DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 28

Bitcoin Inches Toward Breakout as DeFi and Altcoins Dry Up

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Bitcoin is trading in the $73,000–$74,500 range, with recent highs approaching $74,500 up roughly 3–4% in the last 24 hours in some reports. This follows a consolidation period after earlier volatility, with BTC pushing out of multi-week ranges and showing signs of upward momentum.

Analysts note it’s nearing or testing resistance levels around $73,500–$75,000, with potential for further gains toward $78,000–$80,000 or higher in optimistic scenarios if a clean breakout occurs—supported by factors like reduced long-term holder selling, improving risk sentiment, and easing geopolitical pressures.

On the DeFi side, activity and metrics have shown signs of contraction or “drying up” in recent periods. Transaction fees and on-chain demand have declined amid lower volatility and subdued trading, pressuring revenue models for protocols and exchanges. Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi has been resilient in some snapshots (e.g., holding around $96–$105 billion after milder drops compared to broader market drawdowns), but broader narratives highlight reduced liquidity flows, user hoarding, and a shift away from speculative DeFi plays toward more stable assets like BTC itself.

This has led to rotations where capital favors Bitcoin over riskier DeFi tokens, contributing to altcoin underperformance relative to BTC in some phases. This divergence—BTC building strength while DeFi sees reduced activity—fits a pattern where Bitcoin acts as the “safe haven” or primary store of value in crypto during uncertain or low-volatility stretches, potentially setting up for a breakout if macro conditions continue improving.

The market shows cautious optimism for BTC upside, but watch key resistance levels and any reversal signals, as crypto remains highly volatile. Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem remains the cornerstone of decentralized finance in March 2026, serving as the primary infrastructure for programmable smart contracts, stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets, lending, borrowing, and decentralized exchanges.

Despite broader crypto market volatility—including periods of price pressure on ETH—Ethereum continues to dominate key metrics, driving significant impact across the crypto market, blockchain adoption, and even traditional finance integration. Total Value Locked (TVL) on Ethereum stands at approximately $59 billion with some reports citing ranges from $58.9B to higher figures around $60B+ when including recent gains, representing roughly 58–65% of global DeFi TVL depending on the snapshot.

This dominance persists even as competitors like Solana gain ground in high-speed trading and consumer apps—Ethereum plus its Layer 2 networks captures the majority of high-value financial activity, such as institutional DeFi, stablecoin settlement, and RWAs.

Stablecoin market cap on Ethereum exceeds $162 billion, underscoring its role as the go-to settlement layer for digital dollars and cross-border payments. DeFi activity has shown resilience amid market fluctuations. While some earlier 2026 periods saw TVL contractions; broader market drawdowns pulling TVL from peaks like $120B to $105B in prior months, Ethereum’s metrics have stabilized or rebounded, with weekly gains around +4–9% in recent data.

This contrasts with narratives of “drying up”—DeFi isn’t fading; it’s maturing, shifting from speculative hype to battle-tested protocols generating real revenue; over $1B in quarterly fees from Ethereum-based protocols in some analyses. Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem influences the wider landscape in several key ways: Ethereum powers most serious DeFi innovation, stablecoin infrastructure, and tokenized assets.

Its network effects attract institutional capital, with major firms experimenting with on-chain tokens and payments. This convergence of TradFi and DeFi is accelerating in 2026, potentially reshaping capital flows and liquidity. While Bitcoin often leads as a store-of-value “safe haven” during uncertainty, Ethereum captures utility-driven growth—analysts highlight ETH’s potential to outperform BTC in phases of DeFi/RWA expansion.

Ethereum remains the primary platform for developers, hosting the bulk of dApps, NFTs, and enterprise pilots. Layer 2 scaling has reduced costs and boosted throughput, making it more viable for mainstream use. Upcoming upgrades aim to further enhance efficiency, privacy, and quantum resilience, solidifying its lead over faster but less mature alternatives.

DeFi on Ethereum enables permissionless lending and yield farming, tokenized bonds, equities and real estate, and efficient cross-border transfers—potentially disrupting traditional finance. Projections see tokenized RWAs reaching hundreds of billions, with stablecoins hitting $300–500B+ supply. This could integrate blockchain into global payments, corporate treasuries, and investment products, bridging TradFi and DeFi for more transparent, programmable finance.

