DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

Private Sector Credit Edges Up to N75.62tn as Government Borrowing Tightens Grip on Bank Lending

0

Credit to Nigeria’s private sector posted a modest increase in February 2026, offering a tentative sign of recovery in lending activity, but the broader trend still points to a banking system under strain from high interest rates, tight liquidity conditions, and rising government demand for domestic funds.

Latest monetary and credit statistics from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) show that credit to the private sector rose slightly to N75.62 trillion in February, from N75.24 trillion in January, an increase of N380 billion month-on-month.

The uptick is modest, but it comes after a weak start to the year and may suggest that the CBN’s recent monetary easing is beginning to filter gradually into the credit market.

Still, the bigger picture remains far less encouraging. On a year-on-year basis, private sector credit remains below the N76.26 trillion recorded in February 2025, indicating that businesses and households are still borrowing less than they were a year earlier.

The data also underscores how far lending has retreated from its recent peak. Private sector credit had climbed to N78.07 trillion in April 2025 before sliding steadily through the second half of the year, eventually touching a low of N72.53 trillion in September 2025.

That pattern reflects the lagged impact of aggressive monetary tightening and a banking sector that has remained highly selective in extending fresh loans. The February rise, therefore, should be read less as a full recovery and more as an early stabilization signal. What stands out more sharply in the latest figures is the divergence between lending to the private sector and lending to government.

Net domestic credit expanded to N111.40 trillion, up from N109.43 trillion in January, largely driven by a significant jump in public sector borrowing. Credit to the government climbed to N35.77 trillion, from N34.19 trillion in the previous month. This sharp increase reinforces a concern that has increasingly dominated economic analysis in recent months: the crowding-out effect.

As government borrowing intensifies, particularly through the domestic banking system, a larger share of available liquidity is absorbed by sovereign financing needs, leaving less room for productive private sector lending. Several analysts have already warned that this trend is constraining the real economy, particularly manufacturers, SMEs, and consumer-facing businesses that depend heavily on bank financing.

In effect, banks may be finding it more attractive and less risky to lend to the government than to businesses operating in an uncertain macroeconomic environment.

That preference is understandable from a balance-sheet perspective. Government securities and public sector exposures generally carry lower default risk and stronger regulatory treatment than private loans, especially in a high-rate environment where businesses face pressure from inflation, exchange-rate swings, and weak consumer demand.

The monetary backdrop remains a critical part of the story. In February 2026, the CBN cut the Monetary Policy Rate by 50 basis points to 26.5 per cent, marking a cautious shift toward easing after months of tight policy. The apex bank, however, retained the Cash Reserve Ratio at 45 per cent for commercial banks and kept the liquidity ratio at 30 per cent, meaning overall system liquidity remains relatively tight.

This mixed policy stance helps explain why credit recovery has been slow. While the rate cut should theoretically reduce borrowing costs, the still-elevated CRR continues to sterilize a substantial portion of bank deposits, limiting the amount of funds available for lending.

In practical terms, banks are still operating in a restrictive liquidity environment even as benchmark rates begin to ease. That transmission problem has been a recurring weakness in Nigeria’s monetary framework.

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) and other market analysts have repeatedly warned that monetary easing alone may not translate quickly into stronger lending without deeper structural reforms in credit allocation and risk pricing. The challenge is particularly acute for small and medium-sized enterprises, which often face the highest borrowing costs and toughest collateral requirements.

Another important context is the money supply.

Nigeria’s broad money supply (M3) declined marginally to N123.15 trillion in February, from N123.36 trillion in January, suggesting that liquidity expansion in the wider economy remains subdued. A slower growth in money supply, combined with high reserve requirements and elevated lending rates, tends to suppress credit growth even when policy rates are cut.

That said, there are tentative reasons for cautious optimism. Disinflation has continued for several months, external reserves have improved, and the banking recapitalization exercise, which saw 33 banks meet revised capital thresholds, could strengthen the sector’s capacity to lend over the medium term.

If macroeconomic stability continues to improve, especially on inflation and foreign exchange, banks may gradually become more willing to extend credit to productive sectors. For now, however, the February figures tell a more nuanced story: while lending is no longer deteriorating as sharply as before, the recovery remains fragile and uneven.

