Yahoo Mail is rolling out a new artificial intelligence feature called “Catch Up,” a move that signals the company’s deeper foray into AI as it seeks to modernize and regain relevance in an era dominated by competitors like Gmail and Outlook.

The feature, exclusive to Yahoo Mail’s iOS and Android mobile apps, aims to help users instantly skim through their unread emails with AI-powered summaries and intuitive inbox sorting—presented in a “game-like experience” to make email feel less like work.

To promote the launch, Yahoo has partnered with streetwear label Anti Social Social Club on a limited-edition apparel line dubbed “The Anti Email Email Club.” The collaboration includes T-shirts and sweatshirts and is accompanied by a campaign video featuring comedian Morgan Jay, portraying the chaos of managing incoming emails and how the new AI feature eases the burden.

According to Yahoo, the tool was developed in response to how younger users—Millennials and Gen Z—engage with email. A Pollfish survey commissioned by Yahoo Mail found that while 70% of respondents check their personal email multiple times a day, about half reported missing key events due to a cluttered or overwhelming inbox. Yahoo Mail claims that its AI-powered tool is the first of its kind among email platforms and is designed to streamline this growing demand for more intelligent and intuitive communication management.

Kyle Miller, general manager of Yahoo Mail, said the company is rethinking the email experience to make it less of a burden.

“We’re all ‘anti email’ when it becomes another tiring task,” he said. “If you’re anti how email has worked for decades — welcome to our club.”

A Push for Revival

Yahoo’s latest AI push is more than a product upgrade—it’s part of a broader effort to revive the company’s identity and re-establish a competitive foothold in the internet landscape it once ruled. Founded in 1994 as one of the first web directories and portals, Yahoo was an early leader in email, news aggregation, search, and online advertising. By the early 2000s, Yahoo Mail was the most widely used webmail service globally, dominating the inboxes of millions.

But a series of strategic missteps and missed opportunities eventually sent Yahoo into a long decline. In 2002, Yahoo had the chance to buy Google for $5 billion but walked away. In 2006, it failed to acquire Facebook for $1 billion after backing out of a deal. In 2008, Yahoo rejected a $44.6 billion takeover offer from Microsoft, a decision widely criticized after the company’s market value continued to plummet.

The rise of Gmail, with better storage, smarter spam filters, and faster updates, began to erode Yahoo Mail’s dominance. In 2013, Yahoo suffered a massive data breach that eventually affected all 3 billion of its user accounts—a PR and trust disaster that further weakened the brand.

Despite once being valued at over $125 billion, Yahoo was sold in 2017 to Verizon for just $4.48 billion, and its internet business was merged under a new division called Oath, which also included AOL. In 2021, Verizon sold Yahoo to private equity firm Apollo Global Management for $5 billion, marking a new chapter in the company’s long road to reinvention.

Now operating under Yahoo Inc., the company is trying to rebuild its brand through AI, tapping into the current wave of interest surrounding generative technologies. While competitors like Google have begun integrating AI across their services—such as Gmail’s Smart Reply and Smart Compose—Yahoo’s move with “Catch Up” is a notable attempt to leapfrog years of stagnation and speak directly to mobile-first, younger users who grew up with faster, sleeker alternatives.

While the stakes are high, Yahoo is betting that by blending utility with playful branding—like the “Anti Email Email Club” streetwear—it can begin carving out a niche that’s both functional and culturally resonant. The apparel line, priced between $55 and $99, is available for preorder on Anti Social Social Club’s website.

Only time will tell whether “Catch Up” becomes a turning point. But for a company that helped define the early internet, Yahoo’s return to innovation may be its best shot at rewriting its legacy in the AI age.

A recent Coinbase survey indicates that 60% of Fortune 500 companies are actively engaged in blockchain projects, reflecting a significant shift toward decentralized technologies in corporate America. The survey, part of Coinbase’s Q2 2025 State of Crypto report, highlights that blockchain adoption is driven by its potential to enhance efficiency, transparency, and security across industries like supply chain management, digital identity, and decentralized finance.

Additionally, 20% of Fortune 500 executives view on-chain initiatives as central to their long-term strategies, with 80% of institutional investors planning to increase crypto exposure in 2025. Stablecoin usage is also surging, with a 54% year-on-year supply growth and $27.6 trillion in transfer volume, surpassing Visa and Mastercard combined. However, 90% of executives stress the need for clearer U.S. crypto regulations to fully realize blockchain’s potential.

Small and medium-sized businesses are also adopting crypto, with one-third currently using it—double the 2024 figure—and 46% of non-users planning to integrate it within three years. The Coinbase survey’s finding that 60% of Fortune 500 companies are working on blockchain projects signals a transformative shift in corporate strategy, with far-reaching implications.

