DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 713

Roman Storm’s Unlicensed Money Transmitting Conviction Highlights a Critical Juncture For Cryptocurrency

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Roman Storm, a Tornado Cash developer, was convicted on August 6, 2025, of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business, which carries a maximum sentence of five years. The jury could not reach a verdict on the other two charges: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions.

Prosecutors claimed Tornado Cash enabled over $1 billion in illicit transactions, including by North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Storm’s defense argued he had no control over the decentralized protocol’s use by others. He is out on bail, awaiting sentencing, and plans to appeal.

Storm’s conviction sets a potential precedent for holding developers liable for the misuse of decentralized protocols, even when they lack direct control over how the technology is used. Tornado Cash, a decentralized mixer, was designed to enhance transaction privacy on Ethereum, but prosecutors argued it facilitated over $1 billion in illicit transactions, including by groups like North Korea’s Lazarus Group.

This ruling could chill innovation in decentralized finance (DeFi) as developers may fear legal repercussions for building open-source tools. The case underscores tensions between privacy rights and regulatory oversight. Tornado Cash was created to protect user anonymity, a core principle for many in the crypto community.

However, the conviction suggests that tools enabling anonymity may face intense scrutiny if used for illicit purposes, potentially limiting the development of privacy-preserving technologies. The U.S. Treasury’s 2022 sanctions on Tornado Cash already marked a novel move against a decentralized protocol.

Storm faces up to five years in prison for the single charge, with sentencing pending. His planned appeal could test the boundaries of developer liability in higher courts, potentially shaping future legal interpretations of decentralized systems. The hung jury on the money laundering and sanctions charges suggests some juror skepticism about the broader accusations.

Developers of open-source software, especially in blockchain, may hesitate to release tools that could be misused, fearing prosecution. This could stifle innovation in DeFi and other decentralized technologies, as developers weigh legal risks against their work’s potential benefits.

Many in the crypto space view Storm’s conviction as an overreach, arguing that holding developers accountable for third-party actions undermines the ethos of decentralization. They emphasize that Tornado Cash is a neutral tool, akin to a hammer, which can be used for both legitimate and illicit purposes. Supporters, including figures like Edward Snowden, have called the case a threat to free speech and innovation, with some labeling it a “witch hunt.”

The U.S. government, including the DOJ and Treasury, argues that tools like Tornado Cash enable serious crimes, such as money laundering and sanctions evasion. They assert that developers have a responsibility to prevent misuse, even in decentralized systems, and that unregistered money transmission violates U.S. law.

Many crypto users and developers see privacy as a fundamental right, especially in financial transactions. They argue that tools like Tornado Cash protect individuals from surveillance and censorship, particularly in authoritarian regimes. The conviction is seen as prioritizing state control over individual freedom.

Law enforcement and regulators prioritize preventing financial crimes, arguing that unchecked privacy tools enable terrorism, cybercrime, and sanctions evasion. The guilty verdict reflects their view that privacy cannot come at the expense of national security and legal accountability.

Prosecutors and critics contend that someone must be held accountable for enabling criminal activity, even in decentralized systems. They view developers as gatekeepers who should implement safeguards or face consequences. The case has polarized public opinion. Some see it as a necessary crackdown on crypto-enabled crime, while others view it as government overreach into a nascent industry.

The crypto industry has rallied around Storm, with organizations like Coin Center filing amicus briefs in related cases, arguing that sanctioning code violates free speech. The outcome of Storm’s appeal could clarify legal protections for developers. Other countries may follow the U.S.’s lead, tightening regulations on privacy tools. Conversely, some jurisdictions might see this as an opportunity to attract crypto innovation.

Philippines SEC Cracks down on Unregistered Offshore Crypto Exchanges

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

In August 2025, the Philippines—SEC issued a public advisory targeting ten major offshore crypto exchanges—OKX, Bybit, KuCoin, Kraken, MEXC, Bitget, Phemex, CoinEx, BitMart, and Poloniex—for operating without licenses under the new Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) rules, effective July 2025.

These rules, outlined in SEC Memorandum Circulars No. 4 and No. 5, require all crypto platforms to register with the SEC, maintain a minimum capital of 100 million pesos (approximately $1.7 million), establish a local office, and comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.

