Tekedia Mini-MBA welcomes the innovative Africa Prudential Plc team. Africa Prudential is a leading provider of share registration services and capital market solutions, helping businesses manage their shareholder base and streamline operations using digital technology and world class data management systems.
We’re honoured for the opportunity to co-learn with one of Africa’s finest registrars which over 50 years has delivered excellence in the capital market. Welcome and Thank you!
Germany’s Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt announced that the government will seek a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to determine the legality of its migrant turnback policy at the border. This follows a Berlin Administrative Court ruling on June 2, 2025, which declared that turning away asylum seekers without adhering to the EU’s Dublin Regulation—requiring a determination of which EU country is responsible for processing asylum claims—was unlawful. The case stemmed from an incident on May 9, 2025, where three Somali nationals were denied entry at the Polish border and returned without proper asylum procedures.
The German government, led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, introduced stricter border controls in May 2025, allowing asylum seekers to be turned away at the border, a policy central to Merz’s campaign to curb irregular migration. Despite the Berlin court’s ruling, Dobrindt insists the policy is legally justified and plans to continue pushbacks while seeking ECJ clarification. The court emphasized that Germany must follow the Dublin procedure, which assigns responsibility for asylum claims to the first EU country of entry, and rejected arguments that public security threats justified bypassing it.
Critics, including the Greens and advocacy group Pro Asyl, argue the policy violates EU law and strains relations with neighboring countries like Poland. The government maintains that the measures are temporary, with a long-term goal of strengthening EU external borders. Over 2,800 people, including 138 asylum seekers, were reportedly denied entry in the first two weeks of the policy. The ECJ ruling could set a precedent for Germany’s migration strategy and its alignment with EU regulations.
The Berlin Administrative Court’s ruling on June 2, 2025, highlights that Germany’s turnback policy may violate the EU’s Dublin Regulation, which mandates that asylum claims be processed by the first EU country of entry after proper assessment. An ECJ ruling could either legitimize Germany’s approach or force a policy overhaul, clarifying the balance between national border control and EU law. If the ECJ rules against Germany, it could set a precedent limiting member states’ ability to unilaterally implement border pushbacks, reinforcing EU-wide asylum protocols.
Conversely, a ruling in Germany’s favor could embolden other nations to adopt similar measures, potentially fragmenting EU migration policy. Domestically, Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government faces pressure to curb irregular migration, a key campaign promise. Continuing pushbacks despite legal challenges risks backlash from opposition parties like the Greens, who argue it undermines EU values and human rights. A prolonged legal battle could erode public support if migration numbers remain high.
Internationally, the policy strains relations with neighbors like Poland, which has criticized Germany’s unilateral actions. This could hinder EU cohesion, especially as other countries like Austria and Hungary also tighten border controls. Over 2,800 people, including 138 asylum seekers, were turned away in the policy’s first two weeks, raising concerns from groups like Pro Asyl about violations of asylum seekers’ rights. Pushbacks without proper procedure could lead to refoulement, sending migrants to unsafe countries, breaching international law.
The policy fuels anti-migrant sentiment in Germany, potentially deepening social divides, while also galvanizing pro-asylum advocacy, leading to protests and public debate. Germany’s push for an ECJ ruling signals a broader debate on harmonizing EU migration policies. The outcome could influence reforms to the Dublin system, which many criticize as outdated, and affect negotiations on strengthening EU external borders, a stated German goal.
Pro-Policy (Merz’s CDU/CSU argue that strict border controls are necessary to manage migration flows, reduce strain on public services, and address security concerns. They view pushbacks as a pragmatic response to rising irregular crossings (e.g., Germany recorded over 1.2 million asylum applications in 2024, per web sources). Opposition (Greens, SPD Left Wing, NGOs) criticize the policy as inhumane and legally dubious, emphasizing Germany’s obligation to uphold EU and international asylum laws. They warn of social polarization and damage to Germany’s reputation as a humanitarian leader.
