DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

ContiSX Opens Pre-order for ContiSX Phones

0

I have been building things since my days at FUT Owerri, where we launched the university’s first campus FM radio station. In industry, I served as a global lead ASIC design engineer, helping to develop the inertial sensors used in the early versions of the iPhone. I also invented a wafer-level chip-scale packaging technology for inertial sensors. Till today, the US Government has continued to honour royalties for using my PhD research and the patent that came out of it. I am a Nigerian and I build things!

Good People, when we engineered a native blockchain for Contisx Securities Exchange, we saw an opportunity to extend that operating system into a new category of secure communication. That vision led us to build the Contisx Phone, a cryptographically secured blockchain phone designed to deliver superior communication security for individuals, companies and governments.

Yes, blockchain-secured with absolute sovereignty. With ContiSX Phone, you get end-to-end secure communication,  across messaging, voice and video ,  with no eavesdropping or tampering, guaranteed by cryptographic encryption.

The Contisx Phone is now available for preorder, with shipments beginning on October 1, 2026. Preorder yours here: https://contisx.com/phone/

Every preorder comes with these benefits:

  • One year of complimentary Contisx Network services, including Contisx Mail, Contisx Audio and Contisx Video.
  • Zero-rated data access across the Contisx Exchange and CSD ecosystems for one year. Users will incur no telecommunications data charges when accessing core Contisx services.
  • Free access to the Tekedia Nigeria Capital Market Masterclass.
  • Free access to the Tekedia Mini-MBA.

From semiconductor systems to blockchain infrastructure, we continue to build the technologies of the future. Grow with ContiSX Phone contisx.com/phone

 

Ndubuisi Ekekwe, PhD

Engineer | Inventor | Nigerian & Ovim Village-Boy

Volkswagen Plans More Than 4,000 More Porsche Job Cuts as Profit Crisis Deepens

0

Volkswagen is considering more than 4,000 additional job cuts at Porsche as part of its most sweeping restructuring yet, highlighting the depth of the crisis facing the German automaker as weak Chinese demand and a costly shift in electric vehicles weigh on its most prestigious brands.

Documents detailing a recent agreement by Volkswagen’s supervisory board call for about 4,100 positions to be eliminated at Porsche, with the measures aimed at addressing an estimated €700 million ($803.8 million) overhead shortfall, German business daily Handelsblatt reported on Saturday.

The cuts would come on top of existing agreements, the newspaper reported.

The scale of the restructuring underscores the pressure on Porsche, which has historically been one of Volkswagen’s most profitable businesses but is now confronting weaker sales in China, high costs and uncertainty over its electric vehicle strategy.

Porsche management and labor representatives agreed in July to an additional 5,000 job cuts, following 4,000 reductions already agreed earlier. Those measures would bring the number of currently agreed job cuts at the Stuttgart-based sports car manufacturer to about one in five employees by 2035.

Volkswagen’s parent company can recommend measures at Porsche but cannot impose them directly, adding another layer to the restructuring process.

The latest reported cuts come as Volkswagen itself has sharply reduced its expectations for the year.

On Friday, the group lowered its full-year operating margin target to as little as 1%, compared with its previous forecast of 4% to 5.5%.

The revision was largely linked to a write-down at Porsche, underscoring how problems at the sports car business are increasingly affecting the wider Volkswagen group.

Porsche’s difficulties are significant because the brand has traditionally provided Volkswagen with strong profitability and pricing power. A sustained deterioration therefore carries consequences beyond Porsche’s own financial performance.

Chief Executive Michael Leiters is under pressure to deliver a turnaround after the company suffered a sharp decline in sales in China and incurred substantial costs from changing course on its electric vehicle strategy.

The combination has exposed a difficult problem for Porsche: the company must invest in new technologies and products at the same time as it reduces costs and responds to weaker demand in one of its most important markets.

China and EV Strategy Drive the Reset

China has become a central weakness for Porsche.

The company’s premium positioning has not insulated it from the broader slowdown affecting foreign automakers in the Chinese market, where domestic manufacturers have strengthened their position through competitive pricing, electric vehicles, and sophisticated software.

The challenge is acute for European luxury brands because China’s auto market has shifted rapidly toward locally developed electric and hybrid models.

Porsche’s response has also been complicated by its electrification strategy.