Coinbase Contributes its x402 Protocol to Newly Launched x402 Foundation under Linux Foundation

0

Coinbase has contributed its x402 protocol to the newly launched x402 Foundation under the Linux Foundation, turning it into a vendor-neutral open standard with broad industry backing.

x402 revives the long-dormant HTTP 402 Payment Required status code (part of the original HTTP spec but rarely used) to embed payments directly into standard web/HTTP interactions. Instead of redirects, forms, or separate checkout flows, a server can respond to a request from a browser, API client, or AI agentwith a 402 status plus payment details. The client then settles instantly typically via stablecoins like USDC on low-fee networks such as Base and retries the request with proof of payment. If valid, the server delivers the resource.

This makes payments feel as native to the internet as loading a page or calling an API—no accounts, sessions, or complex auth needed for many use cases. Designed for AI agents that need to autonomously pay for APIs, data, compute, content, or services in real time; an agent upgrading its model mid-task via micropayment, or paying per query.

Micropayments done right: Low-cost, near-instant settlement (sub-second to a couple seconds, fees ~$0.0001 on suitable L2s) makes charging fractions of a cent viable—something credit cards and traditional rails struggle with due to fixed fees. HTTP-native: Works within existing web infrastructure; developers can add it with minimal code changes.

Open and chain-agnostic in principle: Started focused on stablecoins and crypto but aims to support broader value transfer; tokens, potentially fiat rails later. It’s not a new coin or closed platform. No geographic or formatting barriers; value moves like data.

The protocol was initially launched by Coinbase in May 2025, inspired by earlier micropayment ideas but made practical by cheap L2 transactions. Coinbase has handed governance of the protocol to the new x402 Foundation under the neutral, non-profit Linux Foundation. This shifts it from Coinbase-led to community-driven and vendor-neutral, which should accelerate adoption across the industry.

The move mirrors how other core internet standards are stewarded. Coinbase and partners like Base remain involved as participants. x402.org for the standard, with GitHub repo and Coinbase developer docs for implementation details. The web was built without a native, frictionless way to exchange value—leading to ad-driven models, subscriptions, or clunky gateways.

x402 aims to fix that original sin by making payments a protocol-level primitive. With the explosion of AI agents and autonomous systems, there’s growing demand for machines to pay machines seamlessly. It could enable new business models like true micropayments for content, metered AI services, or decentralized economies where agents negotiate and settle value on the fly.

Backers see it as building the missing internet-native payment layer—global, programmable, and always-on. Challenges remain: widespread adoption depends on wallet and integration support, security for automated payments, developer tooling, and whether it gains network effects over proprietary alternatives.

But moving it to the Linux Foundation with this coalition is a strong signal of intent to make it a shared standard rather than a Coinbase-specific product. The timing aligns with rising interest in agentic AI and stablecoin usage for real-world transactions. This is one to watch for how the web evolves toward native value exchange.

X Rolling Out New Anti-Scam Measure Which Locks Account for First Time Mentioning Crypto

0

X, formerly Twitter, is rolling out a new anti-scam measure that will automatically lock accounts the first time they mention cryptocurrency.

According to Nikita Bier, X’s Head of Product, the platform will auto-lock any account that posts about crypto for the first time in its history. The account will then require additional identity verification or steps before it can post further. This acts as a scam kill switch or kill switch to curb the common tactic where hackers or scammers hijack dormant or low-activity accounts and suddenly use them to promote tokens, airdrops, phishing links, or fake giveaways.

A surge in scams often involves compromised accounts, sometimes via fake copyright and phishing emails that pivot abruptly to crypto spam. Long-time users who suddenly shill tokens are a red flag. The policy aims to stop most of this at the source by forcing verification on first-time crypto posters.

Not a ban on crypto: Existing crypto users; those who’ve already posted about it won’t be affected in the same way. It’s focused on sudden behavior changes, especially from accounts with larger followings that could spread scams widely. This follows other recent X efforts against spam, bots, and paid promotion in crypto spaces.