Pro-Border Control States (e.g., Germany, Hungary, Austria) favor stricter national measures to deter migration, citing overwhelmed systems and public discontent. They push for stronger EU external borders but resist centralized EU control over their policies. Pro-EU Integration States (e.g., France, Spain) advocate for unified EU migration policies and burden-sharing, opposing unilateral actions like Germany’s that could shift migration pressures to other member states or destabilize EU solidarity.
German public opinion is split, with polls (e.g., from X posts in 2025) showing 55% support for stricter border controls but 60% favoring humane asylum processes. Far-right groups exploit the issue to gain traction, while progressive activists rally against perceived xenophobia. The debate amplifies tensions between urban, cosmopolitan areas and rural, conservative regions, mirroring broader European trends. Poland and other eastern neighbors resent Germany’s pushbacks, which increase pressure on their borders. This has sparked diplomatic friction, with Poland threatening reciprocal measures, highlighting a divide between Western and Eastern EU approaches to migration.
Locals on the German island of Sylt have expressed strong opposition to a proposal allowing hunting tourists to shoot jackals, following the first sighting of a golden jackal on the island. The initiative, backed by the local hunting association and the Hunters’ Association of Schleswig-Holstein, aimed to control the jackal population, citing concerns about the non-native species’ potential impact on local wildlife, such as ground-nesting birds.
However, residents and some conservationists argue that the jackal, likely a lone animal that migrated from Eastern Europe, poses no significant threat and should be left alone or managed non-lethally. They view the involvement of external hunters as unnecessary and disruptive to the island’s ecosystem and tourism-driven identity.
Public sentiment, as reflected in local discussions and posts on X, emphasizes protecting Sylt’s natural balance over introducing hunting tourism, with some calling the plan an overreaction.
The controversy over allowing hunting tourists to shoot jackals on Sylt highlights several implications and reveals a clear divide among stakeholders, reflecting broader tensions between conservation, local identity, and external intervention. The golden jackal, a non-native species in Germany, could potentially disrupt Sylt’s delicate ecosystem, particularly affecting ground-nesting birds like oystercatchers or lapwings. However, with only one confirmed sighting, the ecological threat may be overstated, and lethal measures could unnecessarily disturb the island’s biodiversity. Non-lethal alternatives, like monitoring or relocation, could suffice but require resources and coordination.
Sylt is a premier tourist destination known for its pristine beaches and natural beauty. Introducing hunting tourism risks alienating visitors who prioritize eco-friendly experiences, potentially harming the island’s economy. Conversely, proponents argue controlled hunting could attract a niche market of hunting enthusiasts, though this seems less aligned with Sylt’s established tourism brand. The proposal has sparked a clash between local values and external pressures. Sylt’s residents, many of whom view the island as a sanctuary for nature, see the involvement of outside hunters as an intrusion. This could erode trust in local authorities and hunting associations, deepening community divisions.
The decision on Sylt could set a precedent for handling other non-native species in Germany. A heavy-handed approach might encourage similar measures elsewhere, while a more restrained response could promote coexistence or non-lethal management, influencing national conservation policies. The local hunting association and the Hunters’ Association of Schleswig-Holstein support allowing hunting tourists to target the jackal, framing it as a proactive measure to protect local wildlife from an invasive species.
They argue that jackals, native to Southeast Europe, could multiply and threaten Sylt’s ecosystem. They also see economic potential in regulated hunting tourism. Critics view this as an overreaction to a single animal and question the motives, suspecting profit-driven interests over genuine ecological concerns. Many Sylt locals and some conservationists oppose the plan, advocating for the jackal to be left alone or managed non-lethally (e.g., through monitoring or capture).
They argue the jackal poses no immediate threat and reflects natural migration patterns. They prioritize Sylt’s identity as a nature-friendly destination and reject external hunters as disruptive. Proponents claim this stance underestimates the long-term risks of invasive species and lacks a practical plan for managing potential population growth. Many see the situation as emblematic of broader conservation debates, advocating for science-based, humane solutions over knee-jerk reactions.
