Base, an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, experienced a 33-minute outage due to a faulty sequencer and an improperly configured backup system.
The issue began at 6:07 AM UTC yesterday, the active sequencer lagged in block production, prompting Conductor, Base’s sequencer management system, to switch to a backup sequencer that was not fully set up, halting block production. The core team resolved the issue by 6:40 AM UTC, ensuring no chain reorganization was needed.
Base, securing over $4.1 billion in total value locked (TVL), plans to enhance infrastructure to ensure all sequencers can handle block-building tasks. This was Base’s second major outage, following a 43-minute disruption on September 5, 2023. Community reactions were mixed, with some, like former Coinbase engineer 0xrooter, viewing it as a sign of growing adoption, while others compared it to Solana’s past outages.
The outage was caused by a faulty sequencer and an improperly configured backup, highlighting Base’s reliance on a centralized sequencer for block production. Unlike Ethereum’s layer-1, where multiple nodes validate transactions, Base’s sequencer acts as a single point of failure, undermining the decentralized ethos of blockchain technology.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
This centralization means that if the sequencer or its backup fails, the entire network halts, as seen during the 33-minute downtime, disrupting user transactions and dApp functionality. The resolution of the outage required intervention by Base’s core team, indicating centralized operational control. In a fully decentralized system, automated failover mechanisms or community-driven solutions would ideally handle such issues.
Repeated outages (this being the second major incident after September 2023) could erode trust among users and developers, especially for a network securing over $4.1 billion in TVL. If Base is perceived as unreliable due to centralized points of failure, it may struggle to compete with other layer-2 solutions like Arbitrum or Optimism, which are also working toward greater decentralization.
Community reactions, such as comparisons to Solana’s outages, underscore concerns that Base’s infrastructure may not yet be robust enough to support its growing adoption. Base’s design prioritizes scalability and low-cost transactions, but this incident highlights the trade-off with decentralization.
Centralized sequencers enable faster and cheaper transactions but introduce risks of downtime or censorship, which are antithetical to blockchain’s promise of resilience and autonomy. The sequencer’s failure and the backup’s misconfiguration reveal a critical vulnerability. In a decentralized system, no single component should be able to halt operations.
The reliance on a single sequencer (or a poorly configured backup) raises questions about Base’s resilience against targeted attacks or technical failures. The Conductor system’s failure to switch to a functional backup sequencer suggests inadequate decentralization in failover processes.
A decentralized network would ideally have multiple, independent sequencers or a permissionless mechanism to ensure continuity, which Base currently lacks. Centralized sequencers could, in theory, be manipulated to censor transactions or prioritize certain ones, posing risks to the network’s neutrality.
While no censorship was reported in this incident, the centralized control structure raises concerns about future vulnerabilities, especially under regulatory or external pressures. Base’s plan to “enhance infrastructure” to ensure all sequencers can handle block-building tasks is a step toward resilience but doesn’t address full decentralization.
Without a clear timeline for decentralizing sequencer operations or involving the community in governance, Base risks being seen as a centralized service masquerading as a blockchain. Ethereum’s layer-1 has thousands of nodes ensuring redundancy and decentralization, making outages extremely rare.
Base’s outage underscores the gap between layer-1 and layer-2 in terms of decentralization. Many layer-2 solutions, including Base, face similar issues due to their reliance on centralized components like sequencers to achieve scalability. This incident highlights an industry-wide challenge: balancing performance with decentralization.
Projects like Arbitrum and zkSync are also working toward decentralized sequencer models, but progress is slow. While the network’s $4.1 billion TVL and growing adoption signal strong potential, addressing these concerns is crucial to maintaining trust and competing in the increasingly decentralized layer-2 ecosystem.