The company invested heavily in electric vehicles as European and global regulations pushed automakers away from combustion engines. But weaker-than-expected demand for some EV models has forced Porsche to reconsider the pace and composition of its transition. That reversal comes with a substantial financial cost. Automakers cannot easily unwind years of investment in electric platforms, battery technology and production capacity without taking charges or restructuring operations.

For Porsche, the result has been pressure from both directions: the need to continue developing electric vehicles while maintaining profitable combustion-engine and hybrid models for customers who have not switched to EVs.

The reported 4,100 additional cuts suggest the company is now trying to bring its cost base into line with a weaker sales and earnings outlook.

Wider Volkswagen Restructuring

The Porsche measures form part of a much broader restructuring at Volkswagen. The group is attempting to reduce costs across its German operations while dealing with weak demand, intense competition from Chinese manufacturers and the capital requirements of the industry’s transition toward electric and software-defined vehicles.

The scale of the challenge weighs heavily for Germany, where Volkswagen has historically maintained a large manufacturing footprint and a powerful workforce.

Cost reductions therefore involve negotiations with employee representatives and can take years to implement fully.

At Porsche, the reported measures would extend an already substantial workforce reduction. If the latest plans are implemented alongside previously agreed cuts, the company would be reshaping a significant portion of its workforce over the coming decade.

The objective is not simply to reduce headcount. Volkswagen is trying to repair profitability at a time when the traditional advantages of European automakers are under pressure from changing consumer demand and a more competitive global market.

Porsche’s difficulties also reveal a wider problem facing established automakers: electrification has created new competitors while weakening some of the advantages built around traditional combustion-engine technology.

For Volkswagen, the immediate priority is restoring margins. But the scale of the reported Porsche restructuring suggests that the group is confronting a deeper question over how much of its existing cost structure can be sustained as competition, technology and demand patterns change.

The latest profit warning and reported job cuts indicate that the adjustment at Porsche is becoming a major part of Volkswagen’s broader effort to rebuild its financial performance.

Judge Signals Setback for TikTok’s $400 Million U.S. Privacy Settlement

0

TikTok and its Chinese parent ByteDance have hit a setback in their proposed $400 million settlement with the U.S. Justice Department after a federal judge indicated he would reject a key part of the agreement involving a long-running privacy consent decree.

U.S. District Judge George H. Wu in Los Angeles said Friday that he was inclined to reject the companies’ request to terminate a 2019 consent decree imposed on TikTok’s predecessor, Musical.ly. He scheduled a hearing for Monday to consider the issue.

Wu said that, based on the information currently before the court, he could not determine that ending the decree would provide a “durable remedy” or that the proposed termination was appropriately tailored to the changes cited by the government.

The ruling does not, on its face, reject the entire $400 million settlement. But it puts a significant component of the agreement in doubt and could complicate TikTok’s effort to resolve allegations that it mishandled children’s personal information.

Under the proposed settlement reached in August, TikTok agreed to pay $300 million immediately and another $100 million if the court terminated the 2019 consent decree.

The decree dates back to Musical.ly, the short-video platform that was later folded into TikTok. In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission alleged that Musical.ly knew children under 13 were using the service but failed to obtain parental consent before collecting their names, email addresses, and other personal information.

Musical.ly paid $5.7 million to settle those allegations. The resulting consent decree imposed reporting and record-keeping requirements that remain in effect through 2029.

The latest dispute shows why the decree remains important to the Justice Department’s case. Terminating it would have provided TikTok with a way to close out a regulatory obligation that predates the current ownership and operating structure of its U.S. business.

The $400 million settlement itself stems from a Justice Department lawsuit filed in 2024. The government accused TikTok and ByteDance of violating U.S. children’s online privacy laws by collecting personal information from users under 13 without the required parental consent.

The government has argued that TikTok has undergone substantial changes since the lawsuit was filed, including changes to its ownership structure, management, compliance operations, and privacy practices. Those changes form part of the rationale for seeking an end to the older consent decree.

But Wu’s tentative position suggests that the court wants more evidence that those changes are sufficient to replace the protections and oversight contained in the existing order.

TikTok’s Broader U.S. Restructuring

The privacy case is unfolding alongside a much larger effort by ByteDance to restructure TikTok’s U.S. operations and address Washington’s concerns over the platform’s ownership and handling of American user data.

In January, ByteDance agreed to establish a majority American-owned joint venture intended to safeguard U.S. user data and help avert a potential U.S. ban. TikTok’s U.S. business has more than 200 million American users.

