On March 6, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a move that converts approximately 200,000 Bitcoin (BTC)—seized by the federal government through criminal and civil forfeiture proceedings—into a national reserve asset. This action, detailed by White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks, positions the U.S. as a leader in digital asset strategy and fulfills Trump’s campaign promise to make America the “crypto capital of the world.”
The reserve begins with an estimated 200,000 BTC, valued at roughly $17.5 billion at current prices (around $87,000 per BTC, per CoinMarketCap data). This figure aligns with estimates from Sacks and blockchain analytics like Arkham, which track U.S. government wallets holding seized crypto. The Bitcoin comes entirely from assets confiscated by agencies like the Department of Justice (e.g., from Silk Road, Bitfinex hacks) over the past decade, ensuring no direct taxpayer cost.
No Sales Policy: The order prohibits selling BTC from the reserve, treating it as a long-term store of value—termed a “digital Fort Knox” by Sacks—reversing prior practices where the U.S. Marshals Service auctioned off about 195,000 BTC for $366 million, missing out on $17 billion in potential value at today’s prices.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
The Treasury and Commerce Departments, led by Secretaries Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, are authorized to develop “budget-neutral” strategies to acquire additional Bitcoin, though no immediate purchases are planned beyond seized assets. A full accounting of federal crypto holdings is required, addressing the lack of prior comprehensive audits.
U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile: Alongside the Bitcoin Reserve, the order creates a separate stockpile for other seized cryptocurrencies (e.g., ETH, XRP, Solana, Cardano), though these are not part of the BTC-focused reserve. Trump had earlier floated including these assets in a broader “Crypto Strategic Reserve,” spiking their prices on March 2, but the final order prioritizes Bitcoin alone for the strategic reserve.
Bitcoin dipped nearly 5% to $85,000 shortly after the announcement—possibly due to disappointment over no new purchases—before stabilizing at $88,000 by late March 6, per posts on X and CoinGecko data. Other crypto prices (ETH, XRP, SOL, ADA) also fell 4-8%, reflecting tempered expectations. This marks a departure from the Biden administration’s enforcement-driven crypto stance, aligning with Trump’s pro-crypto pivot since his 2024 campaign, where he received significant industry backing (e.g., $25 million from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and others).
Unlike New York’s Bill A06515 (criminalizing crypto fraud) or Coinbase’s SEC hurdles with tokenized COIN, this order avoids securities classification debates by treating seized BTC as a reserve asset, not an investment vehicle. Wyoming’s crypto-friendly laws (e.g., BioNexus’s Ethereum treasury) set a state-level precedent, but this is a federal leap.
Proponents like Senator Cynthia Lummis argue a Bitcoin reserve could bolster the dollar and counter inflation, akin to gold reserves (the U.S. holds 8,133 tons worth ~$650 billion). Critics, including some X users, call it “a pig in lipstick”—a rebrand of existing holdings with no immediate buying power.
Holding 200,000 BTC (1% of the 21 million cap) signals institutional acceptance, potentially spurring adoption, though volatility risks remain (BTC hit $109,071 in January 2025 before cooling). The White House Crypto Summit on March 7, 2025, may clarify custody logistics (e.g., multisig wallets, audits) and future acquisition plans, watched closely by markets. As of now, the U.S. has repositioned its 200,000 seized Bitcoin into a strategic reserve under Trump’s directive, a historic step in crypto policy, though its full impact hinges on execution and broader regulatory evolution.