Could significantly reduce scam volume, making the platform cleaner and safer for genuine discussions. Many in the crypto community have welcomed it as a way to kill off low-effort phishing and hacked-account spam. It might inconvenience legitimate new users or projects entering crypto conversations for the first time, potentially slowing organic growth or discovery.

Some worry it could feel overly broad or like indirect censorship, pushing more activity to Telegram or other platforms. Others note it may not catch every scam but could deter 99% of the incentive for quick-hit attacks. The feature is described as in the process of implementing or soon to roll out, so exact timing and fine details like what counts as a crypto mention or how verification works may evolve.

Crypto scams exploit the decentralized, irreversible nature of cryptocurrency transactions, making recovery extremely difficult once funds are sent. Scammers primarily target greed, fear, trust, and technical unfamiliarity. In 2025, losses from crypto scams reached an estimated $17 billion, with impersonation tactics and AI-enhanced methods surging dramatically.

Scammers send emails, DMs, texts, or social media messages impersonating legitimate platforms. The message often creates urgency: “Your account is compromised—click here to secure it” or “Claim your rewards/airdrop. Victims are directed to fake websites that look identical to real ones using similar domains or typosquatting.

Once there, users enter seed phrases, private keys, passwords, or connect their wallet and approve malicious smart contracts that drain funds. Variants include ice phishing (tricking users into signing transactions that grant unlimited approvals) or QR code scams at events/ATMs.

Address poisoning: Scammers send tiny dust transactions or fake NFTs to your wallet history, hoping you’ll copy-paste a poisoned address (visually similar) in a future transfer. Any unsolicited request for your seed phrase or to “connect wallet and approve” for rewards.

Scammers compromise dormant or low-activity accounts—often via phishing emails pretending to be copyright violations or security alerts. They pivot the account to suddenly promote a new token, airdrop, or double your crypto giveaway. Posts urge followers to send crypto to a scammer-controlled wallet for matching or early access.

High-follower accounts amplify reach; victims see it from a trusted source and FOMO (fear of missing out) kicks in. After posting, scammers may lock out the owner. This is why X is implementing auto-locks for first-time crypto mentions: it forces verification on sudden behavior changes, targeting this exact vector.

A long-inactive or non-crypto account suddenly shilling tokens, or any this account was hacked admission followed by promo. One of the most devastating and fastest-growing tactics, often yielding billions in losses. Scammers contact victims via dating apps, wrong number texts, or social media, building a romantic or friendly relationship over weeks/months.

They share fabricated success stories about crypto trading and introduce a surefire investment opportunity on a fake platform. Victims deposit crypto or fiat converted to crypto and see fake profits initially to build confidence.

When victims try to withdraw, they’re hit with fees or excuses—until the scammer disappears with everything. AI deepfakes make video calls more convincing. Strangers pushing unsolicited investment advice, especially crypto, after building emotional rapport. Legitimate opportunities don’t start this way.

Scammers advertise free tokens or promise to double crypto sent to a wallet. Victims connect wallets to claim, triggering drainer contracts. Or they send gas fees or small amounts upfront that vanish. Often promoted via hacked accounts, fake influencers, or spam. Ponzi elements pay early investors with new victims’ money until collapse.

Hijacking phone numbers to bypass 2FA and access accounts. AI videos and audio of celebrities or CEOs endorsing scams. Physical coercion to hand over keys. Crypto’s pseudonymity, speed, and global reach make tracing and recovery hard. Scammers use phishing-as-a-service tools, professional laundering networks, and AI for scale.

Verify all URLs, accounts, and links independently. Use hardware wallets for large holdings; enable 2FA preferably app-based, not SMS. Be skeptical of unsolicited contacts, urgency, or too good to be true offers. Research projects thoroughly: team, audits, tokenomics. Use reputable explorers and avoid copy-pasting addresses.

Cluster of 6 Wallets Coordinated a Leveraged Long Position Exceeding $10M on XPL

0

A cluster of 6 wallets, funded via Bitget deposits, coordinated a leveraged long position exceeding $10 million on XPL likely a perpetual futures contract on the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange.

