DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 7257

What Happens When Sharks Swim Into Blue Oceans?

6

The blue ocean strategy is about non-disruptive innovation where growth comes, not by taking market share from anyone, but by finding new markets. Basically, the innovator is finding opportunities in uncontested markets which it is pioneering, and by default the category-king.

According to the Blue Ocean Strategy website, the book is based on a study of 150 strategic moves spanning more than 100 years and 30 industries. The authors argue that leading companies will succeed not by battling competitors, but by systematically creating “blue oceans” of uncontested market space ripe for growth.

The strategy represents the simultaneous pursuit of high product differentiation and low cost, thereby making competition irrelevant. The authors say it is successful because it attracts large numbers of customers while raising the cost of competition.

But what happens when other industry players have seen that the uncontested markets are awesome and profitable? Naturally, you would expect them to enter the waters. Just like that, there will be competition, in the previously uncontested market, and the power of full-monopoly will be gone. Now, the former pioneer has to find ways to overcome the sharks which have arrived to challenge its territories.

Two Cases

Viagra, the ED treatment drug, was a blue ocean when Pfizer accidentally created the drug. Viagra thrived and made a lot of money in the new sector. But over time, other players saw the massive opportunity in the sector, and joined the fray. Cialis became a competitor. But luckily for Viagra, it has remained the industry-king.
Contrast Viagra ability to hold its grounds with Etsy, an e-commerce company that pioneered handmade crafting of vintage items and supplies, at scale. Etsy created a new sector which was producing handmade crafts which were largely ignored by eBay and Amazon. It was a non-disruptive innovation as it did not directly compete with industrialized crafts. (I concede that Viagra is a better example of Blue Ocean as the industry never existed, even though the friction was there. In Etsy, there was the craft industry, though the company brought differentiation via handmade crafting.) From a Fortune Newsletter:

The New York Times spilled what used to be called a ton of ink Sunday on Etsy, whose new CEO, Josh Silverman, has the unenviable task of stabilizing a beloved if wobbly company. Etsy thrived for a time not so much because it deployed innovative technology but because it filled a niche ignored by eBay and Amazon . The latter, unsurprisingly, has come on strong in the crafts market, leaving Etsy a warm and cuddly but financially unstable company.

Etsy is feeling the heat, losing market share as Amazon has shown interests in the previous blue ocean which Etsy dominated. But unlike Viagra, Etsy seems to be losing grounds in the waters. The shark, Amazon, is pushing to take over the territory. Etsy is making many changes, including changing the class of its corporation, to give it more room to compete.

Lesson

The key lesson here is that there is nothing like making competition irrelevant, because sooner or later, competition will come to any sector. What happens is that you may enjoy a period of no competition. But as markets see that a new sector is promising, competition will come.

When Peter Thiel, an investor, wrote that “if you’re a startup, you want to get to a monopoly”, he was right. But of course, a startup must also learn to compete because very soon a lucrative sector will find competitors. This explains that no startup should expect to be a perpetual monopolist in a sector it pioneered: sure, other players can come, but the startup should work to win, despite the competition.

Yes, there is a first-mover advantage, but that does not guarantee success if the pioneer has not built moats around its business.

All Together

There is nothing in business that guarantees that discovering a blue ocean will mean that you will be the leader in the uncontested market, for long. For platform-based web companies, they build defenses by growing very rapidly to enjoy the benefits of network effects. But even with that, a new competitor can come with a new level of competition and disrupt the new market (think of Facebook and MySpace).

Generally, every day, a business must work to discover new customers and markets. And once done, must find ways to keep them happy, extrapolating Sun Tzu’s timeless classic The Art of War: you want to hold a territory after you have conquered it. That is one way to prepare for the arrival of the sharks: economies of scale can provide a huge advantage that reduces marginal cost, making it harder for new sharks to swim in the blue ocean.

Tekedia Forum: Ask Questions, Post Product Updates, Read Perspectives, and Discuss Issues

1

It is going well in the beautiful Pretoria, South Africa. From 4pm today, we will begin an economic festival which is expected to be catalytic in redesigning the architectures of many global economies.