The joint venture has pointed to new safeguards designed to prevent children from accessing the platform. In a court filing, it said all users are required to provide their date of birth and that it has developed age-moderation systems designed to identify users under 13 who misrepresent their age.

Those measures are relevant to the Justice Department’s argument that TikTok’s privacy practices have changed significantly since the original allegations.

The judge’s response, however, indicates that the court may require a clearer connection between those changes and the proposed termination of the 2019 decree. That creates an unusual situation for TikTok. The company is attempting to resolve a new federal privacy case while simultaneously seeking to remove an older regulatory obligation that remains in force for several more years.

The settlement would have, for the Justice Department, provided a financial penalty and a resolution to the litigation while allowing TikTok to operate under its newer compliance framework. For TikTok, ending the consent decree would remove an additional layer of federal oversight inherited from Musical.ly.

The court’s decision could therefore determine whether the proposed settlement can proceed in its current form or whether the parties will need to renegotiate the arrangement.

The Monday hearing is expected to provide more clarity on whether the judge’s concerns can be addressed without reopening the broader settlement. Until then, the $400 million agreement remains subject to a significant legal hurdle, with the fate of the 2019 consent decree at the center of the dispute.

IMF Says AI Could Lift Europe’s Productivity 1% But Deepen Inequality and Energy Strain

0

Artificial intelligence could raise productivity across Europe by about 1% over the next five years, but the gains are likely to be uneven and could widen inequality, put additional pressure on electricity networks and deepen Europe’s reliance on foreign technology, according to an International Monetary Fund paper.

The paper, prepared for an informal meeting of European Union finance ministers in Dublin on September 18-19, said the economic impact of AI would vary significantly across countries, regions and groups of workers.

The IMF argued that completing the EU’s single market could help spread the benefits of AI more broadly by making it easier for capital, labor, energy and technology to move across the 27-member bloc.

The assessment adds to concerns already raised by former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi and the European Commission that fragmented European markets are limiting investment, innovation and the region’s ability to compete in emerging technologies.

Europe’s fragmented economic structure could become an issue as AI investment accelerates. Countries with stronger digital infrastructure, larger pools of skilled workers and better access to capital are positioned to adopt AI more rapidly, while economies with weaker infrastructure or smaller technology sectors could capture fewer of the gains.

AI Could Reshape Europe’s Labor Market

The IMF estimated that about 60% of workers in advanced European economies are employed in occupations that are highly exposed to AI.

Exposure does not necessarily mean job losses. Some workers could use AI tools to perform existing tasks more efficiently, increasing their productivity. Others, however, could face displacement as companies automate routine work.

The distribution of those effects will depend partly on whether AI complements workers or substitutes for them. Jobs involving tasks that can be automated more readily face greater disruption, while workers whose productivity can be enhanced by AI could benefit from the technology. That creates a potential divide within European economies. Workers with the skills needed to use increasingly capable AI systems could see productivity and earnings gains, while those performing more automatable tasks could face greater pressure.

The IMF said the differences could also emerge between countries. More advanced European economies are expected to benefit disproportionately because they are more prepared for AI adoption and have greater exposure to the technology.

Completing the single market could therefore serve as an important mechanism for spreading AI investment and expertise beyond Europe’s largest technology and financial centers.

AI Expansion Adds To Europe’s Power Challenge

The IMF also identified electricity infrastructure as a potential constraint on Europe’s AI ambitions.

European data centers already account for roughly 3% of the continent’s electricity consumption, according to the paper. That demand is expected to rise substantially as AI applications require more computing capacity.

The pressure is already concentrated in major technology and data-center hubs including Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin. Clusters of data centers in those locations are placing additional demands on local electricity networks.

The IMF said Europe should respond by investing in cross-border electricity infrastructure and deepening integration of its energy market.

The recommendation reflects a broader issue facing the AI industry. Building more data centers requires not only semiconductor capacity and capital but also reliable supplies of electricity. Where local grids cannot accommodate new facilities, access to power can become a constraint on AI infrastructure investment.

For Europe, that challenge is complicated by the fact that electricity markets remain fragmented across national borders. Greater integration could allow power to move more efficiently to areas experiencing higher demand and make it easier to support new data-center capacity.

Europe Faces Another Technology Dependency

The IMF also warned that Europe’s AI expansion could create a new form of strategic dependence. The US and China currently dominate the development of leading AI models, leaving Europe reliant on technology developed elsewhere unless it builds a stronger domestic AI industry.

