DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 7697

Why You Must Ensure Advertisers Do Not Get Your Emotions Of Buy

0

Marketing is a great profession. The bests in the field understand how to present their product offerings to customers to get them buying. Irrespective of the quality of the product or service, a very poor marketing campaign could be very disastrous. This field is full of psychology. They focus on mastering the behavior of man under his limited scarce resources. He must make choices and bring that concept of opportunity cost in action; and making sure your product wins in this choice makes you a start marketer.

 

The best marketing strategy begins with pricing. Pricing is such a very huge aspect of microeconomics and the all important topic of demand and supply. Depending on products and markets, a manufacturer could go with price-based pricing or cost-based pricing. In most cases, I prefer the former as the seller could win big provided he understands the potential customers very well.

 

Under price-basing pricing, you are examining the ability of the customer to pay. So, it opens the door to super high profits or possible losses just to keep your market share. For instance, you want to introduce a new brand in a market and your feasibility studies show that your customers cannot pay more than a certain amount that will enable you to break even. Yet, you move ahead because presence in that market provides future prospects for growth and profitability.

 

Pharmaceutical companies do that a lot when they are moving into developing economies. The prices they ask for their products are aligned with the power of the patients to pay than what the products cost them. Through that, they increase market share as more patients buy their products. This implies that a drug that sells $200 in Florida could be sold for $1 in Botswana by the same company. Simply, it is using the purchasing power of the market to drive the marketing dynamics.

 

The other one- cost based pricing- looks at setting price that will give you a certain profit level. You look at your fixed and variable costs and based on those arrive on the price of the product. This method may not be ideal in most cases and I think it is weaker strategy. Marketing is a behavioral science and having rigidity could hurt you in the market. It is better to know your break even point and possibly ascertain if you can take advantage of the purchasing power of your customers.

 

In a commodity market where differentiation is very limited, cost-based pricing could win. Irrespective of your pricing technique, it is vital you know your production cost before you map how to market your products. Some markets command great mark-ups while some do not. If your product is elastic, you must approach the market understanding the behavior of price to your customers.

 

Similarly, for high entry barrier markets like pharmaceuticals, cost-based pricing will never win. The products are so important that consumers rarely have choices than to buy within the industry. That is why the Big Pharma could make profits in excess of 2000%.

 

Now, how do the marketers get you into the business of buying? They work your brain. Look at it this way with basic examples. You visit a grocery store and see a big markdown in price; say 60% off. The reality is that there may not be a markdown. The seller simply understands that you will think of a bargain when you see big markdowns and then open your wallets.

 

In short the propensity to pay $20 for a trouser after the original price was marked down by 80% is higher than paying $18 for a very similar trouser without a markdown. The latter does not communicate winning in our brain, while the former gives a feeling of success and win. But in reality, you lost, financially, in the former by $2. Have you ever wondered why a grocer is stocking a product for the first time and immediately marking it down by 30%? They also try to give a relative time stamped pricing like “was $200, now $50” or they yanked a product very high, mark it down immediately and use that old price to give an impression that price was cut.

 

That brings another point where some airlines will tell you that bags could be transported free and then charge high ticket fees to cover that cost of bag. Others will charge for bags, but their ticket fees are lower. Which one is better? It depends if you carry checked bags when you travel. The one that charges for bags could be more efficient as the price is not shared by all customers. So if you carry checked bag, you pay for it, otherwise, no worries. The other one distributes and subsidies the costs of the bags for those that carry bags and then make ticket fees more expensive for those that don’t. However, you may be stuck with the theme that your bags were not paid in one without realizing that your ticket fee was higher.

 

Psychology of pricing is in everything we do. Government wants out taxes to be withheld and then at the end of the year, they send us tax refunds. Though this is really a very inefficient system to us the payers since the government is not paying interest on the money we have “loaned” them, we tend to think we made a gain. Simply, any time you get a tax refund, it means you have not invested your money very well. You gave government free loan accumulated over one year; that money might have yielded some interests if invested.

 

But what can you do? Nothing, because it is government and in most cases, it can be designed to look like government just did you a great deal while in reality they used your money for free and not paying any interest.

 

Pricing is very important and making customers to feel like winners is very important. If you know how to do that, you will have a great career. That is why understanding your customer matters. So, if you think it is easy to be a marketing director, try to become a psychologist first as those price tags you see in Wal-Mart, Giants, Sears, etc are not just the works of accountants; many things are into them

 

Reasons Why Africa Needs Advanced Microfabrication Foundry And Research Lab

0

In our proposal, we have made the case that without a viable microelectronics industry, the continent of Africa will continue to be a technology consumer. To change that we must develop technology and build the foundations for prosperity. One way of doing this is by establishing an advanced technology center.

 

So  we present the reasons why the continent must establish an institute which we have named a  Microelectronics Training and Research Institute (MTRI). African Union in its efforts to help the continent get ready for unification must focus on enabling technology readiness. This center can be built across regions and countries will share them due to cost issues. Again, here are the reasons why we need an MTRI in selected African regions located in universities.

  • MTRI program will promote any African university’s stature as a leader in creating and disseminating new knowledge, and in the application of new knowledge
  •  MTRI program will fulfill the need for cross-disciplinary training of students, and enhance recruitment with a program that will be in increasing demand. This has a major component of attracting not just male students, but female students to S&T.
  •  MTRI program will drive a vibrant collaboration between African schools and their foreign partners. This will enable any African school shape its program with more market relevance.
  •  The MTRI program will offer new field of research and application which will create increased opportunities for employment and economic growth in the nation.
  •  We are optimistic that having MTRI will enable us African schools request funding for researches from HP, Intel, AMD, Motorola and other semiconductor firms presently selling their products in Africa’s market. Our lack of infrastructure has undermined our capacity to obtain these grants.
  •  MTRI will enable us hire and retain qualified Africans and other global experts to conduct researches and teach in our university. Our present effort of attracting some of our high-achieving alumni will be easier. This has the potential of improving the quality of our students and boosting Africa’s technical competitiveness.
  •  MTRI will enable any African university to bring world-class scholars in contacts with our students through video teleconferencing like Cisco Telepresense.  Telepresence refers to a set of technologies which allow a person to feel as if they were present, to give the appearance that they were present, or to have an effect, at a location other than their true location [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepresence].
  • It will help selected university have a world-class multimedia computing center, which will enable our staff, and students collaborate with other researchers globally through web technologies. The Telepresence technologies will be stationed locally and our students can take lectures/lab works administered by experts separated by distance in this center.
  •  Though African schools have programs on microelectronics and general semiconductor areas, the lacks of the right mix of people, processes and tools have affected our capacities to develop a world-class program. The necessary Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools, the microcontroller development platforms, test and measurement systems are not available. Also, though not obvious, we have missed opportunities to hire some doctorate graduates that studied in some prestigious US universities simply because we do not have the learning and teaching environment they requested to come on board. Consequently, some emerging areas of engineering have been suspended because of the lack of the right teaching and learning environments.

Justifications For Establishing An African Advanced Technology Institute

0

Information and communication technology (ICT) is facilitating the process of socio-economic development in Africa. It has offered new ways of exchanging information, and transacting businesses, efficiently and cheaply. It has also changed the dynamic natures of financial, entertainment and communication industries and provided fluidic means of using the human and institutional capabilities of the continent in both the public and private sectors.

 

Increasingly, ICT is rapidly moving Africa towards knowledge-based economic structures and information societies, comprising networks of individuals, firms and nations that are linked electronically and in interdependent global relationships. This remarkable success of ICT in Africa and indeed globally since the dawn of the 20th century has been enabled by the phenomenal growth of the microelectronics technology. Microelectronics is the engine that drives the information age and without its constant evolution, ICT cannot advance. Unfortunately, the microelectronics industry does not have presence in Africa despite a hugely expanding ICT sector.

 

Over the years, many African schools have developed and taught courses on microelectronics. However, lack of institutional capabilities, like excellent facilities, teaching and learning environments have stalled its capacity to offer practical and relevant skills needed by its students to facilitate the diffusion of microelectronics technology from bottom-up approach in Africa. At present, no sub-Sahara African university or institution has a world-class microelectronics teaching and learning environments. We understand the challenge which has affected Africa’s capacity to develop world-class programs on microelectronics- the lack of adequate funding which partly affected the abilities to have the right mix of people, processes and tools.

 

Though we teach the techniques in African schools, the students never get to practice doing them. Poor teaching and learning environments have undermined the abilities of university teachers to develop some programs with potentials to make the students technology creators, and not just technology consumers. Across the globe, a paradigm is evolving; it is educating 360- i.e. educating from design specification to product market introduction. It is Hear it, See it, Touch it and Do it’. This is what we envisage in all the schools and we are optimistic that availability of excellent learning environment will enable us attract African experts abroad to join local schools towards developing the industry and building Africa.

 

Further, because of the rapidly-growing Africa’s telecommunication sector and the identification of microelectronics as a major research thrust area to help develop Made-in-Africa’s infrastructure, the stage is set for any African university and its partners to develop one of the model microelectronics programs in the continent. This Made-in-Africa’s products will cover the full spectrum of products, such as cell phones, microprocessors, cameras, etc.

The Big Threat – Using SMS To ShutDown Your Enemy Phone

0

 

The world has marveled at the security threats posed by the smartphones. Many agencies of governments in the US do not even approve the use of some of these devices for official activities. Obama cannot use his Blackberry because of threats. Recently, to the joy of Research in Motion, Playbook was approved as the only tablet in the US to be certified for use by government agencies. They found out that it has a good security compared with the competition.

 

Yet, it is not only the smartphones that are at threats. They just figured out that the “feature phones” – the less glamorous ones are also not excluded. They can be compromised with ease. The fact is that most of these features phones have web browsing, MP3 players and many other features which the cheapest Nokia voice only phones do not have. And of course the feature phones are not as sophisticated as the most advanced smartphones. They seat between the common cheap phones and the complex smartphones.

 

One guy, named Collin Mulliner, who is showing the world how insecure some of these gadgets are have figured out that features phones can easily be compromised. Mulliner was the guy that humiliated Apple when in 2009 in the BlackHat Security Conference demonstrated an SMS based attack on the iPhone. Apple fixed the hole immediately.

 

Now, with his student Nico Golde, they can knock your phone out of network just by SMS. They can even crash the phone completely. How? Special software which  send SMS-like message to the phone and which makes the device to disconnect from the network. In cases where they want to go far, they can shutdown the phone via those SMS messages.

 

Now, next time you hold those gizmos, be careful. Someone can attack them from Germany, specifically Technical University  Berlin if he sends SMS to the wrong phone number.

 

How Embedded Systems And Innovation Shaped German Economy. What Africa Can Learn And Do.

0

 

Editor’s Note: In a bid to develop the right growth model for Nigeria and Africa, the author examines some selected emerging and developed economies. Today, he takes a look at the Germany economy .

 

The Germany Economy

 

“The financial and economic crisis is presenting Germany with enormous challenges. To emerge from this crisis even stronger than before, we will have to make immense joint efforts. In addition to managing the crisis in the short term, we will have to commit ourselves to a path of growth and economic success. Investments in education, science and research are the right way to make such a commitment” (BMBF, 2009).

 

This was the foreword presented by Prof. Dr. Annette Schavan, a member of the German Bundestag, Federal Minister of Education and Research on the publication titled “Research and Innovation for Germany, Results and Outlook” in the year 2009. Research and innovation are indispensable for highly developed, resources-poor countries such as Germany. Innovative goods and services keep the economy moving, creating jobs and high incomes. Production, value creation and employment grow far more strongly in highly innovative companies than they do in weakly innovative ones. The prosperity of the country, and of its citizens, depends on research and innovation, as does the country’s ability to provide for its citizens’ futures and their quality of life (BMBF, 2009).

 

In Germany, the proportion of value-added products and services based on research is higher than in any other industrialized country (BMBF, 2010). The export of technological goods makes up one fifth of the country’s economic output. Hence, research and development are very important to the economic power and economic growth in Germany (BMBF, 2010). Since 2005, the German central government expenditure on research has risen by 21 percent; private sector investment in research has increased by 19 percent (BMBF, 2010). This puts Germany in the leading group among European countries (BMBF, 2010). They have also steadily increased the number of scientific publications and patents.

 

The Federal Report on Research and Innovation underlines the key findings of the report on research, innovations and technological performance (Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovationen und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit) compiled by the Expert Commission on Research and Innovation (Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation). The report showed that Germany has a powerful and internationally recognised scientific system and a high proportion of innovative enterprises (BMBF, 2010).

 

Worldwide, research and innovation systems are in a process of strong growth and transformation hence global expenditure on research and development (R&D) has doubled since 1997(BMBF, 2010). In total, more than 5.7 million people work in research and development compared to just below four million in 1995 (BMBF, 2010). Many industrial and emerging countries are increasingly investing in education, research and innovation. For Germany, it is a question of asserting itself in this competitive environment with the appropriate emphasis. The German economy needs new prospects for growth (BMBF, 2010). In a leading industrial nation like Germany, research and development activities based on the latest findings from research and development in particular form an essential basis for new and sustainable growth. New, because it is based on the latest findings from research and development and sustainable because it is derived from proactive and courageous decisions for promising products, processes and services.  

 

In recent years, the German Federal Government has moved research and innovation closer to the core of its growth policy. It has consistently given priority to education, research and innovation. The German Federal Government’s research and innovation policy measures were re-initiated and bundled together to form the High-Tech Strategy (BMBF, 2010). The central and local government reform initiatives the Excellence Initiative (Exzellenzinitiative), the Higher Education Pact (Hochschulpakt) and the Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (Pakt für Forschung und Innovation) have strengthened the performance capability of the German science system and made Germany even more attractive as a scientific location (BMBF, 2010). This High-Tech Strategy, the reform initiatives and the strategy for the internationalization of science and research complement each other perfectly.

 

The following data and facts show that the chosen path is the correct one (BMBF, 2010; BMBF, 2009):

 

  • In 2007, absolute expenditure on R&D in Germany was higher than in any other country in Europe. Compared internationally, only the USA, Japan and China spent more on R&D.
  • According to preliminary calculations by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), expenditure on R&D as a percentage of GDP rose to about 2.64% in 2008. This is the highest level since German reunification and a further step towards the 3% targeted of the Lisbon Strategy.
  • In absolute terms, total expenditure on R&D (government, industry and others) between 2005 and 2007 increased from 55.7 billion euros to 61.5 billion euros. This corresponds to an increase of approximately 10%. A further increase to over 65 billion euros was expected in 2008.
  • Central government expenditure on R&D increased from 9 billion euros in 2005 to 10.9 billion euros in 2008, a rise of around 21%. In 2009, central government expenditure on R&D increased further to 12.1 billion euros (target), a rise to 12.7 billion euros is planned for 2010.
  • Despite the uncertainty caused by the financial and economic crisis in 2008, German companies have increased internal expenditure on R&D, compared to the previous year, by 7% (to 46.1 billion euros). As a result, enterprises in Germany increased their annual R&D investments between 2005 and 2008 by around 19% (7.4 billion euros). Increases were recorded by large, small and medium-sized enterprises.
  • Never before have so many people in Germany been employed in R&D: in 2008, the number of researchers, laboratory technicians and engineers employed in industry rose to 333, 000 (measured in full-time equivalents). Compared to 2005, this is an increase of almost 30 000 people.
  • The proportion of research-intensive products and services providing added value is more than 45% in Germany higher than in any other industrialized country. The USA, which was ahead in 2000, has now been surpassed. The German economy is excellently positioned in the global technology markets. The creativity and technological performance of those companies impressively demonstrates how new ideas can open up future markets and top international positions.
  • Statistics have proven that, by the end of 2008, there was a positive innovation climate: around 31% of companies can trace their innovation behavior back to central government’s improved research and innovation policies.

 

The sum total of all the scientific, economic and political initiatives has had considerable impact: Germany has taken significant steps forward in research, development and innovation, as confirmed by the German Council of Economic Expertsand the Expert Commission on Research and Innovation (BMBF, 2010).

 

Key technologies, such as biotechnology and nanotechnology, optical technologies, microsystem, materials and production technologies, aeronautics technology, as well as information and communication technology (which all depend on embedded system designs) are the drivers of innovation and form the foundation for new products, processes and services (BMBF, 2010). They are essential in solving global challenges in the demand fields. Its benefits will depend critically on how successfully they can be converted into industrial applications. In Germany, key technologies’ funding will therefore focus more on fields of application.

 

P.S. The references are being auto-populated and we will update.