Meanwhile, we’ve added a Forum on Tekedia to simplify the process of engaging with stakeholders. Simply, the same reason that triggered me to be making videos is the same one that has brought the need for this Forum: I do not like to repeat myself. For some non-private questions, but with general-interest components, I will ask people to post them on the Forum. By posting them on the Forum, I can answer them, and when others ask similar questions, I can refer them to the answers. (In some cases, my team will answer them.) That saves everyone time and supports our African ecosystems.

You can ask questions (business, startup, funding, etc), post product updates, share perspectives and discuss issues on the Forum. My team or myself will respond to each comment/question.

Besides, I will be sharing shorter insights and perspectives therein. LinkedIn, while good, is transactional. You post something and within days the discovery becomes a nightmare. To find a past post is hard and with no efficient search system, it makes co-learning difficult. This Forum will fix.

Tekedia Forum

 

Apple’s New Growth Under Finite Hardware Maturity Evolution

0

Apple is growing, but it is also looking for new sources of growth at this moment. Its effort to diversify into shows and movies is a testament that it understands that iPhone cannot carry it forever. As I have noted many times, iPhone is a hardware, and it has a finite maturity in its evolution. In other words, there is going to be a time when any new feature or advancement becomes incremental. I am not sure there is any PC or laptop anyone can sell today that will be radically differentiated from PCs and laptops we have in the market. iPhone will get to that level. And when it gets there, the new basis of competition which has brought Apple unprecedented accumulation of value will be marginal.

A post-fashionista iPhone life will be challenging for Apple, because Apple will need a business model redesign to execute any strategy for the “volume market” where quantity is as important as big purse. Having a proprietary hardware packaged in exclusive software named iOS will not fix many issues because under most cases, on services, the sheer volume of users matter.

You may have 100 iPhone buyers, and you can make good money from them. But when you launch TV shows, the advantage may not just be having 100 iPhone users, but having as many people in the ecosystem as possible, unless the purpose of the shows is to stimulate the purchase of iPhone. It would be very strange if Apple makes its shows exclusive to iOS devices. Doing that will hamper growth of the services, despite a possibility of stimulating growth of iPhone and iPad, in the short-term. But that is most likely the strategy because an Apple that makes it services available to anyone is one that has lost its fashonista’s vision. That exclusivity which Apple has used will be tested and most partners will run away from it.

Case Study – Walmart Pay

Apple is beatable in businesses where everyone matters: poor, rich and in-between. Walmart Pay which is used in only Walmart Stores is giving Apple Pay a tough challenge. Walmart had declined to work with Apple Pay, passing over the exclusivity, for a product that welcomes anyone with a smartphone to the Walmart fold. The people include users of Android and also iPhone. That is a strategy that makes sense in all ways. It is working for Walmart.

Walmart’s decision to turn its back on a major Apple initiative might have been a smart gamble.

In a study from Pymnts.com, 5.5% of iPhone users said that they had used Apple Pay at participating retailers in June, up from 4% in March and 4.5% in October 2016. Walmart Pay, the retail giant’s mobile payment alternative, attracted 5.1% of Walmart shoppers in June. That was up from 3.3% in March. In an interview with Bloomberg, which earlier reported on the study, Walmart senior vice president of services and digital acceleration Daniel Eckert said Walmart Pay should soon pass Apple Pay for usage at participating retailers, making the retail giant’s service the most popular in the U.S.

Eckert’s comments were echoed by Richard Crone, a researcher who monitors the mobile-payment market, who told Bloomberg that Walmart Pay should be bigger than Apple Pay by the end of next year.

Like Apple Pay, Walmart Pay is a service that allows users to make purchases from their smartphones without ever taking out a credit card. However, Walmart Pay is exclusive to Walmart stores. Apple Pay is available at a variety of retail stores, including the Apple Store, Walgreens, Best Buy, and others.

The reality is that the only important differentiator in Apple Pay is the device which is made by Apple. The credit card remains ones issued by Visa, MasterCard, AmEx and Discover. Technically, the upscale Apple does not win here. Many Walmart stores customers are not necessarily affluent, so having an exclusive device like iPhone does not make sense. But having a product that can work in Android and iPhone, and agnostic of hardware, is a slam dunk.

Yes, Walmart Pay has an edge over Apple Pay which works only on iOS. There is no reason for anyone to go with Apply Pay when it is possible to combine Android and iOS. Simply, you want more devices to enable you pay with credit cards.

Walmart Pay is a feature in the Walmart mobile app that enables you to quickly, easily and securely pay with your smartphone in Walmart stores.

Walmart Pay works with any iOS or Android smartphone capable of downloading the Walmart app, at any Walmart checkout lane, and with any major credit, debit, pre-paid or Walmart Gift Card.

The path to services requires volume, and Apple’s closed iOS will be a challenge when the company stalls in its evolutionary finite hardware improvements. I do think that Apple must learn from the Walmart Pay experience: in a consumer market, especially on services, the best model is to welcome everyone. Simply, the exclusivity of iOS may not be strength, going forward.

We’ve Launched Tekedia Forum

3

I just added a Forum on Tekedia. The goal is to make it easier to share very short insights which may not be developed enough for a full post. Think of a one-paragraph perspective. It will remain insightful, adding value to readers.

As always, we will remain focused on technology, business/startup, innovation and strategy with focus on Africa and Nigeria in particular.

I have a policy on Tekedia to respond to any comment by a user. In this Forum, that will remain the case.

Finally, open your own Forum thread. Let us discuss business in Africa and experience our moments.  LinkedIn gets lost after days but this Forum is designed to be easily searchable. I do hope you can find time to share: I want to learn what is happening.

You can access the Forum, from the menu bar here. Everyone can be an author.

Nd

The Fascinating Opera Browser, Becoming Africa’s Internet

1

I do not use Opera because my Android smartphone is registered to my Gmail account. Google would not allow me to do YouTube upload, buy Android Play apps, etc without that Gmail account. That is fine, though in the past, it was not necessary to register with only a Gmail account. Since I linked the phone and the Gmail, it has been largely permanent. So, Chrome is my default mobile browser. I like the personalization that comes through recorded search: Google learns more about me when I search through logged account than otherwise. It also helps me in managing my passwords and bookmarks, from one device to the other,

Yet, six months ago in Nigeria, I installed Opera. I wanted to test the mobile browser, after reading about it. Interestingly, Opera does not get a lot of airtime in Western media because its products are largely not used in the Western world. Opera is built for emerging region like Africa where Internet access is metered and people take drastic actions to reduce waste of precious browsing minutes.

Opera develops and sells web browsers for the desktop, device, and mobile markets worldwide. It enables over 350 million internet consumers to discover and connect with the content and services that matter to them. It helps advertisers reach the audiences that build value for their businesses.

Opera also delivers products and services to more than 120 operators around the world, enabling them to provide a faster, more economical, and better network experience to their subscribers. It was launched in 1995 and is based in Oslo, Norway.

After using the browser, I can write that Opera is delivering value to its users. It blocks all JavaScript-advertisements by default making it impossible for you to see any advert in any site you visit. In Africa where Internet is still used for consumption, as people cannot practically do any useful work on metered Internet, blocking ads is a good strategy: watching ads is expensive, irrespective of how engaging it could be. In short, even when you are not watching, just having the ad images load when visiting websites costs you precious broadband minutes. So, making sure that no ad goes through makes Opera delightful to users. It has more than 100 million of such users in Africa.  Watching ad costs data in Africa; in the Western world, it is largely a nuisance, and that explains why Opera and Google Chrome are different.

Opera (source: WSJ)

Unless you use metered Internet you will not understand the mission of Opera. Simply, it saves users data costs through many strategies. Since I installed it, I have noticed that when in Nigeria, the browser could help the browsing hours go further, especially when I am in an area where the problem is not the money but finding where to reload 9Mobile data. They have made real efforts, using their AI systems, to reduce costs of browsing: “Opera users in Africa will get fully personalised and localised content delivered to their browser, the entry point for their internet experience while the data usage can be reduced up to 90%”. It may not be 90%, but it is significant reduction..

The Africa’s Internet

Opera wants to become the Internet for Africa with its bold vision of doing many things in its browser: media publishing, content aggregation, and financial services. It plans to invest $100 million to deepen those services by turning Opera into an ecosystem of apps where many things can happen, at browser level.

Opera, the developer of the most popular mobile browser in Africa, … announced its plan to invest $100 million USD (30 billion Nigerian nairas) over the next two years to facilitate the growth of African digital economy. The company will use the investment to speed up internet adoption in Africa and strengthen the internet ecosystem with local partners.

Africa is on its way to transform itself into digital continent with the rapid adoption of mobile internet. For the past five years, the Opera Mini browser has been a key facilitator in bringing more than half of Africa’s internet population online by featuring tools for lowering data costs. Recently, the company celebrated 100 million monthly users in Africa and is now focusing on making the next generation of web browsers to cater the needs of African internet users.

[…]

“We aim to invest heavily in Africa, to build a local platform and grow with the local business partners. This platform will expand the user base for content providers, e-commerce businesses, operators, OEM’s and others to strengthen the African internet ecosystem.”

If you read that press release carefully, you will see that Opera wants to build solutions which can help content providers, e-commerce businesses, OEMs and other ecosystem participants. The implication is that it wants to abstract away many things we do online (i.e. on websites) like payments and move them into its browser. Imagine a scenario where your browser becomes your payment platform. In other words, the Opera browser offers a payment layer to enable payment. In other words, all that you do via PayPal, Paystack and Flutterwave can be executed right on the browser with no need of going further into the web.
I do not think that antitrust busters will allow Google to do that on Chrome. But I do know that Opera is out of the global radar, being small, and can offer those services. This means that Opera can become the “internet for Africa” as its ecosystems will offer many services you will expect on the web, without leaving it. Since I installed it, I like to read headlines news from the browser even when outside Africa. I do not even have to visit any website, because Opera delivers all at its browser level.

The Industry Dislocation

Opera’s strategy is brilliant for the firm, but it will put it in the crosshairs of many local companies. As more Africans use Opera, most local companies can experience erosion in their brands. Yet, it is also possible that Opera can move in the path of aggregation where it can make it easier to find leading payment, ecommerce and other partners through its browser. But no matter what happens, I do expect massive dislocation as Opera becomes a platform with commercial activities happening at the level of browser. It will be very interesting: Opera needs a business model to make money.

[This section is updated] Opera does need that because it has to pay bills. Chrome supports Google’s advertising business. Opera [browser business in Africa] does not believe in ads via the JavaScript but runs content advertisements. It needs to find a way to monetize that browser business [it could be already making money, in Africa, depending on agreements with partners it shows their contents on its homepage], and having an ecosystem is one of the paths. It hosts contents, aggregates contents and certainly has the pieces to make money. It runs some adverts for banks, but those are content adverts different from the typical JavaScript ads like the ones you see via Google AdSence. Once you exit Opera homepage, it blocks all other ads for products like Opera Mini. In other words, it prevents you from seeing ads outside the contents ads it is showing on its homepage.

All Together

Opera is evolving as a platform with capabilities to abstract away most internet services at the level of its browser. That is a solid business model, and that is exciting. My thinking is that Opera will increasingly make it easier for the bulk of its customer base to do more on its platform, thereby saving them more money in visiting the main Internet. Technically, your Internet can end in Opera because it will allow you do most things there. Simply, Opera is transmuting as an aggregator.

With its plan of investing $100 million in Africa, mainly in South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria, watch out for services that will unlock new levels of experiences and engagements for the users of Opera. Those services will be personalized and customized. And using them while saving broadband costs will ensure Opera stays relevant in Africa. Then, in 2022, Google or Apple will buy Opera.

Google will like it to disappear to avoid loss of revenue through advertising. The 350 million users of Opera who do not watch adverts are not good friends to Google. For Apple, it needs new users for services like shows and movies it plans to unveil. Those services will need a developing region appeal to be profitable. I do think Opera will be acquired within five years.