The SEC’s actions include blocking access to these platforms through internet service providers like PLDT and Smart, issuing cease-and-desist orders, and pursuing criminal complaints. Fines for violations can reach up to 10 million pesos per offense, with additional daily penalties of 10,000 pesos. The regulator has also collaborated with tech giants like Google and Meta to restrict unauthorized marketing. This follows a 2024 precedent where Binance was geo-blocked for similar reasons.

The crackdown aims to protect investors from risks like fraud, fund loss, and lack of legal recourse, while addressing national security concerns such as money laundering and terrorist financing, which could lead to the Philippines being “gray-listed” by international bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

The SEC has clarified that the list of flagged exchanges is not exhaustive, and other unregistered platforms could face similar actions. Filipino users are advised to verify a platform’s registration status with the SEC and avoid trading on unlicensed exchanges. This aligns with regional trends, as countries like Thailand and Indonesia have also tightened regulations on offshore crypto platforms.

The SEC’s actions aim to safeguard Filipino investors by enforcing licensing requirements, ensuring platforms meet capital, transparency, and AML standards. This reduces risks of fraud, hacks, or unrecoverable fund losses seen in cases like FTX or unregistered platforms. Blocking major exchanges like OKX, Bybit, and Binance restricts access to popular trading platforms, potentially pushing users to riskier, less regulated alternatives.

The CASP rules encourage the development of a regulated domestic crypto sector by requiring local offices and compliance. This could foster job creation and innovation but may deter smaller or foreign firms due to high costs (e.g., 100 million pesos capital requirement). The Philippines relies heavily on remittances (9.3% of GDP in 2024), and crypto has been a low-cost alternative for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs).

Restrictions may disrupt these flows, forcing users back to traditional, costlier channels like banks or remittance services. The crackdown aligns with international pressure to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, aiming to avoid FATF gray-listing, which could harm foreign investment and banking ties. However, overly strict measures might stifle the Philippines’ position as a crypto hub in Southeast Asia, where countries like Singapore balance regulation with innovation.

Blocking websites is not foolproof; users can bypass geo-restrictions via VPNs or decentralized platforms. This creates enforcement gaps, as seen in Binance’s continued use post-2024 ban. The SEC’s reliance on tech firms like Google and Meta for ad restrictions may also have limited impact on savvy users.

The SEC prioritizes consumer protection and national security, viewing unregistered exchanges as high-risk due to their lack of oversight. The focus is on formalizing the crypto market to align with global standards. Many Filipino crypto traders, especially retail investors and OFWs, value offshore exchanges for their low fees, high liquidity, and diverse offerings.

The ban creates friction, as compliant local platforms may offer fewer trading pairs or higher costs, pushing users toward unregulated alternatives or black-market trading. Licensed exchanges like Coins.ph and PDAX benefit from the ban, gaining a competitive edge. However, they may struggle to match the scale, liquidity, or advanced features (e.g., derivatives trading) of global giants like Binance or OKX.

Offshore exchanges face a tough choice: invest in costly compliance to enter the Philippine market or lose access to an estimated 11.8 million crypto users (10% of the population in 2025). Some may exit entirely, while others might explore loopholes. The strict rules signal a cautious approach to crypto, potentially stifling innovation in a country with high blockchain adoption (ranked 2nd globally in Chainalysis’ 2024 adoption index).

The Philippines’ actions reflect a global trend of tightening crypto regulations (e.g., India’s tax regime, Thailand’s offshore bans), but the divide between user needs and regulatory goals remains stark. Retail investors may face reduced options, while the government balances economic growth with risk mitigation. The long-term outcome depends on whether the SEC can foster a robust, compliant crypto ecosystem without alienating its tech-savvy population.

Retirement Plans’ Growing Interest in Tokenized Assets, Exemplified By Michigan’s AKRB Bitcoin ETF Exposure

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The State of Michigan Retirement System significantly increased its Bitcoin exposure in Q2 2025, tripling its holdings in the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) from 100,000 to 300,000 shares, valued at approximately $11.4 million as of June 30, according to SEC filings. The fund also maintains 460,000 shares in the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETHE), worth about $9.6 million, unchanged since September 2024.