The wallets deposited around $1.5 million in collateral. They aggressively built long exposure, pushing or riding the price of XPL upward. As unrealized profits grew, they withdrew approximately $3 million; realizing gains while the position was still open or partially managed. When the price reversed sharply, the cluster’s positions were liquidated.

This liquidation cascade triggered over $10 million in additional liquidations and an ADL (Auto-Deleveraging) backstop on Hyperliquid for XPL, amplifying the downside move. One analysis on X suggested it might stem from an API key leak affecting a large trader who had a separate $50 million long position likely lower leverage and still open elsewhere, possibly on Binance or another venue.

This appears to be a classic case of coordinated leveraged trading rather than outright on-chain token price manipulation via spot buys and sells. The profits came from futures PnL on Hyperliquid. The $3M withdrawal happened on the way up, but the cluster ultimately got liquidated on the reversal, so the profit was extracted before the full blow-up.

Such events highlight risks in high-leverage perp markets: clustered positions can create feedback loops of liquidations, especially on lower-liquidity tokens like XPL. Hyperliquid’s mechanism handled the bad debt via its insurance and backstop, but it still caused volatility.

Hyperliquid’s Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) is a last-resort solvency mechanism for its perpetual futures markets. It kicks in only after all other risk controls fail, ensuring the platform never has bad debt (negative equity that can’t be covered). It does this by forcibly closing a portion of the most profitable positions on the opposite side of the bankrupt trade—at the prevailing mark price—so the underwater position can be offset without draining external funds.

Hyperliquid’s liquidation process is layered and designed to maximize trader retention of capital while protecting the platform: Normal (Book) Liquidation Trigger: Account equity falls below maintenance margin typically 1.25%–16.7% of notional, depending on the asset’s max leverage tier. The system sends market orders to the public order book to close the full position (or 20% initially for large positions >$100k USDC, then full after a 30-second cooldown).

The liquidated trader keeps any remaining equity. No liquidation fees. Fully competitive—anyone can take the flow. Equity drops below 2/3 of maintenance margin and book liquidation fails. The entire position + associated margin is transferred to the Hyperliquid Liquidity Provider (HLP) vault.

All cross positions and margin go to HLP ? trader equity goes to zero. Only the isolated position/margin is taken. HLP absorbs the position. On average, these are profitable for the community (PNL flows back to HLP depositors). Maintenance margin is not returned to the trader, this buffer ensures HLP profitability.

Hyperliquid’s ADL logic is deliberately simple and mirrors mainstream centralized exchanges, but executed fully on-chain. ADL is rare by design. The first cross-margin ADL occurred during a major volatility event on Oct 10, 2025, where ~$2.1 billion notional was deleveraged in ~12 minutes across many markets.

In the recent XPL incident you referenced, the cluster’s liquidation cascade exhausted local liquidity + HLP buffers, triggering ADL and amplifying the move via forced closures.
Hyperliquid’s production queue sometimes over-utilized ADL relative to an optimal policy—closing ~28× more notional than the theoretical minimum needed to cover the shortfall, resulting in an estimated $45M–$52M in excess PnL haircuts to winners.

The paper argues better algorithms could reduce unnecessary deleveraging while still guaranteeing solvency. Hyperliquid’s co-founder has pushed back, noting that ADL has net delivered hundreds of millions in realized profits to users by closing winners at favorable prices rather than letting HLP take more risk.

Hyperliquid’s ADL is a robust, transparent nuclear option that prioritizes platform solvency above all while trying to minimize socialization to only the most profitable opposing traders. It has proven effective at preventing insolvency in real stress events, though debates continue on whether the current ranking algorithm is optimally efficient. The mechanism continues to evolve, with the core philosophy remaining: keep it simple, on-chain, and strictly solvent.

SoFi Technologies Launches a Big Business Banking Platform 

0

SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI) has announced the launch of SoFi Big Business Banking. This new enterprise platform allows businesses and institutional clients to manage both traditional fiat (U.S. dollars) and cryptocurrency—including stablecoins—within a single, regulated, nationally chartered bank environment.