ETH price has faced headwinds in 2026 trading in ranges like $1,800–$2,200 recently, down from 2025 peaks, reflecting macro pressures, ETF outflows in some periods, and competition. However, fundamentals remain strong: high TVL share, institutional inflows into DeFi protocols, and DeFi’s maturation signal long-term upside.

Analysts are bullish, with targets like $4,000–$7,500+ by year-end 2026 driven by DeFi growth, RWAs, and network upgrades—positioning Ethereum as a foundational layer for the evolving digital economy. Ethereum’s DeFi impact isn’t diminishing—it’s evolving into a more institutional, utility-focused force that’s quietly powering much of crypto’s real-world relevance in 2026.

Trump’s Coalition Plan Sends Bitcoin Surging Toward Breakout

President Donald Trump has publicly called on several countries including China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others dependent on Middle East oil to join a U.S.-led effort to escort ships through the strait and potentially counter Iran’s actions, such as threats to block the corridor or related strikes on facilities like Kharg Island which handles most of Iran’s crude exports.

Reports indicate the White House may announce participating nations soon, though international enthusiasm appears limited so far, with many leaders taking a cautious stance. This geopolitical development is being interpreted in crypto markets as a risk-on signal—potentially de-escalating oil supply disruptions, stabilizing energy prices (which hovered around $100/barrel), and boosting broader risk assets like Bitcoin.

BTC surged about 2% in early Asian trading to a session high near $74,309, breaking above key levels like $73,000 and its 50-day moving average. It has shown consecutive daily gains up to eight in some reports, decoupling somewhat from tech stocks and nearing $75,000 in U.S. trading.

Technical analysts note bullish indicators rising RSI and MACD supporting a potential breakout above resistance zones like $73,000–$74,000, with targets eyed around $78,000 if momentum holds. Institutional inflows; e.g., $767M recently mentioned in some coverage and whale accumulation around $71K–$73K have added fuel.

This comes amid Trump’s broader pro-crypto stance since taking office, including prior pushes for regulatory clarity, criticism of banks, and earlier initiatives like a strategic Bitcoin reserve—though the current surge ties more directly to this Hormuz-related news rather than fresh crypto-specific announcements.

Bitcoin’s price remains volatile, and while the coalition news provided a short-term catalyst, sustained breakout would likely need confirmation of allied commitments or further positive macro and crypto developments. Always consider market risks—prices can reverse quickly on geopolitical shifts.

The Trump Hormuz Coalition plan—aimed at forming a multinational naval effort to escort commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz amid the ongoing U.S.-Israel-Iran war—has triggered a notable short-term surge in Bitcoin and broader crypto markets on March 16, 2026.

Bitcoin rose ~2% in early Asian trading, hitting a high near $74,309 before settling around $73,000–$73,500. This marks consecutive gains and a break above recent resistance. The move is framed as a risk-on catalyst, with crypto decoupling somewhat from broader equities amid high oil volatility.

Markets interpret the coalition push as a potential de-escalation signal—stabilizing oil flows; 20% of global crude passes through Hormuz, capping energy price spikes, and reducing stagflation/inflation fears that could tighten global liquidity. Lower perceived disruption risk boosts appetite for high-beta assets like BTC.

Institutional inflows and whale accumulation around $71K–$73K have amplified momentum. Technicals show bullish signals rising RSI, positive MACD, with analysts eyeing a breakout toward $78,000 if confirmation of allied participation materializes. Altcoins turned green, with the total market cap adding value despite ongoing tensions. Memecoins and risk assets benefited from the sentiment shift.

Crude benchmarks (WTI/Brent) hover around $100–$106, up significantly due to disruptions but not yet exploding further. The coalition is seen as a counter to Iran’s control/blockade threats, though no firm commitments exist yet; China rejected participation, calling for ceasefire; European/NATO allies hesitant; Trump threatened consequences for non-cooperation.

Many nations (China, France, Japan, South Korea, UK) remain non-committal or cautious, focusing on diplomacy over military involvement. If the plan falters, oil could spike more, strengthening the dollar (DXY pressure) and risking a crypto pullback.

The war now in its third week has already caused casualties, oil infrastructure hits, and global energy fears. Crypto has shown resilience; BTC up ~11% from early-war lows, treating geopolitical headlines as buy-the-dip opportunities rather than sustained sell-offs.

A successful coalition (actual escorts, reopened traffic) could sustain the rally by easing macro headwinds and supporting Fed flexibility on rates. Escalation or no allied buy-in could drive oil higher, inflation expectations up, and risk-off flows into safe havens—potentially reversing BTC gains quickly.