Some accuse these voices of being detached from local realities, arguing that urban or non-resident perspectives may overlook the practical challenges faced by island communities. Sylt’s case underscores the challenge of aligning local governance with community values, especially in areas dependent on tourism. The lack of consensus risks prolonging the stalemate, with the jackal’s fate—and Sylt’s approach to conservation—hanging in the balance. No recent updates indicate a resolution, suggesting ongoing deliberation among stakeholders.
The Stolbur phytoplasma, transmitted by the cixiid planthopper Hyalesthes obsoletus (commonly known as the Schilf-Glasflügelzikade or reed leafhopper), has caused significant crop yield losses in Germany, particularly affecting potatoes, sugar beets, and various vegetables. In Baden-Württemberg, yield losses in potato crops have reached up to 70% in some areas, with severe cases leading to total crop failure. Potatoes are a critical crop for Germany, which is largely self-sufficient in potato production, making these losses particularly concerning.
The affected area for sugar beets has nearly doubled from 40,000 hectares in 2023 to at least 75,000 hectares in 2024, representing about a quarter of Germany’s sugar beet cultivation area. Yield losses in Baden-Württemberg reached up to 25% in 2024. Crops such as red beets, celery, cabbage, onions, carrots, and even rhubarb and peppers in some regions have experienced significant yield and quality losses. Infected plants often become rubbery, wilt, or rot, rendering them unsuitable for processing or storage.
The German Farmers’ Association (Deutscher Bauernverband) and the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Agriculture have described Stolbur as a “serious threat” to the supply of domestic potatoes, vegetables, and sugar. Farmers face financial losses due to reduced yields, increased sorting efforts, and the disposal of unmarketable crops. In some cases, entire farms’ viability is at risk. Stolbur is caused by the bacterium Candidatus Phytoplasma solani, which is transmitted through the feeding of the reed leafhopper. Infected plants exhibit symptoms such as wilting, reddening, rubbery roots or tubers, and reduced sugar content, severely impacting quality and marketability.
The reed leafhopper has spread rapidly from southern Germany (Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate, Bavaria, Hesse) to northern regions, including Lower Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt. Warmer and drier conditions linked to climate change have enhanced the leafhopper’s reproduction and survival, exacerbating the disease’s spread. Weeds like Convolvulus arvensis (field bindweed) and Cirsium arvense (Canada thistle) can act as reservoirs for the phytoplasma, facilitating its persistence and spread among crops.
Baden-Württemberg is the hardest hit, with significant losses in potato and sugar beet production. Other southern states like Bavaria, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Hesse are also affected. The disease has reached Lower Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt, indicating a northward expansion likely driven by climate change. There are currently no known natural enemies of the reed leafhopper in Germany, complicating biological control efforts.
Effective chemical or biological controls for the leafhopper are scarce. Research is ongoing, with trials exploring deeper tillage (20 cm or more) to reduce leafhopper nymphs, crop rotation with maize or fallow land, and the use of SBR-tolerant sugar beet varieties. Repellents and natural enemies are also being tested, but results are preliminary. Strategies like crop rotation, intercropping, and resistant cultivars are being explored to reduce disease incidence. However, these require further research to optimize for different cropping systems.
Consumer and Health Implications
Authorities and associations confirm that Stolbur poses no health risks to humans. Affected crops with rubbery textures or rot are not sold in markets. Continued spread could lead to reduced availability of domestically grown potatoes and vegetables by autumn, potentially increasing reliance on imports and affecting food prices. Warmer and drier conditions are amplifying the leafhopper’s lifecycle, increasing Stolbur’s prevalence. This aligns with broader trends where climate change exacerbates plant disease risks, particularly in temperate regions like Europe.