Companies can hold deposits, move funds, convert between USD and stablecoins such as SoFi’s own fully reserved SoFiUSD, and settle transactions—all in one place. It eliminates the need for separate traditional banks, crypto custodians, or exchanges.

API-driven payments and settlements operate around the clock (24/7/365), supporting instant or near-instant transfers in fiat or selected crypto. This addresses limitations of legacy banking hours, which typically close after 5 p.m. on weekdays. Built on SoFi Bank, N.A. (a nationally chartered, FDIC-insured bank) with direct Federal Reserve access. It combines bank-grade compliance, security, and oversight with blockchain integration.

The platform leverages blockchain with reports highlighting Solana for certain capabilities for efficient on-chain settlement and liquidity. It supports issuing and redeeming SoFiUSD and selected crypto assets. This launch builds on SoFi’s recent crypto expansions.

In late 2025, SoFi became the first nationally chartered bank to offer crypto trading to consumers; buy, sell, and hold assets like BTC, ETH, and SOL directly in the app. It also issued SoFiUSD, a fully reserved U.S. dollar stablecoin on a public blockchain, aimed at infrastructure for banks, fintechs, and enterprises.

The Big Business Banking platform targets enterprise clients needing seamless fiat-crypto flows, such as crypto-native firms, payment processors, or institutions handling digital assets. Initial partners reportedly include entities like BitGo, Mastercard, Cumberland, Bullish, and others for custody, liquidity, and infrastructure.

It offers a compliant one-stop solution for bridging TradFi and crypto, potentially reducing friction, costs, and counterparty risks in stablecoin usage, payments, and liquidity management. This reflects growing mainstream integration of digital assets into regulated banking. SoFi positions itself as a bridge between traditional finance and blockchain, competing with legacy systems while appealing to crypto-forward businesses.

Note that SoFi’s stock reportedly dipped following the announcement despite the positive crypto news, which is common in volatile markets and may reflect broader sentiment or profit-taking. This development signals continued maturation of U.S. banking’s embrace of crypto infrastructure under clear regulatory pathways for national banks.

SoFiUSD (ticker: SoFiD) is a fully reserved U.S. dollar stablecoin issued directly by SoFi Bank, N.A., a nationally chartered, FDIC-insured U.S. bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Launched in December 2025, it is the first stablecoin issued by a U.S. national bank on a public, permissionless blockchain.

Every SoFiUSD token is backed 1:1 by U.S. dollars or cash equivalents. Reserves are held primarily as cash balances in SoFi Bank’s account at the Federal Reserve. This structure minimizes liquidity and credit risk, enabling immediate redemption at par (1:1 with USD).

Unlike most stablecoins, SoFiUSD comes from a regulated depository institution. This provides stronger regulatory oversight, direct Federal Reserve access, and bank-grade compliance, including AML/KYC rules. Initially launched on Ethereum, with plans for expansion to additional public blockchains and integration with networks like Solana in SoFi’s broader ecosystem.

It supports 24/7 near-instant settlement at very low (fractional-cent) costs, overcoming traditional banking hours and delays. Institutions and partners can mint and burn SoFiUSD directly through SoFi accounts or integrated infrastructure. It is designed for programmable finance, real-time payments, and seamless fiat-to-crypto conversions.

Banks, fintechs, and enterprises — to enable faster, cheaper, always-on money movement. Payments and settlements — including integration with Mastercard’s global network for card transaction settlements.

Other institutions can potentially issue interoperable stablecoins using SoFi’s framework. It supports internal SoFi operations and is expanding availability to SoFi members and consumers. Partners like BitGo provide custody, mint and burn operations, and distribution support.

Direct national bank issuance offers potentially higher trust and easier integration for traditional finance players compared to non-bank issuers. On-demand and immediate via the bank, with FDIC-insured entity backing though the token itself is not a deposit.

When held directly on the SoFi platform by bank customers, it may function more like a tokenized bank deposit potentially earning interest and FDIC-eligible in some contexts, while the on-chain version operates as a transferable stablecoin.

Integrated into SoFi’s unified fiat-crypto business banking platform. Focus remains on transparency, regulatory strength, and 24/7 efficiency for payments, remittances, trading settlements, and programmable money.