Trump’s pro-crypto policies provide underlying support, but this surge ties more to Hormuz news than fresh crypto announcements. The coalition plan has acted as a bullish geopolitical catalyst for Bitcoin in the near term, fueling optimism around reduced energy chaos.

However, with commitments still pending and the conflict fluid, volatility remains high—prices could swing sharply on updates. Markets are headline-driven right now; always factor in risks like sudden reversals.

Iran Proposal to Use Yuan for Oil Settlement is Big Blow on Petrodollar System

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

A senior Iranian official told CNN that Tehran is considering allowing a limited number of oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz — but only on the condition that the oil cargo is traded/settled/paid for in Chinese yuan rather than US dollars.

This comes amid an ongoing regional conflict involving US-Israel-Iran tensions that has disrupted shipping through the strait, with Iran previously vowing to keep it closed and oil prices spiking above $100/barrel in response.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints: roughly 20–21% of global seaborne oil trade and a significant portion of LNG passes through this narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. Any conditional access tied to currency could symbolically — and potentially practically — chip away at the dollar’s dominance in oil pricing.

The modern petrodollar arrangement traces to 1973–1974 agreements, particularly between the US and Saudi Arabia under King Faisal, where OPEC members led by Saudi agreed to price oil exports in US dollars and invest surpluses in US Treasuries, in exchange for security guarantees and arms. This created artificial global demand for dollars, helping sustain the USD as the world’s primary reserve currency even after the end of the Bretton Woods gold standard.

No single country can unilaterally “end” the petrodollar overnight — the system’s inertia comes from deep liquidity in dollar markets, vast USD-denominated debt, and institutional preference. However, moves like this Iranian proposal add to ongoing de-dollarization trends:

-Russia and Iran already sell much of their oil to China in yuan (or rubles/yuan blends) to evade sanctions. China has pushed yuan-denominated oil futures on the Shanghai International Energy Exchange since 2018 and built payment infrastructure (CIPS) as an alternative to SWIFT.

Broader BRICS discussions have explored non-dollar energy trade. If Iran’s conditional Hormuz policy were implemented and gained traction (even partially), it could redirect some structural dollar demand toward yuan, especially for shipments heading to China (which already buys the vast majority of Iran’s sanctioned oil exports). Analysts note this would likely lead to a more fragmented oil market with parallel pricing systems rather than a full, rapid replacement of the dollar.

In short: This isn’t a global yuan takeover announcement, but it’s a provocative geopolitical signal from Iran — leveraging control over the chokepoint to accelerate de-dollarization efforts while deepening ties with China amid war and sanctions. The proposal highlights how energy, currency, and military power remain deeply intertwined.

Yuan-denominated oil futures refer primarily to the crude oil futures contract (ticker: SC) traded on the Shanghai International Energy Exchange (INE), a subsidiary of the Shanghai Futures Exchange. Launched on March 26, 2018, this is China’s flagship effort to create an internationally accessible, RMB (yuan)-priced benchmark for crude oil, often called the “petroyuan” in geopolitical discussions. Traded and settled in Chinese yuan (RMB) per barrel (tax-exclusive quotation).

1,000 barrels per lot. Physical delivery of medium-sour crude oil reflecting Asia’s import mix; delivery warehouses in China, e.g., bonded zones for foreign participants. Open to international investors since launch (no QFII/RQFII restrictions for foreigners), with English-language support on INE’s site.

To establish an Asian/China-centric price benchmark, hedge domestic demand (China is the world’s largest oil importer), and promote yuan internationalization in energy trade. The contract remains active and liquid: Front-month contracts like SC2605 trading around 789.5 yuan/barrel, with daily volumes in the tens of thousands of lots.

Annual turnover has been massive in recent years — e.g., by late 2024, single-counted annual volume hit over 126 million lots with RMB 31+ trillion turnover. Global comparisons place it as the third-largest crude oil futures market behind Brent (ICE) and WTI (NYMEX/CME), with average daily volumes often in the 200,000–300,000 contract range (roughly 2–3 million barrels equivalent per day in front-month activity).