That dependence could extend beyond AI models to computing infrastructure, chips, cloud services and other parts of the technology stack.

The IMF said Europe would need significant investment in its own AI industry to reduce the risk of becoming dependent on foreign technology. Building that capacity, however, would require addressing some of the same constraints that currently limit European technology investment, including fragmented capital markets and differences between national regulatory and energy systems.

The productivity opportunity is therefore closely connected to Europe’s ability to remove barriers within its own economy.

The IMF’s estimate of a roughly 1% productivity increase over five years suggests that AI could make a measurable contribution to European economic growth, but the gains are unlikely to arrive automatically or evenly. Countries with stronger infrastructure, deeper technology ecosystems and more AI-exposed industries could capture a larger share of the benefits. Regions facing electricity constraints or lacking access to capital and skilled workers could fall further behind.

For European policymakers, the challenge is consequently not only how quickly businesses adopt AI, but whether the economic infrastructure around them can support that adoption. A more integrated single market, stronger cross-border electricity networks and greater investment in European AI capabilities are expected to be a determinant of how widely the productivity gains are distributed.

Without those changes, the IMF’s assessment indicates that AI could increase Europe’s productivity while simultaneously bolstering existing gaps between countries, regions and workers and creating new dependencies on technology developed outside the bloc.

AI Art Enters a New Era of Memory, Ecology and Onchain Culture

0

Artificial intelligence is no longer simply a tool for generating images. It is becoming a subject through which artists are questioning memory, ecology, identity, ownership and humanity’s responsibility toward technology.

A series of exhibitions and cultural events involving artists including Ryan Koopmans, Alice Wexell, Auriea Harvey and Refik Anadol illustrates how rapidly AI and digital art are moving into the center of contemporary culture.

At the Victoria and Albert Museum, a free conversation with Lumen Prize artists examines how AI, memory and ecology are reshaping ideas of responsibility and care in technology. The discussion reflects a broader shift in digital art.

Rather than focusing exclusively on what machines can create, artists are increasingly asking what societies should preserve, what technology should remember and how technological systems affect the natural world.

That conversation is particularly relevant as AI-generated media becomes increasingly sophisticated. The abundance of synthetic images, videos and data raises questions about cultural memory and authorship.

Artists are therefore exploring AI not merely as software, but as a framework for examining how humans construct and preserve meaning. In New York, Ryan Koopmans and Alice Wexell extend this conversation through The Wild Within at Leila Heller Gallery.

The exhibition combines motion works, archival pigment prints and wall sculptures, creating an environment where digital imagery and physical objects interact.

Their work occupies a space between photography, technology and constructed landscapes, encouraging viewers to reconsider the relationship between natural environments and digitally mediated experiences.

The title itself suggests a tension that has become increasingly important in contemporary art: the distinction between the natural world and the technological systems increasingly used to represent it.

As AI becomes capable of producing convincing simulations of places, organisms and environments, the question of what is authentic becomes increasingly complicated. Auriea Harvey approaches digital culture from another direction with Ready To Die.

A solo exhibition at Heft featuring 48 works spanning marble, ceramic, bronze and generative video.  The exhibition also includes Amulets recorded on Ethereum, connecting traditional sculptural practices with blockchain-based forms of provenance and ownership.

Harvey’s work demonstrates that the digital does not necessarily replace the physical. Instead, blockchain, generative technology and traditional materials can exist within the same artistic language. An Ethereum-recorded artwork becomes more than a digital object.

It becomes part of an emerging history in which code, cryptographic ownership and physical craftsmanship overlap. Refik Anadol represents perhaps the most visible expression of this transformation. His inclusion in TIME100 Art 2026 as the “Artist of the AI age” follows the opening of Dataland in Los Angeles, museum dedicated to immersive data-driven art.

Anadol’s practice has helped move machine intelligence and massive datasets from technical environments into galleries and public cultural spaces.

These developments point toward a changing definition of contemporary art.

AI is becoming simultaneously a medium, an archive, a collaborator and a subject of criticism. Blockchain adds another layer by introducing programmable provenance and new models for distributing and collecting digital works.

The emerging movement is therefore larger than AI-generated imagery. It is about how technology changes the way humanity remembers, represents nature, owns culture and understands creativity. As museums, galleries and artists continue to engage with these questions.

The future of art may increasingly be defined not by the boundary between physical and digital worlds, but by the space where they converge.