Stolbur is not unique to Germany. Studies from South Moravia (Czech Republic) reported yield losses of up to 60% in tomatoes, 93% in peppers, and 100% in celeriac from 2006–2008. Similar issues have been noted in maize in Bosnia and Herzegovina and potatoes in Turkey, indicating a regional challenge in Europe. Farmers are urged to adopt deeper tillage and consider crop rotations with non-host crops like maize to reduce leafhopper populations. Monitoring and removing weed reservoirs can also help.
The German Farmers’ Association President, Joachim Rukwied, has called for urgent political action to develop effective control measures, as current responses are deemed insufficient. Collaborative efforts, like Südzucker’s task force with the Julius Kühn Institute and universities, aim to accelerate research and practical solutions. Investing in resistant crop varieties, improving disease surveillance, and adopting climate-smart farming practices (e.g., ICM) are critical to mitigating future losses.
Good People, join me to thank Unyime Obot for making another generous donation to Tekedia Institute Mini-MBA general scholarship fund. For this, we will give full scholarships to two proprietors of primary schools in any rural location in Africa. Our non-profit selection partner, Ideas Worth Billions IWB Africa, will do the selection.
IWB Africa will send the names latest this Friday as the live session of Tekedia Mini-MBA begins on Saturday. Connect IWB if interested.
At Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC 25), the tech giant shifted its focus from the anticipated AI advancements to a major software design overhaul.
Expectations for major AI advancements, particularly a revamped, AI-powered Siri, went unmet, leaving many disappointed.
Instead of unveiling the highly anticipated “more personalized” Siri promised at WWDC 24, Apple delayed its release, with SVP of Software Engineering Craig Federighi stating that the update needed more time to meet quality standards.
He said,
“As we’ve shared, we’re continuing our work to deliver the features that make Siri even more personal. This work needed more time to reach our high-quality bar, and we look forward to sharing more about it in the coming year.”
The company first announced the delay in March, shifting leadership by replacing SVP of Machine Learning and AI Strategy John Giannandrea with Mike Rockwell, formerly of Vision Pro, signaling internal struggles to keep pace with AI rivals like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.
The lack of AI progress sparked concern among investors, with Apple shares dipping post-event, and users voicing frustration over Siri’s lag behind competitors’ custom GPTs, multimodal agents, and creative copilots.
A LinkedIn User @Geetansh Pardhi wrote,
“After watching WWDC, I’d give Apple Intelligence a ?/??. Yes, there’s a sprinkle of ChatGPT. Yes, Siri got a revamp. But in the grand scheme of things… it still feels like Apple is catching up, not leading.
“Meanwhile, competitors are releasing custom GPTs, multimodal agents, and creative copilots at a rapid pace. As someone who works with AI daily, I find that Siri is still too far from being a reliable assistant. Apple plays the long game, sure. But in AI? The game’s moving faster than ever.”
Founder of Sentiment Louis Gleeson wrote,
“This isn’t the company that used to ship culture-defining products out of nowhere. This is a trillion-dollar giant playing catch-up. Steve Jobs once said: “Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.”
“Right now? Apple looks like a follower. Big moves are coming from players like OpenAI, Perplexity, and startups you haven’t even heard of yet. And if Apple doesn’t regain its product soul soon, it won’t just lose relevance in AI. They’ll lose the next generation entirely.”
Several others are of the opinion that Apple may get lost in the dust as they continue to lag the field in AI. They emphasized that big leaps are made, and Apple seems like a spectator, which may endanger the iPhone.
Industry analysts, including Wedbush Securities’ Daniel Ives, warned that Apple’s cautious, privacy-focused approach, while admirable, risks losing ground in the fast-moving AI race, potentially threatening the iPhone’s dominance.
Ives said,
“Apple needs to move faster in the AI space if it wants to remain competitive. Their focus on privacy and caution is admirable, but the tech world won’t wait.”
While others worry that Apple risks falling behind as AI becomes increasingly central to both devices and software worldwide, some industry watchers have praised the Cupertino’s giant cautious approach as responsible.
In place of AI revelations, Apple showcased its largest software design overhaul in a decade, a sleek new aesthetic it calls “Liquid Glass.” The refreshed look, characterized by transparency, depth, and a fluid visual style, now spans across Apple’s entire ecosystem.
Apple’s focus on design over AI innovation underscores a strategic divide, raising questions about its ability to keep up in a rapidly evolving field. As the tech giant doubles down on privacy and careful innovation, the question remains whether this approach can enable it to keep pace in an industry rapidly shaped by AI.
It’s a beautiful year for badminton lovers in Malaysia as their heroes, Aaron Chia and Soh Wooi Yik, make it to their first-ever Singapore Open final. The pair defeated the Indian pair of Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty in a stunning semi-final.
The duo’s relentless drive has cemented Malaysia’s badminton as a global force. The fans are feeling their rhythm all the way from Kuala Lumpur and beyond. Aaron-Wooi Yik have had an amazing year after bagging titles at the Badminton Asia Championships 2025 and Thailand Open. They lost their third final to their compatriots at the Malaysian masters last week. Their bout against South Korea in the Singapore Open finals would be their fourth this year. The pair must be trying to set a record of 3 championships in one year.
Their performance had the pair’s betting fans from platforms like 7Slots Casino describe their synergy as “electric.”
Aaron-Wooi Yik gave the fans a run for their money with a truly stunning display of skill and grit in the Singapore Open 2025 semifinals. That performance set them apart as Malaysia’s badminton powerhouse. They defeated India’s formidable Satwiksairaj Rankireddy-Chirag Shetty, formerly ranked number 3 in the world.
Aaron-Wooi Yik delivered a masterclass in the 63-minute clash with India’s Chirag Shetty-Satwiksairaj Rankireddy in a gripping 19-21, 21-10, 21-18 battle. The Malaysian pair had a beautiful comeback from a first-game loss. Key moments included:
The comeback was celebrated by fans as the duo showcased their resilience under immense pressure. They’ve indeed given the fans something to look forward to in the Singapore Open final.
The pair’s semi-final win stemmed from precision and seamless teamwork. Their approach blended Wooi Yik’s explosive smashes with Aaron’s deft net control. This helped them to outsmart the Indian’s fast-paced attack. The Malaysian Badminton pair tightened their defense to counter Chirag’s drives and exploit Satwik’s backcourt errors.
From the early rounds to the high-stakes clashes, Aaron-Wooi Yik carved a remarkable path through the Singapore Open 2025. Their journey is marked by strategic brilliance and clutch performances. Everything they faced so far has set them up for their historic first final appearance in this prestigious tournament.
The pair had their fill of tough wins while working their way up to the finals. They started with an early-round dominance, and in the second round, they ended a four-year jinx against Japan’s Takuro Hoki and Yugo Kobayashi. They beat the pair in a 21-13, 19-21, 21-18 three-game clash. This tournament showed just how consistent and hungry Aaron-Wooi Sik were to reach the Singapore Open 2025 final. Their early key victories include:
This year’s tournament brought strong opps that truly tested Aaron-Wooi Yik’s mettle. Their semi-final win over India’s finest felt like a replay of their Badminton Malaysia Open 2025 campaign, where they toppled China’s Liang Wei Keng-Wang Chang.
The pair is equipped with mental toughness and rigorous training to neutralize high-ranked opponents. It worked for them. Each victory built on the previous one to usher them into the finals.
Aaron-Wooi Yik’s semifinal triumph sent waves of pride and optimism across Malaysia’s badminton fanbase. You could see the joy as the national coaching staff echoed sentiments lauding the duo’s growth. Without a doubt, they cemented their role as torchbearers for Malaysia’s badminton on the global stage.
You could see the hard work and pride on Aaron and Wooi Yik’s faces after the match. They shared their sentiments on the popular new app X. Aaron said, “We fought for every point, and this final means everything to Malaysia.” Wooi Yik added, “Our fans’ support pushed us through.” Fans all over are looking forward to a spirited final. Right now, we see:
Malaysia’s badminton head coach Tan Bin Shen praised the duo and talked about their evolution since their Badminton Asia Championships 2025 title. When asked what he thought, he said, “Their discipline and synergy are world-class.” He further talks about their defense and mental resilience, noting that “They’ve grown into leaders.”
Aaron Chia and Soh Wooi Yik’s qualification for the Singapore Open 2025 finals marks a monumental milestone in their careers. Beyond them, it also stands as a legacy for Malaysia’s badminton.
This historic first appearance in the tournament’s final breaks a 17-year drought for Malaysia in this prestigious event. The duo has indeed cemented their place in the sport’s history.
Aaron-Wooi Yik marked their first appearance in this Super 750 event’s championship match, ending a 17-year drought on June 1, 2025. Here’s a table that helps put things into perspective:
| Year | Malaysian Men’s Doubles Finalists | Result |
| 2008 | Fairuzizuan Tazari-Zakry Latif | Won |
| 2025 | Aaron Chia-Soh Wooi Yik | TBD |
After a 17-year drought, it feels wonderful to finally taste the waters of a final. The duo’s success alongside peers like Lee Zii Jia inspires young players. Aaron-Wooi Yik’s four final runs this year send a message to all: Malaysia’s men are returning to men’s doubles dominance. They have indeed boosted the nation’s pride and global respect. They have returned bragging rights to their dedicated fans.
Making it to the finals alone means Aaron-Wooi Yik are on the cusp of history. The Singapore Open 2025 men’s doubles final will be a defining moment for Malaysian badminton. Set for June 1, 2025, at the Singapore Indoor Stadium, this clash with the Koreans promises high-adrenaline action.
Aaron-Wooi Yik have two titles in the bag this year but are looking to crown their efforts with a historic win not seen since 2008.
The duo will face South Korea’s Kim Won Ho-Seo Seung Jae, world No. 10. They defeated Denmark’s Kim Astrup-Anders Skaarup Rasmussen 21-17, 21-16 to enter the finals. They ‘re a tough challenge for Malaysia’s favourite duo.
Head-to-head stats so far favor Kim-Seo, who won their sole 2025 clash at the India Open semi-finals. Key metrics include:
Winning is no simple thing in badminton. For Aaron-Wooi Yik to take home the purse, they must counter Kim’s power with speed and Seo’s defense with precise attacks. Mixing smashes with soft drops—the same tactic used in the semi-final—could exploit Seo’s backcourt gaps.
The duo have had 15 matches in the last three weeks leading up to this final, so fatigue is a big issue. Pace control will be crucial for Malaysia’s first Singapore Open title since 2008.
The first men’s double Singapore Open final in years has ignited a firestorm of excitement across Malaysia. Fans and the media are buzzing over the duo’s historic feat. No one expected them to come this far.
The world’s number 3 duo has already won hearts and headlines with their comeback, triumphing over India’s Rankireddy-Shetty. Now it’s time to bring home the trophy and set a new record.
“CHIASOH TO THE FINAL” is the anthem on Malaysian Twitter. Fans in Petaling Jaya and Kuala Lumpur took to X to praise Aaron-Wooi Yik’s unstoppable spirit. You can feel the pride, the hype, and the unity.
Fans are thrilled that the duo made a comeback to qualify for the finals. Word on the street is “It feels destined”. Malaysia’s badminton obsession is further amplified by betting fans who put some skin in the game with popular platforms like 7Slots Casino.
As expected of a historic event, global media hailed Aaron-Wooi Yik’s run. The Olympics praised their semi-final comeback. Badminton Planet called them “Malaysia’s golden pair.” News outlets like Bernama emphasized their historic final.
Coverage like this elevates Malaysia’s badminton profile. The stage is set for a blockbuster final. Will Aaron Chia and Soh Wooi Yik bring home the trophy? We will see.