Liquidity has grown steadily since launch, boosted by physical deliveries, storage expansions, and participation from foreign traders though domestic Chinese entities still dominate ~80–90% of volume. This futures market underpins China’s push for yuan-based oil pricing and settlements:

It provides infrastructure for non-dollar trades, especially with sanctioned producers like Russia and Iran who already route much of their China-bound oil in yuan or yuan blends to bypass SWIFT/dollar restrictions. Iran’s reported proposal to conditionally allow limited tanker passage through the Strait of Hormuz only if oil is traded/settled in yuan directly ties into this.

It leverages the INE platform and China’s CIPS payment system to redirect flows away from dollar-denominated markets, especially for China-bound cargoes; China buys most of Iran’s exports anyway. China is expanding yuan pricing to other energies; plans for LNG futures on Shanghai Futures Exchange, potentially launching soon after early 2026 discussions.

This builds on INE crude oil’s success as the first major internationalized yuan futures product. While the INE contract hasn’t displaced Brent or WTI as the global pricing anchor due to dollar liquidity, established contracts, and institutional inertia, it has carved out a meaningful role in Asia-Pacific pricing, hedging, and de-dollarization efforts — particularly amid sanctions, geopolitical tensions, and China’s massive import needs.

If Iran’s Hormuz yuan condition gains traction, it could accelerate yuan futures usage for marginal barrels in high-risk routes.

US Department of Justice to Retry Roman Storm for Operating Unlicensed Money-transmitting Operation

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently moved to retry Roman Storm, co-founder and developer of the Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixer.

This follows his August 2025 trial in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), where a jury convicted him on one count—conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business—but deadlocked (failed to reach a unanimous verdict) on two more serious charges: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions.

Prosecutors filed a motion around March 9-10, 2026, requesting a retrial on those two counts, with a proposed start date in October 2026 potentially October 5 or 12. The retrial is expected to last about three weeks. Storm remains free on bail while also seeking a judgment of acquittal on the convicted count, with arguments scheduled for April 2026.

Storm has publicly criticized the decision, noting the significant personal and financial toll of another trial and arguing that a jury already couldn’t unanimously agree on the more severe allegations. This comes amid shifting U.S. regulatory tones on crypto privacy tools, including a recent Treasury Department acknowledgment that mixers can serve legitimate purposes, which some see as contrasting with the DOJ’s persistence here.

If convicted on the remaining counts, Storm could face up to 40 years in prison.Separately, the DOJ is investigating whether Iran used Binance to evade U.S. sanctions. Reports from March 11, 2026 primarily via The Wall Street Journal indicate the probe focuses on transactions allegedly routing over $1 billion through Binance to networks linked to Iran-backed groups, including Yemen’s Houthi militants and entities tied to the IRGC.

It’s unclear if Binance itself is a direct target or if the focus is on users/customers facilitating the flows. This follows earlier internal flags at Binance and comes after the exchange’s 2023 $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities over sanctions violations and other issues including a guilty plea and ongoing oversight. In response to the WSJ reporting, Binance filed a defamation lawsuit against the newspaper on the same day the probe details emerged.

These developments highlight ongoing U.S. scrutiny of crypto platforms and tools in the context of money laundering, sanctions evasion, and national security concerns.

Meanwhile, the ongoing DOJ investigation into Iran’s alleged use of Binance to evade sanctions adds another layer of scrutiny to major crypto platforms. He faces renewed legal pressure and potential severe consequences. If convicted on the retrial counts, he could receive up to 40 years in federal prison (20 years each for money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations), plus substantial fines.

Storm has described the retrial as personally and financially devastating, with his defense already raising millions including Ethereum Foundation support for legal costs. He remains free on bail, with arguments on his motion for acquittal on the existing conviction (unlicensed money-transmitting business, max ~5 years) set for April 2026. The retrial is slated for October 2026 and could last ~3 weeks.

This case tests the boundaries of developer liability for open-source code misused by others. A conviction could chill innovation in privacy-focused protocols, deterring developers due to fears of criminal exposure even without direct intent or facilitation of crime. It might accelerate capital flight from such tools, with exchanges and custodians imposing stricter compliance filters.

Conversely, an acquittal or another hung jury could affirm that building neutral privacy software isn’t inherently criminal, boosting demand for decentralized privacy solutions amid growing blockchain transparency concerns. The mixed original verdict already highlights uncertainty, potentially making prosecutors more cautious in similar cases lacking strong evidence of intent.

The push for retrial contrasts with recent softer signals from U.S. authorities. The Treasury Department’s March 2026 report to Congress acknowledged that mixers can serve legitimate purposes.

The DOJ has also signaled via memos against “regulation by prosecution” for end-user actions. This apparent tension fuels debates over U.S. crypto policy consistency, potentially influencing future enforcement priorities and encouraging advocacy for clearer rules on privacy tech.

Tornado Cash usage dropped sharply (85% post-2022 OFAC sanctions), but the case keeps privacy tools in the spotlight. Illicit crypto flows remain high overall ($158B in 2025 estimates), so outcomes could shift how privacy protocols are perceived and regulated globally.

The exchange faces renewed U.S. regulatory heat despite its 2023 $4.3B settlement including guilty pleas on sanctions/AML violations and ongoing compliance monitoring. The probe examines whether over $1 billion routed through Binance to networks tied to Iran-backed groups. It’s unclear if Binance itself is targeted or if the focus is solely on users/customers.

Binance denies direct sanctioned transactions, claims it uncovered and acted on suspicious patterns with law enforcement, and has sued the WSJ for defamation over related reporting. Potential outcomes include new fines, enhanced monitoring, operational restrictions, or even charges against executives if systemic failures are found—further pressuring its global dominance.

National security and sanctions enforcement: This underscores crypto’s role in evading traditional sanctions, especially for state actors like Iran funding proxies. It amplifies U.S. efforts to disrupt terror financing via digital assets, with congressional oversight demanding accountability. Broader implications include tighter global scrutiny of exchanges handling high-risk jurisdictions.

Heightened probes reinforce compliance burdens on centralized platforms, potentially driving users toward decentralized alternatives (though those face their own risks, as seen in Tornado Cash). It highlights persistent challenges in balancing innovation with anti-illicit finance goals, possibly spurring more regulatory tools or international coordination.

These cases together illustrate ongoing U.S. tensions between cracking down on crypto-enabled crime/sanctions evasion and adapting to legitimate uses of privacy tech. Outcomes in both could set precedents for years.

China’s Hua Hong Moves Into 7nm Chipmaking With Huawei Support, Marking New Step in Beijing’s Semiconductor Self-Reliance Drive

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Hua Hong Group has developed advanced chip manufacturing technology capable of producing processors at the 7-nanometre level, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to Reuters.

The development marks an important step in China’s effort to build a domestic semiconductor ecosystem capable of supporting artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.

The technology is being developed by the group’s contract chipmaking arm, Huali Microelectronics, which is preparing a 7-nanometre (nm) manufacturing process at its facility in Shanghai, the sources said.

If the technology is successfully deployed at scale, Hua Hong would become the second Chinese semiconductor manufacturer capable of producing chips at the 7-nm node, joining Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, or SMIC, the country’s largest contract chipmaker.

The development signals steady progress in Beijing’s attempt to build advanced semiconductor capabilities at home after years of U.S. export restrictions targeting China’s access to cutting-edge chip technologies.

The ability to manufacture chips at 7 nm represents a key technological threshold for modern computing systems. Chips produced at this node are widely used in artificial intelligence accelerators, advanced mobile processors, data center hardware, and high-performance computing systems.

Although global leaders have moved to even smaller manufacturing processes such as 5-nm and 3-nm, the 7-nm node remains highly relevant for AI workloads and advanced computing applications.

Achieving this capability domestically is strategically significant for China because it reduces dependence on overseas semiconductor foundries and strengthens the country’s ability to support its rapidly expanding AI industry.

People familiar with the project said Huawei Technologies has been working with Hua Hong on developing the 7-nm manufacturing technology. The collaboration underlines Huawei’s central role in China’s semiconductor self-sufficiency push after the company was cut off from many Western chip suppliers and manufacturing partners due to U.S. sanctions.

Huawei has since invested heavily in rebuilding a domestic semiconductor supply chain, partnering with chip designers, fabrication plants, and equipment manufacturers across China. Such collaborations have become increasingly important as Beijing attempts to build an integrated technology ecosystem capable of designing, manufacturing, and deploying advanced processors without relying heavily on foreign technology.

Test Production And Early Industry Adoption

Research and development work on the 7-nm process began last year at Hua Hong Fab 6, the company’s most advanced semiconductor plant located in Shanghai. Sources said the facility is expected to start with relatively modest output, producing a few thousand silicon wafers per month by the end of the year, with capacity expected to scale gradually as manufacturing processes are refined.

Chinese graphics processor developer Biren Technology has reportedly already used the new production line for a tape-out — the stage where a chip design is finalized and turned into a physical prototype before mass manufacturing.

The development is particularly significant for Biren, which lost access to overseas manufacturing services after being placed on a U.S. trade blacklist in 2023. That move forced the company to stop using fabrication services from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world’s largest contract chipmaker.

Access to domestic manufacturing capacity, therefore, provides Chinese chip designers with an alternative path to bring advanced processors to market.

The domestic equipment ecosystem is emerging, underpinning progress among China’s semiconductor equipment makers.

Sources said Hua Hong’s work on the 7-nm process involved support from domestic suppliers, including SiCarrier, a Huawei-backed semiconductor equipment company. SiCarrier reportedly tested its manufacturing equipment at a facility in Shenzhen last year as part of efforts to develop indigenous tools for advanced chip production.

The rise of domestic equipment manufacturers is a critical element of China’s semiconductor strategy, as export restrictions have limited access to some of the most advanced machinery used in chip fabrication.

The Challenge of Technology Constraints

China’s semiconductor industry continues to face major technological hurdles despite these advances. The most sophisticated lithography systems required for the world’s most advanced chips are produced by ASML in the Netherlands. These extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines enable chipmakers to produce processors at cutting-edge nodes such as 5-nm and 3-nm.

Chinese companies do not currently have access to EUV technology due to export controls.

Instead, Chinese foundries have relied on older deep ultraviolet lithography equipment to produce advanced chips using complex multi-patterning techniques. While technically feasible, this method can significantly reduce production efficiency and chip yields.

Analysts have said SMIC has used such techniques to produce 7-nm chips, although yields — the proportion of usable chips produced from each wafer — remain relatively low. However, it remains unclear how Hua Hong achieved its 7-nm capability, what equipment was used, or how efficient the process will be at scale.

Financial Backing And Industrial Consolidation

The push into advanced chip manufacturing is backed by significant investment. In December, Hua Hong Semiconductor announced plans to acquire a controlling stake in Huali Microelectronics and raise 7.56 billion yuan ($1.10 billion) to support research, development, and technological upgrades at the foundry.

The move is part of a broader effort by Chinese semiconductor companies to consolidate resources and accelerate progress toward advanced manufacturing capabilities.

The Hua Hong Group currently operates seven semiconductor fabrication plants. Fab 6 — where the new 7-nm technology is being developed — is its most advanced facility and currently produces logic chips at the 22-nm and 28-nm nodes. Another plant, Fab 5, focuses on mature technologies between 40-nm and 55-nm, which are widely used in automotive electronics, industrial systems, and consumer devices.

Investors reacted strongly to the report of Hua Hong’s technological progress, highlighting its importance. Shares in Hua Hong Semiconductor surged about 12% following the news, reflecting optimism that China’s semiconductor industry may be closing part of the gap with global leaders.

The progress is also another example of how China’s chip sector has continued to advance despite restrictions imposed by the United States. Although Washington has eased some export controls in recent months — allowing companies such as Nvidia to sell certain AI chips to Chinese customers — Beijing has continued encouraging domestic companies to adopt homegrown semiconductor technologies.

Despite the breakthrough, China’s semiconductor industry still faces a long path to matching global leaders. Companies such as TSMC and Samsung produce chips at far smaller process nodes and at vastly larger volumes, supported by decades of technological experience and access to the world’s most advanced equipment.

However, the emergence of a second Chinese manufacturer capable of producing 7-nm chips suggests that China’s semiconductor ecosystem is gradually strengthening.

For Beijing, the strategic goal is not necessarily to surpass global leaders immediately, but to ensure that critical technologies — particularly those needed for artificial intelligence, telecommunications, and national security — can be produced domestically if geopolitical tensions disrupt global supply chains.

The Petrodollar Arrangement Helped Cement the US Dollar as World Dominant Reserve Currency

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The petrodollar arrangement—dating back to the 1970s—helped cement the US dollar as the world’s dominant reserve currency by ensuring oil is priced and traded primarily in dollars, creating perpetual global demand for USD and allowing the US “exorbitant privilege” of running large deficits.

The Bretton Woods system (1944) and subsequent post-WWII order, including the dollar’s role, were explicitly designed to foster a unified, stable international monetary and trade framework—preventing the competitive devaluations, trade wars, and currency fragmentation that contributed to the Great Depression and geopolitical instability in the interwar period.