Blockchain’s ability to streamline processes through decentralized ledgers is driving adoption in supply chain management, financial services, and data verification. For instance, smart contracts can automate transactions, reducing costs and errors—potentially saving billions annually across industries. Sectors like finance, logistics, and healthcare face disruption as blockchain enables peer-to-peer transactions, transparent record-keeping, and secure data sharing. This could erode the dominance of centralized intermediaries like banks or clearinghouses.

With 20% of executives prioritizing on-chain strategies, companies are racing to integrate blockchain to maintain competitive edges. Early adopters may set industry standards, locking in long-term advantages. The $27.6 trillion in stablecoin transfer volume (surpassing Visa and Mastercard) underscores their role as a stable, scalable medium for corporate transactions, cross-border payments, and DeFi applications. This could reshape global financial systems.

The 90% of executives calling for clearer U.S. crypto regulations highlights a bottleneck. Ambiguity stifles innovation, but clear frameworks could unlock broader adoption, potentially boosting blockchain-related investments and job creation. The doubling of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using crypto (one-third currently, 46% of non-users planning adoption) suggests blockchain’s democratization. This could level the playing field, enabling smaller firms to compete with giants in efficiency and transparency.

The 60% of Fortune 500 companies embracing blockchain contrast with the 40% yet to engage. Non-adopters risk falling behind in efficiency and innovation, especially as early movers establish standards. SMEs show a similar split, with one-third adopting crypto while others lag, potentially creating a competitive gap. The U.S. lags behind regions like the EU, which has implemented MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation), offering clearer guidelines.

This creates a divide between U.S. firms constrained by uncertainty and global competitors in more permissive environments. Financial services and tech lead blockchain adoption, leveraging DeFi and tokenization, while slower-moving sectors like manufacturing or retail trail. This creates an uneven pace of transformation across industries.

Large corporations with capital and expertise dominate blockchain innovation, while SMEs face barriers like cost, technical know-how, and infrastructure. This could widen economic disparities unless adoption tools become more accessible. Stablecoin growth and cross-border blockchain applications highlight a divide between globalized firms leveraging crypto for international transactions and local businesses focused on traditional systems, limiting their scalability.

Blockchain’s mainstreaming among Fortune 500 companies signals a paradigm shift toward decentralized, efficient systems, but it also exposes divides between adopters and laggards, regulated and unregulated markets, and resource-rich versus resource-constrained entities. Clear regulations and accessible technology will be critical to bridging these gaps and maximizing blockchain’s potential.

In June 2025, the United States and China reached a preliminary trade deal framework following two days of intensive talks in London, building on a prior agreement from Geneva in May 2025. The framework aims to de-escalate trade tensions by addressing tariff reductions and export restrictions, pending approval from Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping.

The U.S. agreed to maintain 55% tariffs on Chinese goods (including existing tariffs from Trump’s first term), while China will keep 10% tariffs on U.S. imports, as per the Geneva consensus. This follows a temporary rollback in May from 145% U.S. tariffs and 125% Chinese tariffs to 30% and 10%, respectively, for a 90-day negotiation period.

Rare Earths and Magnets: China committed to resolving export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, critical for U.S. industries like automotive, defense, and electronics. In return, the U.S. will ease certain countermeasures, though specifics remain unclear.

The framework includes provisions for the U.S. to allow Chinese students access to American universities, reversing prior restrictions. China seeks eased U.S. controls on semiconductor and AI-related technology, but the U.S. clarified there’s no direct exchange of high-end AI chip access for rare earths. The talks, led by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, followed mutual accusations of violating the Geneva deal.

China’s exports to the U.S. dropped 34.5% in May, and rare earth restrictions threatened global supply chains, prompting urgency. Markets showed muted responses due to the deal’s preliminary nature and lack of detailed terms. Analysts, like Wendy Cutler of the Asia Society, expressed concern that the U.S. may have compromised by negotiating national security-related export controls, potentially weakening its stance. Others, like Deutsche Bank, noted historical patterns of progress stalling post-talks.

The preliminary U.S.-China trade deal framework announced in June 2025 carries significant implications across economic, geopolitical, and industrial domains. The framework aims to prevent a return to high tariffs (145% U.S., 125% China) post the July 9, 2025, deadline, potentially stabilizing bilateral trade flows. This could mitigate the 34.5% drop in Chinese exports to the U.S. seen in May 2025, supporting global supply chains.

