Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment begins today, Saturday, March 14. I will start with a broad introduction to AI, connecting ideas from natural philosophy to modern computing to provide the conceptual foundations.
By the end of tomorrow’s session, you will have a mini-ChatGPT running on your personal computer or laptop.If you would like to learn with us, registration is still open here.
Vibe coding—the loose, prompt-driven style popularized by figures like Andrej Karpathy in 2025, where you describe ideas in natural language and let AI; Claude, Cursor, Gemini, etc. generate, iterate, and sometimes fully build apps—remains alive and thriving for prototyping, weekend projects, personal tools, and early MVPs.
It’s not disappearing because it’s incredibly fun and fast for exploration. Tools and workflows around it keep evolving, with people still sharing “vibe coding sesh” stories daily. But the broader “move fast and let AI break things” mindset—pushing AI-generated code straight into production with minimal oversight, often after mass engineer layoffs to chase efficiency—is slamming into hard limits.
Liability is becoming the wall. Recent incidents highlight this: High-profile outages tied to over-reliance on autonomous AI agents; one case reportedly nuked a production environment while “fixing” a config. Growing reports of massive technical debt from unchecked AI output: spaghetti logic, security holes, scaling failures, memory leaks, and unmaintainable black-box code that even the original “vibe coder” can’t debug.
Companies that fired or reduced headcount aggressively to bet on AI replacement are now discovering the catch: AI produces volume, but humans still own the accountability. When things go wrong—data breaches, compliance violations, lost revenue, or regulatory scrutiny—the buck stops with the engineers who approved and merged it, not the model.
Legal and insurance pressures are rising; some predict personal liability clauses for AI-approved code will spread from Big Tech downward. The irony is sharp: firms wanted AI to replace engineers ? they cut the very people who could reliably babysit; review, harden, test, and integrate that AI output ? now the remaining (or rehiring) engineers are more critical than ever, but focused on higher-leverage roles like orchestration, auditing, guardrailing agents, and fixing AI messes rather than line-by-line coding.
Evidence from 2025–2026 trends shows: Junior and entry-level hiring remains suppressed in many places. Senior/strong engineers are in demand for “AI steering,” reverse-engineering agent-generated chaos, enforcing governance, and reducing risk. Productivity gains exist; 20–40% on scoped tasks but only with disciplined human oversight—industrializing AI use like testing frameworks in the 2000s.
Warnings about “vibe coding hangover” and “development hell” from unchecked slop are common. In short: Vibe coding isn’t dead—it’s just graduating from party trick to something that needs adult supervision at scale. The reckless “ship AI slop fast” phase is ending because the bill (outages, debt, lawsuits) is arriving.
Companies are re-learning that AI amplifies engineers; it doesn’t eliminate the need for engineering judgment and responsibility. The next phase looks like: fewer total coders needed for volume, but higher bar for those who remain—aptitude, system thinking, and “when to override the AI” skill over pure syntax. The babysitters are coming back, often at premium rates.
Liability clauses are contractual provisions that allocate financial and legal responsibility when something goes wrong—such as a bug in AI-generated code causing an outage, data breach, IP infringement, or customer harm.
In the 2026 AI coding landscape, they have become central because AI tools produce code at scale, but humans (engineers) still own the consequences of approving or deploying it. These clauses appear in three main places: AI tool/vendor terms of service. Client or enterprise contracts. Internal employment policies or professional standards
They do not typically make individual engineers personally write a check for damages; companies almost always shield employees from direct financial hits. Instead, they enforce accountability through review requirements, caps, and risk-shifting—exactly why the “move fast and let AI break things” era is hitting a wall.
Global oil prices held above the psychologically significant $100 threshold on Friday as the war involving the United States, Israel, and Iran edged toward its third week, reinforcing fears that a prolonged disruption to Middle East energy routes could soon ripple through the global economy.
The international benchmark Brent crude traded at $101.15 per barrel by 5:40 a.m. ET, up about 0.7%, while West Texas Intermediate rose 0.1% to $95.87 per barrel, after both contracts trimmed earlier gains.
Despite the modest moves on Friday, oil markets are closing out another powerful week. Brent is set to finish the week more than 9% higher, following a 27.9% surge last week, the biggest weekly gain since the market turmoil during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. U.S. benchmark WTI, which logged its strongest weekly performance since 1983 last week, is on course for a further 5.8% increase.
The rally reflects mounting anxiety among traders that the conflict could trigger a sustained disruption to global oil supply, particularly through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.
The narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to international markets is one of the most critical choke points in the global energy system. Roughly 20% of the world’s oil consumption passes through the corridor, making it central to energy supply chains across Asia, Europe, and North America.
With shipping in the area increasingly restricted amid the conflict, dozens of tankers have been forced to delay voyages or remain stranded while producers face mounting storage constraints.
Several foreign vessels operating in or near the Strait have reportedly been struck by ammunition this week, heightening fears that the conflict could evolve into a wider maritime security crisis.
Industry executives say the impact on global supply is already significant.
Speaking to CNBC, Amjad Bseisu, chief executive of EnQuest, warned that every day the disruption persists, it removes massive volumes of crude from global markets.
“Every day we see a delay, there’s another 20 million barrels wiped off the market, and that will have an impact, and continues to have an impact,” he said.
Bseisu added that the current supply shock is comparable to the disruption triggered by the Arab oil embargo of the 1970s, one of the most dramatic episodes in modern energy markets.
“The last time there was a similar reduction in supply was the Arab embargo. Then we saw a quadrupling of prices,” he said, noting that crude has already surged about 50% since the conflict began.
Markets are also reacting to political signals suggesting the war may not end soon. Donald Trump said overnight that the United States was prepared for a prolonged campaign.
“We have unparalleled firepower, unlimited ammunition, and plenty of time,” he said, urging supporters to “watch what happens” to Iran’s leadership.
According to a report by Axios, Trump also told leaders during a call with the Group of Seven that Iran was “about to surrender.” But Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, rejected the claim in remarks broadcast on state television, vowing that Tehran would continue the fight.
Iranian officials have warned that the consequences for global energy markets could be severe. Earlier this week, military spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaqari cautioned that oil prices could climb as high as $200 per barrel if regional security deteriorates further.
Emergency measures have struggled to calm markets.
Governments have attempted to contain the rally through emergency measures aimed at boosting supply. The International Energy Agency has approved a release of 400 million barrels of crude from strategic reserves, the largest coordinated drawdown of emergency stockpiles in history.
Washington has also temporarily eased certain sanctions on Russian oil exports to allow more crude to reach international markets. Even so, the response has done little to calm traders, underscoring the scale of the potential supply disruption should the Strait of Hormuz remain constrained.
Beyond the energy markets, economists warn that the war’s economic consequences may soon begin to surface more clearly across the global economy.
Oil is a fundamental input for transportation, manufacturing, and power generation. Sustained price increases typically cascade through supply chains, raising the cost of everything from shipping and aviation fuel to food production and industrial output.
For central banks already battling stubborn inflation, another surge in energy costs could complicate efforts to stabilize prices. Strategists at Barclays said markets had initially assumed the conflict would be brief, but investors are becoming increasingly uneasy as it drags on.
“Investors still believe in the Trump put, hence global equities are not down as much as in past oil shocks,” wrote Emmanuel Cau in a research note. “But nervousness is growing by the day and the longer the Strait of Hormuz stays closed the more stagflationary markets will turn.”
Stagflation — the toxic combination of weak economic growth and high inflation — remains one of the most feared outcomes for policymakers because it limits the effectiveness of traditional monetary tools.
The potential timing of such a shock is particularly sensitive. Many economies are already grappling with high interest rates, slowing industrial activity, and fragile consumer demand following several years of inflation and tightening monetary policy.
A prolonged spike in oil prices could amplify those pressures, raising fuel costs for businesses and households while undermining economic recovery in both advanced and emerging markets.
Currently, energy markets remain intensely focused on developments in the Middle East. But with the conflict showing little sign of easing and shipping routes still constrained, analysts warn that the real economic impact of the crisis may only begin to emerge in the weeks ahead.
According to the latest Forbes real-time billionaires data and their March 2026 updates, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder and former CEO of Binance, has surpassed Bill Gates in net worth. CZ’s net worth: Estimated at around $111 billion with figures cited as $111.1B or $111.4B ranking him #17 globally.
Bill Gates’ net worth: Estimated at $105.7 billion some reports noted around $108B earlier in the month, ranking him #19 globally. This marks a significant surge for CZ, with Forbes attributing his wealth primarily to his estimated 90% ownership stake in Binance valued around $100 billion, plus holdings in BNB tokens and other crypto-related assets.
Binance’s massive trading volume, revenue estimated $16-17B annually in recent years, and market dominance drove this jump—up roughly $47 billion from the prior year. Gates’ wealth has declined relative to peaks due to extensive philanthropic donations through the Gates Foundation and impacts from his 2021 divorce.
Notably, CZ himself has publicly disputed the Forbes estimate, calling it inaccurate or illogical—pointing out that crypto markets dropped over 50% in early 2026, yet his reported net worth rose sharply. He described it as not aligning with “common sense and basic logic,” though Forbes stands by their valuation methodology.
This shift highlights crypto’s growing influence on global wealth rankings, placing CZ among the top 20 people with 12-figure fortunes and ahead of figures like Michael Bloomberg in some snapshots.
This marks a historic milestone where cryptocurrency-derived wealth has propelled someone into the ultra-elite “centibillionaire” club (12-figure fortunes), overtaking a long-time tech icon like Gates, who dominated rankings for years through Microsoft and diversified investments.
The 2026 list added five new centibillionaires, with crypto figures prominent. This signals a shift in global wealth sources toward digital assets, blockchain, and decentralized finance, potentially diversifying the top ranks beyond tech and traditional finance.
Despite CZ’s 2024 legal troubles; guilty plea to money-laundering violations, four-month prison term, $4.3 billion fine, and stepping down as CEO, Binance has rebounded strongly—retaining ~38% market share and high valuations. His post-release surge up ~$47 billion in a year implies strong recovery, possibly aided by favorable U.S. regulatory shifts l.
This crypto platforms’ ability to thrive amid scrutiny and positions Binance as a enduring powerhouse. CZ publicly disputed Forbes’ figures, arguing they “defy logic” since crypto prices dropped >50% in 2026, yet his net worth rose sharply. He called for “common sense and basic logic,” noting assumptions about private holdings (like his Binance stake) can be speculative.
This highlights ongoing debates about estimating wealth in opaque, volatile sectors like crypto—Forbes relies on comparables insider talks, and discounts for regulatory risks, but private companies lack public filings. It raises questions about accuracy in rankings for non-public assets.
Gates’ drop to ~$105–108 billion stems from massive Gates Foundation donations and his 2021 divorce—reflecting a “giving pledge” ethos in traditional tech wealth. CZ’s rise, tied to a for-profit crypto empire with less emphasis on philanthropy in public view spotlights differing paths to extreme wealth: one legacy/tech/philanthropic, the other disruptive/digital/high-risk.
It fuels discussions on wealth inequality, crypto’s societal impact, and whether new billionaires will prioritize giving back. This event amplifies crypto’s legitimacy in mainstream finance—placing its richest figure ahead of Wall Street giants (Bloomberg, Yass, Griffin) and icons like Gates. It could encourage more institutional adoption but also invite scrutiny.
Looking ahead, if crypto rebounds or Binance grows further, more figures from Coinbase, Tether, or others already on the list could climb, reshaping the billionaire landscape. It’s a vivid illustration of how rapidly emerging technologies like blockchain are rewriting wealth hierarchies—challenging old-guard titans and proving crypto’s staying power, even amid volatility and controversy.
Are you trying to bypass iPad Activation Lock but can’t get past the lock screen on your device? This problem usually happens when you forget your Apple ID password or when you buy a second-hand iPad that is still linked to the previous owner’s account. Because of this lock, you cannot set up or use the iPad normally, which can be very frustrating.
The good news is that there are several ways to solve this problem. In this guide, we will show you how to bypass activation lock step by step using simple methods. We will also introduce Tenorshare 4uKey, a helpful tool that can remove different iPhone and iPad locks quickly and easily.
Let’s get started.
Before getting straight to how to bypass iPad activation lock, it’s essential to first understand what it is. Well, Activation Lock is a security feature built into Apple devices. It automatically turns on when the Find My feature is enabled on an iPhone, iPad, or Mac. The purpose of this feature is to protect your device if it is lost or stolen.
When Activation Lock is active, the device requires the Apple ID and password that were previously used to set up the device. Without these credentials, the device cannot be activated.
This is why many users search for ways to bypass iPad activation lock, especially in situations like:
Although Activation Lock is designed for security, it can sometimes create problems for legitimate users who need access to their devices.
If you don’t know the Apple ID or password linked to your device, bypassing the iPad activation lock through normal methods can be very difficult. In this case, many users turn to a professional tool like Tenorshare 4uKey, which is designed to remove various iOS locks, including screen locks and Activation Lock in certain situations, providing a simple process to help users regain access without the original Apple ID credentials.
Tenorshare 4uKey offers several useful features that make it easier to deal with activation lock problems:
Because of these features, many users rely on this tool when they face problems such as ipad mini activation lock or ipad 2 activation lock, especially when the previous Apple ID cannot be accessed.
Step 1: Download and Install 4uKey
Start by downloading Tenorshare 4uKey on your Windows PC or Mac. Install the program and open it. Then connect your iPad to the computer using a USB cable to begin the process.
Step 2: Enter Recovery Mode
After the device is detected, click “Next.” The software will guide your iPad to enter Recovery Mode so the unlocking process can move forward.
Step 3: Begin the Jailbreak Process
Next, the program will start preparing and jailbreaking the iPad. Keep the device connected to the computer during this step and wait until the process is completed.
Step 4: Start Removing the Activation Lock
Once the jailbreak step is finished, 4uKey will automatically begin removing the iCloud Activation Lock from the device.
Step 5: Activation Lock Successfully Bypassed
After a few minutes, the process will complete. The Activation Lock will be removed, and you will be able to set up your iPad and use it normally again.
If you know the Apple ID and password used on the device, the easiest method is to remove the lock through Apple’s official process.
This method works if:
Step 1: Turn on the iPad and go to the Activation Lock screen.
Step 2: Enter the Apple ID and password that were originally used to set up the device.
Step 3: Tap Next to verify the account.
Step 4: Once verified, the device will unlock and continue the setup process.
If the previous owner still has access to the account, this is the easiest way for how to bypass activation lock.
Many users face activation lock issues after buying a second-hand iPad. In this case, the device may still be connected to the previous owner’s Apple ID.
To remove previous owner’s Apple ID iPad, you can try the following solutions.
The simplest solution is to contact the person who sold you the iPad and ask them to remove the device from their Apple ID.
The previous owner can remove the device remotely:
After this step, the activation lock will disappear.
If contacting the previous owner is not possible, using a tool designed to bypass iPad activation lock may help restore access to the device.
Apple may help remove the activation lock if you provide proof of purchase showing that you legally own the device.
Some bypass tools require jailbreaking the device to remove the activation lock. Jailbreaking gives the tool access to system settings that Apple normally restricts. Tools like Tenorshare 4uKey usually guide users through this process. However, it depends on the iPad model and iPadOS version.
Yes, in most cases you need the paid version to remove the activation lock. Free versions usually only check device compatibility. To fully unlock the iPad, you normally need to upgrade to the full version.
Yes, Apple can remove the activation lock if you prove ownership of the device. You will need to provide a valid proof of purchase. If the information is verified, Apple Support may help remove the lock.
Getting stuck on the activation screen can be frustrating when you can’t access your device. To bypass an iPad activation lock, you can try signing in with the original Apple ID, contacting the previous owner if it’s a used device, or reaching out to Apple Support with proof of purchase. If these options are not available, a professional tool like Tenorshare 4uKey can make the process easier by guiding you step by step to remove the activation lock and regain access to your iPad.