This move reflects growing institutional confidence in digital assets, despite recent Bitcoin ETF outflows totaling $1.4 billion over four days. Michigan’s strategy aligns with a broader trend, as seen with Wisconsin’s $387.3 million Bitcoin ETF position, signaling cautious but increasing adoption among state pension funds.

Tokenized assets, such as Bitcoin ETFs or tokenized real estate and private equity, allow fractional ownership, lowering barriers to entry for retail and institutional investors. This enables retirement plans to offer exposure to high-value or illiquid assets previously reserved for high-net-worth individuals or institutional investors, like private equity or real estate.

Traditionally illiquid assets, such as private equity or infrastructure, gain liquidity through tokenization. Retirement plans can rebalance portfolios more dynamically, meeting cash flow needs without sacrificing long-term returns. For instance, tokenized real estate allows pension funds to exit portions of investments rather than entire holdings, addressing liquidity constraints.

Blockchain-based tokenization reduces intermediaries through smart contracts, lowering transaction and administrative costs. For large pension funds like Michigan’s, this can translate into significant savings, potentially reducing fees passed on to retirees.

Blockchain’s immutable ledger provides a transparent, traceable record of transactions, reducing fraud risks and enhancing regulatory compliance. This is particularly appealing for pension funds, which prioritize fiduciary responsibility and accountability. The lack of consistent global frameworks creates fragmentation.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, even in ETF form, are volatile, posing risks to retirement funds that prioritize stability. The recent $1.4 billion in Bitcoin ETF outflows highlights market fluctuations. Many retirement plans lack the technological expertise or infrastructure to manage blockchain-based assets, requiring costly upgrades.

Tokenized assets are vulnerable to hacks or smart contract errors, necessitating robust security measures. The inclusion of high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies in retirement plans, as enabled by recent U.S. executive actions, raises fiduciary concerns. Plans must balance potential returns with the need to protect retirees from undue risk, especially given warnings about private equity and crypto being diverted into 401(k)s without clear investor consent.

However, limited market liquidity and immature secondary markets could hinder scalability. Following Michigan’s lead, retirement plans are increasingly allocating to Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. Wisconsin’s $387.3 million Bitcoin ETF position and Michigan’s $11.4 million ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF holdings reflect this trend.

Tokenized money market funds have surpassed $1 billion in assets under management in 2024, driven by high-interest-rate environments. Major players like BlackRock, WisdomTree, and Franklin Templeton offer these funds, which provide instant settlement and can be used for payments, enhancing capital efficiency. Retirement plans are exploring these for stable, on-chain returns.

Pension funds are testing tokenized real estate and private equity to diversify portfolios and access illiquid markets. For example, tokenized real estate allows fractional ownership of properties, enabling pension funds to invest globally without large capital commitments. Goldman Sachs is launching tokenization projects for U.S. fund complexes and European debt markets by late 2024, signaling institutional interest.

Retirement plans are eyeing tokenized bonds and equities for faster settlement and lower costs. Slovenia’s issuance of a digital bond in 2024 and Switzerland’s Helvetia III project for tokenized bond settlements using wholesale CBDCs are notable examples. These offer pension funds efficient, transparent investment options.

A U.S. executive order signed on August 7, 2025, directs the Department of Labor to review fiduciary guidance, paving the way for cryptocurrencies and private equity in 401(k) plans. BlackRock’s planned 401(k) target-date fund with 5-20% private investments and Empower’s collaboration with Apollo reflect this shift, though it introduces risks for retail investors.

The tokenized asset market is projected to grow significantly, with estimates ranging from $2 trillion by 2030 (McKinsey) to $16 trillion (Boston Consulting Group). PwC forecasts tokenized investment funds reaching $317 billion by 2028. Retirement plans are aligning with this trend, with 74% of institutional investors planning to invest in digital assets within five years, per a 2024 Fidelity survey.

Trends like tokenized money market funds, real estate, and digital bonds are gaining traction, supported by regulatory sandboxes and institutional pilots. As the market matures, retirement plans must balance innovation with fiduciary duty to ensure long-term stability for retirees.

