Trademark Law in Nigeria – The Sir Victor Uwaifo’s Suit Against Simi on ‘Joromi’

Trademark Law in Nigeria –  The Sir Victor Uwaifo’s Suit Against Simi on ‘Joromi’

  • “Turning and turning in the widening gyre
  • The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
  • Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
  • Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world …”
  • (Culled from -The Second Coming. A poem by William Butler Yeats. )
It was from here that the author Chinua Achebe extracted the now famous phrase that later became the title of his book ‘Things Fall Apart’ which was written in 1958.

 In 2011, American rapper and Actor 50 Cent(real name is Curtis Jackson)  wrote and starred in a movie which was eventually titled ‘All Things Fall Apart ’ even though the original plan was for the movie to be called  ‘Things Fall Apart ’. 

The movie was produced under the same title as the 1958 novel by Chinua Achebe  Things Fall Apart. After contacting Achebe’s legal team ,50 Cent offered $1 million just to keep the title Things Fall Apart for his movie, but Achebe would not sell out at any price as he felt it was an insult to buy him over with money. The Foundation that manages Achebe’s copyrights said: “The novel with the said title was initially produced in 1958. It is listed as the most-read book in modern African literature, and won’t be sold for even £1 billion.” Eventually Mr Curtis Jackson had to settle with what was closest to what he had in mind – All Things Fall Apart. 

This was in 2011. Articles and opinions sprung up in the national dailies and on the Internet giving perspectives to it. One even went as far as saying that Achebe had no right to stop anybody from using the words since he also took it freely from another source. Superficially it does make a little sense to think in that direction, but a little dig beneath the surface shows how fundamentally different the two scenarios are. The words used by Mr Yeats are English words, and a book could contain as much as eighty thousand words and sometimes more. So are we prohibited from using any arrangement of words just because it happened to have appeared elsewhere?  No! The difference is that the title of a book or the name of a product is someone’s intellectual property and is often covered by patent and copyright  laws. 

So the contexts are different. Infact they have absolutely nothing in common. I could use phrases from Shakespeare’s literature for any purpose I deem fit so long as it is not the registerd product name of any individual or group, correct me if I’m wrong; but I can not name another book or product the same name Shakespeare had given any of his books. It’s understandable,and here is why: If someone walks into a store to buy a product that goes by a particular name, he expects to get just what he has in mind and not another item that goes by the same name, as having many items with the same product name would lead to confusion and a lot of uncertainties. Imagine if it was a drug for instance. 

The entire conversation above developed as a result of a recent fifty million naira law suit filed by Sir Victor Uwaifo on the award winning female musician Simi. Simi is being sued for N50 million as damages for using the word ‘Joromi’ in her song and as the title of one of her tracks. Remember ‘Joromi’ was also the title  Uwaifo gave to his 1979 global hit.

I think the problem here is the fact that her song bears the same title as Uwaifo’s. So if a foreigner walks into a store and asks for Joromi, he or she could be given Simi’s even though it may not be what the person had in mind. These are fundamental issues every musician should know, but is frequently violated by a good number of artistes we have today probably because there have been no consequences for neglecting  such rules.

Not long ago, American Musicians Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke were asked to pay a total of nearly $5 million (€4.4 million) to the family of Marvin Gaye, in a final judgment in the plagiarism case that found similarity between their song Blurred Lines and the song Got to Give It Up . In 2013, the song reached the top of the charts in the UK and US.

Yes! Just because the song sounds just like another song, those two musicians had to pay the the price.

In the case of Simi and Uwaifo, many Nigerians were of the opinion that Sir Victor did not invent the word Joromi and hence had no right to sue her for damages, highlighting how ignorant most people are when it comes to intellectual property laws. Other were of the opinion that he should just forgive as Simi is just like a daughter to her. 

In all these,this suit could be the beginning of many more to come, perhaps heralding the beginning of an industry where creativity and originality  will flourish as old resting vintage songs will not be disturbed in their resting place by crafty, desperate musicians who at will tamper and modify, and who believe that many living today  have absolutely no recollection of the past.

Share this post

9 thoughts on “Trademark Law in Nigeria – The Sir Victor Uwaifo’s Suit Against Simi on ‘Joromi’

  1. Very interesting development and article as well. I think it would be worthwhile to legally ascertain if Sir Victor Uwaifo can claim exclusive rights to Joromi which his curator admits is the name of a Bini warrior of antiquity.

    I have post the legal dispute listen to both Joromi musical work and both sound totally different in my ears. I was initially very concerned as to whether Simi ‘borrowed’ lyrics or chords from the original Joromi but this in my view was not the case.

    Having said that, I would really appreciate if both parties can reach an amicable out of court settlement of the dispute. It would be a shame to be denied both creative works by Nigerian musicians. Just my thoughts.

  2. Andrew Robert Jones · Edit

    Dear Mr or Mrs writer
    At least u could have go to point directly instead of going around the bush…
    If You are about to give a judgment just give make it politely
    If my popular and favorite artiste simi is guilty 4 the offense sir Victor sued her 4 just let us know.. Incase of next time go to the point don’t come and confuse us with comparison or experienced be polite at least

  3. It’s seriously obvious that dead also want to live again. If you have carefully listened to Simi and Victor’s songs then Simi is not guilty here.

    In fact, I never knew the title joromi has ever being used before until the #50m suits.

    We have seen cases where yinka ayefele and other singers used Orlando Owoh musical lyrics even words to words and yes, Baba has never made any law suits.

    What about Ebenezer obey and KSA…?

    When you are broke.. You’re broke. Nothing can be done than to be looking for whom to bill.

    Victor did not invent the name ‘Joromi’ and so can be culled by anyone.

    If on the other hand, Simi had used any of the victor lyrics and baba want money for his creativity then no problem but as for title… Baba is hungry jor.

    We have had many artists using same title for long. Not new at all.

    Adekunle gold used Sade as a track and Wizkid also did same. Should we now sue Wizkid by saying what you posted on when someone wants to buy sade or what?

    Your article is 100% biased and I believe it is sponsored as well.

  4. Joromi was actually invented by Sir Victor Uwaufo. The original name of the Warrior is Gioromi. But Uwaifo originated Joromi. Simi should have made some research before using the word Joromi. Joromi is franchised. And all she needed to do was give credit to him. Finito. Ignorance is not an excuse. Let the court decide or Simi humble herself and make things right. If others do not know their rights, not Sir Victor Uwaifo. I know that .


Post Comment