The claim is that aggressive use of dollar-based sanctions; freezing reserves, restricting SWIFT access and military interventions—intended to preserve US-led order and dollar hegemony—are instead accelerating fragmentation: Countries like Russia, Iran, and increasingly others bypass dollar systems via alternatives; China’s CIPS payment network, yuan-settled oil deals, gold stockpiling, local-currency trade among BRICS+ nations.

This creates parallel financial channels: yuan-denominated oil for some often at discounts, dollar-based for others at premiums due to war/sanction risks. Central banks diversify reserves away from dollars; share down from ~70%+ in the early 2000s to under 60% recently, favoring gold and other assets less vulnerable to US seizure.

Sanctions “weaponization” erodes trust in the dollar as a neutral, reliable custodian—pushing neutral or adversarial states toward de-risking and multipolar alternatives. Evidence from recent analyses supports acceleration since 2022 (Russia-Ukraine war sanctions) and into 2025–2026: Russia’s pivot to yuan/ruble trade with China ~90% non-dollar.

BRICS+ experiments with local-currency settlements and gold-backed mechanisms. Emerging bifurcated oil markets tied to currency and alliances. Gradual reserve shifts, though the dollar remains dominant ~58–60% of reserves due to network effects, deep US markets, and lack of a single viable rival.

The irony highlighted is real: tools meant to reinforce dollar primacy (sanctions, military pressure to secure energy routes) incentivize circumvention, building parallel systems and hastening a more fragmented global financial order. Whether this leads to outright “end” of dollar dominance or just a slower erosion toward multipolarity remains debated—many sources note the dollar’s entrenched advantages persist, but trust erosion and geopolitical blowback are mounting headwinds.

BRICS currency initiatives, as of mid-March 2026, focus primarily on de-dollarization and building alternatives to the US dollar-dominated global financial system, rather than launching a single, unified “BRICS currency” in the traditional sense like a shared fiat money replacing national ones.

Discussions about a common currency have persisted for years, but practical efforts emphasize interoperable payment systems, local/national currency trade, and digital infrastructure to reduce reliance on the dollar and SWIFT. A full-fledged common currency remains a “distant dream” according to analyses.

Challenges include differing economic structures among members, sovereignty concerns, and lack of macroeconomic convergence. Proposals for a gold-backed or commodity-anchored unit sometimes called “The Unit,” with ~40% gold and 60% basket of BRICS currencies have been tested or prototyped in pilots, but not fully rolled out as a global alternative.

The most concrete progress centers on linking central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for cross-border trade, tourism, and settlements. India’s Reserve Bank of India (RBI) proposed in January 2026 connecting national CBDCs via interoperable infrastructure. This “BRICS CBDC Bridge” or similar system builds on platforms like China’s mBridge which has processed billions in digital yuan-settled transactions. India, hosting the 2026 BRICS Summit later this year, is pushing this as a key agenda item to enable seamless, non-dollar payments.

Efforts include developing “BRICS Pay” or a blockchain-based and cross-border payment rail capable of high-volume transactions up to 20,000 per second in some reports. This aims to settle trade directly in national currencies or a digital clearing unit, bypassing dollar-based systems. Incremental steps involve expanding local-currency trade and exploring commodity-backed digital units.

Increased bilateral and local currency settlements. Diversification away from dollar reserves (global share dipped slightly in recent years). Experiments with gold/commodity backing for stability. Integration with existing systems like China’s CIPS. These build on 2025 summits and respond to sanctions/geopolitical pressures.

India has distanced itself from aggressive anti-dollar moves to maintain ties with the US (e.g., trade deals, oil purchase halts from certain sources). China pushes yuan dominance in some trades, creating friction. Pilots and tests are underway, with potential operational steps or announcements at the 2026 India-hosted summit.

Full implementation could stretch to 2026-2027 or beyond for broader adoption. While accelerating fragmentation, the dollar retains dominance ~56-60% of reserves due to network effects, liquidity, and lack of a single rival. However, trust erosion and parallel systems; yuan for oil in sanctioned contexts like Iran-China deals are mounting headwinds.

Recent X discussions reflect polarized views—some claim India “killed” a BRICS currency for US alignment, others note China/Russia dynamics favor yuan push—but official progress remains pragmatic and incremental, centered on digital bridges rather than a revolutionary new currency.

1...272829...8,375Page 28 of 8,375

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy