive screens. Overall, the Sun Life Stadium is excellent.

AT&T Stadium

(Image via https://x.com/ATTStadium)

Despite losing the Super Bowl to the Eagles last season, the Dallas Cowboys are winning in their home stadium. AT&T Stadium has an abundance of innovative features, including a rotating 180-foot jumbo video board, a QR code in every seat so fans can access an array of offerings, and the largest-ever electronic retractable glass doors at each end zone. Overall, it’s special.

Allegiant Stadium

Las Vegas is known for its bright lights and its extravagance, making the Allegiant Stadium’s state-of-the-art design hardly surprising. The Raiders’ home has everything a fan could want, from 41 LED videoboards and over 2,550 displays to cashless turnstiles and a retractable grass field design. Overall, it’s an excellent space to watch football.

Riders in Atlanta Are Choosing Robotaxis Over Human Drivers, Signaling a New Era for Uber and the Gig Economy

0

A quiet but telling shift is playing out on the streets of Atlanta. Some Uber passengers, given the choice between a human driver and a driverless Waymo, are deliberately refusing the human option — waiting longer, canceling trips, and re-requesting rides until a robotaxi appears.

What once felt like a futuristic experiment is now turning into a customer preference, and it may mark the beginning of a profound transformation in ride-hailing.

Since Uber introduced Waymo’s self-driving cars into its Atlanta platform in late June, residents like Nate Galesic have leaned heavily into the technology. He admits to declining trip after trip until the app assigns him a robotaxi, a habit he has repeated for more than 35 rides. As an assistant director for TV and film products, Galesic told BI he usually drives himself home after a long day on set. Not having to drive — or face judgment from a ride-hailing driver if he nods off along the way — is another benefit of autonomous vehicles, he said.

“I’ve always dreamt about the day when I could just pass out on the way to and from work,” Galesic told BI. “Now I can do that without the small talk.”

Another rider, Andrew Nerney, describes a similar approach: canceling multiple times until he finally lands a Waymo, even though most of his trips are short, under $12.

“Each day, I see Waymos with passengers more frequently,” he added, underscoring that this is no longer a novelty but an emerging preference.

The behavior captures a pivotal moment. For the first time, Uber’s customers are openly demonstrating that they would rather trust algorithms, sensors, and software than a gig worker behind the wheel. While Uber users cannot guarantee that they’ll get a ride in a Waymo in Atlanta, some are working the system to get paired with one.

The implications are enormous, not just for Uber but for the entire gig economy.

Waymo, Alphabet’s self-driving unit, has gradually expanded from its first commercial rides in Phoenix in 2017 to San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin, with a fleet of more than 1,500 fully driverless cars. Atlanta now joins that map, though for the moment Uber and Waymo only operate “dozens” of cars within a limited 65-square-mile zone. The companies say the fleet will grow into “hundreds” in the coming years, mirroring Austin, where about 100 are already deployed.

But what feels like progress for tech enthusiasts spells potential disaster for Uber’s drivers. Uber has long described its flexible labor model as a gateway to income for millions worldwide. If more riders follow Galesic and Nerney’s example — canceling human drivers to wait for robots — that workforce risks being pushed aside, with automation directly replacing people rather than complementing them.

Many believe that the early signs in Atlanta could be the “first crack” in Uber’s labor model. For Uber, autonomy has always been part of its long game. Labor is its single biggest cost, and replacing drivers with driverless cars is a way to lower expenses and eventually boost profitability.

Former CEO Travis Kalanick openly admitted the company’s survival depended on driverless cars. While the company now frames partnerships like the one with Waymo as “expanding choice,” the trajectory is clear.

But the transformation is far from complete. Robotaxis still face skepticism, safety concerns, and regulatory hurdles. Crashes involving autonomous systems have kept regulators cautious, and polls consistently show Americans are more uneasy than excited about self-driving technology.

Frank McCleary, a partner at consulting firm Arthur D. Little’s automotive and manufacturing practice, said deadly accidents involving self-driving vehicles are one reason that potential riders might be wary.

“That negative news cycle has sort of pushed some folks away from it,” he told Business Insider.

Yet for a growing number of riders, those hesitations are secondary to convenience. “New tech doesn’t become massively adopted overnight,” Galesic said. “But once you’ve experienced a driverless ride, it’s hard to go back.”

The long-term question is no longer whether Uber drivers will be replaced, but how fast — and whether the gig economy that reshaped modern work can survive this tech evolution.

U.S. Envoy Says Putin Open to ‘Article 5-Like’ Protection for Ukraine in Potential Peace Deal

0

Washington is weighing what could be the most significant concession from Moscow since the war in Ukraine began.

U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday that Russian President Vladimir Putin has agreed to let the United States and European partners extend “Article 5-like protection” to Ukraine as part of a possible security guarantee aimed at ending the conflict.

“We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article Five-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,” Witkoff said in an interview on CNN. “It was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.”

NATO’s Article 5 obligates all members of the alliance to treat an attack on one as an attack on all, compelling collective defense measures. For Ukraine, which has long sought NATO membership as a shield against Moscow, the promise of such protection — even outside formal membership — would mark a historic shift.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the U.S. announcement, saying the European Union “is ready to do its share.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also hailed the development as “a historic decision,” stressing that any guarantee must be practical, offering protection “on land, in the air, and at sea,” and must involve Europe.

The envoy’s remarks come just after President Donald Trump held talks with Putin in Alaska, meetings that the White House described as “productive” despite the absence of a ceasefire agreement. Trump had repeatedly called for a swift and lasting truce, but the summit ended without such a breakthrough, raising concerns in Kyiv and European capitals that the U.S. leader might soften Washington’s stance.

In the days since, Trump has insisted that “the best way” to end the conflict is through a comprehensive peace deal. Witkoff said the Alaska talks covered “almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal,” though he declined to detail them, adding only that “we began to see some moderation in the way they’re thinking about getting to a final peace deal.”

Still, U.S. officials caution that a resolution remains distant. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that while progress was made, “we’re still a long ways off” from a peace agreement. He warned Russia would face “additional consequences” if talks collapse, but argued against further sanctions for now.

“The minute you levy additional sanctions, strong additional sanctions, the talking stops,” Rubio said on ABC News.

However, the proposal stirs curiosity. If Putin truly accepted Article 5-style security conditions for Ukraine, it would contradict one of Moscow’s main justifications for its invasion: blocking Kyiv’s NATO aspirations. The Kremlin has repeatedly demanded that Ukraine abandon those ambitions and recognize Russia’s annexations of Crimea and large parts of eastern Ukraine.

Reports following Friday’s summit suggested Trump floated a deal in which Kyiv would surrender the Donbas region. Zelenskyy, however, has been adamant that Ukraine will never cede sovereign territory, saying doing so would breach the Constitution and embolden Russia to strike again.

“Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force,” he wrote on X.

With Trump scheduled to meet Zelenskyy and European leaders on Monday, discussions are expected to focus on what security guarantees should look like and how Ukraine could be rebuilt after nearly four years of devastating war.

“There has to be talk about what the territories are going to look like and what the border lines are going to look like at the end of this conflict,” Rubio said. “There has to be talk about how Ukraine is rebuilt, and how do you rebuild a country that’s been attacked as often as it has.”

For Kyiv, that rebuilding begins with assurances that the nightmare of invasion will not be repeated — and for now, Putin’s unexpected concession may be the closest it has come to that guarantee.