Lower tariffs (55% U.S., 10% China) compared to earlier peaks could reduce costs for businesses and consumers, though still higher than pre-escalation levels, limiting full recovery. Muted market responses reflect skepticism about the deal’s durability, given the lack of detailed terms and historical failures to finalize agreements. Volatility in sectors like technology, automotive, and manufacturing may persist until a final deal is confirmed.

Businesses reliant on U.S.-China trade face continued uncertainty, as unresolved issues like China’s trade surplus and subsidies could derail progress. Easing China’s restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets could stabilize supply chains for industries like electronics, electric vehicles, and defense, where China controls 70-90% of global supply. This reduces risks of shortages and price spikes.

However, incomplete resolution of technology export controls (e.g., semiconductors, AI chips) may limit benefits for U.S. tech firms seeking access to Chinese markets. The framework signals a mutual interest in avoiding a full-blown trade war, potentially cooling U.S.-China relations strained by prior tariff escalations and export bans. This aligns with Presidents Trump and Xi’s reported desire for a workable deal.

Cooperation on student visas suggests a softening of cultural and educational barriers, though this may face domestic pushback in the U.S. over security concerns. Critics, like Wendy Cutler, warn that U.S. concessions on export controls tied to national security (e.g., semiconductors, AI technology) could weaken its strategic position. China’s push for access to advanced tech remains a flashpoint, as the U.S. insists no direct trade-off with rare earths.

The deal’s focus on rare earths highlights China’s leverage over critical minerals, potentially pressuring the U.S. to diversify supply chains with allies like Australia or Canada. A stabilized U.S.-China trade relationship could reduce global economic fragmentation, benefiting allies reliant on both markets. However, failure to finalize the deal risks reinforcing perceptions of U.S.-China decoupling, encouraging other nations to align with one side.

U.S. tech firms may see limited relief if export controls on semiconductors and AI remain stringent. China’s push for access to these technologies suggests ongoing friction, as the U.S. prioritizes national security. Increased access for Chinese students to U.S. universities could boost talent pipelines for tech innovation but raises concerns about intellectual property risks.

Eased rare earth restrictions benefit U.S. manufacturers of electric vehicles, wind turbines, and defense equipment, reducing dependence on volatile Chinese supplies. However, long-term reliance on China persists without alternative sourcing. Lower tariffs could reduce prices for U.S. consumers on Chinese-made goods (e.g., electronics, clothing), though elevated tariffs (55%) still increase costs compared to pre-trade war levels. Chinese consumers may see marginal benefits from 10% U.S. tariffs.

The preliminary nature of the deal and historical breakdowns (e.g., post-Geneva) suggest a high risk of failure. Both sides face domestic pressures—Trump’s base demands tough China policies, while Xi navigates economic slowdown and export reliance. Unresolved issues like subsidies, intellectual property theft, and trade imbalances could stall final negotiations.

In the U.S., critics may argue the deal compromises national security or fails to address China’s market distortions. In China, nationalist sentiments could oppose concessions to the U.S., especially on technology access. A finalized deal could boost global growth by stabilizing trade, but failure risks renewed tariff hikes, disrupting markets and supply chains. Emerging economies reliant on U.S.-China trade (e.g., Southeast Asia) are particularly vulnerable.

A finalized deal by July 2025 could lay the groundwork for sustained trade cooperation, boosting global economic confidence and securing critical supply chains. It may also encourage broader U.S.-China dialogue on climate, technology, or security. If talks collapse, escalating tariffs and restrictions could deepen economic decoupling, increase costs, and accelerate U.S. efforts to “reshore” or diversify supply chains, potentially at higher costs.

The deal underscores the need for the U.S. to invest in domestic rare earth production and tech innovation to reduce reliance on China, while China may accelerate efforts to develop its own advanced technologies. The framework offers a chance to stabilize U.S.-China trade but hinges on resolving complex issues under tight deadlines. Its success or failure will shape global economic and geopolitical dynamics, with significant stakes for industries, consumers, and strategic interests.

Tekedia Capital congratulates Nitrode for its $1.8 million raise, from some of the leading funds in the world, including Rebel Fund, Rebel Maiora Ventures, Y Combinator, Clay VC, Cosmic Venture Partners, Goodwater Capital, Eight Capital, and Tekedia Capital.

The business model of Nitrode is very refreshing – making gamers to also become creators: “With Nitrode, playing and creating games go hand in hand. Our platform offers a seamless and intuitive space for gamers to discover and play, while our dedicated creation engine (built off of Godot) provides powerful tools to simplify game development and launch. With features such as world generation, code-assist, and a new interface, every developer is now a game developer.” QED.

Visit nitrode.com and experience the “ultimate AI Game Engine: design, script, and deploy—all in one AI-native engine”, and capital.tekedia.com to learn about Tekedia Capital.