As the global race for artificial intelligence (AI) supremacy heats up, France is set to announce a €109 billion ($112.5 billion) private sector investment package in its AI sector during the Paris AI Summit, which begins today.

The move, hailed by President Emmanuel Macron as a significant boost to France’s technological ambitions, includes major investments from Canadian asset management giant Brookfield and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The financing package includes €20 billion from Brookfield, primarily earmarked for cutting-edge data centers, and a potential €50 billion investment from the UAE, which will fund AI-related projects, including a 1-gigawatt data center. Macron’s office stated that these investments aim to position France as a leader in AI infrastructure in Europe, a continent that has so far lagged behind the U.S. and China in the AI arms race.

While this announcement signals a step forward for France and Europe, the reality is that Europe remains far behind the AI superpowers, China and the United States. Compared to the massive investments made by Washington and Beijing, the French initiative, though impressive by European standards, represents baby steps in a battle already in full swing elsewhere.

For years, Europe has struggled to compete in the AI space, lagging behind the U.S. and China in research, infrastructure, and computing power. The European Union has focused heavily on AI regulation, aiming to create legal guardrails for AI development and deployment. However, this approach has put the region at a disadvantage, as regulatory hurdles have slowed AI advancements while tech giants in the U.S. and China aggressively expand their capabilities.

The lack of major European AI champions comparable to Google DeepMind, OpenAI, or China’s Baidu and Tencent has also hampered progress. Unlike the U.S., which benefits from a deep venture capital ecosystem and AI research hubs concentrated in Silicon Valley, Seattle, and Boston, Europe’s fragmented tech landscape has made it difficult for companies to achieve AI breakthroughs at scale.

France’s recent announcement of private sector-driven AI investments is a much-needed boost, but experts argue that Europe must ramp up its AI ambitions dramatically to compete with its global rivals.

The U.S. Takes the Lead with $500 Billion AI Initiative “Stargate”

Just weeks before France’s AI summit, the United States made a game-changing move to assert its dominance in AI. Last month, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a massive $500 billion AI investment initiative dubbed “Stargate.” The program, which aims to safeguard America’s lead in AI, has backing from major tech players, including SoftBank Group, OpenAI, and Oracle.

Stargate is designed to massively expand America’s AI infrastructure, focusing on high-performance data centers, AI model training, and next-generation computing power. It represents one of the largest AI investments in history and is seen as a direct response to the growing threat of China’s AI advancements.

The U.S. has already funneled billions into AI research, with leading tech giants such as Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta making record-breaking AI investments in 2024. Microsoft alone has committed $80 billion to AI-powered data centers this year, with over half of that spending taking place in the United States.

China’s DeepSeek Breakthrough

While the U.S. is leading in terms of private sector investment and infrastructure, China has made significant AI breakthroughs, particularly in open-source AI development. The latest shockwave in the AI industry came from China’s DeepSeek, a powerful open-source AI model that shook the tech industry at launch.

Unlike its U.S. counterparts, which require billions in computing resources, DeepSeek reportedly costs a fraction of what American AI models like OpenAI’s GPT-4 cost to develop and train. This development has raised alarms in Silicon Valley, as it demonstrates China’s ability to produce highly efficient AI models at a significantly lower cost.

DeepSeek’s success triggered a massive stock selloff in AI chipmakers such as Nvidia and Broadcom, which lost a combined $800 billion in market value in a single day last week. The selloff was fueled by fears that cheaper Chinese AI alternatives could disrupt the lucrative AI hardware market dominated by American firms.

As a result, tech CEOs in the U.S. have been forced to justify their hefty AI spending, with Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta all doubling down on their AI infrastructure investments.

France’s Long Road in the AI Race

While France’s €109 billion AI investment package is a significant step forward, it pales in comparison to the scale of U.S. and Chinese AI initiatives. Macron has been vocal about making France a leader in AI research and development, but there has been little effort to walk the talk.

A major challenge facing France and Europe is the energy-intensive nature of AI development. AI data centers require massive amounts of electricity, and Europe’s struggling energy sector may not be able to keep up with the demands of next-generation AI infrastructure.

Macron’s government is expected to use the Paris AI Summit to outline strategies to attract more AI firms, secure energy infrastructure for AI projects, and accelerate research and development efforts.

While the €109 billion investment is a start, experts warn that Europe must dramatically scale up its AI ambitions to compete with the U.S. and China. With the U.S. pumping half a trillion dollars into AI and China proving it can develop powerful AI models at a fraction of the cost, France’s latest move represents a small but necessary step in a race where every second counts.

A fresh wave of discontent has erupted across Nigeria’s business and manufacturing sectors following the introduction of a new 4% administrative charge on the Free-on-Board (FOB) value of imports by the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) and a proposed 15% hike in port charges by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA).

Industry stakeholders, including the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA), the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), and former Senate President Bukola Saraki, have condemned these policies, warning that they will yield dire economic consequences.

NECA strongly criticized the newly imposed 4% levy by the NCS, describing it as a desperate move to meet its ambitious N10 trillion revenue target outlined in the 2025 national budget. The association warned that the new charges would extract an additional N2.84 trillion from private businesses, leading to an 80% increase in import duty for industries.

According to NECA’s Director General, Adewale-Smatt Oyerinde, the levy contradicts ongoing tax reforms aimed at harmonizing Nigeria’s tax system and reducing business costs.

“While the government may achieve its revenue goals, the unintended consequences will be severe—higher costs of goods, business closures, rising unemployment, and worsening economic hardship for millions of citizens,” Oyerinde stated.

He also noted that Nigeria’s N71 trillion annual import volume means the new levy will significantly inflate production costs for industries that rely on imported raw materials. The result, he warned, would be higher inflation, deeper poverty, and a declining investment climate.

Furthermore, Oyerinde accused the NCS of prioritizing revenue generation over its core mandate of facilitating trade and driving economic development. He urged the government to reverse the levy immediately and engage with stakeholders to find more sustainable means of revenue generation.

Manufacturers Warn of Economic Collapse

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) also weighed in, urging the NPA to suspend its planned 15% increase in port tariffs, warning that the decision is ill-timed and contradicts the federal government’s pledge to enhance Nigeria’s ease of doing business ranking.

MAN’s Director General, Segun Ajayi-Kadir, lamented that the manufacturing sector is already struggling under the weight of high production costs, foreign exchange volatility, and rising energy prices.

“Nigeria’s current economic climate is characterized by rising inflation, foreign exchange challenges, and declining industrial capacity utilization. Imposing additional costs on manufacturers will only worsen the crisis,” Ajayi-Kadir said.

He further warned that the increase in port tariffs would make Nigeria’s ports less competitive in regional trade, leading to cargo diversion to neighboring countries like Ghana and the Benin Republic. This, he said, would reduce government revenue and fuel smuggling.

MAN suggested that the NPA should focus on reducing turnaround time for vessels, improving cargo clearance efficiency, and eliminating bureaucratic bottlenecks rather than increasing fees.

“Aligning Nigerian port charges with global best practices will attract more trade volume and increase revenue naturally, without strangulating businesses,” Ajayi-Kadir added.

Former Senate President Bukola Saraki joined the opposition, calling the 4% customs levy an unjustified financial burden on Nigerians. Taking to his verified X (formerly Twitter) handle, Saraki warned that the levy will further impoverish citizens, as importers will transfer the extra costs to consumers.

“With our annual imports estimated at N71 trillion, the new 4% customs charge will amount to N2.84 trillion. Does this mean that Customs needs an additional N2.84 trillion every year to function?” Saraki questioned.

He pointed out that the NCS already receives a budget allocation and incentives from total customs duties collected. Now, he argued, the agency wants to impose an additional $1.5 billion in operating costs at a time when the majority of Nigerians are struggling.

“Importers will inevitably pass these costs on to consumers, straining household budgets and worsening economic hardship,” Saraki stressed.

Saraki also criticized the blanket nature of the levy, which applies to all imports, including raw materials essential for industries. This means businesses that pay just 5% in import duties for raw materials will now face an 80% duty increase due to the new administrative fee.

“How does this support the government’s ease of doing business policy? This policy must be reconsidered immediately,” he insisted.

NCS and NPA Justify the Policies

Despite the backlash, the Nigeria Customs Service defended the levy, saying it is in accordance with the Nigeria Customs Service Act (NCSA) 2023. The NCS stated that the 4% FOB charge is necessary for the effective operation of the service and that extensive consultations had been held before its implementation.

The NPA, on its part, defended its 15% tariff hike, arguing that it is essential to address the aging infrastructure, obsolete equipment, and slow port expansion. The agency noted that Nigerian port charges had not been reviewed since 1993 and that an adjustment was long overdue to bring local ports in line with international standards.

“This increase is necessary to improve port efficiency and competitiveness,” the NPA stated.

A Pattern of Increasing Business Costs

This latest round of levies and tariff increases follows a pattern of rising costs for businesses in Nigeria. Recently, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) reintroduced a controversial cybercrime levy, and multiple agencies have raised taxes and fees to meet revenue targets.

“The government appears more focused on revenue extraction than creating an enabling business environment,” NECA lamented.

The impact is already evident, with Nigerian manufacturers struggling under high inflation, unstable foreign exchange rates, and dwindling consumer purchasing power. Many businesses, including multinationals, have exited Nigeria, citing an unfavorable business climate.

What’s Next?

The growing opposition to these new charges suggests that pressure may mount on the government to reconsider or suspend their implementation. NECA and MAN have called for an urgent dialogue with the federal government, urging policymakers to focus on long-term economic reforms rather than short-term revenue grabs.

Whether the government will heed these calls remains uncertain. However, one thing is clear: if these levies proceed, they could trigger an economic downturn, leading to higher inflation, more job losses, and reduced investor confidence.

For now, importers, manufacturers, and ordinary Nigerians can only brace for tougher times ahead.

Welcome to Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16. Thank you. Registration continues here.