“Art Blocks 500” Milestone Solidifies Generative NFTs As A Transformative Force in Art and Tech

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Art Blocks announced “Art Blocks 500,” marking a milestone of 500 flagship generative art projects from 2020 to 2025. As of August 2025, 495 projects have been released, with five final projects—two Curated and three community-focused Explorations—set to complete the collection by November 2025, coinciding with Art Blocks’ five-year anniversary.

This initiative celebrates their foundational era of on-chain generative art, preserving projects across Curated, Playground, Factory, Presents, Collaborations, and Explorations categories. After reaching 500, Art Blocks plans to focus on preserving these works while exploring new technologies and partnerships through their Studio and Art Blocks Engine.

Art Blocks 500 encapsulates 500 unique, algorithmically generated art projects stored on the Ethereum blockchain, establishing a permanent, immutable archive of digital creativity. This milestone underscores the cultural importance of generative art as a recognized medium, blending code, creativity, and technology.

By including community-driven “Explorations” alongside curated releases, Art Blocks fosters inclusivity, empowering artists and collectors to shape the platform’s legacy. This democratizes art creation and curation, reinforcing the decentralized ethos of Web3. Art Blocks’ success, with over $2.2 billion in secondary market sales and 1.5 million unique outputs, highlights the economic viability of generative NFTs.

The completion of 500 projects may drive renewed interest, potentially increasing demand and value for existing collections. The shift to community-focused releases and the Art Blocks Engine (enabling third-party integrations) could lower barriers for new artists, fostering a broader, more diverse generative art ecosystem. However, market volatility and NFT fatigue could temper speculative enthusiasm.

Art Blocks’ plans to explore new technologies post-500 suggest a pivot toward cross-chain compatibility or layer-2 solutions, addressing Ethereum’s high gas fees and scalability issues. This could expand access but risks fragmenting the community if not executed thoughtfully. The emphasis on archiving and preserving these 500 projects signals a maturing market, prioritizing long-term cultural value over short-term speculation.

Generative NFTs have gained traction in traditional art spaces, with Art Blocks projects exhibited in galleries like Pace and featured at events like Christie’s auctions. The 500 milestone could further legitimize generative art, attracting institutional collectors and museums. By providing a platform for artists to code unique algorithms, Art Blocks has redefined authorship, where artists create systems rather than singular works.

How Generative NFTs Are Shaping Narratives

Generative NFTs shift the artist’s role from creator of a single work to designer of algorithms that produce infinite variations. This narrative of “art as code” emphasizes process over product, with collectors owning unique outputs of a shared system. Example: Projects like Fidenza by Tyler Hobbs create dynamic, unpredictable artworks, sparking discussions about the interplay between human intent and computational randomness.

Blockchain ensures transparent provenance and ownership, fostering a narrative of trust and authenticity in digital art. Collectors are not just buyers but stakeholders in a decentralized ecosystem, as seen with Art Blocks’ on-chain storage. This narrative challenges traditional gatekeepers (galleries, auction houses), empowering artists and collectors to interact directly.

The narrative of NFTs as speculative assets often overshadows their artistic merit. High-profile sales (e.g., Art Blocks’ Chromie Squiggle fetching millions) fuel perceptions of NFTs as status symbols or investments, but the 500 milestone aims to recenter the focus on artistic innovation and cultural significance. Critics argue this speculative narrative risks commodifying art, while proponents see it as a democratizing force, rewarding creators directly.

Generative NFTs bridge art and technology, creating a narrative of interdisciplinary innovation. They appeal to tech enthusiasts, coders, and traditional artists alike, fostering cross-pollination between Silicon Valley and the art world. This narrative positions NFTs as a cultural artifact of the Web3 era, reflecting society’s growing integration with blockchain and decentralized systems.

Generative NFTs challenge elitist art world structures by prioritizing accessibility and programmability. However, they also face criticism for environmental concerns (Ethereum’s energy use) and market exclusivity, as high prices can alienate smaller collectors. The narrative of inclusivity is tempered by the reality of wealth concentration among early adopters and “whales,” sparking debates about equity in the NFT space.

By shaping narratives around decentralized creativity, community participation, and the fusion of code and art, generative NFTs are redefining how we create, own, and value art. However, balancing artistic integrity with speculative fervor and addressing accessibility challenges will be critical to sustaining their cultural impact. As Art Blocks transitions to new phases, the narrative of generative NFTs will likely evolve, influencing broader Web3 and digital culture conversations.

Sheetz’s “Crypto Crave & Save” Promotion, Offers 50% Off Purchases Paid With Cryptocurrencies

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Sheetz is running a promotion called “Crypto Crave & Save,” offering 50% off purchases paid with cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, or USDC via the Flexa network. This discount applies daily from 3 PM to 7 PM at participating locations, from August 1 to August 31, 2025, with a maximum discount of $15 per transaction and up to 10 eligible transactions per Flexa account.

The offer is valid for in-store purchases only, excluding gas, gift cards, online, and in-app payments. To participate, customers need a Flexa-enabled app (like SPEDN, Zashi, Nighthawk Wallet, or Nexus Wallet), deposit digital assets into their wallet (e.g., via Coinbase), and present a flexcode at checkout. Sheetz operates over 750 stores across the U.S., and this initiative aims to boost crypto adoption, particularly among younger consumers.

By incentivizing crypto payments with significant discounts, Sheetz is encouraging mainstream consumers, particularly younger demographics, to explore and use digital currencies. This aligns with the growing trend of retailers accepting crypto to tap into tech-savvy markets.

The promotion could normalize crypto transactions in everyday settings, reducing the perception of cryptocurrencies as speculative investments and positioning them as practical payment methods. Sheetz differentiates itself from competitors by embracing innovative payment methods, potentially attracting a younger, tech-forward customer base. This could enhance brand loyalty among crypto enthusiasts.

The time-limited discount (3 PM to 7 PM) creates urgency, driving foot traffic during those hours and potentially boosting sales of high-margin items like food and beverages. The use of the Flexa network ensures fast, low-cost transactions with fraud protection, which could reduce Sheetz’s payment processing costs compared to traditional credit card fees.

However, the $15 discount cap and 10-transaction limit per account suggest Sheetz is managing financial exposure, as widespread adoption could strain profit margins. The exclusion of gas and gift cards further limits potential losses on low-margin items. The partnership with Flexa highlights the growing role of crypto payment networks in retail.

Flexa benefits from increased visibility and user acquisition, as customers must download Flexa-enabled apps to participate. This could spur similar partnerships between retailers and crypto payment providers, accelerating the integration of blockchain-based payments into mainstream commerce.

While the promotion boosts crypto’s visibility, it operates in a regulatory gray area. Cryptocurrency transactions may face scrutiny from tax authorities, and Sheetz must ensure compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations. Public perception of crypto remains mixed due to volatility and scams.

Discounts like Sheetz’s 50% off deal lower the barrier to entry for crypto-curious consumers, encouraging them to set up wallets and engage with digital currencies. This gamifies the payment process, appealing to younger audiences familiar with digital trends. Crypto-based promotions create a sense of exclusivity and innovation, appealing to consumers who value being early adopters.

The limited-time offer taps into FOMO (fear of missing out), driving quicker purchasing decisions. By integrating crypto payments into a familiar retail environment, Sheetz educates consumers on their practical use, potentially reducing skepticism. However, the complexity of setting up crypto wallets could deter less tech-savvy customers.

Cryptomarketing campaigns signal a shift toward integrating digital currencies into everyday commerce. Retailers like Sheetz are testing the waters, potentially paving the way for wider adoption by chains like Walmart or Target. Some brands are exploring crypto-based loyalty programs (e.g., tokenized rewards), which could further influence consumer spending habits by offering tradeable or redeemable digital assets.

Cryptomarketing aligns with the growing influence of decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3, appealing to consumers who value decentralization and financial sovereignty. This could pressure businesses to adopt crypto-friendly policies to stay relevant. Sheetz’s promotion is a strategic move to capitalize on the rising interest in cryptocurrencies, drive store traffic, and position itself as an innovative retailer.

By offering substantial discounts, Sheetz lowers the psychological and financial barriers to crypto adoption, influencing consumer behavior while testing the scalability of crypto payments. Cryptomarketing, as seen here, is pushing businesses to rethink payment systems and customer engagement, but its success depends on balancing innovation with operational practicality and regulatory compliance.

1...712713714...7,952Page 713 of 7,952

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy