DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 81

Bitcoin Slips Below $70K as Iran War Uncertainty Keeps Crypto Investors on Edge

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Bitcoin has fallen back below the critical $70,000 level as geopolitical tensions linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran continue to make investors cautious about riskier assets such as cryptocurrencies.

The world’s largest cryptocurrency briefly climbed above $70,000 on Tuesday after former U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that the war could end soon. Trump stated that the conflict with Iran “could be over pretty quickly,” while defending the military campaign and outlining Washington’s objectives in the confrontation.

His remarks helped calm markets temporarily. According to Deutsche Bank strategist Jim Reid, the comments eased concerns about a prolonged conflict that could trigger a sustained energy shock and disrupt global financial markets.

Despite the brief rebound, Bitcoin failed to hold the psychological level and was trading at $69,922, down about 0.7% over the past 24 hours, according to CoinDesk data. Other major cryptocurrencies also declined, with Ethereum falling 1.4% and XRP slipping 0.4%.

Bitcoin Trading in a Tight Range

Following the volatility seen in February, Bitcoin has entered a consolidation phase over the past week, trading within a range of $65,962 to $73,669. Even with the recent upward movement, the cryptocurrency remains about 46% below its October 2025 all-time high of $127,080.

Market participants are closely watching the $70,000 level, which has become a key technical threshold. Traders are largely waiting for a decisive breakout or breakdown before taking stronger positions.

Crypto trader Cryptorphic noted that the market structure remains largely unchanged, with Bitcoin still consolidating within its current range.

“Not much has changed; price is still consolidating inside the range,” the trader said in a post on X. “The weekly candle closed bearish, and overall the structure still leans sideways unless we get a clear breakout or breakdown.”

Analyst Mark Cullen also highlighted the importance of the $70,000 level. According to him, Bitcoin needs to reclaim and maintain this level as support before attempting another upward move.

“$70K is critical. Bitcoin needs to get back above and hold it for another attempt at a range breakout. If that happens, the high $70,000 or even the low $80,000 could come into play before the end of the month,” Cullen said.

While many traders are watching for a potential breakout, some prominent figures in the crypto industry are advising caution. Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and chief investment officer of Maelstrom, recently explained why he is currently staying on the sidelines despite his long-term bullish outlook for Bitcoin.

Speaking on the CoinStories podcast, Hayes said he would prefer to wait for clearer signals from global monetary policy before buying the asset. “If I had $1 to invest right now, would I be putting it into Bitcoin? I would wait,” Hayes said.

He believes that escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, could eventually force central banks especially the U.S. Federal Reserve to inject more liquidity into the global financial system to support government spending.

According to Hayes, such liquidity expansions have historically fueled major Bitcoin rallies. As a result, he sees the real buying opportunity emerging when central banks begin printing money again.

He also warned that geopolitical stress and macroeconomic uncertainty could trigger broader sell-offs in both traditional financial markets and cryptocurrencies. In a risk-off scenario, Bitcoin could briefly drop below the $60,000 level as investors move toward safer assets.

Additionally, Bitcoin funding rates across exchanges have recently turned sharply negative, indicating growing demand for short positions. This suggests that many traders are positioning for further downside as fears of an escalating war continue to weigh on sentiment.

Outlook

Looking ahead, Bitcoin’s short-term trajectory will likely depend on both geopolitical developments and macroeconomic policy signals. If tensions in the Middle East ease and Bitcoin manages to reclaim the $70,000 level as support, analysts believe the cryptocurrency could attempt another push toward the $80,000 range before the end of March.

However, continued geopolitical uncertainty or tightening financial conditions could push the market into deeper consolidation or even trigger a decline toward the $60,000 level or lower.

Implications of the Potential Joint Release of Strategic Oil Reserves by G7 Countries

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

G7 countries are actively considering a joint release of emergency oil reserves also known as strategic petroleum reserves.

This stems from a sharp surge in global oil prices—crude has spiked above $100 per barrel; peaking near $120 earlier before pulling back somewhat, driven by the ongoing war involving the US, Israel, and Iran, which has disrupted supplies in the Gulf region including potential impacts on the Strait of Hormuz.

G7 finance ministers held an emergency virtual meeting today to discuss the option. The talks are coordinated with the International Energy Agency (IEA) and its executive director, Fatih Birol. At least three G7 members, including the United States, have expressed support for a coordinated release.

Around 300 million to 400 million barrels roughly 25-35% of the IEA’s collective ~1.2 billion barrels in reserves held by its 32 members. This would be one of the largest such actions in history if approved, exceeding the 2022 release after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. France has confirmed the use of strategic reserves is “an option being considered,” per officials including President Emmanuel Macron.

The goal is to stabilize markets, curb inflation risks from high energy costs, and mitigate supply shocks without fully resolving underlying geopolitical issues. Oil prices have already eased somewhat; Brent around $102-105 in some reports on news of the discussions alone, showing market sensitivity to potential intervention.

This would involve IEA-coordinated action among member nations which include all G7 countries: US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Japan—plus others. The potential joint release of strategic oil reserves by G7 countries potentially 300–400 million barrels, or about 25–35% of the IEA’s collective ~1.2 billion barrels in emergency stocks — would aim to counteract the sharp oil price surge triggered by the escalating US-Israeli war with Iran, including disruptions in the Gulf region and partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

This is a fast-moving situation as of March 9, 2026 with the emergency G7 finance ministers’ virtual meeting underway or recently concluded, so outcomes depend on whether a decision is reached and implemented quickly. Oil prices have pulled back significantly from intraday highs due to the mere discussion and prospect of intervention.

Brent crude spiked as much as 25–29% earlier today, peaking near $119–120 per barrel highest since mid-2022. It has since retreated to around $102–107 per barrel in various reports still up ~15% on the day but well off peaks. WTI crude followed a similar pattern, easing from highs near $114–118 to around $102–104.

This demonstrates high market sensitivity: News of the G7/IEA talks alone provided temporary relief by signaling potential increased supply, curbing panic buying. A release of this scale would flood the market with emergency supply, aiming to offset Gulf disruptions and producer cuts.

It could cap or reduce prices in the near term, preventing a sustained spike above $100–120. High oil drives up fuel, transport, and goods costs globally. Curbing the surge would help limit broader inflationary pressures, especially in energy-importing economies. This reduces risks to consumer spending, business costs, and central bank rate decisions.

Lower energy costs support growth, ease stock market slumps, and avoid a deeper recession risk from prolonged high prices. It provides breathing room for governments facing domestic cost-of-living concerns. Analysts note this is a “one-time” buffer — it doesn’t fix underlying supply issues.

Prices could rebound if disruptions persist, and it might delay market adjustment to a new “geopolitical risk premium” potentially adding $4–10/bbl long-term. Without intervention, sustained high prices threaten growth, higher inflation, and reduced central bank flexibility.

A successful release would blunt these, though experts warn it’s “limited” against major prolonged disruptions. This would mark the first major IEA-coordinated action since 2022, reinforcing collective response mechanisms but depleting reserves potentially leaving less buffer for future crises.

Crypto and risk assets have shown some relief from the oil pullback, as lower energy/inflation fears support sentiment. No final decision has been publicly confirmed yet — reports indicate strong support at least from the US and two others, but others are still assessing. The meeting’s outcome could shift prices further today. If no action follows, volatility might return quickly given the war’s unpredictability.

Equities Rebound As Oil Prices Experience Volatility in Response to Comments from President Donald Trump

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Equities have rebounded sharply, while oil prices experienced extreme volatility—surging dramatically before plunging—in response to comments from President Donald Trump signaling that the ongoing U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran could end “very soon” or is already “very complete.”

This comes amid a roughly 10-day-old war that has disrupted Middle East energy supplies, particularly through threats around the Strait of Hormuz, driving initial market fears of prolonged disruptions and inflation.

Stock markets reversed early losses to close higher on March 9 (U.S. session), with gains carrying into Asian and European trading on March 10. The S&P 500 rose ~0.8%, Nasdaq surged ~1.3%, and Dow gained ~0.6% after erasing intraday declines tied to oil spikes.

European shares like STOXX 600 up ~1.5%, Asian indices such as KOSPI, Nikkel leading gains on de-escalation hopes, and Gulf equities mostly higher. Oil prices saw wild swings: Crude initially spiked over 30%; WTI reaching highs near $119–$120/barrel overnight and early Monday, the highest since 2022 fueled by supply disruption fears.

Prices then collapsed sharply—erasing much or all of the surge—falling to around $85–$91/barrel (WTI ~$85–$90, Brent ~$90–$91) after Trump’s remarks eased concerns.This pullback reflects investor relief that a quick resolution could restore flows, though volatility persists with mixed signal; Iran’s defiant stance and new hardline leadership.

Trump’s comments—reported in interviews and statements—suggested the conflict is advancing faster than his initial 4–5 week estimate, describing it as potentially short-lived while warning of escalation if Iran blocks oil routes. He also floated ideas like U.S. naval escorts for tankers and possible sanctions relief elsewhere to stabilize energy markets.

Analysts note this de-escalation narrative has soothed nerves, offsetting inflation worries from high energy costs, though risks remain; Iran’s rejection of quick surrender, ongoing threats, and potential for shocks. Markets are headline-driven and could swing again on new developments from Tehran or Washington.

Gold prices have shown resilience and upward momentum following President Donald Trump’s hints at de-escalation in the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, contrasting with the sharp volatility seen in oil markets. While gold typically surges as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical escalations (as it did earlier in the conflict, climbing toward record highs above $5,400/oz amid strikes and supply fears), the de-escalation signals have eased some immediate risk premiums.

However, prices have not collapsed like oil—instead, they’ve rebounded modestly, supported by a weaker U.S. dollar, lingering inflation concerns from recent energy spikes, and broader structural bullish factors. Spot gold traded in a range around $5,130–$5,200+ per ounce, with gains of ~0.9–1.7% in recent sessions.

Early Asian and European trading saw advances, wiping out prior-session dips. Prices hovered near $5,140–$5,172 in some reports, with intraday pushes toward $5,180–$5,200 after Trump’s comments. This reflects a rebound from Monday’s pullback; where gold dipped amid dollar strength and initial de-escalation optimism, but remains rangebound in the $5,000–$5,200 zone.

Silver outperformed, surging nearly 5–6% in some sessions to around $89/oz highlighting broader precious metals strength. U.S. gold futures showed similar patterns, with March contracts around $5,100–$5,170. Trump’s remarks; describing the war as “very complete” and likely to end “very soon” boosted risk appetite overall, pressuring oil sharply lower and lifting equities.

For gold, this reduced acute safe-haven buying but was offset by: A softer U.S. dollar down ~0.4–0.5%, making gold more attractive to non-dollar holders. Persistent inflation worries from the prior oil surge even as prices fell back. Iran’s defiant stance, potential for renewed threats around the Strait of Hormuz, and mixed signals mean the conflict isn’t fully resolved.

Analysts note gold’s response has been “unexpectedly firm” compared to typical de-escalation sell-offs, as the metal benefits from both geopolitical tail risks and non-geopolitical drivers. Broader forecasts remain bullish, with some eyeing $5,500+ or higher by year-end if uncertainties linger.

Markets remain headline-sensitive—fresh developments from Tehran, Washington, or military fronts could trigger renewed swings. Overall, gold’s rebound underscores its role as a hedge in this volatile environment, even as de-escalation hopes provide short-term relief.

MicroStrategy and BitMine Immersion Recent Purchases Push Bitcoin and Ethereum Uptrend 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, ticker MSTR, has made another significant Bitcoin acquisition, purchasing 17,994 BTC for approximately $1.28 billion between March 2 and March 8, 2026.

This marks one of the company’s largest single purchases in recent months, with an average price of about $70,946 per Bitcoin. This brings Strategy’s total holdings to 738,731 BTC, acquired at an aggregate cost of roughly $56.04 billion (average price ~$75,862 per BTC).

The purchase was funded through proceeds from its at-the-market (ATM) equity sales program, including common stock and preferred shares. Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman, highlighted this as the company’s 101st Bitcoin purchase, signaling the start of a “second century” in its accumulation strategy.

The move comes amid Bitcoin rebounding toward $70,000+, reflecting continued corporate confidence in BTC as a treasury asset. In parallel, BitMine Immersion Technologies (ticker BMNR), the largest corporate holder of Ethereum, announced it acquired 60,976 ETH last week its biggest weekly purchase of 2026 so far.

This boosts its total holdings to 4,534,563–4.535 million ETH, representing about 3.76% of Ethereum’s circulating supply. The addition pushes BitMine’s overall crypto and cash assets to around $10.3 billion, with a significant portion ~3.04 million ETH staked, generating estimated annualized revenue of $174 million.

The company is pursuing its “Alchemy of 5%” goal to control 5% of ETH supply, and Chairman Tom Lee has expressed optimism that the “mini crypto winter” may be ending, citing improving market signals. These twin announcements from two major corporate treasuries—one heavily Bitcoin-focused (Strategy) and the other Ethereum-focused (BitMine)—underscore ongoing institutional accumulation in major cryptocurrencies despite market volatility.

Such moves often bolster sentiment and can influence price dynamics for BTC and ETH. The dual announcements from Strategy (MSTR) and BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) represent significant institutional accumulation in the crypto space amid a volatile market recovering from a “mini crypto winter.”

Strategy’s $1.28 billion purchase of 17,994 BTC at ~$70,946 average helped fuel BTC’s rebound above $70,000. This large buy contributed to positive momentum, with BTC testing highs near $72,000 in recent sessions amid mixed ETF inflows ($167M net for BTC ETFs in the latest week) and reduced geopolitical risk premiums.

Corporate buying like this often acts as a sentiment booster and supply absorber, supporting stabilization or upside in the $70K–$75K range. However, market reaction to the news itself was relatively muted (MSTR shares up modestly ~0.2–2% in pre/post-market), reflecting expectations of ongoing accumulation rather than surprise.

BitMine’s 60,976 ETH acquisition added to ETH’s holdings push, coinciding with ETH trading around $2,000–$2,500 levels. This reinforced bullish signals from Tom Lee, who declared the “mini crypto winter” nearing its end due to improving fundamentals like high on-chain activity.

ETH saw some share price lift for BMNR (7–10% in related sessions historically), though broader price impact remains tied to staking yields ~$174M annualized from ~3M staked ETH and overall market recovery. These moves highlight corporate demand providing a floor during dips, countering volatility from macro factors.

Both companies signal strong conviction: Strategy marks its “second century” of BTC buys, while BitMine advances toward its “Alchemy of 5%” ETH goal now ~3.76% of supply at 4.535M ETH. This twin strategy—one BTC-focused and one ETH-focused—underscores diversification in corporate treasuries.

It bolsters overall crypto sentiment, showing institutions view major assets as strategic reserves despite paper losses. Corporate treasuries (DATCos) are maturing in 2026, with accumulation shifting toward revenue generation (staking for ETH, potential lending/collateral uses for BTC). This reduces pure speculation risks and attracts more traditional finance interest.

Funded via ATM equity/preferred sales, this supports continued BTC yield but introduces dilution risk for shareholders. MSTR acts as a high-beta BTC proxy, so rallies in BTC amplify gains and vice versa in drawdowns. The buy reinforces its leadership but highlights leverage to BTC volatility.

BitMine (BMNR): Staking generates meaningful revenue ~$174M annualized, differentiating it from pure holders and providing cash flow to fund further buys or operations. This could stabilize BMNR’s valuation relative to NAV, though it’s still highly correlated to ETH price.

Prolonged crypto downturns could pressure equity issuance, force sales, or trigger consolidation among treasury firms. These buys lock away meaningful portions of circulating supply creating upward pressure over time via reduced liquidity—especially with ETF inflows and potential sovereign adoption.

2026 sees crypto treasuries as a growing category (hundreds of firms, $100B+ in holdings), with ETH emerging as a viable alternative to BTC due to yield. This could accelerate institutional infrastructure (custody, collateral use) and normalize digital assets on corporate balance sheets.

These purchases act as bullish catalysts in a consolidating market, reinforcing crypto’s role as a corporate asset class while highlighting risks tied to price dependency and capital raises. If BTC/ETH sustain rebounds aided by these inflows, it could catalyze broader upside; otherwise, dilution concerns may cap enthusiasm.

USDC Flipped USDT in Onchain Transfer Volume Despite Tether’s Larger Market Capitalization

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

USDC issued by Circle has recently flipped USDT (Tether) in terms of on-chain transfer volume also referred to as transaction or transfer activity, marking a significant shift in stablecoin usage despite USDT maintaining a larger market capitalization.

Total stablecoin transfer volume reached a record $1.8 trillion in February, the highest monthly figure on record, according to blockchain analytics firm Allium. USDC accounted for approximately 70% of this volume, with transfers totaling about $1.26 trillion. USDT handled roughly $514 billion — less than half of USDC’s figure.

This isn’t a one-off: Analysts including Simon Dedic of Moonrock Capital note that USDC has consistently outperformed USDT in monthly transfer volume over recent months, even with a smaller circulating supply. This metric reflects actual on-chain movement and usage; payments, DeFi, settlements, and cross-chain activity, where each USDC dollar circulates more frequently (“higher velocity”) than USDT.

USDT remains dominant at around $184 billion, while USDC is at about $77-78 billion. USDT holds roughly 58-59% of total stablecoin market share, with the overall stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion.

Earlier data from 2025 via Artemis Analytics showed USDC already leading in annual “organic” transfer volume; $18.3 trillion vs. USDT’s $13.2 trillion, filtering out noise like bots or intra-exchange trades. The surge highlights growing institutional and regulatory preference for USDC while USDT has seen some supply contraction recently.

This development signals rising adoption of stablecoins for real-world utility, coinciding with broader crypto market recovery and increased exchange liquidity. Stablecoin velocity is a key metric that measures how actively a stablecoin is used in the crypto ecosystem, rather than just how much of it exists, its circulating supply or market cap.

It essentially tells us the “turnover rate” or frequency with which each unit of a stablecoin changes hands over a given period, such as a month or year. Higher velocity indicates more real-world utility, frequent transactions, and economic activity, while lower velocity suggests the stablecoin is more often held as a store of value or parked in wallets/exchanges.

The standard formula is:Velocity = Total Transfer Volume (on-chain) ÷ Circulating Supply(or sometimes averaged over a period, like monthly or 30-day moving average). Transfer volume — The total dollar value of on-chain movements (transfers, payments, DeFi interactions, trades, etc.). This comes from blockchain data analytics platforms like Allium, Artemis, Dune, or The Block.

Circulating supply — The total amount of the stablecoin issued and in circulation; ~$77–78 billion for USDC and ~$184 billion for USDT as of early March 2026. This is analogous to the velocity of money in traditional economics (MV = PQ, where velocity V = nominal GDP ÷ money supply), but applied to blockchain transfers.

Stablecoins like USDC and USDT are both pegged to $1, but their usage patterns differ: High velocity ? The same dollar is reused many times in DeFi lending/borrowing loops, frequent trading, cross-chain bridges, payments, or institutional settlements. This shows “higher utility” and more dynamic circulation.

Low velocity ? More “hodling”; holding as a reserve, store of value, or long-term parking on exchanges, leading to less frequent movement. In recent data: Total stablecoin transfer volume hit a record ~$1.8 trillion in a single month. USDC handled ~$1.26 trillion about 70%, despite having a much smaller supply.

USDT handled ~$514 billion. This means USDC’s velocity is significantly higher — each USDC token circulates much more frequently than each USDT token. Analysts describe USDC as having “higher velocity” because it’s heavily used in active DeFi protocols, institutional flows, compliant trading, and real settlements, where dollars turn over rapidly.

USDT, while dominant in market cap and often in retail and trading pairs especially on chains like Tron, tends to see more static holding or slower movement in some contexts. If USDC supply is ~$78 billion and monthly volume is ~$1.26 trillion ? Velocity ? 16 (meaning the average USDC is transferred ~16 times per month).

If USDT supply is ~$184 billion and monthly volume is ~$514 billion ? Velocity ? 2.8 (much lower turnover). Higher velocity doesn’t mean one is “better” overall (USDT still leads in liquidity for many trading pairs and overall adoption), but it signals shifting preferences toward more compliant, transparent stablecoins for active use cases.

1...808182...8,398Page 81 of 8,398

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy