When Jaiz Bank unveiled its refreshed brand identity, the announcement was meant to highlight renewal, optimism, and an enduring commitment to customers. The new look carried messages of trust, growth, and ethical values. However, public reaction on social media quickly shifted in another direction. Rather than focusing on the bank’s aspirations, the conversation became dominated by allegations that the new logo resembles Samsung’s Bixby symbol. This is not an unusual situation for a brand that has just rebranded. Many organizations encounter criticism when they change their identity. What separates those that grow stronger from those that stumble is the way they respond. For Jaiz Bank, the criticism can be an opportunity to deepen trust and reaffirm its purpose, provided the response is handled with care.
Acknowledging Concerns and Telling the Story
Silence is rarely the right option when public debate becomes intense. If concerns are ignored, negative interpretations often become the accepted version of events. Jaiz Bank’s first step should be to acknowledge that customers and the wider public have raised questions about the new logo. A simple acknowledgement demonstrates respect and creates space for clarity.
The bank also needs to tell the story behind the design. Every strong identity has roots in meaning and intention. If this logo was inspired by themes of growth, cultural values, and the ethical foundation of the bank, those ideas should be explained. A visual breakdown of the design process, along with a comparison to similar symbols, can highlight differences and reinforce originality. Storytelling transforms what looks like a surface-level debate about design into a deeper conversation about identity and values.
Leveraging Advocates and Engaging Critics
Not every reaction to Jaiz Bank’s rebrand has been negative. Many voices on social media have celebrated the refreshed colours, the promise of growth, and the energy of renewal. These voices are important. By amplifying staff, customers, and ambassadors who support the change, the bank can ensure that the conversation does not tilt entirely toward criticism. Positive energy, if given visibility, can help balance the narrative.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
At the same time, respectful engagement with critics is equally important. Some of the harshest comments online can be softened with a simple acknowledgement and a link to explanatory content. Dismissing critics would run counter to Jaiz Bank’s ethical positioning. Responding with courtesy, even in the face of strong accusations, demonstrates confidence and consistency with its values.
Monitoring Sentiment and Adapting
A crisis of perception does not disappear overnight. The bank will need to monitor the conversation continuously to gauge whether responses are changing minds. If criticism persists, there may be value in considering refinements to the identity to further emphasize distinctiveness. Adjustment does not have to mean abandoning the rebrand. Instead, it can be framed as responsiveness and attentiveness to customers’ views.
Handled with transparency, empathy, and a willingness to adapt, this moment can become more than a defensive exercise. It can reinforce Jaiz Bank’s reputation as an institution that listens, that explains its choices, and that stands by its values while being open to improvement.
People should spend their time and energy wisely. I can’t make any sense in this piece!