Reliance Worldwide has reaffirmed its unanimous recommendation for shareholders to approve Brookfield’s proposed $2.53 billion acquisition of the Australian plumbing supplies manufacturer after no competing offer emerged during a designated period for attracting alternative bidders.
The company said on Monday that it had engaged extensively with potential buyers during the “go shop” process but received no proposals, leaving Brookfield’s cash offer as the only announced transaction under consideration.
“Whilst there was extensive engagement with potential buyers during the ‘Go Shop’ process, no proposal was received,” Reliance Worldwide said in a statement.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
The development strengthens the position of Brookfield Capital Partners and its affiliates as they seek to acquire all outstanding shares in Reliance Worldwide under a scheme implementation deed agreed in September.
Under the agreement, Brookfield will pay US$3.38 per share in cash, valuing the company at approximately $2.53 billion. Based on the prevailing exchange rate on October 16, the offer was equivalent to about A$4.87 per share.
Reliance Worldwide previously said shareholders would be able to elect to receive payment in either US dollars or Australian dollars if the transaction proceeds and receives the necessary shareholder approval.
The conclusion of the go-shop period removes a key opportunity for Reliance Worldwide to secure a higher bid before moving further towards shareholder consideration of the Brookfield transaction.
The provision, which is unusual in Australian takeover deals, allowed the company to approach other potential acquirers, share due diligence materials and negotiate alternative transaction terms. Such arrangements are designed to give a target company some flexibility to test whether another buyer is willing to offer a higher price or more favorable conditions after an initial agreement has been reached.
Although Reliance Worldwide said it held extensive discussions with potential buyers, none submitted a proposal before the period expired. The absence of a competing bid leaves shareholders without an announced alternative against which to compare Brookfield’s offer.
Following the end of the go-shop period, customary restrictions under the scheme implementation deed have taken effect. These include no-shop, no-talk and no-due-diligence provisions, which generally limit the company’s ability to solicit competing offers, engage with alternative bidders or provide them with confidential information, subject to any exceptions contained in the agreement.
The restrictions represent a shift from the more flexible conditions that applied during the go-shop window. While the company has retained the ability to proceed under the agreed transaction framework, the scope for pursuing competing proposals is now more limited.
Reliance Worldwide’s board has again recommended that shareholders vote in favor of the scheme, provided no superior proposal emerges.
The recommendation indicates that the board continues to support the agreed terms despite the absence of a competing offer. However, the final outcome remains dependent on the transaction satisfying the applicable approval requirements and other conditions set out in the scheme implementation deed.
For shareholders, the key consideration is whether the cash consideration adequately reflects the company’s value and offers an attractive exit compared with retaining exposure to its future operating performance.
A cash acquisition provides shareholders with a defined transaction price, reducing their exposure to subsequent movements in the company’s share price if the deal completes. In exchange, they surrender any potential gains from future earnings growth or a higher market valuation.
The lack of an alternative proposal also means investors have no publicly disclosed rival bid against which to assess the premium or test whether another buyer would be willing to pay more. That does not establish that the agreed price is either above or below the company’s underlying value, but it removes a potential source of competitive pressure on the transaction terms.
Brookfield’s proposed acquisition therefore moves forward without a rival bidder emerging during the designated market-testing period. Reliance Worldwide’s board remains firmly behind the deal, although shareholder approval and the fulfilment of the agreement’s conditions will determine whether the transaction is completed.