DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 220

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Expresses Hope for Blackwell Chip Sales in China, But Admits It’s Up to Trump

0

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said on Friday he remained hopeful that the company’s Blackwell AI chips could eventually be sold in China, but emphasized that the decision ultimately rests with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Speaking in Seoul, South Korea, during his first official visit to the country in more than ten years, Huang made the remarks a day after Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held bilateral talks there — a meeting closely watched for its implications on trade and technology cooperation.

“I’m always hopeful that both governments will arrive at a conclusion someday where Nvidia’s technology could be exported to China,” Huang said. “We’re always hoping to return to China, and I think that Nvidia in China is very good. It’s in the best interest of the United States. It’s in the best interest of China.”

Following the talks, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that semiconductors had been discussed and that China would be “talking to Nvidia and others about taking chips,” but clarified that “we’re not talking about the Blackwell.”

The Blackwell chip is Nvidia’s most powerful AI processor yet — and the centerpiece of its latest generation of hardware used in training advanced AI systems. Its export to China has been blocked under U.S. restrictions on high-performance semiconductor sales, part of Washington’s broader strategy to prevent Beijing from gaining access to technologies that could enhance its military or surveillance capabilities.

The U.S.-China standoff over advanced chip technology has become a defining element of global AI competition. Washington’s export controls, first tightened in 2022 and later expanded, prohibit the sale of Nvidia’s most capable AI chips, including the A100, H100, and now the Blackwell, to China.

Huang has spent months urging U.S. policymakers to reconsider those limits, arguing that Chinese AI’s reliance on American-designed hardware ultimately benefits the United States.

He has previously said Chinese AI’s dependence on U.S. hardware is good for America, suggesting that restricting access could backfire by accelerating China’s push toward semiconductor self-sufficiency.

According to sources cited by Reuters, Nvidia has been developing a special variant of its Blackwell chip tailored for China — a model that would fall below the U.S. performance threshold for export bans but still outperform the company’s H20 chip, the most advanced model currently cleared for sale in the Chinese market.

However, the Chinese government has reportedly cooled toward Nvidia, discouraging local firms from purchasing the H20 as part of efforts to strengthen domestic alternatives. Instead, Beijing has been encouraging investment in Huawei Technologies Co., which has aggressively moved to expand its own chip production capacity.

A Shrinking Chinese Market

Huang admitted that Nvidia’s ambitions for a foothold in China have diminished significantly.

“We had been hoping for a non-zero market share in China, but we’re now expecting zero,” he told reporters.

Although the U.S. has expressed national security concerns that Nvidia’s chips could be diverted for military use, Huang dismissed the notion that export controls would meaningfully limit China’s technological capabilities. China’s own domestically produced AI chips are already good enough for their military applications, he said.

He further cautioned against underestimating Huawei’s competitive strength, calling it one of the most capable technology companies in the world.

“It is deeply uninformed to think that Huawei can’t build systems,” Huang said. “It is foolish to underestimate the might of China and the incredible competitive spirit of Huawei. This is a company with extraordinary technology.”

A Complex Balancing Act

Nvidia, now the world’s most valuable semiconductor maker with a market capitalization surpassing $5 trillion, relies heavily on global demand for its AI processors but faces increasing political headwinds as Washington and Beijing vie for dominance in advanced computing.

During his trip to Seoul, Huang said he was delighted with the success of the Trump-Xi meeting, though he was unaware of the specific topics discussed.

“I have every confidence that the two presidents had a very good conversation,” he said. “It doesn’t have to involve anything that I do.”

While Nvidia’s presence in China has been sharply curtailed by U.S. policy, Huang’s remarks suggest that the company remains optimistic about a possible reopening of the Chinese market — a move that could reshape the global AI supply chain if permitted by the Trump administration.

For now, Nvidia’s growth continues to be driven by soaring demand in the U.S., Europe, and South Korea, where it is expanding partnerships with Samsung Electronics, Hyundai Motor Group, and other technology firms investing heavily in AI infrastructure.

However, Nvidia’s future in China remains one of the most consequential questions in the evolving U.S.-China technology rivalry — one that hinges on whether Washington sees strategic advantage in allowing its most advanced chips to flow once again into the world’s second-largest economy.

International Criminal Court Ditches Microsoft Office for European Alternative Amid Rising Sovereignty Concerns

0

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is moving away from Microsoft Office and adopting a European software suite known as openDesk, signaling a growing push among European institutions to reduce dependence on U.S. technology providers.

The transition, confirmed by the ICC to The Register, will see the court migrate its productivity and collaboration tools to openDesk, an open-source platform developed by the Center for Digital Sovereignty (ZenDiS) under the authority of Germany’s Federal Ministry of the Interior.

Although ICC officials declined to elaborate on the decision, the timing coincides with deepening unease in Europe over the geopolitical implications of relying on American technology giants — particularly as tensions between Washington and international organizations have escalated under the Trump administration.

The concern was brought to the forefront in February when President Donald Trump signed an executive order sanctioning ICC officials over arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, connected to alleged war crimes in Gaza. The sanctions, which extended to asset freezes and travel restrictions, fueled fears that American companies might be compelled to restrict or suspend services to the court.

Following the sanctions, ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan reportedly lost access to his Microsoft email account, though Microsoft President Brad Smith publicly denied that the company had disabled the account.

“At no point did Microsoft cease or suspend its services to the ICC,” Smith said, emphasizing that the company remained committed to its contractual obligations.

Nonetheless, the incident amplified existing European concerns over data control and sovereignty. The U.S. Cloud Act, which allows Washington access to data stored by American companies even when the information is held in European jurisdictions, has long been viewed by EU officials as a threat to regional privacy laws and institutional independence.

The ICC’s decision to migrate away from Microsoft is widely seen as a precautionary move to ensure data autonomy and shield sensitive judicial operations from external influence.

But the move echoes broader European efforts to assert technological sovereignty. Germany has been at the forefront of these efforts, leading projects aimed at developing homegrown software ecosystems free from U.S. legal and surveillance exposure. The German city of Munich was an early pioneer, migrating its IT infrastructure to Linux and LibreOffice years ago, though it reverted to Microsoft systems in 2020. More recently, the German state of Schleswig-Holstein completed a full transition of 40,000 government accounts to open-source alternatives — including Linux and LibreOffice — as part of its digital independence drive.

ZenDiS, which developed openDesk, describes the platform as a “secure and sovereign digital workspace” tailored for government and international institutions seeking control over their data. The system offers email, document editing, video conferencing, and collaboration tools that mirror Microsoft’s suite, but operate within European data centers governed by EU privacy law.

Analysts believe the ICC’s migration could accelerate similar moves by other international organizations concerned about political exposure and data compliance. Institutions like the ICC are recognizing that control over their digital infrastructure is inseparable from their independence.

The decision also comes amid growing frustration over recent outages on Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which temporarily disrupted access to critical systems across Europe. Those incidents, coupled with Microsoft’s admission that it cannot fully guarantee European data sovereignty under U.S. law, have further bolstered the argument for open-source alternatives managed within the continent.

While the ICC’s partnership with ZenDiS marks a decisive step toward digital independence, Microsoft insists its relationship with the court remains intact.

“We value our relationship with the ICC as a customer and are convinced that nothing impedes our ability to continue providing services to the ICC in the future,” a Microsoft spokesperson told The Register.

However, it is believed that while the ICC’s migration may not trigger a mass exodus from U.S. software providers, it reinforces a trend toward regional tech autonomy. For institutions that deal with sensitive judicial or governmental data, the message is that digital sovereignty is becoming as vital as physical security.

Amazon’s Andy Jassy Says 14,000 Job Cuts Were About “Culture,” Not AI or Cost-Cutting

0
Andy Jassy, boss of AWS

Amazon’s CEO, Andy Jassy, following the company’s latest wave of layoffs that stunned the tech world, has said the decision to cut 14,000 corporate jobs this week was not about artificial intelligence or finances. It was, instead, about “culture.”

That word—simple yet loaded—has become Jassy’s new mantra as he seeks to redefine how the $1.8 trillion company operates in a post-pandemic world. During Amazon’s earnings call on Thursday, Jassy explained that as the company expanded over the years, it accumulated layers of management, processes, and bureaucracy that, in his view, diluted the sense of ownership among employees.

“As you grow and add more people, locations, and businesses, you end up with a lot more layers,” he said. “Sometimes without realizing it, you can weaken the ownership of the people that you have who are doing the actual work.”

Jassy’s approach is seen as part of his ongoing push to return Amazon to what he calls “the world’s largest startup”—a leaner, faster, and more disciplined company. He has made it a mission to root out inefficiency and restore a performance-driven mindset. Part of that effort includes an anonymous complaint line that has already generated 1,500 reports and resulted in more than 450 process changes.

But not everyone is convinced that “culture” fully explains the layoffs. Earlier reports from Reuters and The Wall Street Journal suggested the cuts—potentially affecting up to 30,000 corporate staff—were a response to overhiring during the pandemic and the growing role of AI in automating tasks. And while Jassy downplayed both factors, his own executives have hinted otherwise.

However, Beth Galetti, Amazon’s senior vice president of experience and technology, wrote that “this generation of AI is the most transformative technology we’ve seen since the internet, and it’s enabling companies to innovate much faster than ever before.” The comment reinforced concerns that automation is steadily reshaping the company’s workforce—even if Jassy prefers to frame the changes as cultural rather than technological.

Those concerns are not unfounded. Amazon has long been accused of quietly preparing to replace tens of thousands of warehouse workers with robots. The company denied that claim earlier this year, but it also unveiled two new warehouse robots designed to perform tasks traditionally handled by humans.

The layoffs come despite Amazon’s robust financial performance. The company’s third-quarter earnings exceeded Wall Street expectations, with revenue climbing to $180.17 billion and shares surging 14%. That success makes the timing of the job cuts all the more difficult for affected employees, many of whom see “culture” as a euphemism for efficiency drives and cost savings.

Jassy, who has led the company through years of restructuring and cost-cutting, however, insists the goal is to ensure Amazon doesn’t lose the agility that once defined it.

“It can lead to slowing you down as a leadership team,” he said. “We are committed to operating like the world’s largest startup, and that means removing layers.”

The company’s total headcount, which peaked at 1.6 million in 2021, stood at about 1.5 million at the end of last year—a figure likely to fall further as Jassy pursues his vision of a flatter, faster Amazon.

For those inside the company, Jassy’s message is that Amazon’s next chapter won’t just be about AI or automation. It will be about survival in a culture that rewards speed and precision over size—a return to its scrappy origins, even if it means leaving thousands behind.

Tekedia Capital Presents 18 Global Startups for Current Investment Cycle Ending in Nov

1

Tekedia Capital presents 18 global startups in the H2 2025 investment cycle. These companies cover space tech, quantum computing, finance, AI, fintech, rare earth metal processor, pharmacy tech, lending tech, robotics, trading exchange, drug manufacturing, and more, across economies and markets, from Estonia to US, Kazakhstan to UK, US/Nigeria to Germany, and beyond.

We welcome you to explore these startups and their overview videos by visiting membership area. This cycle will close in November 2025.

Affirm Expands $750m Partnership with New York Life as Fintech Funding Ties Deepen

0

Affirm is expanding its partnership with New York Life Insurance, marking another milestone in the growing alignment between traditional finance and fintech-driven consumer lending.

Under the new deal, New York Life will purchase up to $750 million worth of Affirm’s installment loans through 2026 — a move that strengthens Affirm’s funding pipeline and supports approximately $1.75 billion in annual loan originations.

The partnership, which began in 2023 when New York Life started investing in Affirm’s asset-backed securities and structured lending pools, has already funneled nearly $2 billion into the fintech’s collateral-backed assets. The expansion signals renewed institutional confidence in Affirm’s lending model at a time when fintech companies are under pressure to secure reliable, long-term funding amid volatile capital markets.

“We are proud to expand our relationship with such a trusted and forward-thinking partner in New York Life,” said Michael Linford, Chief Operating Officer, Affirm. “Through our collaboration, we will be even better positioned to responsibly increase access to our flexible and transparent payment options.”

Affirm has already financed more than $100 billion in transactions, with over 90% of its borrowers classified as repeat users — a metric the company touts as evidence of disciplined underwriting and strong customer retention.

The latest move comes amid a broader shift in institutional investment strategies, as insurers, private credit funds, and pension managers increasingly target consumer lending assets to capitalize on higher yields in a prolonged high-interest-rate environment. Insurers like New York Life see structured fintech loans as offering better risk-adjusted returns than traditional bonds or treasuries, especially given the predictable cash flows tied to installment loan repayments.

“As we continue to deploy capital to create lasting value for our policy owners, Affirm has distinguished itself by delivering superior credit outcomes that generate attractive returns,” said Brendan Feeney, Managing Director, New York Life. “We’re excited to take this next step in our relationship, which exemplifies how we collaborate with industry leaders to invest in growing, high-quality assets.”

The broader trend has seen several insurers and asset managers strike similar deals with leading fintechs. Affirm has established additional funding lines with Liberty Mutual Investments, PGIM, and Sixth Street Partners, securing billions in capacity to support its lending operations.

Rival Klarna has entered comparable loan-sale agreements with Nelnet and Pagaya, while PayPal’s $7 billion arrangement with Blue Owl Capital — followed by Blue Owl’s joint venture with Meta to finance the $27 billion Hyperion data center project in Louisiana — underscores the growing integration between fintechs and institutional finance.

These partnerships are becoming vital as consumer lenders navigate an uncertain macroeconomic environment. Although U.S. consumer spending has remained resilient, inflationary pressures and high borrowing costs have tightened credit conditions, prompting fintechs to rely increasingly on external investors for liquidity. Delinquency rates, while stabilizing, remain above pre-pandemic levels in some credit categories, leading to heightened investor scrutiny over underwriting quality and loan performance.

Affirm has managed to maintain strong credit metrics relative to industry peers, helped by its focus on prime and near-prime borrowers and its data-driven risk assessment tools. The company has also expanded partnerships with major retailers such as Amazon, Walmart, and Shopify, providing installment options to millions of consumers at checkout — a strategy that continues to drive transaction growth and steady revenue.

Analysts view the Affirm–New York Life partnership as part of a maturing BNPL sector where technology firms increasingly act as loan originators and distribution platforms, while established financial institutions supply capital and risk management expertise. The model allows fintechs like Affirm to scale responsibly without over-leveraging their balance sheets.

Financial analysts have noted that institutional partnerships are the next phase of fintech evolution — where growth becomes sustainable, not just fast. The collaboration, they said, demonstrates how legacy financial giants are adapting to the digital lending age by working alongside, rather than against, fintech disruptors.

For Affirm, the partnership represents both stability and validation. As the BNPL industry faces headwinds in the U.S. and abroad, aligning with a century-old insurer like New York Life provides credibility that could help reassure investors and regulators that fintech lending can operate safely within traditional finance frameworks.